ClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT02702505MTAUpdated Mar 8, 2016

Success and Color Stability of MTA Pulpotomized Primary Molars: an RCT

A Phase 4 interventional study of NeoMTA and ProRoot MTA in Reversible Pulpitis and Dental Pulp Diseases, sponsored by Texas A & M University Baylor College Of Dentistry. Status unknown at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 2 Years to 8 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-03-08.

Sponsored by Texas A & M University Baylor College Of Dentistry · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Mar 2016), so the status shown — last known as Enrolling by invitation — may be out of date.
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
50
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
2 Years to 8 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Mineral trioxide aggregate has been previously FDA approved as an endodontic filler. Its use in vital teeth has demonstrated significant color change post-treatment leaving it ineffective for esthetic use..

The new formulation will be tested to see if has the same effect.

Read the detailed description

This randomized control, split-mouth trial will use 50 pediatric subjects selected from the patient population in the pediatric dental clinics at Baylor College of Dentistry and in select faculty private practices. The study will use a within-subject control design whereby one tooth will be treated with a pulpotomy using the new formulation of MTA (NeoMTA Plus, Avalon Biomed Inc., Bradenton, FL, USA) and restored with a multi-surface composite, and the other tooth with an MTA pulpotomy and restored with a SSC; thus, approximately 50 teeth will be treated for each treatment group. The restoration type will be randomized as to which side will receive the SSC or composite using sealed, opaque envelopes. Approximately 50 subjects will be needed for the study in order to elicit any significant findings as demonstrated by a power analysis from a similar study.

02

Conditions studied

  • Reversible Pulpitis
  • Dental Pulp Diseases

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Pulp
  • pulpotomies
  • mineral trioxide aggregate
03

In context

Dental Pulp Diseases

130 studies on the registry are indexed under Dental Pulp Diseases; 37 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 50 is close to the median of 52 across 108 interventional studies indexed under Dental Pulp Diseases.

Browse Dental Pulp Diseases studies →

Lead sponsor

Texas A & M University Baylor College Of Dentistry is the lead sponsor of 4 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
2 Years to 8 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

    • Children between the ages of 2 ½ and 8 years of age

      • Patient must have two, contralateral primary molars that are matched for type of molar (first or second), size of carious lesion (same level of approximation of carious lesion to the pulp), and arch (maxillary or mandibular) that are treatment planned for a pulpotomy
      • The teeth selected for the study must be vital and asymptomatic both clinically and radiographically or only display symptoms consistent with reversible pulptitis
      • The teeth selected for the study must be anticipated to be retained in the mouth for at least two years
      • Each patient must have an updated medical history form in the dental record, be examined by the operator, and be classified as (in good general health)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Teeth with a history of spontaneous pain
  • Teeth with radiographic evidence of internal or external resorption, intraradicular or periapical bone loss, loss of lamina dura, or widening of the periodontal ligament space
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

ASA physical status

The anaesthetists’ scale of health before surgery: I is healthy, II has a mild illness that is under control, III a severe one, IV a severe illness that is a constant threat to life. V and VI are used for the critically ill and for organ donors.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
50 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    NeoMTA

    The new formulation of MTA (does not contain bismuth oxide) will be used in one tooth receiving a pulpotomy to determine if the color of the tooth changes over time. The new formulation has received the Food and Drug Administrations 510(k) substantial equivalence clearance for Class II dental materials and is equivalent to its MTA predicate (ProRoot, Dentsply Tulsa Dental, Tulsa, OK, USA).19

    Biological: NeoMTA

  • Other
    ProRoot MTA

    Control group. This group will receive the old formulation of MTA in the pulpotomy and the tooth will receive a full coverage stainless steel crown restoration.

    Other: ProRoot MTA

Interventions

  • BiologicalNeoMTA

    A new formulation of MTA was developed in which bismuth oxide was omitted

  • OtherProRoot MTA

    Control group

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Color stability

    Dental intraoral photographs will evaluated

    Time frame: 2 years

  2. Internal resorption

    Dental radiographs will be evaluatedresorption

    Time frame: 2 years

  3. external resorption

    Dental radiographs will be evaluated resorption

    Time frame: 2 years

  4. Bone loss

    Dental radiographs will be evaluated for intraradicular or periapical bone loss

    Time frame: 2 years

  5. Widening of periodontal ligament space

    Dental radiographs will be evaluated for widening of the PDL space

    Time frame: 2 years

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Texas A & M University Baylor College of Dentistry
    Dallas, Texas 75246, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Agamy HA, Bakry NS, Mounir MM, Avery DR. Comparison of mineral trioxide aggregate and formocresol as pulp-capping agents in pulpotomized primary teeth. Pediatr Dent. 2004 Jul-Aug;26(4):302-9. PubMed 15344622 ↗
  • Farsi N, Alamoudi N, Balto K, Mushayt A. Success of mineral trioxide aggregate in pulpotomized primary molars. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2005 Summer;29(4):307-11. doi: 10.17796/jcpd.29.4.n80t77w625118k73. PubMed 16161395 ↗
  • Holan G, Eidelman E, Fuks AB. Long-term evaluation of pulpotomy in primary molars using mineral trioxide aggregate or formocresol. Pediatr Dent. 2005 Mar-Apr;27(2):129-36. PubMed 15926290 ↗
  • 4. Jabbarifar SE, Khademi D, Ghasemi D. Success rates of formocresol pulpotomy versus mineral trioxide aggregate in human primary molar tooth. J Res Med Sci 2004; 9(6)L 55-8.
  • Peng L, Ye L, Tan H, Zhou X. Evaluation of the formocresol versus mineral trioxide aggregate primary molar pulpotomy: a meta-analysis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2006 Dec;102(6):e40-4. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2006.05.017. Epub 2006 Sep 26. PubMed 17138165 ↗
  • Farooq NS, Coll JA, Kuwabara A, Shelton P. Success rates of formocresol pulpotomy and indirect pulp therapy in the treatment of deep dentinal caries in primary teeth. Pediatr Dent. 2000 Jul-Aug;22(4):278-86. PubMed 10969431 ↗
  • Guelmann M, Fair J, Bimstein E. Permanent versus temporary restorations after emergency pulpotomies in primary molars. Pediatr Dent. 2005 Nov-Dec;27(6):478-81. PubMed 16532888 ↗
  • Holan G, Fuks AB, Ketlz N. Success rate of formocresol pulpotomy in primary molars restored with stainless steel crown vs amalga. Pediatr Dent. 2002 May-Jun;24(3):212-6. PubMed 12064493 ↗
  • Caceda JH. The use of resin-based composite restorations in pulpotomized primary molars. J Dent Child (Chic). 2007 May-Aug;74(2):147-50. PubMed 18477438 ↗
  • Cehreli ZC, Cetinguc A, Cengiz SB, Altay AN. Clinical performance of pulpotomized primary molars restored with resin-based materials. 24-month results. Am J Dent. 2006 Oct;19(5):262-6. PubMed 17073200 ↗
  • Guelmann M, Bookmyer KL, Villalta P, Garcia-Godoy F. Microleakage of restorative techniques for pulpotomized primary molars. J Dent Child (Chic). 2004 Sep-Dec;71(3):209-11. PubMed 15871455 ↗
  • Guelmann M, McIlwain MF, Primosch RE. Radiographic assessment of primary molar pulpotomies restored with resin-based materials. Pediatr Dent. 2005 Jan-Feb;27(1):24-7. PubMed 15839391 ↗
  • Hutcheson C, Seale NS, McWhorter A, Kerins C, Wright J. Multi-surface composite vs stainless steel crown restorations after mineral trioxide aggregate pulpotomy: a randomized controlled trial. Pediatr Dent. 2012 Nov-Dec;34(7):460-7. PubMed 23265162 ↗
  • Maroto M, Barberia E, Planells P, Garcia Godoy F. Dentin bridge formation after mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) pulpotomies in primary teeth. Am J Dent. 2005 Jun;18(3):151-4. PubMed 16158803 ↗
  • Parirokh M, Asgary S, Eghbal MJ, Stowe S, Eslami B, Eskandarizade A, Shabahang S. A comparative study of white and grey mineral trioxide aggregate as pulp capping agents in dog's teeth. Dent Traumatol. 2005 Jun;21(3):150-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-9657.2005.00311.x. PubMed 15876326 ↗
  • Holland R, de Souza V, Murata SS, Nery MJ, Bernabe PF, Otoboni Filho JA, Dezan Junior E. Healing process of dog dental pulp after pulpotomy and pulp covering with mineral trioxide aggregate or Portland cement. Braz Dent J. 2001;12(2):109-13. PubMed 11445912 ↗
  • American Academy on Pediatric Dentistry Clinical Affairs Committee-Pulp Therapy subcommittee; American Academy on Pediatric Dentistry Council on Clinical Affairs. Guideline on pulp therapy for primary and young permanent teeth. Pediatr Dent. 2008-2009;30(7 Suppl):170-4. No abstract available. PubMed 19216417 ↗
  • Zurn D, Seale NS. Light-cured calcium hydroxide vs formocresol in human primary molar pulpotomies: a randomized controlled trial. Pediatr Dent. 2008 Jan-Feb;30(1):34-41. PubMed 18402097 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 8, 2016, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02702505
Lead sponsor
Texas A & M University Baylor College Of Dentistry
Responsible party
Carolyn A. Kerins DDS (Associate Professor and Graduate Program director, Texas A & M University Baylor College Of Dentistry) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 8, 2016
Start date
Nov 2014
Primary completion
Dec 2017 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2017 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 8, 2016

Study contacts

Carolyn A Kerins, DDS, PhD
principal investigator · Texas A & M University Baylor College Of Dentistry

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Mar 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion