CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02728089Updated Feb 5, 2019Results posted

Study of Ceftolozane/Tazobactam (MK-7625A) in Japanese Participants With Uncomplicated Pyelonephritis and Complicated Urinary Tract Infection (MK-7625A-014)

A Phase 3 interventional study of MK-7625A 1.5 g (ceftolozane 1 g/tazobactam 0.5 g) in Urinary Tract Infection (UTI), Complicated Urinary Tract Infection and Pyelonephritis, sponsored by Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC. Completed. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-02-05.

Sponsored by Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
115
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a Phase 3, multi-site, non-randomized, open-label study evaluating the safety and efficacy of MK-7625A 1.5 g (ceftolozane 1 g/tazobactam 0.5 g) for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infection (cUTI) including pyelonephritis (uncomplicated or complicated pyelonephritis and complicated lower urinary tract infection) in Japanese participants. Efficacy will be primarily assessed by microbiological response defined as eradication of the baseline pathogen or pathogens.

02

Conditions studied

  • Urinary Tract Infection (UTI)
  • Complicated Urinary Tract Infection
  • Pyelonephritis
  • Uncomplicated Pyelonephritis
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Japanese males or females who need hospitalization
  • Clinical signs and/or symptoms of urinary tract infection (UTI) at screening visit, either one of the following:

    • Pyelonephritis (uncomplicated or complicated)
    • Complicated lower UTI (cUTI)
  • Has a pretreatment baseline urine culture specimen obtained within 24 hours of start of study drug
  • Requires IV antibacterial therapy for the treatment of the presumed UTI
  • Female participants of child bearing potential must not be pregnant (negative human chorionic gonadotropin test) or breastfeeding and must agree to use adequate contraception for the duration of the study and up to 35 days after the last dose of study drug
  • Male participants must agree to use adequate contraception for the duration of the study and up to 75 days after the last dose of study drug

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Has a history of recent or recurrent Gram-positive organism UTI suggesting colonization, or participant with UTI that shows or suspects the presence of a Gram-positive organism only
  • Has a history of any moderate or severe hypersensitivity or allergic reaction to any Beta-lactam antibacterial including cephalosporins, carbapenems and penicillins, or tazobactam
  • Has a concomitant infection at the time of randomization, which requires non-study systemic antibacterial therapy in addition to study drug with the exception of an antibacterial with Gram-positive activity only (vancomycin, linezolid, daptomycin and teicoplanin)
  • Is receiving probenecid
  • Is currently receiving bladder infusions with topical urinary antiseptics or antibacterial agents
  • Has received any amount of potentially therapeutic antibacterial therapy after collection of the pretreatment baseline urine culture and before administration of the first dose of study drug.
  • Has received any dose of a potentially therapeutic antibacterial agent for the treatment of the current UTI within 48 hours before the pretreatment baseline urine is obtained
  • Intractable urinary infection at baseline that would require more than 7 days of study drug
  • Has complete, permanent obstruction of the urinary tract.
  • Has confirmed fungal urinary tract infection at time of randomization (with ≥ 10\^3 fungal colony forming units /mL)
  • Has permanent indwelling bladder catheter or urinary stent including nephrostomy
  • Has suspected or confirmed perinephric or intrarenal abscess
  • Has suspected or confirmed prostatitis, urethritis, or epididymitis
  • Has ileal loop or known vesico-ureteral reflux
  • Severe impairment of renal function including an estimated CrCl \< 30 mL/min, requirement for peritoneal dialysis, hemodialysis or hemofiltration, or oliguria (\< 20 mL/hr urine output over 24 hours)
  • Has urinary catheter that is not scheduled to be removed before the end of therapy
  • Has any rapidly progressing disease or immediately life-threatening illness including acute hepatic failure, respiratory failure, and septic shock
  • Has an immunocompromising condition (i.e., AIDS, hematological malignancy, or bone marrow transplantation, or immunosuppressive therapy) or is receiving ≥ 40 mg of prednisone per day administered continuously for > 14 days prior to study start
  • Has participated in any clinical study of an investigational product within 30 days prior to the first dose of study drug
  • Has previously participated in any study of ceftolozane or MK-7625A.
04

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
115 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    MK-7625A

    MK-7625A 1.5 g (ceftolozane 1 g/tazobactam 0.5 g) administered as an intravenous (IV) infusion every 8 hours for 7 days. The dose may be reduced to 750 mg (ceftolozane 500 mg/tazobactam 250 mg) for participants with a creatinine clearance (CrCl) of 30-50 mL/min.

    Drug: MK-7625A 1.5 g (ceftolozane 1 g/tazobactam 0.5 g)

Interventions

  • DrugMK-7625A 1.5 g (ceftolozane 1 g/tazobactam 0.5 g)

    MK-7625A 1.5 g (ceftolozane 1 g/tazobactam 0.5 g) administered as an intravenous (IV) infusion

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Response of Eradication at Test of Cure (TOC)

    The per-pathogen microbiological outcome was determined for each uropathogen isolated at baseline at TOC (14 days post first dose). Microbiological outcome was classified as "eradication", "persistence" or "indeterminate." A successful microbiological response was "eradication" which was defined as urine culture showed all uropathogens found at baseline at ≥10\^5 colony-forming unit (CFU)/mL were reduced to \<10\^4 CFU/mL. If the outcome for any uropathogen was" persistence" (CFU/mL not reduced the result was classified as unsuccessful. Participants with responses reported as "indeterminate" were excluded.

    Time frame: Day 14 (14 days post first dose of study drug)

  2. Percentage of Participants Who Report 1 or More Adverse Event (AE)

    An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. An AE was any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with use of a medicinal product, regardless of whether or not it was considered related to the medicinal product. The percentage of participants that reported at least 1 AE was summarized.

    Time frame: Up to 42 days post first dose of study drug

  3. Percentage of Participants Discontinuing Study Drug Due to an AE

    An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. An AE was any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with use of a medicinal product, regardless of whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. The percentage of participants that had study drug discontinued during the study due to an AE was summarized.

    Time frame: Up to 7 days after the first dose of study drug

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Response of Eradication at End Of Therapy (EOT)

    The per-pathogen microbiological outcome was determined for each uropathogen isolated at baseline at EOT (7 days post first dose of study drug). Microbiological outcome was classified as "eradication", "persistence" or "indeterminate." A successful microbiological response was "eradication" which was defined as urine culture showed all uropathogens found at baseline at ≥10\^5 colony-forming unit (CFU)/mL were reduced to \<10\^4 CFU/mL. If the outcome for any uropathogen was" persistence" (CFU/mL not reduced the result was classified as unsuccessful. Participants with responses reported as "indeterminate" were excluded.

    Time frame: Day 7 (7 days post first dose of study drug)

  2. Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Response of Eradication at Late Follow-up (LFU)

    The per-pathogen microbiological outcome was determined for each uropathogen isolated at baseline at LFU (42 days post first dose of study drug). Microbiological outcome was classified as "eradication", "persistence" or "indeterminate." A successful microbiological response was "eradication" which was defined as urine culture showed all uropathogens found at baseline at ≥10\^5 colony-forming unit (CFU)/mL were reduced to \<10\^4 CFU/mL. If the outcome for any uropathogen was" persistence" (CFU/mL not reduced the result was classified as unsuccessful. Participants with responses reported as "indeterminate" were excluded.

    Time frame: Day 42 (42 days post first dose of study drug)

  3. Percentage of Participants With Clinical Response of Clinical Cure at TOC

    The Investigator classified clinical outcome as "clinical cure", "clinical failure", or "indeterminate". A favorable clinical response is "clinical cure" defined as complete resolution of, marked improvement in (where clinical improvement was defined as a reduction in severity of all baseline signs and symptoms with worsening of none and with no requirement for additional antibiotic therapy after EOT), or return to pre-infection signs and symptoms and no use of additional or nonstudy antimicrobial therapy for the treatment of the current UTI. Outcomes reported as "indeterminate" were excluded. Percentage of participants with clinical response of clinical cure at TOC was summarized

    Time frame: Day 14 (14 days post first dose of study drug)

  4. Percentage of Participants With Clinical Response of Clinical Cure at EOT

    The Investigator classified clinical outcome as "clinical cure", "clinical failure", or "indeterminate". A favorable clinical response is "clinical cure" defined as complete resolution of, marked improvement in (where clinical improvement was defined as a reduction in severity of all baseline signs and symptoms with worsening of none and with no requirement for additional antibiotic therapy after EOT), or return to pre-infection signs and symptoms and no use of additional or nonstudy antimicrobial therapy for the treatment of the current UTI. Outcomes reported as "indeterminate" were excluded. Percentage of participants with clinical response of clinical cure at EOT was summarized

    Time frame: Day 7 (7 days post first dose of study drug)

  5. Percentage of Participants With Clinical Response of Clinical Cure at LFU

    The Investigator classified clinical outcome as "clinical cure", "clinical failure", or "indeterminate". A favorable clinical response is "clinical cure" defined as complete resolution of, marked improvement in (where clinical improvement was defined as a reduction in severity of all baseline signs and symptoms with worsening of none and with no requirement for additional antibiotic therapy after EOT), or return to pre-infection signs and symptoms and no use of additional or nonstudy antimicrobial therapy for the treatment of the current UTI. Outcomes reported as "indeterminate" were excluded. Percentage of participants with clinical response of clinical cure at LFU was summarized.

    Time frame: Day 42 (42 days post first dose of study drug)

  6. Percentage of Participants With a Composite Response of Both Eradication and Clinical Cure at TOC

    The percentage of participants that met requirements for both eradication and clinical cure at TOC was summarized.

    Time frame: Day 14 (14 days post first dose of study drug)

  7. Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Response of Eradication, by Pathogen at EOT

    The per-pathogen microbiological outcome was determined for each uropathogen isolated at baseline. Microbiological outcome was classified as "Eradication", "Persistence" or "Indeterminate." A successful microbiological response was "Eradication" which was defined as urine culture showed the specific pathogen found at baseline at ≥10\^5 colony-forming unit (CFU)/mL was reduced to \<10\^4 CFU/mL. If the outcome for any uropathogen was persistence (CFU/mL not reduced the result was classified as a failure. Outcomes reported as "indeterminate" were excluded. The percentage of participants that achieved eradication for each uropathogen at EOT (7 days post first dose of study drug) was summarized.

    Time frame: Day 7 (7 days post first dose of study drug)

  8. Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Response of Eradication by Pathogen at TOC

    The per-pathogen microbiological outcome was determined for each uropathogen isolated at baseline. Microbiological outcome was classified as "Eradication", "Persistence" or "Indeterminate." A successful microbiological response was "Eradication" which was defined as urine culture showed the specific pathogen found at baseline at ≥10\^5 colony-forming unit (CFU)/mL was reduced to \<10\^4 CFU/mL. If the outcome for any uropathogen was persistence (CFU/mL not reduced), the result was classified as a failure. Outcomes reported as "indeterminate" were excluded. The percentage of participants that achieved eradication for each uropathogen at TOC (14 days post first dose of study drug) was summarized.

    Time frame: Day 14 (14 days post first dose of study drug)

  9. Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Response of Eradication by Pathogen at LFU

    The per-pathogen microbiological outcome was determined for each uropathogen isolated at baseline. Microbiological outcome was classified as "Eradication", "Persistence" or "Indeterminate." A successful microbiological response was "Eradication" which was defined as urine culture showed the specific pathogen found at baseline at ≥10\^5 colony-forming unit (CFU)/mL was reduced to \<10\^4 CFU/mL. If the outcome for any uropathogen was persistence (CFU/mL not reduced the result was classified as a failure. Outcomes reported as "indeterminate" were excluded. The percentage of participants that achieved eradication for each uropathogen LFU (42 days post first dose of study drug) was summarized. .

    Time frame: Day 42 (42 days post first dose of study drug)

06

Results

Posted Sep 19, 2018

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneMK-7625A
Started115
Treated114
Completed112
Not completed3
Withdrew: Physician decision2
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject1

Outcome measures

PrimaryPercentage of Participants With Microbiological Response of Eradication at Test of Cure (TOC)

The per-pathogen microbiological outcome was determined for each uropathogen isolated at baseline at TOC (14 days post first dose). Microbiological outcome was classified as "eradication", "persistence" or "indeterminate." A successful microbiological response was "eradication" which was defined as urine culture showed all uropathogens found at baseline at ≥10\^5 colony-forming unit (CFU)/mL were reduced to \<10\^4 CFU/mL. If the outcome for any uropathogen was" persistence" (CFU/mL not reduced the result was classified as unsuccessful. Participants with responses reported as "indeterminate" were excluded.

Time frame:
Day 14 (14 days post first dose of study drug)
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Response of Eradication at Test of Cure (TOC)
Percentage of participantsMK-7625A
Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Response of Eradication at Test of Cure (TOC)80.7 (70.9 to 88.3)
PrimaryPercentage of Participants Who Report 1 or More Adverse Event (AE)

An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. An AE was any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with use of a medicinal product, regardless of whether or not it was considered related to the medicinal product. The percentage of participants that reported at least 1 AE was summarized.

Time frame:
Up to 42 days post first dose of study drug
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Who Report 1 or More Adverse Event (AE)
Percentage of participantsMK-7625A
Percentage of Participants Who Report 1 or More Adverse Event (AE)58.8 (49.2 to 67.9)
PrimaryPercentage of Participants Discontinuing Study Drug Due to an AE

An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. An AE was any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with use of a medicinal product, regardless of whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. The percentage of participants that had study drug discontinued during the study due to an AE was summarized.

Time frame:
Up to 7 days after the first dose of study drug
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Discontinuing Study Drug Due to an AE
Percentage of participantsMK-7625A
Percentage of Participants Discontinuing Study Drug Due to an AE1.8 (0.2 to 6.2)
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Microbiological Response of Eradication at End Of Therapy (EOT)

The per-pathogen microbiological outcome was determined for each uropathogen isolated at baseline at EOT (7 days post first dose of study drug). Microbiological outcome was classified as "eradication", "persistence" or "indeterminate." A successful microbiological response was "eradication" which was defined as urine culture showed all uropathogens found at baseline at ≥10\^5 colony-forming unit (CFU)/mL were reduced to \<10\^4 CFU/mL. If the outcome for any uropathogen was" persistence" (CFU/mL not reduced the result was classified as unsuccessful. Participants with responses reported as "indeterminate" were excluded.

Time frame:
Day 7 (7 days post first dose of study drug)
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Response of Eradication at End Of Therapy (EOT)
Percentage of participantsMK-7625A
Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Response of Eradication at End Of Therapy (EOT)100.0 (95.8 to 100.0)
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Microbiological Response of Eradication at Late Follow-up (LFU)

The per-pathogen microbiological outcome was determined for each uropathogen isolated at baseline at LFU (42 days post first dose of study drug). Microbiological outcome was classified as "eradication", "persistence" or "indeterminate." A successful microbiological response was "eradication" which was defined as urine culture showed all uropathogens found at baseline at ≥10\^5 colony-forming unit (CFU)/mL were reduced to \<10\^4 CFU/mL. If the outcome for any uropathogen was" persistence" (CFU/mL not reduced the result was classified as unsuccessful. Participants with responses reported as "indeterminate" were excluded.

Time frame:
Day 42 (42 days post first dose of study drug)
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Response of Eradication at Late Follow-up (LFU)
Percentage of participantsMK-7625A
Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Response of Eradication at Late Follow-up (LFU)61.0 (49.6 to 71.6)
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Clinical Response of Clinical Cure at TOC

The Investigator classified clinical outcome as "clinical cure", "clinical failure", or "indeterminate". A favorable clinical response is "clinical cure" defined as complete resolution of, marked improvement in (where clinical improvement was defined as a reduction in severity of all baseline signs and symptoms with worsening of none and with no requirement for additional antibiotic therapy after EOT), or return to pre-infection signs and symptoms and no use of additional or nonstudy antimicrobial therapy for the treatment of the current UTI. Outcomes reported as "indeterminate" were excluded. Percentage of participants with clinical response of clinical cure at TOC was summarized

Time frame:
Day 14 (14 days post first dose of study drug)
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Response of Clinical Cure at TOC
Percentage of participantsMK-7625A
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Response of Clinical Cure at TOC96.6 (90.5 to 99.3)
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Clinical Response of Clinical Cure at EOT

The Investigator classified clinical outcome as "clinical cure", "clinical failure", or "indeterminate". A favorable clinical response is "clinical cure" defined as complete resolution of, marked improvement in (where clinical improvement was defined as a reduction in severity of all baseline signs and symptoms with worsening of none and with no requirement for additional antibiotic therapy after EOT), or return to pre-infection signs and symptoms and no use of additional or nonstudy antimicrobial therapy for the treatment of the current UTI. Outcomes reported as "indeterminate" were excluded. Percentage of participants with clinical response of clinical cure at EOT was summarized

Time frame:
Day 7 (7 days post first dose of study drug)
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Response of Clinical Cure at EOT
Percentage of participantsMK-7625A
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Response of Clinical Cure at EOT97.8 (92.1 to 99.7)
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Clinical Response of Clinical Cure at LFU

The Investigator classified clinical outcome as "clinical cure", "clinical failure", or "indeterminate". A favorable clinical response is "clinical cure" defined as complete resolution of, marked improvement in (where clinical improvement was defined as a reduction in severity of all baseline signs and symptoms with worsening of none and with no requirement for additional antibiotic therapy after EOT), or return to pre-infection signs and symptoms and no use of additional or nonstudy antimicrobial therapy for the treatment of the current UTI. Outcomes reported as "indeterminate" were excluded. Percentage of participants with clinical response of clinical cure at LFU was summarized.

Time frame:
Day 42 (42 days post first dose of study drug)
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Response of Clinical Cure at LFU
Percentage of participantsMK-7625A
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Response of Clinical Cure at LFU78.2 (68.0 to 86.3)
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With a Composite Response of Both Eradication and Clinical Cure at TOC

The percentage of participants that met requirements for both eradication and clinical cure at TOC was summarized.

Time frame:
Day 14 (14 days post first dose of study drug)
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With a Composite Response of Both Eradication and Clinical Cure at TOC
Percentage of participantsMK-7625A
Percentage of Participants With a Composite Response of Both Eradication and Clinical Cure at TOC80.7 (70.9 to 88.3)
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Microbiological Response of Eradication, by Pathogen at EOT

The per-pathogen microbiological outcome was determined for each uropathogen isolated at baseline. Microbiological outcome was classified as "Eradication", "Persistence" or "Indeterminate." A successful microbiological response was "Eradication" which was defined as urine culture showed the specific pathogen found at baseline at ≥10\^5 colony-forming unit (CFU)/mL was reduced to \<10\^4 CFU/mL. If the outcome for any uropathogen was persistence (CFU/mL not reduced the result was classified as a failure. Outcomes reported as "indeterminate" were excluded. The percentage of participants that achieved eradication for each uropathogen at EOT (7 days post first dose of study drug) was summarized.

Time frame:
Day 7 (7 days post first dose of study drug)
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Response of Eradication, by Pathogen at EOT
Percentage of participantsMK-7625A
Enterobacter aerogenes100.0 (2.5 to 100.0)
Escherichia coli100.0 (95.3 to 100.0)
Klebsiella pneumoniae100.0 (59.0 to 100.0)
Proteus mirabilis100.0 (15.8 to 100.0)
Proteus vulgaris100.0 (15.8 to 100.0)
Pseudomonas aeruginosa100.0 (2.5 to 100.0)
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Microbiological Response of Eradication by Pathogen at TOC

The per-pathogen microbiological outcome was determined for each uropathogen isolated at baseline. Microbiological outcome was classified as "Eradication", "Persistence" or "Indeterminate." A successful microbiological response was "Eradication" which was defined as urine culture showed the specific pathogen found at baseline at ≥10\^5 colony-forming unit (CFU)/mL was reduced to \<10\^4 CFU/mL. If the outcome for any uropathogen was persistence (CFU/mL not reduced), the result was classified as a failure. Outcomes reported as "indeterminate" were excluded. The percentage of participants that achieved eradication for each uropathogen at TOC (14 days post first dose of study drug) was summarized.

Time frame:
Day 14 (14 days post first dose of study drug)
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Response of Eradication by Pathogen at TOC
Percentage of participantsMK-7625A
Citrobacter koseri100.0 (2.5 to 100.0)
Enterobacter aerogenes100.0 (2.5 to 100.0)
Escherichia coli82.9 (72.5 to 90.6)
Klebsiella pneumoniae42.9 (9.9 to 81.6)
Proteus mirabilis100.0 (29.2 to 100.0)
Proteus vulgaris100.0 (15.8 to 100.0)
Pseudomonas aeruginosa100.0 (2.5 to 100.0)
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Microbiological Response of Eradication by Pathogen at LFU

The per-pathogen microbiological outcome was determined for each uropathogen isolated at baseline. Microbiological outcome was classified as "Eradication", "Persistence" or "Indeterminate." A successful microbiological response was "Eradication" which was defined as urine culture showed the specific pathogen found at baseline at ≥10\^5 colony-forming unit (CFU)/mL was reduced to \<10\^4 CFU/mL. If the outcome for any uropathogen was persistence (CFU/mL not reduced the result was classified as a failure. Outcomes reported as "indeterminate" were excluded. The percentage of participants that achieved eradication for each uropathogen LFU (42 days post first dose of study drug) was summarized. .

Time frame:
Day 42 (42 days post first dose of study drug)
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Response of Eradication by Pathogen at LFU
Percentage of participantsMK-7625A
Citrobacter koseri100.0 (2.5 to 100.0)
Enterobacter aerogenes100.0 (2.5 to 100.0)
Escherichia coli62.9 (50.5 to 74.1)
Klebsiella pneumoniae37.5 (8.5 to 75.5)
Proteus mirabilis66.7 (9.4 to 99.2)
Proteus vulgaris100.0 (2.5 to 100.0)
Pseudomonas aeruginosa100.0 (2.5 to 100.0)

Adverse events

Collected over up to 35 post last dose of study drug (up to 42 days total). Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
MK-7625A0/114 (0%)13/114 (11.4%)26/114 (22.8%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 13
Most frequent serious events
EventMK-7625A
Pyelonephritis acuteInfections and infestations3/114
Cardiac failureCardiac disorders1/114
GastritisGastrointestinal disorders1/114
IleusGastrointestinal disorders1/114
Rectal prolapseGastrointestinal disorders1/114
CholelithiasisHepatobiliary disorders1/114
Pneumonia bacterialInfections and infestations1/114
PyelonephritisInfections and infestations1/114
Pyelonephritis chronicInfections and infestations1/114
Patella fractureInjury, poisoning and procedural complications1/114
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventMK-7625A
ConstipationGastrointestinal disorders9/114
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders9/114
Alanine aminotransferase increasedInvestigations9/114
Aspartate aminotransferase increasedInvestigations7/114

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(Years)MK-7625A
Mean68.2 ± 13.8
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)MK-7625A
Female77
Male38
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)MK-7625A
American Indian or Alaska Native0
Asian115
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0
Black or African American0
White0
More than one race0
Unknown or Not Reported0
07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Arakawa S, Kawahara K, Kawahara M, Yasuda M, Fujimoto G, Sato A, Yokokawa R, Yoshinari T, Rhee EG, Aoyama N. The efficacy and safety of tazobactam/ceftolozane in Japanese patients with uncomplicated pyelonephritis and complicated urinary tract infection. J Infect Chemother. 2019 Feb;25(2):104-110. doi: 10.1016/j.jiac.2018.10.009. Epub 2018 Nov 9. PubMed 30420153 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Dec 21, 2015

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — http://engagezone.msd.com/doc/ProcedureAccessClinicalTrialData.pdf

09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02728089
Lead sponsor
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 5, 2016
Start date
Apr 14, 2016
Primary completion
Sep 5, 2017
Completion
Sep 5, 2017
Results posted
Sep 19, 2018
Last update
Feb 5, 2019

Study contacts

Medical Director
study director · Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion