An interventional study of AC5 Topical Hemostatic Device in Skin Neoplasms, sponsored by Arch Therapeutics. Completed at 1 site in Ireland. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 85 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-08-07.
Sponsored by Arch Therapeutics · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care
This study is designed to monitor patient safety after excision of skin lesions and subsequent application of AC5 topical hemostatic agent and to assess the performance of AC5 for controlling bleeding in skin wounds.
This is a randomized, controlled single-blind pilot study to evaluate the safety and performance of AC5 following excision of lesions from the trunk or upper limbs under local anesthetic, in patients currently prescribed or not prescribed antiplatelet monotherapy.
Each patient had sequential shave excision of two lesions (one treatment, one Control) at the same sitting. The sequence of wound treatment (AC5 first or Control first) was randomized.
Study and Control treatments were administered immediately after lesion excision, followed by determination of time to hemostasis (TTH), and application of an occlusive water-resistant dressing
582 studies on the registry are indexed under Skin Neoplasms; 114 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 46 is below the median of 53 across 416 interventional studies indexed under Skin Neoplasms.
Browse Skin Neoplasms studies →Arch Therapeutics is the lead sponsor of 2 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Antiplatelet monotherapy with one of the following agents:
Female subjects must meet at least one of the following additional criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
The intervention in this arm is the application of a topical hemostatic agent (AC5) to a freshly excised skin lesion
Device: AC5 Topical Hemostatic Device
The intervention in this arm is the application of saline (Control) to a freshly excised skin lesion
Device: AC5 Topical Hemostatic Device
Randomized application of the hemostatic agent AC5 to one of two freshly excised lesions in each patient
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events Related to Clinical Investigation Product During the 30 Days of Follow-up
Local reactions to clinical investigation product (pain, edema, rash, cellulitis, localized infectious processes, other) detected during clinical investigation follow up. Systemic reactions after administration of clinical investigation product (fever, allergic reaction, anaphylaxis or any clinical untoward event) detected during clinical investigation follow up.
Time frame: 30 Days Post Procedure
Median Time to Hemostasis (Seconds)
Measure of time from application of treatment or control to the wound, to bleeding cessation
Time frame: At time of application (Day 0)
Time to Hemostasis in Seconds Per Square Centimeter Wound Area
Measure of time from application of treatment or control to the wound, to bleeding cessation/ divided by wound area
Time frame: At time of application (Day 0)
Number of Wounds With ASEPSIS Wound Scores of 0 at Day 7 and Day 30
The Additional treatment, the presence of Serous discharge, Erythema, Purulent exudate, and Separation of the deep tissues, the Isolation of bacteria, and the duration of inpatient Stay longer than 14 days (ASEPSIS) Wound Score (reference 1) was used to assess wound healing and overall wound sepsis. This multipoint system is reported as a total score ranging from 0 to 30 points in the first 7 days postoperatively. Additional points after 7 days can be added for additional treatments such as use of antibiotics, drainage of pus under local anesthesia, and debridement of the wound; and isolation of bacteria or duration of stay, for a total score of from 0 to 70 points by day 30. Total scores from 0-10 indicate satisfactory healing, from 11 to 20=disturbance of healing, from 21 to 30=minor wound infection, from 31 to 40=moderate wound infection, and \>40 points signifies severe infection. For this study, the number of wounds with ASEPSIS score = 0 was counted.
Time frame: 7 and 30 Days Post Procedure
Time to Hemostasis in Patients Who Were Taking or Not Taking Anti Platelet Medication
Time frame: Day 0
Patients were recruited who were to undergo excision of two skin lesions in the same sitting.
| Milestone | All Study Participants |
|---|---|
| Started | 46 |
| Completed | 46 |
| Not completed | 0 |
Local reactions to clinical investigation product (pain, edema, rash, cellulitis, localized infectious processes, other) detected during clinical investigation follow up. Systemic reactions after administration of clinical investigation product (fever, allergic reaction, anaphylaxis or any clinical untoward event) detected during clinical investigation follow up.
| Participants | AC5 Topical Hemostatic Device | Control |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events Related to Clinical Investigation Product During the 30 Days of Follow-up | 2 | 3 |
Measure of time from application of treatment or control to the wound, to bleeding cessation
| seconds | AC5 Topical Hemostatic Device | Control |
|---|---|---|
| Median Time to Hemostasis (Seconds) | 24.5 (7 to 165) | 44 (10 to 387) |
Measure of time from application of treatment or control to the wound, to bleeding cessation/ divided by wound area
| seconds/cm2 | AC5 Topical Hemostatic Device | Control |
|---|---|---|
| Time to Hemostasis in Seconds Per Square Centimeter Wound Area | 42 (5 to 1100) | 104 (6 to 797) |
The Additional treatment, the presence of Serous discharge, Erythema, Purulent exudate, and Separation of the deep tissues, the Isolation of bacteria, and the duration of inpatient Stay longer than 14 days (ASEPSIS) Wound Score (reference 1) was used to assess wound healing and overall wound sepsis. This multipoint system is reported as a total score ranging from 0 to 30 points in the first 7 days postoperatively. Additional points after 7 days can be added for additional treatments such as use of antibiotics, drainage of pus under local anesthesia, and debridement of the wound; and isolation of bacteria or duration of stay, for a total score of from 0 to 70 points by day 30. Total scores from 0-10 indicate satisfactory healing, from 11 to 20=disturbance of healing, from 21 to 30=minor wound infection, from 31 to 40=moderate wound infection, and \>40 points signifies severe infection. For this study, the number of wounds with ASEPSIS score = 0 was counted.
| wounds | Wounds Treated With AC5 Topical Hemostatic Device | Wounds Treated With Control |
|---|---|---|
| Day 7 | 40 | 40 |
| Day 30 | 44 | 44 |
| seconds | AC5 Topical Hemostatic Device | Control |
|---|---|---|
| Taking antiplatelet therapy | 24 (7 to 120) | 90 (23 to 387) |
| Not taking antiplatelet therapy | 24 (8 to 165) | 40 (10 to 244) |
Collected over 30 days. Non-serious events are listed at a 3% frequency threshold.
| Group | Deaths | Serious | Other |
|---|---|---|---|
| AC5 Topical Hemostatic Device | 0/46 (0%) | 0/46 (0%) | 13/46 (28.3%) |
| Control | 0/46 (0%) | 0/46 (0%) | 13/46 (28.3%) |
| Event | AC5 Topical Hemostatic Device | Control |
|---|---|---|
| Wound complicationInjury, poisoning and procedural complications | 4/46 | 4/46 |
| Secretion dischargeGeneral disorders | 3/46 | 3/46 |
| Fibrin D dimer increasedInvestigations | 2/46 | 2/46 |
| Wound hemorrhageInjury, poisoning and procedural complications | 2/46 | 2/46 |
| Back painMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | 2/46 | 2/46 |
| Age, Continuous(years) | Overall |
|---|---|
| Mean | 57 ± 15.5 |
| Sex: Female, Male(Participants) | Overall |
|---|---|
| Female | 22 |
| Male | 24 |
| Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants) | Overall |
|---|---|
| American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 |
| Asian | 0 |
| Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 |
| Black or African American | 1 |
| White | 45 |
| More than one race | 0 |
| Unknown or Not Reported | 0 |
| Region of Enrollment(participants) | Overall |
|---|---|
| Ireland | 46 |
| Antiplatelet therapy(Participants) | Overall |
|---|---|
| Count of participants | 10 |
Plan to share: Undecided
This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Arch Therapeutics