CClinicalTrials.gg
SuspendedNCT02742428Updated May 2, 2017

Preoperative Ascites Drainage Versus Standard Care for Patients With Advanced Ovarian Cancer

An interventional study of Systematic ascites evacuation and Acute paracentesis. in Ascites, Ovarian Epithelial Cancer and Malnutrition, sponsored by Gdynia Oncology Center. Suspended at 1 site in Poland. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-05-02.

Sponsored by Gdynia Oncology Center · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

Why this study was suspended
The protocol will be discussed and consulted. Potentially will resume.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
40
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Patients with significant ascites and advanced ovarian cancer (AOC), undergoing complex, cytoreductive surgery are at risk of malnutrition, poor quality of life and the risk of hypo- or hypervolemia in a perioperative period. All these factors may cause hemodynamic consequences during anesthesia and surgery, and elevate the risk of morbidity and mortality.

The objective of the study is to evaluate, whether slow ascites evacuation for a few days before the surgery for AOC, could 1) influence the hemodynamic consequences of ascites on systemic circulation in patients undergoing surgery, 2) improve patient's quality of life and 3) ability to feed correctly before treatment starts, and thus lower the risk of perioperative morbidity.

Eligible patients are those with significant ascites, diagnosed or suspected for AOC, who are scheduled for primary surgery (both upfront cytoreduction or laparoscopic evaluation before neoadjuvant chemotherapy), that cannot be performed within next 7 or more days, for any reason. Patients will be asked to fill in quality of life questionnaire (QLQ). Clinical data, a Subjective Global Assessment (SGA) will be recorded. Patients will be randomized to either intervention arm A - insertion of vascular catheter into abdominal cavity and slow, systematic, daily ascites evacuation, or to observation arm B - standard of care with just observation (acute large volume (>5000ml) paracentesis allowed if needed). Patients in both groups will be encouraged to use oral nutritional support. Randomization will be open, 1:1, for every eligible, consecutive patient. After 7 days patients will be interviewed, asked to fill in QLQ, patient's experience on the treatment survey, a SGA will be recorded. During the first hour of the surgery hemodynamic data from anethetic charts will be recorded along with other clinical data concerning patient's characteristics, surgery details and 30-day postoperative follow-up. A template is provided.

The hypothesis of the study is that slow, systematic ascites evacuation few days before surgery for advanced ovarian cancer can facilitate hemodynamic control of systemic circulation of patients undergoing surgery, and improve patients' quality of life, feeding ability before treatment starts. Secondary we would expect lower risk of perioperative morbidity and mortality.

02

Conditions studied

  • Ascites
  • Ovarian Epithelial Cancer
  • Malnutrition
03

In context

Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial

1,617 studies on the registry are indexed under Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial; 246 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 40 is below the median of 47 across 1,194 interventional studies indexed under Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial.

Browse Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Gdynia Oncology Center as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • patients with significant ascites and suspected ovarian cancer scheduled for upfront cytoreductive surgery, or diagnostic laparoscopy and neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and the surgery is planned to be performed in at least 7 days,
  • signed informed consent of the patient.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • ascites not of malignant origin,
  • low volume ascites,
  • other then primary ovarian malignancy suspected,
  • suspected or clinically apparent infection especially at the site of planned drainage placement,
  • no patient's consent.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
40 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Ascites drainage before surgery.

    A group of patients with (or suspected for) advanced ovarian cancer and significant ascites. An indwelling catheter insertion into abdominal cavity and slow, systematic ascites evacuation for 7 or more days before surgery (if it cannot be scheduled immediately) will be performed. Patients will undergo an interview, will be asked to fill in questionnaires concerning a quality of life and nutritional status. If available noninvasive bioimpedance analysis will be performed and 2ml of blood will be taken for serum prealbumin concentration evaluation. If possible 20ml of ascitic fluid will be taken for cytology examination.

    Device: Systematic ascites evacuation · Behavioral: Interview. · Behavioral: Quality of life. · Behavioral: Nutritional status.

  • Other
    Observation.

    A group of patients with (or suspected for) advanced ovarian cancer and significant ascites. A standard of care: observation or acute paracentesis (\>5000ml) will be performed while waiting for the surgery (if it cannot be scheduled immediately). Patients will undergo an interview, will be asked to fill in questionnaires concerning a quality of life and nutritional status. If available noninvasive bioimpedance analysis will be performed and 2ml of blood will be taken for serum prealbumin concentration evaluation. If possible 20ml of ascitic fluid will be taken for cytology examination.

    Procedure: Acute paracentesis. · Behavioral: Interview. · Behavioral: Quality of life. · Behavioral: Nutritional status.

Interventions

  • DeviceSystematic ascites evacuation

    Systematic ascites evacuation via indwelling catheter inserted into abdominal cavity, sutured to the skin. Drainage performed by the patient, on demand with day limit of 2000ml, in ambulatory settings.

  • ProcedureAcute paracentesis.

    Evacuation of a large (\>5000ml) volume of ascites via single abdominocentesis. Allowed in observational arm only, in case of acute symptoms concerned with ascites.

  • BehavioralInterview.

    Interview according to provided chart in order to collect data concerning symptoms, co-morbidities.

  • BehavioralQuality of life.

    Patients will be asked to fill in a quality of life questionnaire (EORTC-C15-PAL) before randomization and 7 days later.

  • BehavioralNutritional status.

    Patients will be asked to fill in (together with a physician) a questionnaire to assess risk of malnutrition (SGA) before randomization and 7 days later.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Changes in median arterial pressure (MAP) during anesthesia.

    Changes (minimal and maximal) in median arterial pressure during 1st hour of anesthesia during cytoreductive surgery for advanced ovarian cancer - comparison of two groups: with and without preoperative ascites drainage. MAP calculation - MAP = \[(2 x diastolic)+systolic\] / 3.

    Time frame: 1 hour

  2. Volume of intravenous fluids transfused.

    Volume of intravenous fluids transfused during the 1st hour of cytoreductive surgery for advanced ovarian cancer - comparison of two groups: with and without preoperative ascites drainage.

    Time frame: 1 hour

  3. Number of participants who required vasoconstrictors.

    Need for using vasoconstrictors during 1st hour of cytoreductive surgery for advanced ovarian cancer - comparison of two groups: with and without preoperative ascites drainage.

    Time frame: 1 hour

  4. Changes in Heart Rate (HR).

    Changes in HR (minimal and maximal) during 1st hour of anesthesia during cytoreductive surgery for advanced ovarian cancer - comparison of two groups: with and without preoperative ascites drainage.

    Time frame: 1 hour

Secondary outcomes

  1. Changes in feeding ability.

    Evaluation of changes in feeding ability before the treatment starts, according to Subjective Global Assesment survey - comparison of two groups: with and without preoperative ascites drainage.

    Time frame: 7 days

  2. Changes in patients' quality of life.

    To note any changes in quality of life evaluated with standardized quality of life questionnaire.

    Time frame: 7 days

Other outcomes

  1. Number of adverse events concerned with indwelling catheter insertion.

    Number of adverse events concerned with catheter insertion for ascites drainage.

    Time frame: 7 days

  2. Number of participants correctly diagnosed with ovarian cancer based on ascitic fluid cytology.

    Ascitis fluid collected for cytology examination. The accuracy of ascitic fluid cytology in diagnosing ovarian cancer.

    Time frame: 1 day

  3. Changes in Extracellular Fluid (ECF) and Intracellular Fluid (ICF).

    Changes in body fluid balance measured with bioimpedance analysis tools and defined with ECF and ICF. Parameters will be recorded at randomization, before surgery, and during the 1st hour of the anesthesia.

    Time frame: 7 days

  4. Changes in Phase Angle (PA).

    Changes in nutritional status measured with bioimpedance analysis tools and defined with PA. Parameters will be recorded at randomisation and before the surgery.

    Time frame: 7 days

  5. Changes in prealbumin concentration.

    Changes in nutritional status measured with prealbumin plasma concentration.

    Time frame: 7 days

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Gdynia Oncology Center
    Gdynia, 81-519, Poland
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Hunsicker O, Fotopoulou C, Pietzner K, Koch M, Krannich A, Sehouli J, Spies C, Feldheiser A. Hemodynamic Consequences of Malignant Ascites in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Surgery*: A Prospective Substudy of a Randomized Controlled Trial. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 Dec;94(49):e2108. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000002108. PubMed 26656336 ↗
  • Feldheiser A, Braicu EI, Bonomo T, Walther A, Kaufner L, Pietzner K, Spies C, Sehouli J, Fotopoulou C. Impact of ascites on the perioperative course of patients with advanced ovarian cancer undergoing extensive cytoreduction: results of a study on 119 patients. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2014 Mar;24(3):478-87. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000069. PubMed 24463641 ↗
  • Stukan M, Lesniewski-Kmak K, Wroblewska M, Dudziak M. Management of symptomatic ascites and post-operative lymphocysts with an easy-to-use, patient-controlled, vascular catheter. Gynecol Oncol. 2015 Mar;136(3):466-71. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.11.073. Epub 2014 Nov 28. PubMed 25434633 ↗
  • Nelson G, Altman AD, Nick A, Meyer LA, Ramirez PT, Achtari C, Antrobus J, Huang J, Scott M, Wijk L, Acheson N, Ljungqvist O, Dowdy SC. Guidelines for pre- and intra-operative care in gynecologic/oncology surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS(R)) Society recommendations--Part I. Gynecol Oncol. 2016 Feb;140(2):313-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.11.015. Epub 2015 Nov 18. No abstract available. PubMed 26603969 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 2, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02742428
Lead sponsor
Gdynia Oncology Center
Responsible party
Maciej Stukan, MD, PhD (Dr, Gdynia Oncology Center) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 19, 2016
Start date
Jan 2018 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jan 2020 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 2020 (estimated)
Last update
May 2, 2017

Study contacts

Maciej Stukan, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Gdynia Oncology Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is suspended, as verified in Apr 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion