ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02734121PEGIUpdated Sep 26, 2018

PEGI to Improve Shared Decision-Making for Breast Reconstruction

An interventional study of pre-consultation educational group intervention in Breast Cancer, sponsored by University Health Network, Toronto. Completed at 1 site in Canada. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-09-26.

Sponsored by University Health Network, Toronto · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 1 year 1 month after the study started (first participant enrolled Feb 2015, registered Apr 2016).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
156
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to determine the effectiveness of a pre-consultation decision support workshop for breast reconstruction after breast cancer, in facilitating the decision-making process, compared to routine pre-surgical education.

Read the detailed description

Postmastectomy breast reconstruction is becoming increasingly utilized in breast cancer patients to provide surgical restoration of the breast mounds. The breast reconstruction discussions can be highly complex, as there are many different techniques, timing, and complications that are unique to each procedure. However ¼ of women report being dissatisfied with some component of their cancer or reconstructive care. Failure of the physician to provide adequate information about treatment options is the most frequent source of cancer patient dissatisfaction and breast reconstruction patients have expressed a need for further information regarding the complex decision to pursue breast reconstruction. In such scenarios of complex medical decision-making, decision support techniques may be an effective solution to information provision and shared decision-making. As a result, the investigators developed a pre-consultation educational group intervention delivered in a group setting for women considering breast reconstruction, with the aims to fill an existing information-gap, promote high-quality decision-making and enhance decision self-efficacy and other decision measures. This study will evaluate the educational group intervention.

02

Conditions studied

  • Breast Cancer

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • breast cancer
  • breast reconstruction
  • shared decision making
  • decision support intervention
03

In context

Breast Neoplasms

12,815 studies on the registry are indexed under Breast Neoplasms; 2,920 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 156 is above the median of 72 across 9,494 interventional studies indexed under Breast Neoplasms.

Browse Breast Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

University Health Network, Toronto is the lead sponsor of 1,432 studies on the registry; 292 are open to participants now.

Of its 17 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 3 (18%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Patients > 18 years of age.
  2. Seeking consultation for delayed Post Mastectomy Breast Reconstruction, or prophylactic mastectomy and immediate Post Mastectomy Breast Reconstruction for breast cancer prevention.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Chest wall or atypical breast malignancy that require chest wall reconstruction.
  2. Active invasive or in situ breast cancer.
  3. Consultation for breast revision or nipple reconstruction only.
  4. Patient cannot read or write in English.
  5. Cognitive impairment or uncontrolled psychiatric diagnosis.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
156 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Educational group intervention

    The pre-consultation educational group intervention will be 2 hours in duration on the morning of the consultation and will be facilitated by a dedicated social worker from psycho-oncology.

    Behavioral: pre-consultation educational group intervention

  • No intervention
    Standard Care

    Routine pre-consultation education

Interventions

  • Behavioralpre-consultation educational group intervention

    Incorporates the key components of shared decision-making and decision support with the philosophy of delivering supportive care to cancer patients. * Surgeon (40 mins): treatment options for breast reconstruction with indications/ contraindications, advantages / disadvantages, expected post-operative course, aesthetic result and complications with probabilities * Registered nurse (20 mins): preparing for surgery, postoperative recovery and how to navigate the health care system * Social worker (30 mins): values clarification exercise * Breast reconstruction patient volunteers (30 mins) questions and answers about their personal experience

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Decisional Conflict Scale

    Decision conflict scale measures personal perceptions of uncertainty in choosing options and has been demonstrated to be valid and responsive to change. The decisional conflict scale is a 16-item 5-response instrument that reports a score from 0 - 100 with higher scores indicating more conflict (items are summed, divided by 16 and multiplied by 25).

    Time frame: Change from baseline decision conflict at 1 week after surgical consultation

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Toronto General Hospital
    Toronto, Ontario M5G 2C4, Canada
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Causarano N, Platt J, Baxter NN, Bagher S, Jones JM, Metcalfe KA, Hofer SO, O'Neill AC, Cheng T, Starenkyj E, Zhong T. Pre-consultation educational group intervention to improve shared decision-making for postmastectomy breast reconstruction: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Support Care Cancer. 2015 May;23(5):1365-75. doi: 10.1007/s00520-014-2479-6. Epub 2014 Oct 29. PubMed 25351455 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Feb 2015 to primary completion in Jun 2018, 40 months.

Of 2,272 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Breast Neoplasms, half reached primary completion within 34 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 16 and three quarters within 69. This study's 40 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 2,345 studies reached it within 34 months; a quarter within 16 and three quarters within 69.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Apr 6, 2016
First posted
Apr 12, 2016
StartActual
Feb 15, 2015
Primary completionActual
Jun 15, 2018
CompletionActual
Sep 15, 2018
Last update
Sep 26, 2018
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 26, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02734121
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 12, 2016
Start date
Feb 15, 2015
Primary completion
Jun 15, 2018
Completion
Sep 15, 2018
Last update
Sep 26, 2018

Study contacts

Toni Zhong, MD, MHS
principal investigator · University Health Network, Toronto

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion