CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02719938Updated Jan 8, 2019Results posted

Triggered Palliative Care for Advanced Dementia

An interventional study of Specialty Palliative Care in Alzheimer Disease and Dementia, sponsored by University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 65 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-01-08.

Sponsored by University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
62
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
65 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The objective of this study is to generate preliminary data for a large multi-site randomized clinical trial of a model of palliative care consultation for patients with advanced dementia, and for their family caregivers.

Read the detailed description

Alzheimer's disease and related dementias affect 5 million Americans at an annual cost of $215 billion. Dementia is a contributing cause for 1 in 3 deaths, and is the only major cause of death with no effective prevention or treatment. Dementia-specific palliative care is needed to address the unique symptoms and treatment decisions relevant to this disease.

Investigators therefore propose to develop and pilot test a model of palliative care consultation for advanced dementia patients, triggered by hospitalization for a serious acute illness. After systematic refinement of operational protocols and tools with stakeholders, they will enroll persons with advanced dementia plus an acute illness associated with high risk of death in the coming year. Patients will be enrolled with their family decision-makers (N=60 dyads) in a randomized feasibility trial. Intervention dyads will receive specialty palliative care consultation during hospital admission, plus post-discharge collaborative care by their outpatient primary care provider and a palliative care nurse practitioner. Control dyads will receive usual care.

The research objective is to generate preliminary data for a large multi-site randomized controlled trial of a model of palliative care consultation for advanced dementia.

Specific aims are:

Aim 1: To develop a best-practice model of palliative care consultation for advanced dementia triggered by hospital admission for serious acute illness.

Aim 2: To conduct a pilot randomized trial of triggered palliative care consultation for advanced dementia (versus usual care) to demonstrate the feasibility of conducting a larger randomized trial.

02

Conditions studied

  • Alzheimer Disease
  • Dementia
03

In context

Alzheimer Disease

3,678 studies on the registry are indexed under Alzheimer Disease; 872 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 62 is below the median of 70 across 2,808 interventional studies indexed under Alzheimer Disease.

Browse Alzheimer Disease studies →

Lead sponsor

University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill is the lead sponsor of 1,340 studies on the registry; 133 are open to participants now.

Of its 155 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 136 (88%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
65 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Diagnosis of dementia from Alzheimer's or other underlying cause
  • Global Deterioration Scale (GDS) Stage 5, 6 or 7
  • acute illness hospitalization

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • No English-speaking family decision-maker
  • Primary physician expects study to be too stressful for family caregiver
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
62 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Specialty Palliative Care

    Specialty inter-disciplinary Palliative Care consultation during hospitalization with post-discharge collaborative care by a Palliative Care Nurse Practitioner and outpatient primary care physician. Clinical care will be augmented by evidence-based educational materials for dementia caregivers.

    Behavioral: Specialty Palliative Care

  • No intervention
    Control

    Usual care.

Interventions

  • BehavioralSpecialty Palliative Care

    Specialty inter-disciplinary Palliative Care consultation during hospitalization with post-discharge collaborative care by a Palliative Care Nurse Practitioner and outpatient primary care physician. Clinical care will be augmented by evidence-based educational materials for dementia caregivers.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Hospital / Emergency Visits Per 60 Days (no. of Events/Follow-up Days)

    Includes emergency department visits and hospital admissions during measure interval

    Time frame: From time of hospital discharge up to 60 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Patient Comfort End of Life in Dementia (CAD-EOLD)

    Comfort at the End of Life in Dementia (CAD-EOLD) instrument, consisting of 14 Likert-scaled items measuring comfort in the final phase of life with dementia. Scores range from 14-42, with higher scores indicting greater comfort.

    Time frame: 60 days

  2. Caregiver Strain

    Family Distress in Advanced Dementia instrument, a 21 item questionnaire designed to detect strain in family caregivers in dementia. Caregivers are asked a series of items about emotional distress, preparedness, and relations with healthcare providers scored 1-5, with higher scores indicting greater distress.

    Time frame: Interview at 60 days after hospitalization

  3. Percent of Participants With Referral to Hospice or Outpatient Palliative Care From Discharge to 60 Days Follow-Up

    Percent of patients with referral to hospice or outpatient palliative care from discharge to 60 days follow-up from family interviews.

    Time frame: From time of hospital discharge up to 60 days

  4. Percent of Participants With Physician Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment (POLST)

    Percent of participants with POLST (Physician Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment) form completed and signed

    Time frame: From time of hospital discharge up to 60 days

  5. Number of Palliative Care Domains in Treatment Plan

    Number of palliative care domains addressed in treatment plan, using the Palliative Care Domain score which is scored 0 (not addressed) or 1 (addressed) for each of 10 possible domains of a palliative care treatment plan -- prognosis, overall goals of care, physical symptoms, psychiatric symptoms, spiritual needs, and 5 treatment preferences: resuscitation, artificial feeding, intravenous fluids, antibiotics, and hospitalization. Scores are summed for a total possible score of 0-10, with higher scores indicating greater attention to palliative care needs in the treatment plan.

    Time frame: From time of hospital discharge up to 60 days

  6. Number of Participants With Burdensome Treatments

    Number of participants with burdensome treatments, defined as a count of participants with any use of the following treatments: feeding tube, central intravenous line, surgical procedure, intensive care transfer, ventilator use, cardiopulmonary resuscitation use at any time during the time frame of measurement.

    Time frame: From time of hospital discharge up to 60 days

07

Results

Posted Jan 8, 2019

Participant flow

March 2016 to August 2017 enrolled dyads of hospitalized patients with late-stage dementia and family decision-makers.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneSpecialty Palliative CareControl
Started3032
Completed2631
Not completed41

Outcome measures

PrimaryHospital / Emergency Visits Per 60 Days (no. of Events/Follow-up Days)

Includes emergency department visits and hospital admissions during measure interval

Time frame:
From time of hospital discharge up to 60 days
Reported as:
Number · events per day
Hospital / Emergency Visits Per 60 Days (no. of Events/Follow-up Days)
events per daySpecialty Palliative CareControl
Hospital / Emergency Visits Per 60 Days (no. of Events/Follow-up Days).68.53
Statistical analysis
  • Specialty Palliative Care vs Control · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.415
SecondaryPatient Comfort End of Life in Dementia (CAD-EOLD)

Comfort at the End of Life in Dementia (CAD-EOLD) instrument, consisting of 14 Likert-scaled items measuring comfort in the final phase of life with dementia. Scores range from 14-42, with higher scores indicting greater comfort.

Time frame:
60 days
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Patient Comfort End of Life in Dementia (CAD-EOLD)
score on a scaleSpecialty Palliative CareControl
Patient Comfort End of Life in Dementia (CAD-EOLD)34.8 ± 4.234.0 ± 4.1
Statistical analysis
  • Specialty Palliative Care vs Control · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.521
SecondaryCaregiver Strain

Family Distress in Advanced Dementia instrument, a 21 item questionnaire designed to detect strain in family caregivers in dementia. Caregivers are asked a series of items about emotional distress, preparedness, and relations with healthcare providers scored 1-5, with higher scores indicting greater distress.

Time frame:
Interview at 60 days after hospitalization
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Caregiver Strain
score on a scaleSpecialty Palliative CareControl
Caregiver Strain2.3 ± 0.52.4 ± 0.5
Statistical analysis
  • Specialty Palliative Care vs Control · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.409
SecondaryPercent of Participants With Referral to Hospice or Outpatient Palliative Care From Discharge to 60 Days Follow-Up

Percent of patients with referral to hospice or outpatient palliative care from discharge to 60 days follow-up from family interviews.

Time frame:
From time of hospital discharge up to 60 days
Reported as:
Number · percentage of patients
Percent of Participants With Referral to Hospice or Outpatient Palliative Care From Discharge to 60 Days Follow-Up
percentage of patientsSpecialty Palliative CareControl
Percent of Participants With Referral to Hospice or Outpatient Palliative Care From Discharge to 60 Days Follow-Up253
Statistical analysis
  • Specialty Palliative Care vs Control · Chi-squared · p = 0.019
SecondaryPercent of Participants With Physician Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment (POLST)

Percent of participants with POLST (Physician Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment) form completed and signed

Time frame:
From time of hospital discharge up to 60 days
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percent of Participants With Physician Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment (POLST)
percentage of participantsSpecialty Palliative CareControl
Percent of Participants With Physician Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment (POLST)7930
Statistical analysis
  • Specialty Palliative Care vs Control · Chi-squared · p = <0.001
SecondaryNumber of Palliative Care Domains in Treatment Plan

Number of palliative care domains addressed in treatment plan, using the Palliative Care Domain score which is scored 0 (not addressed) or 1 (addressed) for each of 10 possible domains of a palliative care treatment plan -- prognosis, overall goals of care, physical symptoms, psychiatric symptoms, spiritual needs, and 5 treatment preferences: resuscitation, artificial feeding, intravenous fluids, antibiotics, and hospitalization. Scores are summed for a total possible score of 0-10, with higher scores indicating greater attention to palliative care needs in the treatment plan.

Time frame:
From time of hospital discharge up to 60 days
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Number of Palliative Care Domains in Treatment Plan
units on a scaleSpecialty Palliative CareControl
Number of Palliative Care Domains in Treatment Plan7.6 ± 2.52.7 ± 1.7
Statistical analysis
  • Specialty Palliative Care vs Control · t-test, 2 sided · p = <0.001
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Burdensome Treatments

Number of participants with burdensome treatments, defined as a count of participants with any use of the following treatments: feeding tube, central intravenous line, surgical procedure, intensive care transfer, ventilator use, cardiopulmonary resuscitation use at any time during the time frame of measurement.

Time frame:
From time of hospital discharge up to 60 days
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Burdensome Treatments
ParticipantsSpecialty Palliative CareControl
Number of Participants With Burdensome Treatments98
Statistical analysis
  • Specialty Palliative Care vs Control · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.516

Adverse events

Collected over 60 days. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Specialty Palliative Care0/30 (0%)0/30 (0%)0/30 (0%)
Control0/32 (0%)0/32 (0%)0/32 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Specialty Palliative CareControlTotal
Mean83.0 ± 8.884.7 ± 8.783.9 ± 8.7
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Specialty Palliative CareControlTotal
Female201535
Male101727
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Specialty Palliative CareControlTotal
Hispanic or Latino123
Not Hispanic or Latino293059
Unknown or Not Reported000
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Specialty Palliative CareControlTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native011
Asian000
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American8715
White212344
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported112
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(Participants)Specialty Palliative CareControlTotal
United States303262
08

Study locations

1 site
  • University of North Carolina
    Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Hanson LC, Kistler CE, Lavin K, Gabriel SL, Ernecoff NC, Lin FC, Sachs GA, Mitchell SL. Triggered Palliative Care for Late-Stage Dementia: A Pilot Randomized Trial. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2019 Jan;57(1):10-19. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2018.10.494. Epub 2018 Oct 18. PubMed 30342242 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Jul 18, 2016

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided — Data sharing plan not written

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 8, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02719938
Lead sponsor
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Collaborators
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, National Institute on Aging (NIA)
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 25, 2016
Start date
Mar 2016
Primary completion
Oct 31, 2017
Completion
Oct 31, 2017
Results posted
Jan 8, 2019
Last update
Jan 8, 2019

Study contacts

Laura Hanson, MD, MPH
principal investigator · University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion