CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02706873SELECT-EARLYUpdated Jul 7, 2023Results posted

A Study to Compare Upadacitinib (ABT-494) Monotherapy to Methotrexate (MTX) Monotherapy in Adults With Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) Who Have Not Previously Taken Methotrexate

A Phase 3 interventional study of Placebo to Upadacitinib and Methotrexate in Rheumatoid Arthritis, sponsored by AbbVie. Completed at 290 sites in 45 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-07-07.

Sponsored by AbbVie · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
1,002
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The objectives of Period 1 were the following:

  • To compare the safety and efficacy of upadacitinib 7.5 mg once daily (QD) monotherapy (for participants in Japan only), 15 mg QD monotherapy, and 30 mg QD monotherapy versus weekly methotrexate monotherapy for the treatment of signs and symptoms of RA in methotrexate-naïve adults with moderately to severely active RA;
  • To compare the efficacy of upadacitinib 15 mg QD monotherapy and upadacitinib 30 mg QD monotherapy versus weekly methotrexate monotherapy for prevention of structural progression in methotrexate-naïve adults with moderately to severely active RA.

The objective of Period 2 is to evaluate the long-term safety, tolerability, and efficacy of upadacitinib 7.5 mg QD (for participants in Japan only), 15 mg QD, and 30 mg QD in adults with RA who have completed Period 1.

Read the detailed description

This study includes 2 periods (a 48-week double-blind treatment period and a long-term extension period) and a Japan substudy. In Period 1 participants will be randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio to treatment Groups 2, 3, and 4 below, except for participants from Japan, who will be randomized in a 2:1:1:1 ratio to Groups 1, 2, 3, and 4:

  • Group 1: Upadacitinib 7.5 mg once daily (QD) monotherapy (participants in Japan only)
  • Group 2: Upadacitinib 15 mg QD monotherapy
  • Group 3: Upadacitinib 30 mg QD monotherapy
  • Group 4: Methotrexate monotherapy

Rescue therapy is defined for Weeks 12 through 24, Week 26, and Weeks 36 through 40. Starting at Week 12 through Week 24, participants who do not achieve ≥ 20% improvement in both tender joint count (TJC) and swollen joint count (SJC) compared with baseline at two consecutive visits will continue on their blinded therapy and the Investigator should optimize (initiate or increase) background RA medications: non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug(s) (NSAIDs), corticosteroids (oral ≤ 10 mg/day prednisone equivalent or prednisone equivalent ≤ 0.5 mg/kg/day for 3 consecutive days) and/or low-potency analgesics.

Rescue therapy for participants who meet the following criteria at Week 26 are as follows:

Participants who do not achieve clinical remission (CR) based on Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) (defined as a CDAI score ≤ 2.8):

  • but achieve ≥ 20% improvement in both TJC and SJC compared with baseline will continue on blinded study drug and the Investigator should optimize (initiate or increase) background RA medications: NSAIDs, corticosteroids (oral ≤ 10 mg/day prednisone equivalent and up to 2 local injections), low-potency analgesics and conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug(s) (csDMARDs) (only 1 of the following: sulfasalazine, hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine) throughout the remainder of Period 1 and until the study is unblinded.
  • and do not achieve ≥ 20% improvement in both TJC and SJC compared with baseline and originally assigned to methotrexate will be re-randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive blinded upadacitinib 15 mg QD or upadacitinib 30 mg QD (participants in Japan will be randomized 1:1:1 to receive upadacitinib 7.5 mg QD, 15 mg QD, or 30 mg QD) while continuing methotrexate treatment in a blinded manner until the study is unblinded. Participants originally assigned to upadacitinib will add methotrexate 10 mg/week (7.5 mg for Japan) to upadacitinib in a blinded manner and will remain on upadacitinib plus methotrexate 10 mg/week (7.5 mg for Japan) until the study is unblinded.

Starting at Week 36 through Week 40, participants who do not achieve ≥ 20% improvement in both TJC and SJC compared with baseline at two consecutive visits will continue on their blinded therapy and the Investigator should optimize (initiate or increase) background RA medications: NSAIDs, corticosteroids (oral ≤ 10 mg/day prednisone equivalent or prednisone equivalent ≤ 0.5 mg/kg/day for 3 consecutive days and up to 2 local injections), low-potency analgesics and csDMARDs (only 1 of the following: sulfasalazine, hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine).

Participants who complete the Week 48 visit (end of Period 1) will enter the long-term extension, Period 2 (212 weeks) and continue study treatment per assignment at the end of Period 1 in a blinded fashion. When the last participant completes the last visit of Period 1 (Week 48), study drug assignment in both periods may be unblinded, and participants will be dispensed study drug in an open-label fashion until the completion of Period 2. Starting with Protocol Amendment 6, participants receiving upadacitinib 15 mg and 30 mg QD will receive open-label upadacitinib 15 mg QD, and participants receiving methotrexate will receive open-label methotrexate.

A global analysis will be conducted for the comparisons of the primary and secondary efficacy endpoints between the upadacitinib 15 mg QD and 30 mg QD treatment groups versus the methotrexate treatment group for all participants (excluding the Japan specific upadacitinib 7.5 mg treatment group). Analyses will be conducted separately for United States (US)/Food and Drug Administration (FDA), European Union (EU)/European Medicines Agency (EMA), and Japan/Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA) regulatory purposes, each according to a pre-specified sequence of primary and ranked secondary endpoints.

A separate Japan sub-study analysis will be conducted for the comparisons of the efficacy endpoints between the upadacitinib 7.5 mg QD, 15 mg QD, and 30 mg QD treatment groups versus the methotrexate treatment group for participants enrolled in Japan only.

02

Conditions studied

  • Rheumatoid Arthritis

Keywords

  • Musculoskeletal disease
  • Arthritis
  • Joint disease
  • Anti-inflammatory agents
  • Antirheumatic agents
  • ABT-494
  • Upadacitinib
03

In context

Arthritis

3,554 studies on the registry are indexed under Arthritis; 317 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 1,002 is above the median of 90 across 2,377 interventional studies indexed under Arthritis.

Browse Arthritis studies →

Lead sponsor

AbbVie is the lead sponsor of 953 studies on the registry; 136 are open to participants now.

Of its 350 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 210 (60%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Duration of symptoms consistent with RA for ≥ 6 weeks who also fulfill the 2010 American College of Rheumatology (ACR)/European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) classification criteria for RA.
  • Naïve to Methotrexate (MTX) or, if already on MTX, have received no more than 3 weekly MTX doses with requirement to complete a 4-week MTX washout before the first dose of study drug.
  • Participants with prior exposure to conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs(csDMARDs) other than MTX may be enrolled if completed the washout period.
  • Participant meets both of the following minimum disease activity criteria:

    -≥ 6 swollen joints (based on 66 joint counts) and ≥ 6 tender joints (based on 68 joint counts) at Screening and Baseline Visits.

  • high sensitivity C reactive protein (hsCRP) ≥ 5 mg/L (central lab, upper limit of normal [ULN] 2.87 mg/L at Screening Visit.
  • Greater than or equal to 1 bone erosion on x-ray (by local reading) OR in the absence of documented bone erosion, both positive rheumatoid factor (RF) and positive anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (anti CCP) autoantibodies are required at Screening.
  • Stable dose of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), acetaminophen, oral corticosteroids (equivalent to prednisone ≤ 10 mg/day), or inhaled corticosteroids for stable medical conditions are allowed but must have been at a stable dose ≥ 1 week prior to the first dose of study drug.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Intolerant to Methotrexate (MTX).
  • Prior exposure to any Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor (including but not limited to tofacitinib, baricitinib, and filgotinib).
  • Prior exposure to any biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs).
  • History of any arthritis with onset prior to age 17 years or current diagnosis, inflammatory joint disease other than RA (including but not limited to gout, systemic lupus erythematosus, psoriatic arthritis, axial spondyloarthritis including ankylosing spondylitis and non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis, reactive arthritis, overlap connective tissue diseases, scleroderma, polymyositis, dermatomyositis, fibromyalgia [currently with active symptoms]. Current diagnosis of secondary Sjogren's Syndrome is permitted.
  • Has been treated with intra-articular, intramuscular, intravenous, trigger point or tender point, intra-bursa, or intra-tendon sheath corticosteroids in the preceding 8 weeks prior to the first dose of study drug.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
1,002 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Methotrexate

    Period 1: Participants will receive placebo to upadacitinib once daily and methotrexate once weekly for 48 weeks. Period 2: Participants will continue on placebo to upadacitinib once daily and methotrexate once weekly until the study is unblinded, after which participants will receive open-label methotrexate up to Week 260.

    Drug: Placebo to Upadacitinib · Drug: Methotrexate

  • Experimental
    Upadacitinib 7.5 mg (Japan-only)

    Period 1: Participants will receive upadacitinib 7.5 mg once daily and placebo to methotrexate once weekly for 48 weeks. Period 2: Participants will continue on upadacitinib 7.5 mg once daily and placebo to methotrexate once weekly until the study is unblinded, after which participants will receive open-label upadacitinib 7.5 mg up to Week 260.

    Drug: Placebo to Methotrexate · Drug: Upadacitinib

  • Experimental
    Upadacitinib 15 mg

    Period 1: Participants will receive upadacitinib 15 mg once daily and placebo to methotrexate once weekly for 48 weeks. Period 2: Participants will continue on upadacitinib 15 mg once daily and placebo to methotrexate once weekly until the study is unblinded, after which participants will receive open-label upadacitinib 15 mg up to Week 260.

    Drug: Placebo to Methotrexate · Drug: Upadacitinib

  • Experimental
    Upadacitinib 30 mg

    Period 1: Participants will receive upadacitinib 30 mg once daily and placebo to methotrexate once weekly for 48 weeks. Period 2: Participants will continue on upadacitinib 30 mg once daily and placebo to methotrexate once weekly until the study is unblinded, after which participants will receive open-label upadacitinib 30 mg once daily. After implementation of Protocol Amendment 6 participants will receive upadacitinib 15 mg once daily up to Week 260.

    Drug: Placebo to Methotrexate · Drug: Upadacitinib

Interventions

  • DrugPlacebo to Upadacitinib

    Tablet; Oral

  • DrugMethotrexate

    Capsule or Tablet; Oral

  • DrugPlacebo to Methotrexate

    Capsule or Tablet; Oral

  • DrugUpadacitinib

    Tablet; Oral

    Also known as: ABT-494, Rinvoq

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response at Week 12 - Global Analysis

    The primary endpoint for United States (US)/Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulatory purposes was ACR 50% response (ACR50) at Week 12. Participants who met the following 3 conditions for improvement from Baseline were classified as meeting the ACR50 response criteria: 1. ≥ 50% improvement in 68-tender joint count; 2. ≥ 50% improvement in 66-swollen joint count; and 3. ≥ 50% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: * Physician global assessment of disease activity * Patient global assessment of disease activity * Patient assessment of pain * Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) * High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP).

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

  2. Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission (CR) Based on DAS28(CRP) at Week 24 - Global Analysis

    The primary endpoint for European Union (EU)/European Medicines Agency (EMA) regulatory purposes was clinical remission, based on a Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28)-CRP score of \< 2.6 at Week 24. The DAS28 is a composite index used to assess rheumatoid arthritis disease activity, calculated based on the tender joint count (out of 28 evaluated joints), swollen joint count (out of 28 evaluated joints), Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (0-100 mm), and hsCRP (in mg/L). Scores on the DAS28 range from 0 to approximately 10, where higher scores indicate more disease activity. A DAS28 score less than 2.6 indicates clinical remission.

    Time frame: Week 24

  3. Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Week 12 - Global Analysis

    The primary endpoint for Japan/Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA) regulatory purposes was ACR 20% response (ACR20) at Week 12. Participants who met the following 3 conditions for improvement from Baseline were classified as meeting the ACR20 response criteria: 1. ≥ 20% improvement in 68-tender joint count; 2. ≥ 20% improvement in 66-swollen joint count; and 3. ≥ 20% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: * Physician global assessment of disease activity * Patient global assessment of disease activity * Patient assessment of pain * Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) * High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP).

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

  4. Change From Baseline in Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) at Week 24 - Global Analysis

    The second primary endpoint for Japan/PMDA regulatory purposes was change from baseline in mTSS at Week 24. The mTSS measures the level of joint damage from radiographs of the hands and feet. Joint erosion and joint space narrowing (JSN) were assessed by two independent, blinded readers. Joint erosion was assessed in 16 joints in each hand/wrist and 6 joints in each foot. Each joint was scored from 0 (no erosion) to 5 for hands/wrists or to 10 for feet (complete collapse). The total erosion score ranges from 0 to 280 (worst). JSN was assessed in 15 joints of each hand and wrist, and 6 joints of each foot, including subluxation, from 0 (normal) to 4 (complete loss of joint space, bony ankylosis, or luxation). The total JSN score ranges from 0 to 168 (worst). The mTSS is the sum of the joint erosion and JSN scores and ranges from 0 (normal) to 448 (worst). A change from Baseline greater than 0 indicates progression.

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 24

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline in DAS28 (CRP) at Week 12 - Global Analysis

    The DAS28 is a composite index used to assess rheumatoid arthritis disease activity, calculated based on the tender joint count (out of 28 evaluated joints), swollen joint count (out of 28 evaluated joints), Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (0-100 mm), and hsCRP (in mg/L). Scores on the DAS28 range from 0 to approximately 10, where higher scores indicate more disease activity. A negative change from Baseline in DAS28 (CRP) indicates improvement in disease activity.

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 12

  2. Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 12 - Global Analysis

    The Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index is a patient-reported questionnaire that measures the degree of difficulty a person has in accomplishing tasks in 8 functional areas (dressing, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reaching, gripping, and errands and chores) over the past week. Participants assessed their ability to do each task on a scale from 0 (without any difficulty) to 3 (unable to do). Scores were averaged to provide an overall score ranging from 0 to 3, where 0 represents no disability and 3 represents very severe, high-dependency disability. A negative change from Baseline in the overall score indicates improvement.

    Time frame: Baseline to week 12

  3. Percentage of Participants Achieving Low Disease Activity (LDA) Based on DAS28(CRP) at Week 12 - Global Analysis

    The DAS28(CRP) is a composite index used to assess rheumatoid arthritis disease activity, calculated based on the tender joint count (out of 28 evaluated joints), swollen joint count (out of 28 evaluated joints), Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (0-100 mm), and hsCRP (in mg/L). Scores on the DAS28 range from 0 to approximately 10, where higher scores indicate more disease activity. A DAS28(CRP) score less than or equal to 3.2 indicates low disease activity.

    Time frame: Week 12

  4. Change From Baseline in Short-Form 36 (SF-36) Physical Component Score (PCS) at Week 12 - Global Analysis

    The Short Form 36-Item Health Survey (SF-36) Version 2 is a self-administered questionnaire that measures the impact of disease on overall quality of life during the past 4 weeks. The SF-36 consists of 36 questions in eight domains (physical function, pain, general and mental health, vitality, social function, physical and emotional health). The physical component score is a weighted combination of the 8 subscales with positive weighting for physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, and general health. The PCS was calculated using norm-based scoring so that 50 is the average score and the standard deviation equals 10. Higher scores are associated with better functioning/quality of life; a positive change from baseline score indicates an improvement.

    Time frame: Baseline to week 12

  5. Change From Baseline in DAS28 (CRP) at Week 24 - Global Analysis

    The DAS28 is a composite index used to assess rheumatoid arthritis disease activity, calculated based on the tender joint count (out of 28 evaluated joints), swollen joint count (out of 28 evaluated joints), Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (0-100 mm), and hsCRP (in mg/L). Scores on the DAS28 range from 0 to approximately 10, where higher scores indicate more disease activity. A negative change from Baseline in DAS28 (CRP) indicates improvement in disease activity.

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 24

  6. Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 24 - Global Analysis

    The Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index is a patient-reported questionnaire that measures the degree of difficulty a person has in accomplishing tasks in 8 functional areas (dressing, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reaching, gripping, and errands and chores) over the past week. Participants assessed their ability to do each task on a scale from 0 (without any difficulty) to 3 (unable to do). Scores were averaged to provide an overall score ranging from 0 to 3, where 0 represents no disability and 3 represents very severe, high-dependency disability. A negative change from Baseline in the overall score indicates improvement.

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 24

  7. Percentage of Participants With an ACR50 Response at Week 24 - Global Analysis

    Participants who met the following 3 conditions for improvement from Baseline were classified as meeting the ACR50 response criteria: 1. ≥ 50% improvement in 68-tender joint count; 2. ≥ 50% improvement in 66-swollen joint count; and 3. ≥ 50% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: * Physician global assessment of disease activity * Patient global assessment of disease activity * Patient assessment of pain * Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) * High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP).

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 24

  8. Percentage of Participants Achieving Low Disease Activity (LDA) Based on DAS28(CRP) at Week 24 - Global Analysis

    The DAS28(CRP) is a composite index used to assess rheumatoid arthritis disease activity, calculated based on the tender joint count (out of 28 evaluated joints), swollen joint count (out of 28 evaluated joints), Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (0-100 mm), and hsCRP (in mg/L). Scores on the DAS28 range from 0 to approximately 10, where higher scores indicate more disease activity. A DAS28(CRP) score less than or equal to 3.2 indicates low disease activity.

    Time frame: Week 24

  9. Change From Baseline in Short-Form 36 (SF-36) Physical Component Score (PCS) at Week 24 - Global Analysis

    The Short Form 36-Item Health Survey (SF-36) Version 2 is a self-administered questionnaire that measures the impact of disease on overall quality of life during the past 4 weeks. The SF-36 consists of 36 questions in eight domains (physical function, pain, general and mental health, vitality, social function, physical and emotional health). The physical component score is a weighted combination of the 8 subscales with positive weighting for physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, and general health. The PCS was calculated using norm-based scoring so that 50 is the average score and the standard deviation equals 10. Higher scores are associated with better functioning/quality of life; a positive change from baseline score indicates an improvement.

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 24

  10. Percentage of Participants With No Radiographic Progression at Week 24 - Global Analysis

    No radiographic progression is defined as a change from Baseline in mTSS ≤ 0. The mTSS measures the level of joint damage from radiographs of the hands and feet. Joint erosion and joint space narrowing (JSN) were assessed by two independent, blinded readers. Joint erosion severity was assessed in 16 joints in each hand and wrist and 6 joints in each foot. Each joint was scored from 0 (no erosion) to 5 for hands/wrists or to 10 for feet (complete collapse). The total erosion score ranges from 0 to 280 (worst). Joint space narrowing (JSN) was assessed in 15 joints of each hand and wrist, and 6 joints of each foot, including subluxation, from 0 (normal) to 4 (complete loss of joint space, bony ankylosis, or luxation). The total JSN score ranges from 0 to 168 (worst). The mTSS is the sum of the joint erosion and JSN scores and ranges from 0 (normal) to 448 (worst).

    Time frame: Week 24

  11. Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response at Week 12 - Global Analysis

    Participants who met the following 3 conditions for improvement from Baseline were classified as meeting the ACR70 response criteria: 1. ≥ 70% improvement in 68-tender joint count; 2. ≥ 70% improvement in 66-swollen joint count; and 3. ≥ 70% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: * Physician global assessment of disease activity * Patient global assessment of disease activity * Patient assessment of pain * Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) * High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP).

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

  12. Percentage of Participants With an ACR20 Response at Week 24 - Global Analysis

    Participants who met the following 3 conditions for improvement from Baseline were classified as meeting the ACR20 response criteria: 1. ≥ 20% improvement in 68-tender joint count; 2. ≥ 20% improvement in 66-swollen joint count; and 3. ≥ 20% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: * Physician global assessment of disease activity * Patient global assessment of disease activity * Patient assessment of pain * Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) * High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP).

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 24

  13. Percentage of Participants With an ACR70 Response at Week 24 - Global Analysis

    Participants who met the following 3 conditions for improvement from Baseline were classified as meeting the ACR70 response criteria: 1. ≥ 70% improvement in 68-tender joint count; 2. ≥ 70% improvement in 66-swollen joint count; and 3. ≥ 70% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: * Physician global assessment of disease activity * Patient global assessment of disease activity * Patient assessment of pain * Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) * High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP).

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 24

  14. Percentage of Participants With an ACR20 Response at Week 12 - Japan Sub-study

    Participants who met the following 3 conditions for improvement from Baseline were classified as meeting the ACR20 response criteria: 1. ≥ 20% improvement in 68-tender joint count; 2. ≥ 20% improvement in 66-swollen joint count; and 3. ≥ 20% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: * Physician global assessment of disease activity * Patient global assessment of disease activity * Patient assessment of pain * Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) * High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP).

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

  15. Percentage of Participants With an ACR50 Response at Week 12 - Japan Sub-study

    Participants who met the following 3 conditions for improvement from Baseline were classified as meeting the ACR50 response criteria: 1. ≥ 50% improvement in 68-tender joint count; 2. ≥ 50% improvement in 66-swollen joint count; and 3. ≥ 50% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: * Physician global assessment of disease activity * Patient global assessment of disease activity * Patient assessment of pain * Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) * High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP).

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

  16. Percentage of Participants With an ACR70 Response at Week 12 - Japan Sub-study

    Participants who met the following 3 conditions for improvement from Baseline were classified as meeting the ACR70 response criteria: 1. ≥ 70% improvement in 68-tender joint count; 2. ≥ 70% improvement in 66-swollen joint count; and 3. ≥ 70% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: * Physician global assessment of disease activity * Patient global assessment of disease activity * Patient assessment of pain * Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) * High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP).

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

  17. Change From Baseline in DAS28 (CRP) at Week 12 - Japan Sub-study

    The DAS28 is a composite index used to assess rheumatoid arthritis disease activity, calculated based on the tender joint count (out of 28 evaluated joints), swollen joint count (out of 28 evaluated joints), Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (0-100 mm), and hsCRP (in mg/L). Scores on the DAS28 range from 0 to approximately 10, where higher scores indicate more disease activity. A negative change from Baseline in DAS28 (CRP) indicates improvement in disease activity.

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 12

  18. Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 12 - Japan Sub-study

    The Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index is a patient-reported questionnaire that measures the degree of difficulty a person has in accomplishing tasks in 8 functional areas (dressing, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reaching, gripping, and errands and chores) over the past week. Participants assessed their ability to do each task on a scale from 0 (without any difficulty) to 3 (unable to do). Scores were averaged to provide an overall score ranging from 0 to 3, where 0 represents no disability and 3 represents very severe, high-dependency disability. A negative change from Baseline in the overall score indicates improvement.

    Time frame: Baseline to week 12

  19. Change From Baseline in Short-Form 36 (SF-36) Physical Component Score (PCS) at Week 12 - Japan Sub-study

    The Short Form 36-Item Health Survey (SF-36) Version 2 is a self-administered questionnaire that measures the impact of disease on overall quality of life during the past 4 weeks. The SF-36 consists of 36 questions in eight domains (physical function, pain, general and mental health, vitality, social function, physical and emotional health). The physical component score is a weighted combination of the 8 subscales with positive weighting for physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, and general health. The PCS was calculated using norm-based scoring so that 50 is the average score and the standard deviation equals 10. Higher scores are associated with better functioning/quality of life; a positive change from baseline score indicates an improvement.

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 12

  20. Percentage of Participants Achieving Low Disease Activity (LDA) Based on DAS28(CRP) at Week 12 - Japan Sub-study

    The DAS28(CRP) is a composite index used to assess rheumatoid arthritis disease activity, calculated based on the tender joint count (out of 28 evaluated joints), swollen joint count (out of 28 evaluated joints), Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (0-100 mm), and hsCRP (in mg/L). Scores on the DAS28 range from 0 to approximately 10, where higher scores indicate more disease activity. A DAS28(CRP) score less than or equal to 3.2 indicates low disease activity.

    Time frame: Week 12

  21. Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission (CR) Based on DAS28(CRP) at Week 24 - Japan Sub-study

    The DAS28(CRP) is a composite index used to assess rheumatoid arthritis disease activity, calculated based on the tender joint count (out of 28 evaluated joints), swollen joint count (out of 28 evaluated joints), Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (0-100 mm), and hsCRP (in mg/L). Scores on the DAS28 range from 0 to approximately 10, where higher scores indicate more disease activity. A DAS28 score less than 2.6 indicates clinical remission.

    Time frame: Week 24

  22. Change From Baseline in Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) at Week 24 - Japan Sub-study

    The mTSS measures the level of joint damage from radiographs of the hands and feet. Joint erosion and joint space narrowing (JSN) were assessed by two independent, blinded readers. Joint erosion was assessed in 16 joints in each hand/wrist and 6 joints in each foot. Each joint was scored from 0 (no erosion) to 5 for hands/wrists or to 10 for feet (complete collapse). The total erosion score ranges from 0 to 280 (worst). JSN was assessed in 15 joints of each hand and wrist, and 6 joints of each foot, including subluxation, from 0 (normal) to 4 (complete loss of joint space, bony ankylosis, or luxation). The total JSN score ranges from 0 to 168 (worst). The mTSS is the sum of the joint erosion and JSN scores and ranges from 0 (normal) to 448 (worst). A change from Baseline greater than 0 indicates progression.

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 24

  23. Percentage of Participants With No Radiographic Progression at Week 24 - Japan Sub-study

    No radiographic progression is defined as a change from Baseline in mTSS ≤ 0. The mTSS measures the level of joint damage from radiographs of the hands and feet. Joint erosion and joint space narrowing (JSN) were assessed by two independent, blinded readers. Joint erosion severity was assessed in 16 joints in each hand and wrist and 6 joints in each foot. Each joint was scored from 0 (no erosion) to 5 for hands/wrists or to 10 for feet (complete collapse). The total erosion score ranges from 0 to 280 (worst). Joint space narrowing (JSN) was assessed in 15 joints of each hand and wrist, and 6 joints of each foot, including subluxation, from 0 (normal) to 4 (complete loss of joint space, bony ankylosis, or luxation). The total JSN score ranges from 0 to 168 (worst). The mTSS is the sum of the joint erosion and JSN scores and ranges from 0 (normal) to 448 (worst).

    Time frame: Week 24

07

Results

Posted Oct 4, 2019

Participant flow

Participants were randomized at 236 sites in 43 countries. The study included 2 periods and a Japan sub-study. The global study analysis included participants from Japan, but excluded the upadacitinib 7.5 mg group. The Japan sub-study included all participants from Japan, including the upadacitinib 7.5 mg group.

Period 1 (Weeks 1 to 48)
Participant flow — Period 1 (Weeks 1 to 48)
MilestoneMethotrexateUpadacitinib 7.5 mgUpadacitinib 15 mgUpadacitinib 30 mg
Started31555317315
Received study drug31455317314
Global analysis population3140317314
Japan sub-study28552728
Completed week 24 study drug26851290282
Received combination rescue therapy at week 26373199
Completed25651277271
Not completed5944044
Withdrew: Adverse event1531811
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject2201220
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up4065
Withdrew: Lack of efficacy12024
Withdrew: Other5123
Withdrew: Not dosed1001
Period 2 (Weeks 48 to 260)
Participant flow — Period 2 (Weeks 48 to 260)
MilestoneMethotrexateUpadacitinib 7.5 mgUpadacitinib 15 mgUpadacitinib 30 mg
Started25350275268
Received study drug24248273260
Completed16340217187
Not completed90105881
Withdrew: Adverse event1641126
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject3252327
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up170106
Withdrew: Lack of efficacy11011
Withdrew: Coronavirus disease of 2019 (covid-19) infection0003
Withdrew: Covid-19 logistic restrictions0021
Withdrew: Other1411117

Outcome measures

PrimaryPercentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response at Week 12 - Global Analysis

The primary endpoint for United States (US)/Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulatory purposes was ACR 50% response (ACR50) at Week 12. Participants who met the following 3 conditions for improvement from Baseline were classified as meeting the ACR50 response criteria: 1. ≥ 50% improvement in 68-tender joint count; 2. ≥ 50% improvement in 66-swollen joint count; and 3. ≥ 50% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: * Physician global assessment of disease activity * Patient global assessment of disease activity * Patient assessment of pain * Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) * High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP).

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 12
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response at Week 12 - Global Analysis
percentage of participantsMethotrexateUpadacitinib 15 mgUpadacitinib 30 mg
Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response at Week 12 - Global Analysis28.3 (23.4 to 33.3)52.1 (46.6 to 57.5)56.4 (50.9 to 61.9)
Statistical analysis
  • Methotrexate vs Upadacitinib 15 mg · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = <0.001 (The adjusted p-value under multiplicity control is reported, with significance achieved if the adjusted p-value is less than 0.05.) · Response rate difference: 23.7 · 95% CI 16.3 to 31.1Response Rate Difference = Upadacitinib - Methotrexate
  • Methotrexate vs Upadacitinib 30 mg · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = <0.001 (The adjusted p-value under multiplicity control is reported, with significance achieved if the adjusted p-value is less than 0.05.) · Response rate difference: 28.0 · 95% CI 20.6 to 35.4Response Rate Difference = Upadacitinib - Methotrexate
PrimaryPercentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission (CR) Based on DAS28(CRP) at Week 24 - Global Analysis

The primary endpoint for European Union (EU)/European Medicines Agency (EMA) regulatory purposes was clinical remission, based on a Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28)-CRP score of \< 2.6 at Week 24. The DAS28 is a composite index used to assess rheumatoid arthritis disease activity, calculated based on the tender joint count (out of 28 evaluated joints), swollen joint count (out of 28 evaluated joints), Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (0-100 mm), and hsCRP (in mg/L). Scores on the DAS28 range from 0 to approximately 10, where higher scores indicate more disease activity. A DAS28 score less than 2.6 indicates clinical remission.

Time frame:
Week 24
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission (CR) Based on DAS28(CRP) at Week 24 - Global Analysis
percentage of participantsMethotrexateUpadacitinib 15 mgUpadacitinib 30 mg
Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission (CR) Based on DAS28(CRP) at Week 24 - Global Analysis18.5 (14.2 to 22.8)48.3 (42.8 to 53.8)50.0 (44.5 to 55.5)
Statistical analysis
  • Methotrexate vs Upadacitinib 15 mg · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = <0.001 (The adjusted p-value under multiplicity control is reported, with significance achieved if the adjusted p-value is less than 0.05.) · Response rate difference: 29.8 · 95% CI 22.8 to 36.8Response Rate Difference = Upadacitinib - Methotrexate
  • Methotrexate vs Upadacitinib 30 mg · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = <0.001 · Response rate difference: 31.5 · 95% CI 24.5 to 38.5Response Rate Difference = Upadacitinib - Methotrexate
PrimaryPercentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Week 12 - Global Analysis

The primary endpoint for Japan/Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA) regulatory purposes was ACR 20% response (ACR20) at Week 12. Participants who met the following 3 conditions for improvement from Baseline were classified as meeting the ACR20 response criteria: 1. ≥ 20% improvement in 68-tender joint count; 2. ≥ 20% improvement in 66-swollen joint count; and 3. ≥ 20% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: * Physician global assessment of disease activity * Patient global assessment of disease activity * Patient assessment of pain * Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) * High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP).

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 12
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Week 12 - Global Analysis
percentage of participantsMethotrexateUpadacitinib 15 mgUpadacitinib 30 mg
Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Week 12 - Global Analysis54.1 (48.6 to 59.7)75.7 (71.0 to 80.4)77.1 (72.4 to 81.7)
Statistical analysis
  • Methotrexate vs Upadacitinib 15 mg · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = <0.001 (The adjusted p-value under multiplicity control is reported, with significance achieved if the adjusted p-value is less than 0.05.) · Response rate difference: 21.6 · 95% CI 14.3 to 28.8Response Rate Difference = Upadacitinib - Methotrexate
  • Methotrexate vs Upadacitinib 30 mg · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = <0.001 (The adjusted p-value under multiplicity control is reported, with significance achieved if the adjusted p-value is less than 0.05.) · Response rate difference: 22.9 · 95% CI 15.7 to 30.1Response Rate Difference = Upadacitinib - Methotrexate
PrimaryChange From Baseline in Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) at Week 24 - Global Analysis

The second primary endpoint for Japan/PMDA regulatory purposes was change from baseline in mTSS at Week 24. The mTSS measures the level of joint damage from radiographs of the hands and feet. Joint erosion and joint space narrowing (JSN) were assessed by two independent, blinded readers. Joint erosion was assessed in 16 joints in each hand/wrist and 6 joints in each foot. Each joint was scored from 0 (no erosion) to 5 for hands/wrists or to 10 for feet (complete collapse). The total erosion score ranges from 0 to 280 (worst). JSN was assessed in 15 joints of each hand and wrist, and 6 joints of each foot, including subluxation, from 0 (normal) to 4 (complete loss of joint space, bony ankylosis, or luxation). The total JSN score ranges from 0 to 168 (worst). The mTSS is the sum of the joint erosion and JSN scores and ranges from 0 (normal) to 448 (worst). A change from Baseline greater than 0 indicates progression.

Time frame:
Baseline to Week 24
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) at Week 24 - Global Analysis
units on a scaleMethotrexateUpadacitinib 15 mgUpadacitinib 30 mg
Change From Baseline in Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) at Week 24 - Global Analysis0.67 (0.43 to 0.90)0.14 (-0.09 to 0.37)0.07 (-0.16 to 0.31)
Statistical analysis
  • Methotrexate vs Upadacitinib 15 mg · ANCOVA · p = 0.001 (The adjusted p-value under multiplicity control is reported, with significance achieved if the adjusted p-value is less than 0.05.) · Least squares (ls) mean difference: -0.53 · 95% CI -0.85 to -0.20Difference = Upadacitinib - Methotrexate
  • Methotrexate vs Upadacitinib 30 mg · ANCOVA · p = <0.001 (The adjusted p-value under multiplicity control is reported, with significance achieved if the adjusted p-value is less than 0.05.) · Ls mean difference: -0.59 · 95% CI -0.91 to -0.27Difference = Upadacitinib - Methotrexate
SecondaryChange From Baseline in DAS28 (CRP) at Week 12 - Global Analysis

The DAS28 is a composite index used to assess rheumatoid arthritis disease activity, calculated based on the tender joint count (out of 28 evaluated joints), swollen joint count (out of 28 evaluated joints), Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (0-100 mm), and hsCRP (in mg/L). Scores on the DAS28 range from 0 to approximately 10, where higher scores indicate more disease activity. A negative change from Baseline in DAS28 (CRP) indicates improvement in disease activity.

Time frame:
Baseline to Week 12
Reported as:
Least squares mean · scores on a scale
Change From Baseline in DAS28 (CRP) at Week 12 - Global Analysis
scores on a scaleMethotrexateUpadacitinib 15 mgUpadacitinib 30 mg
Change From Baseline in DAS28 (CRP) at Week 12 - Global Analysis-1.85 (-2.00 to -1.69)-2.73 (-2.87 to -2.58)-2.85 (-3.00 to -2.70)
Statistical analysis
  • Methotrexate vs Upadacitinib 15 mg · ANCOVA · p = <0.001 (The nominal p-value is reported) · Ls mean difference: -0.88 · 95% CI -1.09 to -0.67ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as fixed factors and Baseline value as the covariate.
  • Methotrexate vs Upadacitinib 30 mg · ANCOVA · p = <0.001 (The nominal p-value is reported) · Ls mean difference: -1.01 · 95% CI -1.21 to -0.80Difference = Upadacitinib - Methotrexate
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 12 - Global Analysis

The Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index is a patient-reported questionnaire that measures the degree of difficulty a person has in accomplishing tasks in 8 functional areas (dressing, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reaching, gripping, and errands and chores) over the past week. Participants assessed their ability to do each task on a scale from 0 (without any difficulty) to 3 (unable to do). Scores were averaged to provide an overall score ranging from 0 to 3, where 0 represents no disability and 3 represents very severe, high-dependency disability. A negative change from Baseline in the overall score indicates improvement.

Time frame:
Baseline to week 12
Reported as:
Least squares mean · scores on a scale
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 12 - Global Analysis
scores on a scaleMethotrexateUpadacitinib 15 mgUpadacitinib 30 mg
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 12 - Global Analysis-0.49 (-0.55 to -0.42)-0.83 (-0.90 to -0.76)-0.86 (-0.93 to -0.79)
Statistical analysis
  • Methotrexate vs Upadacitinib 15 mg · ANCOVA · p = <0.001 (The nominal p-value is reported) · Ls mean difference: -0.34 · 95% CI -0.44 to -0.25Difference = Upadacitinib - Methotrexate
  • Methotrexate vs Upadacitinib 30 mg · ANCOVA · p = <0.001 (The nominal p-value is reported) · Ls mean difference: -0.37 · 95% CI -0.47 to -0.28Difference = Upadacitinib - Methotrexate
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Achieving Low Disease Activity (LDA) Based on DAS28(CRP) at Week 12 - Global Analysis

The DAS28(CRP) is a composite index used to assess rheumatoid arthritis disease activity, calculated based on the tender joint count (out of 28 evaluated joints), swollen joint count (out of 28 evaluated joints), Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (0-100 mm), and hsCRP (in mg/L). Scores on the DAS28 range from 0 to approximately 10, where higher scores indicate more disease activity. A DAS28(CRP) score less than or equal to 3.2 indicates low disease activity.

Time frame:
Week 12
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving Low Disease Activity (LDA) Based on DAS28(CRP) at Week 12 - Global Analysis
percentage of participantsMethotrexateUpadacitinib 15 mgUpadacitinib 30 mg
Percentage of Participants Achieving Low Disease Activity (LDA) Based on DAS28(CRP) at Week 12 - Global Analysis28.3 (23.4 to 33.3)53.3 (47.8 to 58.8)54.8 (49.3 to 60.3)
Statistical analysis
  • Methotrexate vs Upadacitinib 15 mg · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = <0.001 (The nominal p-value is reported) · Response rate difference: 25.0 · 95% CI 17.6 to 32.4Response Rate Difference = Upadacitinib - Methotrexate
  • Methotrexate vs Upadacitinib 30 mg · Chi-squared, Corrected · p = <0.001 (The nominal p-value is reported) · Response rate difference: 26.4 · 95% CI 19.0 to 33.9Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test adjusting for geographic region (North America, South/central America, Western Europe, Eastern Europe, Asia/other).
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Short-Form 36 (SF-36) Physical Component Score (PCS) at Week 12 - Global Analysis

The Short Form 36-Item Health Survey (SF-36) Version 2 is a self-administered questionnaire that measures the impact of disease on overall quality of life during the past 4 weeks. The SF-36 consists of 36 questions in eight domains (physical function, pain, general and mental health, vitality, social function, physical and emotional health). The physical component score is a weighted combination of the 8 subscales with positive weighting for physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, and general health. The PCS was calculated using norm-based scoring so that 50 is the average score and the standard deviation equals 10. Higher scores are associated with better functioning/quality of life; a positive change from baseline score indicates an improvement.

Time frame:
Baseline to week 12
Reported as:
Least squares mean · scores on a scale
Change From Baseline in Short-Form 36 (SF-36) Physical Component Score (PCS) at Week 12 - Global Analysis
scores on a scaleMethotrexateUpadacitinib 15 mgUpadacitinib 30 mg
Change From Baseline in Short-Form 36 (SF-36) Physical Component Score (PCS) at Week 12 - Global Analysis5.74 (4.84 to 6.64)9.99 (9.11 to 10.88)10.08 (9.19 to 10.98)
Statistical analysis
  • Methotrexate vs Upadacitinib 15 mg · ANCOVA · p = <0.001 (The nominal p-value is reported) · Ls mean difference: 4.25 · 95% CI 3.00 to 5.50Difference = Upadacitinib - Methotrexate
  • Methotrexate vs Upadacitinib 30 mg · ANCOVA · p = <0.001 (The nominal p-value is reported) · Ls mean difference: 4.34 · 95% CI 3.09 to 5.59Difference = Upadacitinib - Methotrexate
SecondaryChange From Baseline in DAS28 (CRP) at Week 24 - Global Analysis

The DAS28 is a composite index used to assess rheumatoid arthritis disease activity, calculated based on the tender joint count (out of 28 evaluated joints), swollen joint count (out of 28 evaluated joints), Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (0-100 mm), and hsCRP (in mg/L). Scores on the DAS28 range from 0 to approximately 10, where higher scores indicate more disease activity. A negative change from Baseline in DAS28 (CRP) indicates improvement in disease activity.

Time frame:
Baseline to Week 24
Reported as:
Least squares mean · scores on a scale
Change From Baseline in DAS28 (CRP) at Week 24 - Global Analysis
scores on a scaleMethotrexateUpadacitinib 15 mgUpadacitinib 30 mg
Change From Baseline in DAS28 (CRP) at Week 24 - Global Analysis-2.15 (-2.31 to -1.99)-3.07 (-3.21 to -2.92)-3.34 (-3.49 to -3.19)
Statistical analysis
  • Methotrexate vs Upadacitinib 15 mg · ANCOVA · p = <0.001 (The nominal p-value is reported) · Ls mean difference: -0.92 · 95% CI -1.12 to -0.71Difference = Upadacitinib - Methotrexate
  • Methotrexate vs Upadacitinib 30 mg · ANCOVA · p = <0.001 (The nominal p-value is reported) · Ls mean difference: -1.19 · 95% CI -1.40 to -0.99Difference = Upadacitinib - Methotrexate
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 24 - Global Analysis

The Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index is a patient-reported questionnaire that measures the degree of difficulty a person has in accomplishing tasks in 8 functional areas (dressing, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reaching, gripping, and errands and chores) over the past week. Participants assessed their ability to do each task on a scale from 0 (without any difficulty) to 3 (unable to do). Scores were averaged to provide an overall score ranging from 0 to 3, where 0 represents no disability and 3 represents very severe, high-dependency disability. A negative change from Baseline in the overall score indicates improvement.

Time frame:
Baseline to Week 24
Reported as:
Least squares mean · scores on a scale
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 24 - Global Analysis
scores on a scaleMethotrexateUpadacitinib 15 mgUpadacitinib 30 mg
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 24 - Global Analysis-0.60 (-0.67 to -0.52)-0.87 (-0.94 to -0.80)-0.91 (-0.98 to -0.84)
Statistical analysis
  • Methotrexate vs Upadacitinib 15 mg · ANCOVA · p = <0.001 (The nominal p-value is reported) · Ls mean difference: -0.27 · 95% CI -0.37 to -0.17Difference = Upadacitinib - Methotrexate
  • Methotrexate vs Upadacitinib 30 mg · ANCOVA · p = <0.001 (The nominal p-value is reported) · Ls mean difference: -0.31 · 95% CI -0.41 to -0.21Difference = Upadacitinib - Methotrexate
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With an ACR50 Response at Week 24 - Global Analysis

Participants who met the following 3 conditions for improvement from Baseline were classified as meeting the ACR50 response criteria: 1. ≥ 50% improvement in 68-tender joint count; 2. ≥ 50% improvement in 66-swollen joint count; and 3. ≥ 50% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: * Physician global assessment of disease activity * Patient global assessment of disease activity * Patient assessment of pain * Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) * High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP).

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 24
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With an ACR50 Response at Week 24 - Global Analysis
percentage of participantsMethotrexateUpadacitinib 15 mgUpadacitinib 30 mg
Percentage of Participants With an ACR50 Response at Week 24 - Global Analysis33.4 (28.2 to 38.7)60.3 (54.9 to 65.6)65.6 (60.4 to 70.9)
Statistical analysis
  • Methotrexate vs Upadacitinib 15 mg · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = <0.001 (The nominal p-value is reported) · Response rate difference: 26.8 · 95% CI 19.3 to 34.3Response Rate Difference = Upadacitinib - Methotrexate
  • Methotrexate vs Upadacitinib 30 mg · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = <0.001 (The nominal p-value is reported) · Response rate difference: 32.2 · 95% CI 24.8 to 39.6Response Rate Difference = Upadacitinib - Methotrexate
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Achieving Low Disease Activity (LDA) Based on DAS28(CRP) at Week 24 - Global Analysis

The DAS28(CRP) is a composite index used to assess rheumatoid arthritis disease activity, calculated based on the tender joint count (out of 28 evaluated joints), swollen joint count (out of 28 evaluated joints), Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (0-100 mm), and hsCRP (in mg/L). Scores on the DAS28 range from 0 to approximately 10, where higher scores indicate more disease activity. A DAS28(CRP) score less than or equal to 3.2 indicates low disease activity.

Time frame:
Week 24
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving Low Disease Activity (LDA) Based on DAS28(CRP) at Week 24 - Global Analysis
percentage of participantsMethotrexateUpadacitinib 15 mgUpadacitinib 30 mg
Percentage of Participants Achieving Low Disease Activity (LDA) Based on DAS28(CRP) at Week 24 - Global Analysis32.2 (27.0 to 37.3)59.9 (54.5 to 65.3)65.0 (59.7 to 70.2)
Statistical analysis
  • Methotrexate vs Upadacitinib 15 mg · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = <0.001 (The nominal p-value is reported) · Response rate difference: 27.8 · 95% CI 20.3 to 35.2Response Rate Difference = Upadacitinib - Methotrexate
  • Methotrexate vs Upadacitinib 30 mg · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = <0.001 (The nominal p-value is reported) · Response rate difference: 32.8 · 95% CI 25.4 to 40.2Response Rate Difference = Upadacitinib - Methotrexate
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Short-Form 36 (SF-36) Physical Component Score (PCS) at Week 24 - Global Analysis

The Short Form 36-Item Health Survey (SF-36) Version 2 is a self-administered questionnaire that measures the impact of disease on overall quality of life during the past 4 weeks. The SF-36 consists of 36 questions in eight domains (physical function, pain, general and mental health, vitality, social function, physical and emotional health). The physical component score is a weighted combination of the 8 subscales with positive weighting for physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, and general health. The PCS was calculated using norm-based scoring so that 50 is the average score and the standard deviation equals 10. Higher scores are associated with better functioning/quality of life; a positive change from baseline score indicates an improvement.

Time frame:
Baseline to Week 24
Reported as:
Least squares mean · scores on a scale
Change From Baseline in Short-Form 36 (SF-36) Physical Component Score (PCS) at Week 24 - Global Analysis
scores on a scaleMethotrexateUpadacitinib 15 mgUpadacitinib 30 mg
Change From Baseline in Short-Form 36 (SF-36) Physical Component Score (PCS) at Week 24 - Global Analysis6.97 (6.03 to 7.91)10.70 (9.76 to 11.63)11.39 (10.42 to 12.36)
Statistical analysis
  • Methotrexate vs Upadacitinib 15 mg · ANCOVA · p = <0.001 (The nominal p-value is reported) · Ls mean difference: 3.72 · 95% CI 2.42 to 5.03Difference = Upadacitinib - Methotrexate
  • Methotrexate vs Upadacitinib 30 mg · ANCOVA · p = <0.001 (The nominal p-value is reported) · Ls mean difference: 4.42 · 95% CI 3.12 to 5.72Difference = Upadacitinib - Methotrexate
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With No Radiographic Progression at Week 24 - Global Analysis

No radiographic progression is defined as a change from Baseline in mTSS ≤ 0. The mTSS measures the level of joint damage from radiographs of the hands and feet. Joint erosion and joint space narrowing (JSN) were assessed by two independent, blinded readers. Joint erosion severity was assessed in 16 joints in each hand and wrist and 6 joints in each foot. Each joint was scored from 0 (no erosion) to 5 for hands/wrists or to 10 for feet (complete collapse). The total erosion score ranges from 0 to 280 (worst). Joint space narrowing (JSN) was assessed in 15 joints of each hand and wrist, and 6 joints of each foot, including subluxation, from 0 (normal) to 4 (complete loss of joint space, bony ankylosis, or luxation). The total JSN score ranges from 0 to 168 (worst). The mTSS is the sum of the joint erosion and JSN scores and ranges from 0 (normal) to 448 (worst).

Time frame:
Week 24
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With No Radiographic Progression at Week 24 - Global Analysis
percentage of participantsMethotrexateUpadacitinib 15 mgUpadacitinib 30 mg
Percentage of Participants With No Radiographic Progression at Week 24 - Global Analysis77.7 (72.6 to 82.7)87.5 (83.6 to 91.3)89.3 (85.6 to 93.0)
Statistical analysis
  • Methotrexate vs Upadacitinib 15 mg · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.002 (The nominal p-value is reported) · Response rate difference: 9.8 · 95% CI 3.5 to 16.2Response Rate Difference = Upadacitinib - Methotrexate
  • Methotrexate vs Upadacitinib 30 mg · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = <0.001 (The nominal p-value is reported) · Response rate difference: 11.6 · 95% CI 5.4 to 17.8Response Rate Difference = Upadacitinib - Methotrexate
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response at Week 12 - Global Analysis

Participants who met the following 3 conditions for improvement from Baseline were classified as meeting the ACR70 response criteria: 1. ≥ 70% improvement in 68-tender joint count; 2. ≥ 70% improvement in 66-swollen joint count; and 3. ≥ 70% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: * Physician global assessment of disease activity * Patient global assessment of disease activity * Patient assessment of pain * Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) * High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP).

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 12
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response at Week 12 - Global Analysis
percentage of participantsMethotrexateUpadacitinib 15 mgUpadacitinib 30 mg
Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response at Week 12 - Global Analysis14.0 (10.2 to 17.9)32.5 (27.3 to 37.6)36.9 (31.6 to 42.3)
Statistical analysis
  • Methotrexate vs Upadacitinib 15 mg · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = <0.001 (The nominal p-value is reported) · Response rate difference: 18.5 · 95% CI 12.1 to 24.9Response Rate Difference = Upadacitinib - Methotrexate
  • Methotrexate vs Upadacitinib 30 mg · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = <0.001 (The nominal p-value is reported) · Response rate difference: 22.9 · 95% CI 16.4 to 29.5Response Rate Difference = Upadacitinib - Methotrexate
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With an ACR20 Response at Week 24 - Global Analysis

Participants who met the following 3 conditions for improvement from Baseline were classified as meeting the ACR20 response criteria: 1. ≥ 20% improvement in 68-tender joint count; 2. ≥ 20% improvement in 66-swollen joint count; and 3. ≥ 20% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: * Physician global assessment of disease activity * Patient global assessment of disease activity * Patient assessment of pain * Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) * High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP).

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 24
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With an ACR20 Response at Week 24 - Global Analysis
percentage of participantsMethotrexateUpadacitinib 15 mgUpadacitinib 30 mg
Percentage of Participants With an ACR20 Response at Week 24 - Global Analysis58.6 (53.2 to 64.0)78.9 (74.4 to 83.4)78.0 (73.4 to 82.6)
Statistical analysis
  • Methotrexate vs Upadacitinib 15 mg · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = <0.001 (The nominal p-value is reported) · Response rate difference: 20.3 · 95% CI 13.2 to 27.3Response Rate Difference = Upadacitinib - Methotrexate
  • Methotrexate vs Upadacitinib 30 mg · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = <0.001 (The nominal p-value is reported) · Response rate difference: 19.4 · 95% CI 12.3 to 26.5Response Rate Difference = Upadacitinib - Methotrexate
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With an ACR70 Response at Week 24 - Global Analysis

Participants who met the following 3 conditions for improvement from Baseline were classified as meeting the ACR70 response criteria: 1. ≥ 70% improvement in 68-tender joint count; 2. ≥ 70% improvement in 66-swollen joint count; and 3. ≥ 70% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: * Physician global assessment of disease activity * Patient global assessment of disease activity * Patient assessment of pain * Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) * High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP).

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 24
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With an ACR70 Response at Week 24 - Global Analysis
percentage of participantsMethotrexateUpadacitinib 15 mgUpadacitinib 30 mg
Percentage of Participants With an ACR70 Response at Week 24 - Global Analysis18.5 (14.2 to 22.8)44.5 (39.0 to 49.9)49.7 (44.2 to 55.2)
Statistical analysis
  • Methotrexate vs Upadacitinib 15 mg · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = <0.001 (The nominal p-value is reported) · Response rate difference: 26.0 · 95% CI 19.1 to 33.0Response Rate Difference = Upadacitinib - Methotrexate
  • Methotrexate vs Upadacitinib 30 mg · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = <0.001 (The nominal p-value is reported) · Response rate difference: 31.2 · 95% CI 24.2 to 38.2Response Rate Difference = Upadacitinib - Methotrexate
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With an ACR20 Response at Week 12 - Japan Sub-study

Participants who met the following 3 conditions for improvement from Baseline were classified as meeting the ACR20 response criteria: 1. ≥ 20% improvement in 68-tender joint count; 2. ≥ 20% improvement in 66-swollen joint count; and 3. ≥ 20% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: * Physician global assessment of disease activity * Patient global assessment of disease activity * Patient assessment of pain * Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) * High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP).

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 12
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With an ACR20 Response at Week 12 - Japan Sub-study
percentage of participantsMethotrexateUpadacitinib 7.5 mgUpadacitinib 15 mgUpadacitinib 30 mg
Percentage of Participants With an ACR20 Response at Week 12 - Japan Sub-study57.1 (38.8 to 75.5)85.5 (76.1 to 94.8)85.2 (71.8 to 98.6)78.6 (63.4 to 93.8)
Statistical analysis
  • Methotrexate vs Upadacitinib 7.5 mg · Chi-squared · p = 0.004 · Response rate difference: 28.3 · 95% CI 7.7 to 48.9Response Rate Difference = Upadacitinib - Methotrexate
  • Methotrexate vs Upadacitinib 15 mg · Chi-squared · p = 0.022 · Response rate difference: 28.0 · 95% CI 5.3 to 50.7Response Rate Difference = Upadacitinib - Methotrexate
  • Methotrexate vs Upadacitinib 30 mg · Chi-squared · p = 0.086 · Response rate difference: 21.4 · 95% CI -2.4 to 45.2Response Rate Difference = Upadacitinib - Methotrexate
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With an ACR50 Response at Week 12 - Japan Sub-study

Participants who met the following 3 conditions for improvement from Baseline were classified as meeting the ACR50 response criteria: 1. ≥ 50% improvement in 68-tender joint count; 2. ≥ 50% improvement in 66-swollen joint count; and 3. ≥ 50% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: * Physician global assessment of disease activity * Patient global assessment of disease activity * Patient assessment of pain * Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) * High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP).

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 12
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With an ACR50 Response at Week 12 - Japan Sub-study
percentage of participantsMethotrexateUpadacitinib 7.5 mgUpadacitinib 15 mgUpadacitinib 30 mg
Percentage of Participants With an ACR50 Response at Week 12 - Japan Sub-study21.4 (6.2 to 36.6)60.0 (47.1 to 72.9)66.7 (48.9 to 84.4)71.4 (54.7 to 88.2)
Statistical analysis
  • Methotrexate vs Upadacitinib 7.5 mg · Chi-squared · p = <0.001 · Response rate difference: 38.6 · 95% CI 18.6 to 58.5Response Rate Difference = Upadacitinib - Methotrexate
  • Methotrexate vs Upadacitinib 15 mg · Chi-squared · p = <0.001 · Response rate difference: 45.2 · 95% CI 21.8 to 68.6Response Rate Difference = Upadacitinib - Methotrexate
  • Methotrexate vs Upadacitinib 30 mg · Chi-squared · p = <0.001 · Response rate difference: 50.0 · 95% CI 27.4 to 72.6Response Rate Difference = Upadacitinib - Methotrexate
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With an ACR70 Response at Week 12 - Japan Sub-study

Participants who met the following 3 conditions for improvement from Baseline were classified as meeting the ACR70 response criteria: 1. ≥ 70% improvement in 68-tender joint count; 2. ≥ 70% improvement in 66-swollen joint count; and 3. ≥ 70% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: * Physician global assessment of disease activity * Patient global assessment of disease activity * Patient assessment of pain * Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) * High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP).

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 12
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With an ACR70 Response at Week 12 - Japan Sub-study
percentage of participantsMethotrexateUpadacitinib 7.5 mgUpadacitinib 15 mgUpadacitinib 30 mg
Percentage of Participants With an ACR70 Response at Week 12 - Japan Sub-study0.0 (0.0 to 0.0)34.5 (22.0 to 47.1)51.9 (33.0 to 70.7)64.3 (46.5 to 82.0)
Statistical analysis
  • Methotrexate vs Upadacitinib 7.5 mg · Chi-squared · p = <0.001 · Response rate difference: 34.5 · 95% CI 22.0 to 47.1Response Rate Difference = Upadacitinib - Methotrexate
  • Methotrexate vs Upadacitinib 15 mg · Chi-squared · p = <0.001 · Response rate difference: 51.9 · 95% CI 33.0 to 70.7Response Rate Difference = Upadacitinib - Methotrexate
  • Methotrexate vs Upadacitinib 30 mg · Chi-squared · p = <0.001 · Response rate difference: 64.3 · 95% CI 46.5 to 82.0Response Rate Difference = Upadacitinib - Methotrexate
SecondaryChange From Baseline in DAS28 (CRP) at Week 12 - Japan Sub-study

The DAS28 is a composite index used to assess rheumatoid arthritis disease activity, calculated based on the tender joint count (out of 28 evaluated joints), swollen joint count (out of 28 evaluated joints), Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (0-100 mm), and hsCRP (in mg/L). Scores on the DAS28 range from 0 to approximately 10, where higher scores indicate more disease activity. A negative change from Baseline in DAS28 (CRP) indicates improvement in disease activity.

Time frame:
Baseline to Week 12
Reported as:
Least squares mean · scores on a scale
Change From Baseline in DAS28 (CRP) at Week 12 - Japan Sub-study
scores on a scaleMethotrexateUpadacitinib 7.5 mgUpadacitinib 15 mgUpadacitinib 30 mg
Change From Baseline in DAS28 (CRP) at Week 12 - Japan Sub-study-1.42 (-1.82 to -1.03)-2.86 (-3.14 to -2.58)-3.28 (-3.68 to -2.89)-3.34 (-3.74 to -2.95)
Statistical analysis
  • Methotrexate vs Upadacitinib 7.5 mg · ANOVA · p = <0.001 · Ls mean difference: -1.43 · 95% CI -1.92 to -0.95Difference = Upadacitinib - Methotrexate
  • Methotrexate vs Upadacitinib 15 mg · ANOVA · p = <0.001 · Ls mean difference: -1.86 · 95% CI -2.42 to -1.30Difference = Upadacitinib - Methotrexate
  • Methotrexate vs Upadacitinib 30 mg · ANOVA · p = <0.001 · Ls mean difference: -1.92 · 95% CI -2.48 to -1.36Difference = Upadacitinib - Methotrexate
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 12 - Japan Sub-study

The Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index is a patient-reported questionnaire that measures the degree of difficulty a person has in accomplishing tasks in 8 functional areas (dressing, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reaching, gripping, and errands and chores) over the past week. Participants assessed their ability to do each task on a scale from 0 (without any difficulty) to 3 (unable to do). Scores were averaged to provide an overall score ranging from 0 to 3, where 0 represents no disability and 3 represents very severe, high-dependency disability. A negative change from Baseline in the overall score indicates improvement.

Time frame:
Baseline to week 12
Reported as:
Least squares mean · scores on a scale
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 12 - Japan Sub-study
scores on a scaleMethotrexateUpadacitinib 7.5 mgUpadacitinib 15 mgUpadacitinib 30 mg
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 12 - Japan Sub-study-0.20 (-0.37 to -0.04)-0.75 (-0.86 to -0.63)-0.95 (-1.12 to -0.78)-0.95 (-1.12 to -0.79)
Statistical analysis
  • Methotrexate vs Upadacitinib 7.5 mg · ANOVA · p = <0.001 · Ls mean difference: -0.54 · 95% CI -0.75 to -0.34Difference = Upadacitinib - Methotrexate
  • Methotrexate vs Upadacitinib 15 mg · ANOVA · p = <0.001 · Ls mean difference: -0.75 · 95% CI -0.99 to -0.51Difference = Upadacitinib - Methotrexate
  • Methotrexate vs Upadacitinib 30 mg · ANOVA · p = <0.001 · Ls mean difference: -0.75 · 95% CI -0.99 to -0.51Difference = Upadacitinib - Methotrexate
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Short-Form 36 (SF-36) Physical Component Score (PCS) at Week 12 - Japan Sub-study

The Short Form 36-Item Health Survey (SF-36) Version 2 is a self-administered questionnaire that measures the impact of disease on overall quality of life during the past 4 weeks. The SF-36 consists of 36 questions in eight domains (physical function, pain, general and mental health, vitality, social function, physical and emotional health). The physical component score is a weighted combination of the 8 subscales with positive weighting for physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, and general health. The PCS was calculated using norm-based scoring so that 50 is the average score and the standard deviation equals 10. Higher scores are associated with better functioning/quality of life; a positive change from baseline score indicates an improvement.

Time frame:
Baseline to Week 12
Reported as:
Least squares mean · scores on a scale
Change From Baseline in Short-Form 36 (SF-36) Physical Component Score (PCS) at Week 12 - Japan Sub-study
scores on a scaleMethotrexateUpadacitinib 7.5 mgUpadacitinib 15 mgUpadacitinib 30 mg
Change From Baseline in Short-Form 36 (SF-36) Physical Component Score (PCS) at Week 12 - Japan Sub-study2.87 (0.56 to 5.18)8.84 (7.18 to 10.50)10.79 (8.48 to 13.09)9.63 (7.13 to 12.13)
Statistical analysis
  • Methotrexate vs Upadacitinib 7.5 mg · ANOVA · p = <0.001 · Ls mean difference: 5.97 · 95% CI 3.15 to 8.80Difference = Upadacitinib - Methotrexate
  • Methotrexate vs Upadacitinib 15 mg · ANOVA · p = <0.001 · Ls mean difference: 7.92 · 95% CI 4.66 to 11.19Difference = Upadacitinib - Methotrexate
  • Methotrexate vs Upadacitinib 30 mg · ANOVA · p = <0.001 · Ls mean difference: 6.76 · 95% CI 3.33 to 10.20Difference = Upadacitinib - Methotrexate
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Achieving Low Disease Activity (LDA) Based on DAS28(CRP) at Week 12 - Japan Sub-study

The DAS28(CRP) is a composite index used to assess rheumatoid arthritis disease activity, calculated based on the tender joint count (out of 28 evaluated joints), swollen joint count (out of 28 evaluated joints), Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (0-100 mm), and hsCRP (in mg/L). Scores on the DAS28 range from 0 to approximately 10, where higher scores indicate more disease activity. A DAS28(CRP) score less than or equal to 3.2 indicates low disease activity.

Time frame:
Week 12
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving Low Disease Activity (LDA) Based on DAS28(CRP) at Week 12 - Japan Sub-study
percentage of participantsMethotrexateUpadacitinib 7.5 mgUpadacitinib 15 mgUpadacitinib 30 mg
Percentage of Participants Achieving Low Disease Activity (LDA) Based on DAS28(CRP) at Week 12 - Japan Sub-study17.9 (3.7 to 32.0)69.1 (56.9 to 81.3)77.8 (62.1 to 93.5)78.6 (63.4 to 93.8)
Statistical analysis
  • Methotrexate vs Upadacitinib 7.5 mg · Chi-squared · p = <0.001 · Response rate difference: 51.2 · 95% CI 32.5 to 70.0Response Rate Difference = Upadacitinib - Methotrexate
  • Methotrexate vs Upadacitinib 15 mg · Chi-squared · p = <0.001 · Response rate difference: 59.9 · 95% CI 38.8 to 81.1Response Rate Difference = Upadacitinib - Methotrexate
  • Methotrexate vs Upadacitinib 30 mg · Chi-squared · p = <0.001 · Response rate difference: 60.7 · 95% CI 39.9 to 81.5Response Rate Difference = Upadacitinib - Methotrexate
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission (CR) Based on DAS28(CRP) at Week 24 - Japan Sub-study

The DAS28(CRP) is a composite index used to assess rheumatoid arthritis disease activity, calculated based on the tender joint count (out of 28 evaluated joints), swollen joint count (out of 28 evaluated joints), Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (0-100 mm), and hsCRP (in mg/L). Scores on the DAS28 range from 0 to approximately 10, where higher scores indicate more disease activity. A DAS28 score less than 2.6 indicates clinical remission.

Time frame:
Week 24
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission (CR) Based on DAS28(CRP) at Week 24 - Japan Sub-study
percentage of participantsMethotrexateUpadacitinib 7.5 mgUpadacitinib 15 mgUpadacitinib 30 mg
Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission (CR) Based on DAS28(CRP) at Week 24 - Japan Sub-study17.9 (3.7 to 32.0)67.3 (54.9 to 79.7)70.4 (53.1 to 87.6)82.1 (68.0 to 96.3)
Statistical analysis
  • Methotrexate vs Upadacitinib 7.5 mg · Chi-squared · p = <0.001 · Response rate difference: 49.4 · 95% CI 30.6 to 68.3Response Rate Difference = Upadacitinib - Methotrexate
  • Methotrexate vs Upadacitinib 15 mg · Chi-squared · p = <0.001 · Response rate difference: 52.5 · 95% CI 30.2 to 74.8Response Rate Difference = Upadacitinib - Methotrexate
  • Methotrexate vs Upadacitinib 30 mg · Chi-squared · p = <0.001 · Response rate difference: 64.3 · 95% CI 44.2 to 84.3Response Rate Difference = Upadacitinib - Methotrexate
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) at Week 24 - Japan Sub-study

The mTSS measures the level of joint damage from radiographs of the hands and feet. Joint erosion and joint space narrowing (JSN) were assessed by two independent, blinded readers. Joint erosion was assessed in 16 joints in each hand/wrist and 6 joints in each foot. Each joint was scored from 0 (no erosion) to 5 for hands/wrists or to 10 for feet (complete collapse). The total erosion score ranges from 0 to 280 (worst). JSN was assessed in 15 joints of each hand and wrist, and 6 joints of each foot, including subluxation, from 0 (normal) to 4 (complete loss of joint space, bony ankylosis, or luxation). The total JSN score ranges from 0 to 168 (worst). The mTSS is the sum of the joint erosion and JSN scores and ranges from 0 (normal) to 448 (worst). A change from Baseline greater than 0 indicates progression.

Time frame:
Baseline to Week 24
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) at Week 24 - Japan Sub-study
units on a scaleMethotrexateUpadacitinib 7.5 mgUpadacitinib 15 mgUpadacitinib 30 mg
Change From Baseline in Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) at Week 24 - Japan Sub-study2.64 (1.19 to 4.09)0.95 (-0.09 to 1.98)0.24 (-1.21 to 1.69)0.19 (-1.31 to 1.70)
Statistical analysis
  • Methotrexate vs Upadacitinib 7.5 mg · ANOVA · p = 0.063 · Ls mean difference: -1.69 · 95% CI -3.47 to 0.09Difference = Upadacitinib - Methotrexate
  • Methotrexate vs Upadacitinib 15 mg · ANOVA · p = 0.022 · Ls mean difference: -2.40 · 95% CI -4.45 to -0.35Difference = Upadacitinib - Methotrexate
  • Methotrexate vs Upadacitinib 30 mg · ANOVA · p = 0.022 · Ls mean difference: -2.45 · 95% CI -4.54 to -0.35Difference = Upadacitinib - Methotrexate
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With No Radiographic Progression at Week 24 - Japan Sub-study

No radiographic progression is defined as a change from Baseline in mTSS ≤ 0. The mTSS measures the level of joint damage from radiographs of the hands and feet. Joint erosion and joint space narrowing (JSN) were assessed by two independent, blinded readers. Joint erosion severity was assessed in 16 joints in each hand and wrist and 6 joints in each foot. Each joint was scored from 0 (no erosion) to 5 for hands/wrists or to 10 for feet (complete collapse). The total erosion score ranges from 0 to 280 (worst). Joint space narrowing (JSN) was assessed in 15 joints of each hand and wrist, and 6 joints of each foot, including subluxation, from 0 (normal) to 4 (complete loss of joint space, bony ankylosis, or luxation). The total JSN score ranges from 0 to 168 (worst). The mTSS is the sum of the joint erosion and JSN scores and ranges from 0 (normal) to 448 (worst).

Time frame:
Week 24
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With No Radiographic Progression at Week 24 - Japan Sub-study
percentage of participantsMethotrexateUpadacitinib 7.5 mgUpadacitinib 15 mgUpadacitinib 30 mg
Percentage of Participants With No Radiographic Progression at Week 24 - Japan Sub-study46.2 (27.0 to 65.3)82.4 (71.9 to 92.8)80.8 (65.6 to 95.9)79.2 (62.9 to 95.4)
Statistical analysis
  • Methotrexate vs Upadacitinib 7.5 mg · Chi-squared · p = 0.001 · Response rate difference: 36.2 · 95% CI 14.4 to 58.0Response Rate Difference = Upadacitinib - Methotrexate
  • Methotrexate vs Upadacitinib 15 mg · Chi-squared · p = 0.010 · Response rate difference: 34.6 · 95% CI 10.2 to 59.0Response Rate Difference = Upadacitinib - Methotrexate
  • Methotrexate vs Upadacitinib 30 mg · Chi-squared · p = 0.016 · Response rate difference: 33.0 · 95% CI 7.9 to 58.1Response Rate Difference = Upadacitinib - Methotrexate

Adverse events

Collected over From first dose of study drug up to 30 days after last dose, maximum of 264 weeks; Adverse events (AEs) are reported for Weeks 1 to 24, Weeks 1 to 260, and After Switch for participants who transitioned from upadacitinib 30 mg QD to 15 mg QD after implementation of Protocol Amendment 6 in December 2019.. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Weeks 1-24: Methotrexate Monotherapy1/314 (0.3%)13/314 (4.1%)159/314 (50.6%)
Weeks 1-24: Upadacitinib 7.5 mg Monotherapy0/55 (0%)5/55 (9.1%)38/55 (69.1%)
Weeks 1-24: Upadacitinib 15 mg Monotherapy2/317 (0.6%)16/317 (5%)169/317 (53.3%)
Weeks 1-24: Upadacitinib 30 mg Monotherapy3/314 (1%)20/314 (6.4%)174/314 (55.4%)
Weeks 1-260: Methotrexate Monotherapy8/314 (2.5%)49/314 (15.6%)234/314 (74.5%)
Weeks 1-260: Upadacitinib 7.5 mg Monotherapy1/55 (1.8%)13/55 (23.6%)52/55 (94.5%)
Weeks 1-260: Upadacitinib 15 mg Monotherapy6/317 (1.9%)68/317 (21.5%)242/317 (76.3%)
Weeks 1-260/Switch: Upadacitinib 30 mg Monotherapy9/314 (2.9%)71/314 (22.6%)256/314 (81.5%)
Weeks 1-260: Any Upadacitinib 7.5 mg1/56 (1.8%)15/56 (26.8%)55/56 (98.2%)
Weeks 1-260: Any Upadacitinib 15 mg6/335 (1.8%)88/335 (26.3%)272/335 (81.2%)
Weeks 1-260/Switch: Any Upadacitinib 30 mg10/332 (3%)79/332 (23.8%)277/332 (83.4%)
After Switch: Upadacitinib 15 mg Monotherapy5/181 (2.8%)28/181 (15.5%)100/181 (55.2%)
After Switch: Any Upadacitinib 15 mg7/218 (3.2%)35/218 (16.1%)126/218 (57.8%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 252
Most frequent serious events
EventWeeks 1-24: Methotrexate MonotherapyWeeks 1-24: Upadacitinib 7.5 mg MonotherapyWeeks 1-24: Upadacitinib 15 mg MonotherapyWeeks 1-24: Upadacitinib 30 mg MonotherapyWeeks 1-260: Methotrexate MonotherapyWeeks 1-260: Upadacitinib 7.5 mg MonotherapyWeeks 1-260: Upadacitinib 15 mg MonotherapyWeeks 1-260/Switch: Upadacitinib 30 mg MonotherapyWeeks 1-260: Any Upadacitinib 7.5 mgWeeks 1-260: Any Upadacitinib 15 mgWeeks 1-260/Switch: Any Upadacitinib 30 mgAfter Switch: Upadacitinib 15 mg MonotherapyAfter Switch: Any Upadacitinib 15 mg
COVID-19 PNEUMONIAInfections and infestations0/3140/550/3170/3141/3140/552/3172/3140/563/3352/3328/18112/218
PYELONEPHRITIS ACUTEInfections and infestations0/3141/550/3170/3140/3142/550/3170/3142/560/3350/3320/1810/218
PNEUMONIAInfections and infestations2/3140/552/3172/3143/3141/558/3175/3141/569/3355/3321/1812/218
CARDIAC TAMPONADECardiac disorders0/3141/550/3170/3140/3141/550/3170/3141/560/3350/3320/1810/218
PERICARDITISCardiac disorders0/3141/550/3170/3140/3141/550/3170/3141/560/3350/3320/1810/218
GASTRIC ULCER HAEMORRHAGEGastrointestinal disorders0/3141/550/3170/3140/3141/550/3170/3141/560/3350/3320/1810/218
GASTRITISGastrointestinal disorders0/3140/550/3170/3140/3141/550/3170/3141/560/3350/3320/1810/218
SALIVARY GLAND CALCULUSGastrointestinal disorders0/3140/550/3170/3140/3141/550/3170/3141/560/3350/3320/1810/218
COVID-19Infections and infestations0/3140/550/3170/3140/3141/550/3171/3141/562/3351/3322/1813/218
KERATITIS BACTERIALInfections and infestations0/3140/550/3170/3140/3141/550/3170/3141/560/3350/3320/1810/218
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 71
Most frequent other events
EventWeeks 1-24: Methotrexate MonotherapyWeeks 1-24: Upadacitinib 7.5 mg MonotherapyWeeks 1-24: Upadacitinib 15 mg MonotherapyWeeks 1-24: Upadacitinib 30 mg MonotherapyWeeks 1-260: Methotrexate MonotherapyWeeks 1-260: Upadacitinib 7.5 mg MonotherapyWeeks 1-260: Upadacitinib 15 mg MonotherapyWeeks 1-260/Switch: Upadacitinib 30 mg MonotherapyWeeks 1-260: Any Upadacitinib 7.5 mgWeeks 1-260: Any Upadacitinib 15 mgWeeks 1-260/Switch: Any Upadacitinib 30 mgAfter Switch: Upadacitinib 15 mg MonotherapyAfter Switch: Any Upadacitinib 15 mg
NASOPHARYNGITISInfections and infestations13/3145/5518/31717/31443/31422/5548/31751/31425/5657/33558/3328/18110/218
HERPES ZOSTERInfections and infestations1/3142/557/3177/3147/31412/5532/31724/31413/5634/33527/3327/1818/218
PHARYNGITISInfections and infestations6/3145/554/3178/31416/31412/5512/31717/31413/5614/33518/3323/1814/218
INFLUENZAInfections and infestations1/3142/551/3173/3147/3148/555/3179/31410/569/33511/3322/1812/218
CONTUSIONInjury, poisoning and procedural complications2/3141/552/3172/3148/3148/5510/3175/31410/5611/3355/3323/1815/218
UPPER RESPIRATORY TRACT INFECTIONInfections and infestations14/3143/5520/31723/31431/3149/5549/31743/3149/5659/33551/3325/1817/218
BLOOD CREATINE PHOSPHOKINASE INCREASEDInvestigations2/3142/559/31734/31410/3143/5537/31751/3145/5646/33554/33210/18112/218
BRONCHITISInfections and infestations6/3140/557/3175/31424/3147/5522/31727/3149/5633/33529/3325/1817/218
GASTROENTERITISInfections and infestations7/3142/555/3175/31412/3148/5511/31710/3149/5613/33510/3321/1811/218
HYPERTENSIONVascular disorders8/3143/5512/31714/31431/3148/5536/31744/3149/5643/33547/3328/18110/218

Baseline characteristics

The full analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)MethotrexateUpadacitinib 7.5 mgUpadacitinib 15 mgUpadacitinib 30 mgTotal
Mean53.3 ± 12.8959.7 ± 13.851.9 ± 12.5854.9 ± 12.5853.7 ± 12.86
Age, Customized
Age, Customized(Participants)MethotrexateUpadacitinib 7.5 mgUpadacitinib 15 mgUpadacitinib 30 mgTotal
< 40 years5056034149
40 - 65 years20625204212647
≥ 65 years58255368204
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)MethotrexateUpadacitinib 7.5 mgUpadacitinib 15 mgUpadacitinib 30 mgTotal
Female24036241240757
Male74197674243
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)MethotrexateUpadacitinib 7.5 mgUpadacitinib 15 mgUpadacitinib 30 mgTotal
Hispanic or Latino1020107107316
Not Hispanic or Latino21255210207684
Unknown or Not Reported00000
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)MethotrexateUpadacitinib 7.5 mgUpadacitinib 15 mgUpadacitinib 30 mgTotal
White2560256254766
Black or African American12081333
American Indian/Alaska Native208717
Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander20316
Asian37553534161
Multiple507517
Geographic Region
Geographic Region(Participants)MethotrexateUpadacitinib 7.5 mgUpadacitinib 15 mgUpadacitinib 30 mgTotal
North America4604846140
South/Central America9009191272
Western Europe3703636109
Eastern Europe8508787259
Asia-Japan28552728138
Asia - China10113
Asia - Other30429
Other240232370
Duration of Rheumatoid Arthritis Diagnosis
Duration of Rheumatoid Arthritis Diagnosis(years)MethotrexateUpadacitinib 7.5 mgUpadacitinib 15 mgUpadacitinib 30 mgTotal
Mean2.6 ± 5.142.3 ± 5.772.9 ± 5.382.8 ± 5.632.7 ± 5.40
Tender Joint Count
Tender Joint Count(tender joints)MethotrexateUpadacitinib 7.5 mgUpadacitinib 15 mgUpadacitinib 30 mgTotal
Mean26.4 ± 16.1518.0 ± 11.7525.4 ± 14.4225.2 ± 14.9925.3 ± 15.12

8 further baseline measures are reported on the registry.

08

Study locations

290 sites
  • TriWest Research Associates- La Mesa /ID# 143738
    La Mesa, California 91942, United States
  • Desert Medical Advances /ID# 143730
    Palm Desert, California 92260, United States
  • International Medical Research - Daytona /ID# 143748
    Daytona Beach, Florida 32117, United States
  • FL Med Ctr and Research, Inc. /ID# 143724
    Miami, Florida 33142, United States
  • Millennium Research /ID# 143736
    Ormond Beach, Florida 32174, United States
  • Arthritis Research of Florida /ID# 143743
    Palm Harbor, Florida 34684-2672, United States
  • Sarasota Arthritis Center /ID# 145978
    Sarasota, Florida 34239, United States
  • FL Med Clinic, PA /ID# 143744
    Zephyrhills, Florida 33542, United States
  • Deerbrook Medical Associates /ID# 143728
    Vernon Hills, Illinois 60061, United States
  • Four Rivers Clinical Research /ID# 143741
    Paducah, Kentucky 42003, United States
  • Ocean Rheumatology, PA /ID# 143737
    Toms River, New Jersey 08755, United States
  • Arthritis Rheumatic Back Disorder /ID# 143733
    Voorhees, New Jersey 08043, United States
  • Trinity Health Med Arts Clinic /ID# 143727
    Minot, North Dakota 58701, United States
  • STAT Research, Inc. /ID# 143750
    Vandalia, Ohio 45377-9464, United States
  • Healthcare Research Consultant /ID# 143747
    Tulsa, Oklahoma 74135, United States
  • Advanced Rheumatology & Arthri /ID# 147947
    Wexford, Pennsylvania 15090, United States
  • Articularis Healthcare Group, Inc d/b/a Low Country Rheumatology /ID# 145653
    Summerville, South Carolina 29486-7887, United States
  • West Tennessee Research Inst /ID# 143723
    Jackson, Tennessee 38305, United States
  • Dr. Ramesh Gupta /ID# 143732
    Memphis, Tennessee 38119, United States
  • Diagnostic Group Integrated He /ID# 152921
    Beaumont, Texas 77701, United States
  • Adriana Pop-Moody MD Clinic PA /ID# 147626
    Corpus Christi, Texas 78404, United States
  • Doctor's Hosp at Renaissance /ID# 156407
    Edinburg, Texas 78539, United States
  • MedResearch Inc. /ID# 156409
    El Paso, Texas 79935, United States
  • Rheumatic Disease Clin Res Ctr /ID# 151103
    Houston, Texas 77004, United States
  • Accurate Clinical Research /ID# 143749
    Houston, Texas 77089, United States
  • SW Rheumatology Res. LLC /ID# 143745
    Mesquite, Texas 75150, United States
  • Sun Research Institute /ID# 159546
    San Antonio, Texas 78215, United States
  • Accurate Clinical Management /ID# 159543
    San Antonio, Texas 78229, United States
  • NextGen Clinical Trials LLP /ID# 150930
    San Antonio, Texas 78229, United States
  • Arthritis Clinic of Central TX /ID# 159541
    San Marcos, Texas 78666, United States
  • Arthritis & Osteoporosis Clinic /ID# 159542
    Waco, Texas 76710, United States
  • Arthritis Clinic of N. VA, P.C /ID# 143734
    Arlington, Virginia 22205, United States
  • Aprillus Asistencia e Investig /ID# 149179
    Capital Federal, Buenos Aires 1046, Argentina
  • Iari /Id# 148595
    San isidro, Buenos Aires 1646, Argentina
  • Instituto CAICI /ID# 143141
    Rosario, Santa FE 2000, Argentina
  • Org Medica de Investigacion /ID# 143142
    Buenos Aires, C1015ABO, Argentina
  • Consultora Integral de Salud S /ID# 143144
    Cordoba, 5900, Argentina
  • Centro Integral de Reumatologi /ID# 143143
    San Miguel de Tucuman, 4000, Argentina
  • Centro Medico Privado/Reuma /ID# 143140
    San Miguel de Tucuman, 4000, Argentina
  • Royal Prince Alfred Hospital /ID# 143149
    Camperdown, New South Wales 2050, Australia
  • Rheumatology Research Unit /ID# 143147
    Maroochydore, Queensland 4558, Australia
  • The Queen Elizabeth Hospital /ID# 143148
    Woodville, South Australia 5011, Australia
  • Southern Clinical Research Pty /ID# 143150
    Hobart, Tasmania 7000, Australia
  • Emeritus Research /ID# 143146
    Camberwell, Victoria 3124, Australia
  • First City Clinical Hospital /ID# 159020
    Minsk, 220013, Belarus
  • City Clinical Hospital #9 /ID# 145650
    Minsk, 220116, Belarus
  • Rhumaconsult SPRL /ID# 143158
    Charleroi, Hainaut 6000, Belgium
  • Algemeen Stedelijk Ziekenhuis /ID# 153504
    Aalst, Oost-Vlaanderen 9300, Belgium
  • UZ Gent /ID# 143157
    Gent, Oost-Vlaanderen 9000, Belgium
  • ReumaClinic Genk /ID# 143159
    Genk, 3600, Belgium
  • CHU Ambroise Pare /ID# 152955
    Mons, 7000, Belgium
  • University Clinical Centre of the Republic of Srpska /ID# 143161
    Banja Luka, Republika Srpska 78000, Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • University Clinical Centre of the Republic of Srpska /ID# 143162
    Banja Luka, Republika Srpska 78000, Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Clinical Center University of Sarajevo /ID# 143164
    Sarajevo, 71000, Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • CIP - Centro Internacional de Pesquisa /ID# 143171
    Goiânia, Goias 74110-120, Brazil
  • Ceti - Centro de Estudos Em Terapias Inovadoras Ltda /Id# 143169
    Curitiba, Parana 80030-110, Brazil
  • Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre /ID# 143168
    Porto Alegre, Rio Grande Do Sul 90035-903, Brazil
  • LMK Sevicos Medicos S/S /ID# 143167
    Porto Alegre, Rio Grande Do Sul 90480-000, Brazil
  • CEPIC - Centro Paulista de Investigação Clínica e Serviços Médicos Ltda /ID# 143166
    São Paulo, Sao Paulo 04266-010, Brazil
  • CCBR Brasil /ID# 150925
    Rio de Janeiro, 22271-100, Brazil
  • MHAT Trimontsium /ID# 143173
    Plovdiv, 4000, Bulgaria
  • UMHAT Pulmed OOD /ID# 143176
    Plovdiv, 4000, Bulgaria
  • MHAT Kaspela /ID# 143172
    Plovdiv, 4001, Bulgaria
  • Diagnostic Consultative Center /ID# 143174
    Sofia, 1612, Bulgaria
  • UMHAT Sv. Ivan Rilski /ID# 143175
    Sofia, 1612, Bulgaria
  • Rheumatology Research Assoc /ID# 143206
    Edmonton, Alberta T5M 0H4, Canada
  • Manitoba Clinic /ID# 143203
    Winnipeg, Manitoba R3A IM3, Canada
  • Ciads /Id# 143205
    Winnipeg, Manitoba R3N 0K6, Canada
  • CA Ctr for Clin Trials CCCT /ID# 159080
    Thornhill, Ontario L4J 1W3, Canada
  • Ctr. de Rheum de l'est du QC /ID# 151317
    Rimouski, Quebec G5L 8W1, Canada
  • Ctr de Inv Clinica del Sur /ID# 143208
    Temuco, Araucania 4781156, Chile
  • Someal /Id# 143207
    Providencia, Santiago 7510186, Chile
  • Quantum Research LTDA. /ID# 143210
    Puerto Varas, 5550170, Chile
  • Quantum Research Stgo. /ID# 145651
    Santiago, 7500588, Chile
  • Soc. de Prestaciones medicas y Paramedicas Goecke /ID# 143209
    Santiago, 7510047, Chile
  • Investigaciones Medicas SSMSO /ID# 151685
    Santiago, 8207257, Chile
  • Centro de Estudios Clinicos Qu /ID# 152913
    Vina Del Mar, Chile
  • 1st Aff Hosp of Bengbu Med Col /ID# 162974
    Bengbu, Anhui 233099, China
  • The 1st Aff Hosp Xiamen Univ /ID# 162076
    Xiamen, Fujian 361003, China
  • 1st Aff Hosp of Shantou Univ /ID# 162968
    Shantou, Guangdong 515041, China
  • Centro de Investigacion en Reumatologia y Especialidades Medicas- CIREEM SAS /ID# 143214
    Bogota, Cundinamarca 110221, Colombia
  • Ctr Int de Reum del Caribe SAS /ID# 143211
    Barranquilla, 80002, Colombia
  • Riesgo de Fractura S.A - CAYRE /ID# 143212
    Bogota, 110221, Colombia
  • Simedics IPS SAS /ID# 152572
    Bogota, 110221, Colombia
  • Fund Inst de Reum F. Chalem /ID# 159544
    Bogotá, Colombia
  • Medicity S.A.S. /ID# 143213
    Bucaramanga, 680003, Colombia
  • Klinicki bolnicki centar Split /ID# 143216
    Split, 21000, Croatia
  • Clinical Hospital Dubrava /ID# 143217
    Zagreb, 10000, Croatia
  • Medical Center Kuna-Peric /ID# 143218
    Zagreb, 10000, Croatia
  • Poliklinika Bonifarm /ID# 143215
    Zagreb, 10000, Croatia
  • L.K.N. Arthrocentrum, s.r.o /ID# 143224
    Hlučín, Moravskoslezsky Kraj 748 01, Czechia
  • CTCenter MaVe, s.r.o. /ID# 143226
    Olomouc, Olomoucky Kraj 779 00, Czechia
  • Nuselská poliklinika, Revmatologie /ID# 143232
    Prague 4, Praha 4 140 00, Czechia
  • Nuselská poliklinika, Revmatologie /ID# 143233
    Prague 4, Praha 4 140 00, Czechia
  • Thomayerova nemocnice /ID# 143228
    Prague, Praha 4 140 59, Czechia
  • PV MEDICAL Services s.r.o. /ID# 143234
    Zlín 1, Zlin 760 01, Czechia
  • RHEUMA s.r.o. /ID# 143230
    Breclav, 690 02, Czechia
  • Revmatologie, s.r.o. /ID# 143223
    Brno, 638 00, Czechia
  • Revmatologie Bruntal, s.r.o /ID# 143220
    Bruntál, 79201, Czechia
  • Nemocnice Slany /ID# 143221
    Slany, 274 01, Czechia

Showing the first 100 of 290 sites across 45 countries.

09

References and documents

Publications

  • van Vollenhoven R, Takeuchi T, Pangan AL, Friedman A, Mohamed MF, Chen S, Rischmueller M, Blanco R, Xavier RM, Strand V. Efficacy and Safety of Upadacitinib Monotherapy in Methotrexate-Naive Patients With Moderately-to-Severely Active Rheumatoid Arthritis (SELECT-EARLY): A Multicenter, Multi-Country, Randomized, Double-Blind, Active Comparator-Controlled Trial. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020 Oct;72(10):1607-1620. doi: 10.1002/art.41384. Epub 2020 Sep 8. PubMed 32638504 ↗
  • Bergman M, Buch MH, Tanaka Y, Citera G, Bahlas S, Wong E, Song Y, Zueger P, Ali M, Strand V. Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3 (RAPID3) in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis Treated with Long-Term Upadacitinib Therapy in Five Randomized Controlled Trials. Rheumatol Ther. 2022 Dec;9(6):1517-1529. doi: 10.1007/s40744-022-00483-4. Epub 2022 Sep 20. PubMed 36125701 ↗
  • Peterfy CG, Strand V, Friedman A, Hall S, Mysler E, Durez P, Baraliakos X, Enejosa JV, Shaw T, Li Y, Chen S, Song IH. Inhibition of structural joint damage progression with upadacitinib in rheumatoid arthritis: 1-year outcomes from the SELECT phase 3 program. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2022 Aug 3;61(8):3246-3256. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keab861. PubMed 34897366 ↗
  • Yamaoka K, Tanaka Y, Kameda H, Khan N, Sasaki N, Harigai M, Song Y, Zhang Y, Takeuchi T. The Safety Profile of Upadacitinib in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis in Japan. Drug Saf. 2021 Jun;44(6):711-722. doi: 10.1007/s40264-021-01067-x. Epub 2021 May 27. PubMed 34041702 ↗
  • Strand V, Tundia N, Wells A, Buch MH, Radominski SC, Camp HS, Friedman A, Suboticki JL, Dunlap K, Goldschmidt D, Bergman M. Upadacitinib monotherapy improves patient-reported outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis: results from SELECT-EARLY and SELECT-MONOTHERAPY. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2021 Jul 1;60(7):3209-3221. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keaa770. PubMed 33313898 ↗
  • Cohen SB, van Vollenhoven RF, Winthrop KL, Zerbini CAF, Tanaka Y, Bessette L, Zhang Y, Khan N, Hendrickson B, Enejosa JV, Burmester GR. Safety profile of upadacitinib in rheumatoid arthritis: integrated analysis from the SELECT phase III clinical programme. Ann Rheum Dis. 2021 Mar;80(3):304-311. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-218510. Epub 2020 Oct 28. Erratum In: Ann Rheum Dis. 2021 May;80(5):e83. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-218510corr1. PubMed 33115760 ↗
  • Nader A, Mohamed MF, Winzenborg I, Doelger E, Noertersheuser P, Pangan AL, Othman AA. Exposure-Response Analyses of Upadacitinib Efficacy and Safety in Phase II and III Studies to Support Benefit-Risk Assessment in Rheumatoid Arthritis. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2020 Apr;107(4):994-1003. doi: 10.1002/cpt.1671. Epub 2019 Nov 30. PubMed 31610021 ↗

Related links

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Dec 3, 2020
  • Statistical analysis plan · Sep 11, 2020

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — AbbVie is committed to responsible data sharing regarding the clinical trials we sponsor. This includes access to anonymized, individual and trial-level data (analysis data sets), as well as other information (e.g., protocols, analyses plans, clinical study reports), as long as the trials are not part of an ongoing or planned regulatory submission. This includes requests for clinical trial data for unlicensed products and indications.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Sap, Csr

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 7, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02706873
Lead sponsor
AbbVie
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 11, 2016
Start date
Feb 23, 2016
Primary completion
Mar 15, 2018
Completion
Nov 10, 2022
Results posted
Oct 4, 2019
Last update
Jul 7, 2023

Study contacts

AbbVie Inc.
study director · AbbVie

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Other studies from this sponsor

AbbVie

Start the discussion