ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02714816Updated Sep 21, 2026

Natural History Study of Patients With Leber Congenital Amaurosis Associated With Mutations in RPE65

An observational study in Leber Congenital Amaurosis, sponsored by MeiraGTx UK II Ltd. Completed at 2 sites in 2 countries. Open to participants aged 3 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-21.

Sponsored by MeiraGTx UK II Ltd · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
37
Ages
3 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

MGT005 is a natural history study to collect longitudinal prospective data from patients with Leber Congenital Amaurosis associated with defects in RPE65.

Read the detailed description

Leber Congenital Amaurosis (LCA) is a diagnosis for a group of severe, autosomal recessively inherited rod - cone dystrophies that typically result in complete visual loss in the third or fourth decade of life. One form, LCA2, is caused by a mutation in the gene encoding RPE56, an RPE-specific 65-kDa isomerase. Non-functional RPE65 results in photoreceptor cells that are unable to respond to light resulting in these patients being visually impaired.

In preparation for human clinical trials, a detailed prospective phenotypic study will be undertaken to investigate the natural history of RPE65-LCA. Such a study will help identify suitable patients for therapeutic intervention. Furthermore through greater phenotyping an optimal window for intervention and specific parameters to help quantify effect and identify clinical end points may have been ascertained .

02

Conditions studied

  • Leber Congenital Amaurosis
03

In context

Leber Congenital Amaurosis

32 studies on the registry are indexed under Leber Congenital Amaurosis; 4 are open to participants now.

Browse Leber Congenital Amaurosis studies →

Lead sponsor

MeiraGTx UK II Ltd is the lead sponsor of 10 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Of its 5 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 4 (80%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
3 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patients with RPE65-LCA condition

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients with RPE65 associated retinal dystrophy
  • Minimum subject age of 3 years
  • Able to give consent/parent or guardian able to give consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients unable or unwilling to undertake consent or clinical testing
  • Have received a gene therapy treatment in both eyes
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
37 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Analysis of retinal structure and function

    Retinal structure will be analysed using Adaptive optics and SD-OCT and Fundal autofluorescence. This will be correlated with assessment of visual acuity, psychophysical visual assessment, visual mobility, retinal sensitivity and visual fields

    Time frame: 6 years

Secondary outcomes

  1. Quality of Life Questionnaires

    Assessment of Visual impairment using appropriate, validated questionnaires

    Time frame: 6 years

  2. Retinal Sensitivity

    To be assessed in Microperimetry

    Time frame: 6 years

  3. Retinal Structural analysis

    Retinal Structure analysis with Adaptive Optics

    Time frame: 6 years

  4. Fundal Autofluorescence

    Presence or Absence

    Time frame: 6 years

  5. Assessment of Visual Fields

    Assessment of Visual Fields with analysis of hill of vision

    Time frame: 6 years

07

Study locations

2 sites
  • Kellogg Eye Center
    Ann Arbor, Michigan MI 48105, United States
  • Moorfields Eye Hospital
    London, United Kingdom
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Kumaran N, Georgiou M, Bainbridge JWB, Bertelsen M, Larsen M, Blanco-Kelly F, Ayuso C, Tran HV, Munier FL, Kalitzeos A, Michaelides M. Retinal Structure in RPE65-Associated Retinal Dystrophy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2020 Apr 9;61(4):47. doi: 10.1167/iovs.61.4.47. PubMed 32347917 ↗
  • Kumaran N, Rubin GS, Kalitzeos A, Fujinami K, Bainbridge JWB, Weleber RG, Michaelides M. A Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Study of Retinal Sensitivity in RPE65-Associated Leber Congenital Amaurosis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2018 Jul 2;59(8):3330-3339. doi: 10.1167/iovs.18-23873. PubMed 30025081 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 21, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02714816
Lead sponsor
MeiraGTx UK II Ltd
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 22, 2016
Start date
Apr 2016
Primary completion
Jul 22, 2023
Completion
Jul 22, 2023
Last update
Sep 21, 2026

Study contacts

Michel Michealides, Prof
principal investigator · UCL/Moorfileds

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion