CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02711410Updated Mar 18, 2016

The Influence of CYP2C19 Polymorphism and Clinical Outcomes in Stroke Patients

An observational study in Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors, sponsored by National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Japan. Completed. Open to participants aged 20 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-03-18.

Sponsored by National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Japan · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
518
Ages
20 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Background:

Clopidogrel, an antiplatelet prodrug, is widely used for prevention of the recurrent cardiovascular events. CYP2C19 is one of the crucial enzymes for the activation of clopidogrel. Recent studies, mostly done in cardiovascular patients, showed association of the CYP2C19 genotypes with recurrent cardiovascular events. However, prospective data on the impact of the genetic variants in stroke patients are limited.

Methods:

Five hundred and eighteen Japanese non-acute stroke patients treated with clopidogrel were registered at 14 institutions. Three CYP2C19 variants (CYP2C19*2, *3, *17) were genotyped and the patients were classified into three clopidogrel metabolizer groups inferred from the CYP2C19 genotypes: extensive (EM: *1/*1), intermediate (IM: *1/*2 or *1/*3), and poor (PM: *2/*2, *2/*3, or *3/*3). The CYP2C19*17 carriers were excluded from the analysis. The antiplatelet effects of clopidogrel were assessed by Adenosine diphosphate (ADP) -induced platelet aggregation and vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP) phosphorylation, expressed as VASP index. The endpoint was the composite incidence of stroke, transient ischemic attack, myocardial infarction, revascularization, other thromboembolic disease, or cardiovascular death during 2 years of follow-up.

02

Conditions studied

  • Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors
03

In context

Lead sponsor

National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Japan is the lead sponsor of 19 studies on the registry; 3 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
20 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

Patients were recruited at each institution between October 2009 and March 2012. The investigators enrolled males and females aged 20 years or older who had experienced cerebral infarction or transient ischemic attack (TIA) (except for cardiogenic embolism) in the prior 3 years but not in the last one month, who received long-term clopidogrel therapy (75 mg once a day) for the secondary prevention (for at least one month), and who were willing and able to give written informed consent.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients who had received long-term clopidogrel therapy (once a day for at least one month) with a minimum one-month interval between enrollment and the last cerebral ischemic or TIA event.
  • Males and females aged 20 years or older who were prescribed clopidogrel for the secondary prevention of cerebral infarction or transient ischemic attack and who were willing and able to give written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Malignancies
  • Congenital bleeding tendency
  • Atrial fibrillation
  • Concomitant use of an oral anticoagulant agent
  • a platelet count of \< 100 x 109/L or > 450 x 109/L within 3 months of enrollment
  • Modified rankin scale > 4
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
518 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples with dna

Interventions

  • DrugClopidogrel
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The primary outcome of the study was recurrent cardiovascular event (CVEs), including ischemic stroke, transient ischemic attack (TIA), acute myocardial infarction, urgent revascularization, other thromboembolic disease, and cardiovascular death.

    Ischemic stroke was defined as a new neurologic deficit of cardiovascular origin lasting at least \> 24 hours based on radiological evidence of stroke. TIA was defined as a transient episode of neurologic dysfunction caused by focal brain ischemia and improving within 24 hours. Urgent revascularization was defined as emergent revascularization for unexpected hospitalization. Acute myocardial infarction was defined as myocardial cell necrosis in the setting of ischemic symptoms and electrocardiogram changes (ST segment elevation or depression, development of Q waves) and/or rising specific cardiac biomarkers. Cardiovascular death was defined as death due to stroke, myocardial infarction or documented sudden cardiac death.

    Time frame: Two Years

Secondary outcomes

  1. Secondary outcome was major bleeding (intracranial haemorrhage, documented retroperitoneal bleed, and any red blood cell transfusion rates or proportion with bleeding associated with a ≧2g/dl hemoglobin drop).

    Intracranial haemorrhage retroperitoneal bleed were defined on radiological evidence. Proportion with bleeding associated with a ≧2g/dl hemoglobin drop was assessed by Blood laboratory test.

    Time frame: two years

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 18, 2016, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02711410
Lead sponsor
National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Japan
Responsible party
Tomotaka Tanaka (Medical Researcher, Department of Neurology, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Japan) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 17, 2016
Start date
Oct 2009
Primary completion
Apr 2014
Completion
Oct 2015
Last update
Mar 18, 2016

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion