ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02743962Updated May 3, 2018Results posted

A Pilot Study Investigating the Use of a Therapeutic Wand in Addition to Physiotherapy for Bladder Pain Syndrome

An interventional study of Therapeutic Wand and Routine physiotherapy control in Painful Bladder Syndrome, sponsored by University of Bradford. Completed. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-05-03.

Sponsored by University of Bradford · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
10
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Bladder pain syndrome is a condition where pain is experienced when the bladder fills with urine and eases briefly when the bladder empties. There can also be a constant need to urgently empty the bladder.

The internal pelvic floor muscles in people with bladder pain syndrome can be tense and painful, and relaxing and stretching them may improve symptoms; reducing bladder pain, urgency and how often people have to empty their bladder.

This pelvic floor release is done by specialist physiotherapists.Therapeutic wands, such as the TheraWand®, are used routinely throughout the United Kingdom to allow people to relax and stretch their pelvic floor themselves. Using a therapeutic wand has been shown to be safe and to reduce pelvic pain, improve bladder and bowel symptoms and relax the pelvic floor muscles. However, this research was conducted mostly in men with pelvic pain.

The aim of this study is to find out if using a therapeutic wand at home as well as having a specialist physiotherapist massage the pelvic floor gives any added benefit than just having the physiotherapy treatment. The investigators hope to find out if the therapeutic wand gives women a way of managing their symptoms independently in their own homes.

Read the detailed description

A volunteer sample of ten women will be recruited and randomised into two groups, with descriptive analysis of their demographics at baseline. Both groups will receive six weeks of standard pelvic floor myofascial release by a specialist physiotherapist and one group will also use a therapeutic wand twice weekly at home. Outcome measures of bladder urgency, pain, health related quality of life and the perceived effect and ease of therapeutic wand use will be measured weekly for six weeks of treatment and then six weeks following treatment. A diary of therapeutic wand use, release exercises and medication use will also be kept for 3 months. Analysis of any significant difference in symptom change between the two groups and of subjective ease of wand use will then occur and inform the development of a randomised controlled trial.

02

Conditions studied

  • Painful Bladder Syndrome
03

In context

Cystitis, Interstitial

236 studies on the registry are indexed under Cystitis, Interstitial; 35 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 10 is below the median of 51 across 158 interventional studies indexed under Cystitis, Interstitial.

Browse Cystitis, Interstitial studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Bradford is the lead sponsor of 6 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 18- 65 years - upper limit to reduce the risk of vaginal bleeding upon treatment with the therapeutic wand
  • A diagnosis of Bladder Pain Syndrome or interstitial cystitis as per the definition of the International Society for the Study of bladder pain syndrome
  • Symptoms of bladder pain, urgency and frequency in at least the last month prior to study participation
  • Pain on palpation of the pelvic floor muscles, as per the European Urology Association bladder pain syndrome guidelines
  • Ability to attend the department for treatment
  • Ability to give
  • Sufficient upper limb control to allow the participant to manipulate the therapeutic wand for self-treatment

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Concurrent diagnoses which may cause pelvic pain including; chronic pelvic inflammatory disease, endometriosis, dysmenorrhoea, or irritable bowel syndrome
  • atrophic vaginitis due to risk of vaginal trauma and bleeding with therapeutic wand use
  • Reasonable suspicion of other treatable pathologies, such as urinary tract infection
  • No appropriate investigations completed such as urinalysis, urodynamic or cystoscopic assessment during diagnosis of bladder pain syndrome, as per National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidance
  • Pregnancy or planning to conceive
  • Symptoms associated only with menses
  • Undergoing concurrent treatments that could affect outcome e.g. botox or analgesic injections, sacral neuromodulation or physiotherapy treatment
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Postmenopausal

Periods have stopped for good: usually no period for 12 months in a row without another medical reason, sometimes confirmed by a blood test (FSH).

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
10 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Usual physiotherapy treatment group

    This group will receive standard specialist physiotherapy intervention for bladder pain syndrome: dietary advice regarding fluid and fibre intake, advice regarding bladder retraining and 15 minutes manual intra-vaginal pelvic floor muscle myofascial release and gentle stretching each week for 6 weeks. They will be instructed to briefly contract and then fully relax their pelvic floor muscles independently (clothed, in a seated or lying position) for 5 minutes daily.

    Other: Routine physiotherapy control

  • Experimental
    Therapeutic Wand group

    This group will receive the standard specialist physiotherapy intervention for bladder pain syndrome for 6 weeks, but will also be provided with an intra-vaginal therapeutic wand and taught how to use it. They will then be asked to use the therapeutic wand at home twice a week to release and relax their pelvic floor muscles for 5 minutes.

    Device: Therapeutic Wand

Interventions

  • DeviceTherapeutic Wand

    The therapeutic wand will be used to apply a gentle caudad pressure on the pelvic floor, encouraging a release and gentle stretch of the muscles. The participants will follow a protocol of sweeping gently along one side then the other to find tender or tight areas, and then to apply the wand to relax and stretch the muscles for up to 5 minutes in total, twice weekly for the duration of the study.

    Also known as: TheraWand

  • OtherRoutine physiotherapy control

    This group will receive standard specialist physiotherapy intervention for bladder pain syndrome as stated in the arm descriptor, and will not use the therapeutic wand.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in O'Leary-Sant Interstitial Cystitis Symptom Index Score

    Single page questionnaire of bladder symptoms and rating of bother. This outcome measure has 4 questions and scores for each question range from 0 to 4 or 5. The total achievable in this outcome measure is a score of between 0 to 19. A higher score describes greater symptoms of Interstitial Cystitis. Total scores were collected for analysis.

    Time frame: Baseline to 6 weeks and 6 to 12 weeks

  2. Change in O'Leary-Sant Interstitial Cystitis Problem Index Score

    Single page questionnaire of bladder symptoms and rating of bother. This outcome measure has 4 questions and scores for each question range from 0 to 4. The total achievable in this outcome measure is a score of between 0 to 16. A higher score describes greater burden of Interstitial Cystitis symptoms on the individual. Total scores were collected for analysis.

    Time frame: Baseline to 6 weeks and 6 to 12 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Genitourinary Pain Index

    Single page questionnaire of genital pain and rating of perceived bother. This outcome measure has 9 questions, each has between 4 and 10 potential responses which are weighted differently, between 0 and 10 units. The total achievable in this outcome measure is a score of 45 and the least achievable is a score of 0. A higher score describes a higher perceived genital pain level and greater burden of symptoms on the individual. Total scores were collected for analysis.

    Time frame: 0 to 12 weeks

  2. Pelvic Pain and Urinary Urgency Frequency Patient Symptom Scale

    Single page questionnaire of urinary symptoms, sexual symptoms and perceived bother. This outcome measure has 12 questions, each has between 2 and 4 potential responses which are weighted between 0 and 4 units. The total achievable in this outcome measure is a score of 35 and the least achievable is a score of 0. A higher score describes a worse urinary symptoms, sexual symptoms and a greater burden of the symptoms on the individual. Total scores were collected for analysis at baseline and 12 weeks.

    Time frame: 0 to 12 weeks

  3. Change in Perceived Urinary Urgency

    This outcome measure is a single 10 centimetre visual analogue scale rating the participant's perceived urinary urgency. The total achievable in this outcome measure is a score of 100 millimeters and the least achievable is a score of 0. A higher score describes a greater perceived urinary urgency. Patients mark along the score line to indicate their perceived urinary urgency. The number of millimeters from the 0 point was recorded as their score, for example "57mm". This outcome was recorded at baseline and at 12 weeks for each participant, averaged, and the change in average score was recorded.

    Time frame: Baseline to 12 weeks

  4. Change in Perceived Overall Pain

    This outcome measure is a single 10 centimetre visual analogue scale rating the participant's perceived overall pain. The total achievable in this outcome measure is a score of 100 millimeters and the least achievable is a score of 0. A higher score describes a greater perceived overall pain. Patients mark along the score line to indicate their perceived overall pain. The number of millimeters from the 0 point was recorded as their score, for example "57mm". This outcome was recorded at baseline and at 12 weeks for each participant, averaged, and the change in average score was recorded.

    Time frame: Baseline to 12 weeks

  5. Perceived Ease of Therapeutic Wand Use

    This outcome measure is a single 10 centimetre visual analogue scale rating the participant's perceived ease of using a therapeutic wand. The total achievable in this outcome measure is a score of 100 millimeters and the least achievable is a score of 0. A higher score describes a greater perceived ease of therapeutic wand use. Patients mark along the score line to indicate their perceived ease of therapeutic wand use. The number of millimeters from the 0 point was recorded as their score, for example "57mm". This outcome was recorded at baseline and at 12 weeks for each participant, averaged, and the change in average score was recorded.

    Time frame: 0 to 12 weeks

Other outcomes

  1. Subjective Reports of Adverse Events

    Participant reports of adverse events will be recorded to inform development of the method

    Time frame: 0 to 12 weeks

07

Results

Posted May 3, 2018
Limitations and caveats
As a feasibility study a small sample was used, which limits interpretation of the data. A single, unblinded assessor was used and participants were also not blinded.

Participant flow

Urology and Urogynaecology consultants' secretaries identified potential participants using a range of keywords and International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10) codes in April 2016. Potential participants attended a meeting at a single private hospital site and recruitment was completed by the end of May 2016.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneUsual Physiotherapy Treatment GroupTherapeutic Wand Group
Started55
Completed45
Not completed10
Withdrew: Atrophic vaginitis diagnosed10

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange in O'Leary-Sant Interstitial Cystitis Symptom Index Score

Single page questionnaire of bladder symptoms and rating of bother. This outcome measure has 4 questions and scores for each question range from 0 to 4 or 5. The total achievable in this outcome measure is a score of between 0 to 19. A higher score describes greater symptoms of Interstitial Cystitis. Total scores were collected for analysis.

Time frame:
Baseline to 6 weeks and 6 to 12 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change in O'Leary-Sant Interstitial Cystitis Symptom Index Score
units on a scaleUsual Physiotherapy Treatment GroupTherapeutic Wand Group
Change in ICSI score 0 to 6 weeks-4.25 ± 0.95-6.2 ± 0.83
Change in ICSI score 6 to 12 weeks0 ± 0.95-1.8 ± 2.12
Statistical analysis
  • Usual Physiotherapy Treatment Group vs Therapeutic Wand Group · Mean difference (final values): 3.75
  • Usual Physiotherapy Treatment Group vs Therapeutic Wand Group · Mean difference (net): 3.25
PrimaryChange in O'Leary-Sant Interstitial Cystitis Problem Index Score

Single page questionnaire of bladder symptoms and rating of bother. This outcome measure has 4 questions and scores for each question range from 0 to 4. The total achievable in this outcome measure is a score of between 0 to 16. A higher score describes greater burden of Interstitial Cystitis symptoms on the individual. Total scores were collected for analysis.

Time frame:
Baseline to 6 weeks and 6 to 12 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change in O'Leary-Sant Interstitial Cystitis Problem Index Score
units on a scaleUsual Physiotherapy Treatment GroupTherapeutic Wand Group
Change in ICPI 0 to 6 weeks-3.5 ± 1.91-5 ± 1.41
Change in ICPI 6 to 12 weeks-0.25 ± 1.29-2 ± 0.70
SecondaryChange in Genitourinary Pain Index

Single page questionnaire of genital pain and rating of perceived bother. This outcome measure has 9 questions, each has between 4 and 10 potential responses which are weighted differently, between 0 and 10 units. The total achievable in this outcome measure is a score of 45 and the least achievable is a score of 0. A higher score describes a higher perceived genital pain level and greater burden of symptoms on the individual. Total scores were collected for analysis.

Time frame:
0 to 12 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change in Genitourinary Pain Index
units on a scaleUsual Physiotherapy Treatment GroupTherapeutic Wand Group
Change in Genitourinary Pain Index-10.5 ± 4.04-15 ± 6.25
SecondaryPelvic Pain and Urinary Urgency Frequency Patient Symptom Scale

Single page questionnaire of urinary symptoms, sexual symptoms and perceived bother. This outcome measure has 12 questions, each has between 2 and 4 potential responses which are weighted between 0 and 4 units. The total achievable in this outcome measure is a score of 35 and the least achievable is a score of 0. A higher score describes a worse urinary symptoms, sexual symptoms and a greater burden of the symptoms on the individual. Total scores were collected for analysis at baseline and 12 weeks.

Time frame:
0 to 12 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Pelvic Pain and Urinary Urgency Frequency Patient Symptom Scale
units on a scaleUsual Physiotherapy Treatment GroupTherapeutic Wand Group
Pelvic Pain and Urinary Urgency Frequency Patient Symptom Scale-4.5 ± 2.64-9 ± 2.83
SecondaryChange in Perceived Urinary Urgency

This outcome measure is a single 10 centimetre visual analogue scale rating the participant's perceived urinary urgency. The total achievable in this outcome measure is a score of 100 millimeters and the least achievable is a score of 0. A higher score describes a greater perceived urinary urgency. Patients mark along the score line to indicate their perceived urinary urgency. The number of millimeters from the 0 point was recorded as their score, for example "57mm". This outcome was recorded at baseline and at 12 weeks for each participant, averaged, and the change in average score was recorded.

Time frame:
Baseline to 12 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change in Perceived Urinary Urgency
units on a scaleUsual Physiotherapy Treatment GroupTherapeutic Wand Group
Change in Perceived Urinary Urgency-30 ± 8.16-48 ± 13.03
SecondaryChange in Perceived Overall Pain

This outcome measure is a single 10 centimetre visual analogue scale rating the participant's perceived overall pain. The total achievable in this outcome measure is a score of 100 millimeters and the least achievable is a score of 0. A higher score describes a greater perceived overall pain. Patients mark along the score line to indicate their perceived overall pain. The number of millimeters from the 0 point was recorded as their score, for example "57mm". This outcome was recorded at baseline and at 12 weeks for each participant, averaged, and the change in average score was recorded.

Time frame:
Baseline to 12 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change in Perceived Overall Pain
units on a scaleUsual Physiotherapy Treatment GroupTherapeutic Wand Group
Change in Perceived Overall Pain-25 ± 10-46 ± 16.73
SecondaryPerceived Ease of Therapeutic Wand Use

This outcome measure is a single 10 centimetre visual analogue scale rating the participant's perceived ease of using a therapeutic wand. The total achievable in this outcome measure is a score of 100 millimeters and the least achievable is a score of 0. A higher score describes a greater perceived ease of therapeutic wand use. Patients mark along the score line to indicate their perceived ease of therapeutic wand use. The number of millimeters from the 0 point was recorded as their score, for example "57mm". This outcome was recorded at baseline and at 12 weeks for each participant, averaged, and the change in average score was recorded.

Time frame:
0 to 12 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Perceived Ease of Therapeutic Wand Use
units on a scaleTherapeutic Wand Group
Perceived Ease of Therapeutic Wand Use3.5 ± 0.95
Other pre-specifiedSubjective Reports of Adverse Events

Participant reports of adverse events will be recorded to inform development of the method

Time frame:
0 to 12 weeks
Reported as:
Number · Number of adverse events
Subjective Reports of Adverse Events
Number of adverse eventsUsual Physiotherapy Treatment GroupTherapeutic Wand Group
Subjective Reports of Adverse Events00

Adverse events

Collected over Data regarding adverse events were recorded during the 12 week study intervention period, which included 6 weeks of active intervention and a 6 week follow up period.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Usual Physiotherapy Treatment Group—0/4 (0%)0/4 (0%)
Therapeutic Wand Group—0/5 (0%)0/5 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Usual Physiotherapy Treatment GroupTherapeutic Wand GroupTotal
Mean36.3 ± 17.932.6 ± 7.234.4 ± 12.2
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Usual Physiotherapy Treatment GroupTherapeutic Wand GroupTotal
Female459
Male000
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Usual Physiotherapy Treatment GroupTherapeutic Wand GroupTotal
United Kingdom459
O'Leary-Sant Interstitial Cystitis Symptom Score
O'Leary-Sant Interstitial Cystitis Symptom Score(units on a scale)Usual Physiotherapy Treatment GroupTherapeutic Wand GroupTotal
Mean10.5 ± 2.6412.4 ± 2.0711.5 ± 2.4
O'Leary-Sant Interstitial Cystitis Problem Score
O'Leary-Sant Interstitial Cystitis Problem Score(units on a scale)Usual Physiotherapy Treatment GroupTherapeutic Wand GroupTotal
Mean10 ± 3.911.2 ± 2.710.6 ± 3.12
Genito-Urinary Pain Index
Genito-Urinary Pain Index(units on a scale)Usual Physiotherapy Treatment GroupTherapeutic Wand GroupTotal
Mean27 ± 7.131 ± 4.929.2 ± 5.9
The Pelvic Pain and Urinary Frequency Patient Symptom Score
The Pelvic Pain and Urinary Frequency Patient Symptom Score(units on a scale)Usual Physiotherapy Treatment GroupTherapeutic Wand GroupTotal
Mean14 ± 3.616.2 ± 1.615.2 ± 2.7
Visual Analogue Scale of pain experienced on palpation of the pelvic floor muscles
Visual Analogue Scale of pain experienced on palpation of the pelvic floor muscles(units on a scale)Usual Physiotherapy Treatment GroupTherapeutic Wand GroupTotal
Mean7.25 ± 1.58 ± 0.77.6 ± 1.1

1 further baseline measures are reported on the registry.

08

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

09

References and documents

Publications

  • Imamura M, Scott NW, Wallace SA, Ogah JA, Ford AA, Dubos YA, Brazzelli M. Interventions for treating people with symptoms of bladder pain syndrome: a network meta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jul 30;7(7):CD013325. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013325.pub2. PubMed 32734597 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 3, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02743962
Lead sponsor
University of Bradford
Responsible party
Jilly Bond (Clinical Specialist Physiotherapist, University of Bradford) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 19, 2016
Start date
Apr 2016
Primary completion
Oct 2016
Completion
Oct 2016
Results posted
May 3, 2018
Last update
May 3, 2018

Study contacts

Jilly Bond, MSc
principal investigator · University of Bradford

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion