ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02725177Updated Nov 14, 2023Results posted

Ocular Sarcoidosis Open Label Trial of ACTHAR Gel

An interventional study of Repository Corticotropin Injection and Repository Corticotropin Injection -Treatment Extension in Ocular Sarcoidosis, Panuveitis and Anterior Uveitis, sponsored by The Cleveland Clinic. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 99 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-11-14.

Primary conditionUveitis, AnteriorRegistry: PanuveitisReclassifiedWhy we changed it
Registry
Panuveitis — the first condition term the registry derived for this study.
ClinicalTrials.gg
Uveitis, Anterior
Why
  1. The study's listed conditions name Uveitis, Anterior, a narrower term within Panuveitis.
Confidence
High: the new condition is named in the study's own listed conditions. Of 351 hand-checked studies reclassified this way, 68% were exactly right and 84% in the right disease family; the registry's first term was right for 5% (measured 2026-10-21). How we classify →
Wrong?
Tell us the study's main condition →

Sponsored by The Cleveland Clinic · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
9
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years to 99 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Treatment with ACTHAR Gel will result in a reduction of ocular inflammation in patients with active ocular sarcoidosis that requires systemic immunosuppressant therapy (hypothesis)

Read the detailed description

The initial treatment of ocular sarcoidosis usually relies on a combination of topical glucocorticoids and oral glucocorticoids, both of which are associated with significant ocular and systemic toxicities. Steroid-sparing therapies are limited by variable and unpredictable efficacy, prolonged time until clinical response, medication intolerance, and difficulties obtaining payor approval. As a result, it is not uncommon that treating physicians must choose between excessive glucocorticoid toxicity versus poor control of ocular inflammation. Ongoing ocular inflammation, in turn, leads to eventual visual loss and occasionally blindness.

There is a need for a more reliable, expeditious therapy that can be used as an alternative to glucocorticoids in sarcoidosis uveitis. Adrenocorticotropic hormone, through activation of melanocortin receptors on leukocytes, can dampen immune responses through non-glucocorticoid dependent mechanisms. The proposed study will aim to define whether there is effectiveness for ACTHAR gel in these patients, delineate an effect dosing regimen, and provide information about the safety of this approach for moderate to severe ocular sarcoidosis.

ACTHAR is a 39-amino acid peptide natural form of adrenocorticotropin hormone (ACTH) that was initially approved in 1952 by the FDA. It has since been approved for 19 indications including respiratory sarcoidosis, multiple sclerosis, and infantile spasms.

02

Conditions studied

  • Ocular Sarcoidosis
  • Panuveitis
  • Anterior Uveitis

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Ocular Sarcoidosis
03

In context

Uveitis, Anterior Reclassified

56 studies on the registry are indexed under Uveitis, Anterior; 9 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 9 is below the median of 50 across 45 interventional studies indexed under Uveitis, Anterior.

Browse Uveitis, Anterior studies →

Lead sponsor

The Cleveland Clinic is the lead sponsor of 831 studies on the registry; 119 are open to participants now.

Of its 90 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 73 (81%) have results posted.

Compared within Uveitis, Anterior, this study's primary condition as ClinicalTrials.gg classifies it; the registry's first condition term is Panuveitis. The counts are of registry records indexed under each term, refreshed daily. How we classify →

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 99 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patient with sarcoidosis as defined by ATS/ERS/WASOG guidelines (American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society /World Association of Sarcoidosis and Other Granulomatous Diseases)
  • Any posterior, intermediate or panuveitis of sufficient severity to warrant therapy, in the opinion of the treating physician --OR-- Anterior uveitis requiring 4 or more daily applications of topical to maintain control of inflammation, or uncontrolled with topical therapy
  • Persistent disease activity (active uveitis) at the time of screening

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Other cause for ocular inflammation
  • Uncontrolled diabetes, hypertension, or other to increased dosage of
  • Recent (less than 4 weeks) intra-ocular or intra-orbital steroid injection
  • Escalation of medications between screening and initiation of the study medication
  • Severe extra-ocular sarcoidosis likely to require additional therapy (in the opinion of the investigator)
  • Administration of an medication for sarcoidosis within 3 months, or 5 half-lives, whichever is longer
  • Have a history of any opportunistic infection within 6 months prior to screening
  • Have any history of , except fully resected cutaneous squamous cell cancer or cutaneous basal cell cancer, or cervical carcinoma in-situ with a minimum of 5 years period without recurrence
  • Severe other organ disease felt to be likely to lead to death within the next six months
  • Unable to follow the study protocol, including the requisite travel and follow-up ocular testing
  • Women of must be using adequate measures (abstinence, hormonal contraceptives, intrauterine device, barrier method with spermicide, or surgical sterilization) and must agree to continue such precautions, and not become pregnant or plan a pregnancy for 6 months after receiving their last treatment with study agent. Women of childbearing potential must test negative on a serum pregnancy test at screening.
  • Breastfeeding women are excluded from participation
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(7)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
9 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    H.P. Achtar Gel 80 U

    H.P. Acthar Gel (repository corticotropin) Injection, 80 U daily for 10 days, then 80 U twice weekly for up to a total of 24 weeks on therapy.

    Drug: Repository Corticotropin Injection · Drug: Repository Corticotropin Injection -Treatment Extension

Interventions

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Patients With Clinically Significant Improvement in Visual Acuity

    The primary outcome was percentage of patients meeting at least one of the following variables 1) improved visual acuity, 2) resolution of intraocular inflammation, 3) ability to taper ocular or oral steroids by at least 50% or 4) reduction of cystoid macular edema, with no worsening of any single one and no need for additional sarcoidosis therapies at 24 weeks .

    Time frame: Measured at 24 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Patients With Clinically Significant Improvement in the Resolution-intraocular Inflammation

    Time frame: Measured at 24 weeks

  2. Proportion of Patients Experiencing a Tapering of Ocular/Oral Steroids by at Least 50%

    Time frame: Measured at 24 weeks

  3. Proportion of Patients With a Clinically Significant Reduction-cystoid Macular Edema

    Time frame: Measured at 24 weeks

07

Results

Posted Feb 15, 2023

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneH.P. Achtar Gel 80 U
Started9
Completed4
Not completed5
Withdrew: Physician decision4
Withdrew: Adverse event1

Outcome measures

PrimaryPercentage of Patients With Clinically Significant Improvement in Visual Acuity

The primary outcome was percentage of patients meeting at least one of the following variables 1) improved visual acuity, 2) resolution of intraocular inflammation, 3) ability to taper ocular or oral steroids by at least 50% or 4) reduction of cystoid macular edema, with no worsening of any single one and no need for additional sarcoidosis therapies at 24 weeks .

Time frame:
Measured at 24 weeks
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Percentage of Patients With Clinically Significant Improvement in Visual Acuity
ParticipantsH.P. Achtar Gel 80 U
Percentage of Patients With Clinically Significant Improvement in Visual Acuity3
SecondaryPercentage of Patients With Clinically Significant Improvement in the Resolution-intraocular Inflammation
Time frame:
Measured at 24 weeks
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Percentage of Patients With Clinically Significant Improvement in the Resolution-intraocular Inflammation
ParticipantsH.P. Achtar Gel 80 U
Percentage of Patients With Clinically Significant Improvement in the Resolution-intraocular Inflammation2
SecondaryProportion of Patients Experiencing a Tapering of Ocular/Oral Steroids by at Least 50%
Time frame:
Measured at 24 weeks
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Proportion of Patients Experiencing a Tapering of Ocular/Oral Steroids by at Least 50%
ParticipantsH.P. Achtar Gel 80 U
Proportion of Patients Experiencing a Tapering of Ocular/Oral Steroids by at Least 50%2
SecondaryProportion of Patients With a Clinically Significant Reduction-cystoid Macular Edema
Time frame:
Measured at 24 weeks
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Proportion of Patients With a Clinically Significant Reduction-cystoid Macular Edema
ParticipantsH.P. Achtar Gel 80 U
Proportion of Patients With a Clinically Significant Reduction-cystoid Macular Edema1

Adverse events

Collected over 24 Weeks. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
H.P. Achtar Gel 80 U0/9 (0%)0/9 (0%)7/9 (77.8%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventH.P. Achtar Gel 80 U
Fluid RetentionVascular disorders7/9
InsomniaGeneral disorders4/9
HypertensionVascular disorders4/9
DepressionPsychiatric disorders3/9
Impaired Blood SugarMetabolism and nutrition disorders3/9

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)H.P. Achtar Gel 80 U
Median51 (35 to 71)
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)H.P. Achtar Gel 80 U
Female6
Male3
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)H.P. Achtar Gel 80 U
American Indian or Alaska Native0
Asian0
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0
Black or African American2
White7
More than one race0
Unknown or Not Reported0
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Cleveland Clinical Foundation
    Cleveland, Ohio 44145, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 14, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02725177
Collaborators
Mallinckrodt
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 31, 2016
Start date
Jul 2016
Primary completion
Dec 2021
Completion
Mar 2022
Results posted
Feb 15, 2023
Last update
Nov 14, 2023

Study contacts

Daniel A Culver, DO
principal investigator · The Cleveland Clinic

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Adrenocorticotropic Hormone

Start the discussion