CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT02763956GelStixUpdated Feb 22, 2022

RCT Study of the Gelstix™ Device to Treat Chronic Discogenic Low Back Pain GelStix Study

An interventional study of GelStix™ Nucleus Augmentation Device and Placebo in Degeneration of Lumbar Intervertebral Disc, sponsored by Ospedale Regionale di Lugano. Recruiting at 2 sites in 2 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-02-22.

Sponsored by Ospedale Regionale di Lugano · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Jul 2025, 1 year 3 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
72
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Degenerative Disc Disease is one of the most common spinal pathologies, affecting up to 10-15 % of adults. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of treatment with the GelStix™ device in a patient population with discogenic pain that had no benefit from conservative care.

Read the detailed description

Degenerative Disc Disease (DDD) is one of the most common spinal pathologies, affecting up to 10-15 % of adults. The degeneration is associated with diminished water-binding capabilities of the nucleus pulpous leading to disc dehydration, volume reduction, changes in cellular activity, biomechanical changes and painful symptoms. Patients are initially treated with non-surgical pain-management techniques, such as anti-inflammatory medications and physical therapy, but these therapies often provide only temporary relief. When non-surgical intervention fails, fusion or total disc arthroplasty are often prescribed, both of which are highly invasive surgeries with significant associated morbidity. Clearly, a meaningful solution for the treatment gap existing between conservative care and invasive surgical intervention is needed.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of treatment with the GelStix™ device in a patient population that had no benefit from conservative care.

The primary objective of this study is to quantify the reduction in lumbar pain in a GelStix™ treatment group compared with a control group receiving a saline solution injection as placebo.

The secondary objectives are to assess:

  • Disability, using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)
  • Quality of life (QoL), quantified with the European Quality of Life Five Dimension Five Level Scale (EQ-5D-5L).
  • The Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) scale. This scale assesses the patient's own evaluation of improvement or deterioration over time on a 7-point Likert Scale rated from 'very much improved' to 'very much worse'.
  • The use of pain medication
  • The disc degeneration process will be assessed by means of MRI twelve months after treatment compared to baseline. Pfirrmann grade, disc height, and the presence of high intensity zones, Modic signs, and Schmorl's nodes will be recorded.
  • The incidence and severity of complications and adverse events

The total expected number of patients to be randomized is 72. Taking into account a relevant difference of 1.5 between groups on the NRS, with an SD of 2, 30 patients per group (60 patients in total) will be required to detect a statistically significant difference with a power of 80% at an alpha of 5% (two-tailed) for unpaired Student's T test. Taking into account a 20% drop out rate, 72 patients are expected to be randomized for this study.

The estimated duration for the investigational plan (from start of screening of first participant to end of follow-up of last participant) is 24 months.

02

Conditions studied

  • Degeneration of Lumbar Intervertebral Disc

Keywords

  • Gelstix, Hydrogel
03

In context

Back Pain

2,373 studies on the registry are indexed under Back Pain; 284 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 72 is above the median of 60 across 1,941 interventional studies indexed under Back Pain.

Browse Back Pain studies →

Lead sponsor

Ospedale Regionale di Lugano is the lead sponsor of 8 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • discogenic pain caused by one or two levels of degenerative disc disease, confirmed by MRI and positive discography
  • failure to have symptoms resolved or reduced following at least 12 weeks of conservative care (pain medication and/or physical therapy)
  • negative medial branches block results
  • baseline Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) pain score ≥5/10

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • radiculopathy
  • disc herniations
  • annular tear (greater than Grade 4 Modified Dallas Grading)
  • coagulopathy or oral anticoagulant therapy (except low-dose acetylsalicylic acid) in conditions that do not allow for a temporary discontinuation
  • previous lumbar surgery
  • disc height less than 5 mm at the treatment level or less than 50% the original height
  • BMI (Body Mass Index (kg/m2) of ≥ 35
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
72 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Gelstix

    The intradiscal insertion of the GelStix™ Nucleus Augmentation Device.

    Device: GelStix™ Nucleus Augmentation Device

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    Intradiscal saline solution (1 mL NaCl 0.9%) injection.

    Other: Placebo

Interventions

  • DeviceGelStix™ Nucleus Augmentation Device

    Intradiscal Gelstix insertion

    Also known as: Hydrogel

  • OtherPlacebo

    Intradiscal saline injection

    Also known as: Saline, NaCl 0,9%

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Lumbar Pain intensity measured on Numeric Rating Scale

    Pain intensity will be assessed employing an 11-point (i.e. 0-10) NRS with 0 meaning 'no pain' and '10' meaning 'worst possible pain'. Three times daily pain scores will be assessed for five consecutive days around the intended measurement time.

    Time frame: The mean NRS scores on the pain diary will be measured at baseline, and at one week, and one, three, six (primary outcome) and twelve months.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Changes in disability measured by the Owestry Disability Index

    The ODI is a self-administered questionnaire, assessing the patient's level of pain and function during basic activities of daily living such as walking, personal care, standing, sleeping, etc.

    Time frame: The ODI is completed at baseline, and at three, six and twelve months.

  2. Changes in health related quality of life measured by EuroQualityOfLife-5 dimensions questionnaire

    This questionnaire assesses health related quality of life in terms of five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression.49 Additionally, the EuroQol Visual Analogue Scale (EQ VAS) records the respondent's self-rated health on a 20 cm vertical, visual analogue scale with endpoints labelled 'the best health you can imagine'.

    Time frame: The EQ-5D-5L will be completed at baseline and at three, six and twelve months.

  3. The Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) scale

    This scale assesses the patient's own evaluation of improvement or deterioration over time on a 7-point Likert Scale rated from 'very much improved' to 'very much worse'.

    Time frame: The Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) scale will be measured at three, six and twelve months.

  4. Pain medication

    Reliance on medication to relieve pain: type and dose of analgesics

    Time frame: The use of pain medication will be assessed as the intake of analgesics at baseline, at one week, and at one, three, six and twelve months.

  5. The disc degeneration process

    Pfirrmann grade, disc height, and the presence of high intensity zones (HIZ), Modic signs, and Schmorl's nodes will be recorded.

    Time frame: The disc degeneration process will be assessed by means of MRI twelve months after treatment compared to baseline.

  6. The incidence and severity of complications and adverse events

    The safety outcome of this study is the incidence and severity of complications and adverse events (AE's) including procedure-related complications at any time point in the study.

    Time frame: The incidence and severity of complications and adverse events are assessed at any time point in the study up to one year follow up.

07

Study locations

2 of 2 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Koetsier E, van Kuijk SMJ, Maino P, Dukanac J, Scascighini L, Cianfoni A, Scarone P, Kuhlen DE, Hollman MW, Kallewaard JW. Efficacy of the Gelstix nucleus augmentation device for the treatment of chronic discogenic low back pain: protocol for a randomised, sham-controlled, double-blind, multicentre trial. BMJ Open. 2022 Mar 30;12(3):e053772. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053772. PubMed 35354635 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 22, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02763956
Lead sponsor
Ospedale Regionale di Lugano
Collaborators
Rijnstate Ziekenhuis, Arnhem, The Netherlands, Paolo Maino, Sponsor-Investigator
Responsible party
Eva Koetsier MD PhD LLM (MD PhD LLM, Ospedale Regionale di Lugano) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 5, 2016
Start date
Apr 2016
Primary completion
Jul 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Feb 22, 2022

Study contacts

Eva Koetsier, MD PhD LLM
Contact
eva.koetsier@eoc.ch
0041918117590
Paolo Maino, MD PhD
Contact
paolo.maino@eoc.ch
0041918117590
Eva Koetsier, MD PhD LLM
principal investigator · Centro Terapia del Dolore, EOC Lugano

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion