CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02761551Updated Jun 24, 2019

Centralized IIS-based Reminder/Recall to Increase Childhood Influenza Vaccination Rates

An interventional study of Reminder notifications via autodialer in Reminder Systems and Influenza Vaccines, sponsored by University of Colorado, Denver. Completed. Open to participants aged 6 Months to 18 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-06-24.

Sponsored by University of Colorado, Denver · Not applicable, Interventional, and Health services research

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
56,549
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
6 Months to 18 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Despite U.S. guidelines for influenza vaccination of all children starting at age 6 months, only about half of children are vaccinated annually leading to substantial influenza disease in children and spread of disease to adults. A major barrier is that families are not reminded about the need for their children to receive influenza vaccination. The investigators will evaluate the impact of patient reminder/recall (R/R) performed by state immunization information systems to improve influenza vaccination rates by using three clinical trials in two states. The investigators will assess effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of phone reminder/recall on improving influenza vaccination rates. The investigators will disseminate the state immunization information system based reminder/recall system to all states for use for both seasonal and pandemic influenza vaccinations with the goal of lowering influenza morbidity.

Read the detailed description

Annual epidemics of seasonal influenza cause substantial morbidity and mortality in the U.S. with high rates of hospitalizations, emergency department and outpatient visits, and medical costs. Children experience significant morbidity from influenza, and also play a critical role in spreading infection to adults. Since 2010, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) has recommended influenza vaccination for all children >6 months of age. However, vaccination rates remain very low-- only 56% of children 2-17 years are vaccinated. Low rates are a concern for both seasonal influenza and in preparation for pandemic influenza. One of the nationally recommended strategies for raising childhood influenza vaccination rates is to use parent reminder/recall (R/R) by phone or mail, which can raise rates by up to 20 percentage points. However, less than 16% of primary care practices use R/R despite many studies showing its effectiveness.

Statewide immunization information systems (IISs) now exist in all states to track childhood vaccinations, but they have not been used for R/R for influenza vaccine because of the lack of evidence for its effectiveness and lack of a template for IIS-based R/R. The investigators have united two leading immunization research groups (Denver, CO and Rochester, NY) to assess the impact of centralized IIS-based influenza vaccine R/R, and to evaluate the effect of intensity of recall (1 v. 2 v. 3 reminders) over usual care. The investigators will also develop tools to aid other states in creating efficient IIS R/R systems for seasonal and possible pandemic influenza outbreaks.

This study has four aims.

Aim 1 is to develop the protocols, clinical decision support, and message content for state IISs to conduct reminder/recall for influenza vaccinations.

Aim 2 is to conduct a pragmatic trial, with randomization at the level of the patient within practices randomly selected to be proportionate to each state, to compare: 1) effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of centralized R/R of different intensity (1 vs. 2 vs. 3 messages) and usual care (0 messages) and 2) effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of R/R in specified subgroups (family medicine vs pediatric provider, rural vs urban, age of child) on receipt of influenza vaccination.

Aim 3 will measure the effect of adding mailed or text message R/R for autodialer failures vs. autodialer-alone R/R on influenza vaccination rates using a 2-arm Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT).

Aim 4 (dissemination aim) will develop a toolkit for state IIS-based influenza vaccine R/R for seasonal and pandemic influenza, and work with key stakeholders on a sustainability plan.

By the end of the study the investigators will have a feasible and cost-effective model to raise child seasonal or possibly pandemic influenza vaccination rates to prevent influenza. The investigators will disseminate the IIS model to all states.

02

Conditions studied

  • Reminder Systems
  • Influenza Vaccines

Browse trials for

03

In context

Influenza, Human

2,214 studies on the registry are indexed under Influenza, Human; 163 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 56,549 is above the median of 238 across 1,853 interventional studies indexed under Influenza, Human.

Browse Influenza, Human studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Colorado, Denver is the lead sponsor of 1,499 studies on the registry; 315 are open to participants now.

Of its 139 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 89 (64%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
6 Months to 18 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • A record in the Colorado Immunization Information System,
  • In need of at least one influenza vaccination at time of study,
  • Affiliated with a participating practice, or
  • Randomly selected among unaffiliated patients.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Opted out of participating in CIIS, or
  • Are up-to-date on influenza vaccine
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
56,549 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    Usual Care

    Patients in this group will not receive any reminders for influenza vaccine.

  • Experimental
    1 notice

    Patients in this group will receive one reminder for influenza vaccine across the 2016 influenza season.

    Behavioral: Reminder notifications via autodialer

  • Experimental
    2 notices

    Patients in this group will receive up to two reminders for influenza vaccine across the 2016 season.

    Behavioral: Reminder notifications via autodialer

  • Experimental
    3 notices

    Patients in this group will receive up to three reminders for influenza vaccine across the 2016 season.

    Behavioral: Reminder notifications via autodialer

Interventions

  • BehavioralReminder notifications via autodialer
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of subjects receiving influenza vaccine based on zero notices versus those receiving 1, 2 or 3 notices.

    The primary outcome is receipt of influenza vaccine by children receiving zero notices compared to those receiving 1, 2 or 3 notices.

    Time frame: 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of subjects receiving influenza vaccine based on demographic subgroups.

    This outcome will categorize the number of influenza vaccines administered by subgroups, e.g.: Urban/Rural, Pediatrics/Family Practice, and age from 6m-1.9 yr., 2-10.9 yr. and 11-17.9 yr.

    Time frame: 6 months

  2. Number of subjects <9 years of age that will receive an additional vaccine.

    If the subject is \<9 years of age, they are required to received a second vaccine at least 1 month after receiving the initial vaccine.

    Time frame: 1 month

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Kempe A, Saville AW, Dickinson LM, Beaty B, Eisert S, Gurfinkel D, Brewer S, Shull H, Herrero D, Herlihy R. Collaborative centralized reminder/recall notification to increase immunization rates among young children: a comparative effectiveness trial. JAMA Pediatr. 2015 Apr;169(4):365-73. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2014.3670. PubMed 25706340 ↗
  • Kempe A, Saville A, Dickinson LM, Eisert S, Reynolds J, Herrero D, Beaty B, Albright K, Dibert E, Koehler V, Lockhart S, Calonge N. Population-based versus practice-based recall for childhood immunizations: a randomized controlled comparative effectiveness trial. Am J Public Health. 2013 Jun;103(6):1116-23. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2012.301035. Epub 2012 Dec 13. PubMed 23237154 ↗
  • Kempe A, Saville AW, Albertin C, Helmkamp L, Zhou X, Vangela S, Dickinson LM, Tseng CH, Campbell JD, Whittington M, Gurfinkel D, Roth H, Hoefer D, Szilagyi P. Centralized Reminder/Recall to Increase Influenza Vaccination Rates: A Two-State Pragmatic Randomized Trial. Acad Pediatr. 2020 Apr;20(3):374-383. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2019.10.015. Epub 2019 Nov 5. PubMed 31698085 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 24, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02761551
Lead sponsor
University of Colorado, Denver
Collaborators
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 4, 2016
Start date
Sep 1, 2016
Primary completion
Apr 30, 2019
Completion
Apr 30, 2019
Last update
Jun 24, 2019

Study contacts

Allison Kempe, MD, MPH
principal investigator · University of Colorado, Denver

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion