CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT02691988WHISPERUpdated Feb 25, 2016

Withdrawal of Inhaled Corticosteroids in Primary Care Patients With COPD

An interventional study of ICS withdrawal and Usual care in Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive, sponsored by Radboud University Medical Center. Status unknown at 1 site in Netherlands. Open to participants aged 40 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-02-25.

Sponsored by Radboud University Medical Center · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Feb 2016), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
620
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
40 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Rationale: Because long-term use of ICS is associated with an increased likelihood of side-effects such as increased risk of pneumonia and loss of bone density, it is important to limit prescription of ICS to patients who have a clear indication for this treatment. In addition, avoiding unnecessary treatment with ICS could reduce the burden that chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) puts on healthcare budgets. The recently updated COPD guideline of the Dutch college of General Practitioners (NHG) emphasizes the importance of optimizing medical treatment for COPD patients with only limited room for the use of inhaled corticosteroids.

Objective: The objective of the study is to investigate whether discontinuation of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) for patients without a clear indication for ICS according to current guidelines results in a reduction of ICS use without adverse health effects for the patients involved.

Study design: The study is a pragmatic, clustered, parallel group, non-inferiority trial in Dutch general practices with a follow-up of 26 weeks per patient.

Study population: 620 COPD patients with confirmed chronic airflow obstruction, aged ≥ 40 yrs who use ICS for at least the prior 6 months without a clear indication.

Intervention (if applicable): Guided ICS withdrawal in optimised COPD management. All study participants (of both study arms) will receive recommendations on optimal bronchodilator therapy and a personalized action plan to recognize symptom deterioration in an early stage.

Main study parameters/endpoints: Number of exacerbation-free weeks. Secondary study parameters: successful cessation of ICS, time to first exacerbation, number of moderate and severe exacerbations, health-related quality of life, health status, and pneumonias. Moreover, information on the process of care and costs will be collected.

Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: Many COPD patients use ICS without a clear indication. Long-term use of ICS is associated with an increased likelihood of side-effects such as increased risk of pneumonia and loss of bone density and should be avoided in those who do not benefit from it. However, there is a small subgroup of COPD patients that have reduced numbers of exacerbations because of their ICS use and it is impossible to identify a priori the patients who this applies too. Therefore, it is important that the ICS discontinuation is guided to detect potential deteriorations early on.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive

Keywords

  • Inhaled corticosteroids
  • General practice
  • Primary care
  • Pharmacotherapy
03

In context

Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive

4,131 studies on the registry are indexed under Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; 697 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 620 is above the median of 70 across 2,926 interventional studies indexed under Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive.

Browse Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive studies →

Lead sponsor

Radboud University Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 959 studies on the registry; 134 are open to participants now.

Of its 6 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
40 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • COPD diagnosis in the medical record (ICPC code R95 or R91);
  • Most recent spirometry result is less than three years old and shows a ratio of the Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second (FEV1) to the Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) of less than 0.7, in short: FEV1/FVC ratio \<0.7 (If no recent spirometry results are available, the patient will be scheduled for a diagnostic spirometric test);
  • ICS treatment for at least the past 6 months;
  • Accessible electronic medical record and prescription data history of at least one year;
  • The subject's COPD is primarily managed by the general practioner (GP) (i.e., not by a chest physician); or if a subject's COPD is treated by a chest physician as well, the chest physician agrees with the invitation of the subject.
  • Willing to provide written informed consent;
  • Mentally competent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • A spirometry test that has demonstrated airflow reversibility (i.e., post-bd FEV1 improvement of at least 12% and 200 ml compared to baseline and/or post-bd FEV1 improvement of 9% of the baseline FEV1 % predicted value) that preceded the initiation of ICS treatment;
  • Diagnosis of asthma in the medical record (ICPC code R96);
  • Allergic respiratory disease which has been confirmed by a positive skin prick test or specific immunoglobulin E (IgE) in serum as documented in the medical record, in combination with a documented history respiratory allergic symptoms;
  • Two or more exacerbations in the previous 12 months that were treated with oral corticosteroids, antibiotics, or both; and/or required a visit to an emergency care facility or hospital admission;
  • Use of oral corticosteroids on a regular basis (i.e., more than six weeks in the previous half year) for any reason;
  • Currently participating in another intervention study that interferes with the current study;
  • Has one or more serious other diseases that are likely to lead to study drop-out (e.g., diseases with limited life expectancy) or influence the study results; or
  • Pregnancy or women who are trying to conceive a child;
  • Unable to read or understand the Dutch language.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
620 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    ICS withdrawal

    Guided ICS withdrawal combined with optimization of bronchodilator treatment

    Other: ICS withdrawal

  • Active comparator
    Usual care

    Optimization of bronchodilator treatment

    Other: Usual care

Interventions

  • OtherICS withdrawal

    Bronchodilator therapy is optimized according to the latest COPD guideline of the Dutch College of General Practitioners (NHG) and inhaled corticosteroids are withdrawn.

  • OtherUsual care

    Bronchodilator therapy is optimized according to the latest COPD guideline of the Dutch College of General Practitioners (NHG)

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of exacerbation-free weeks (EFWs)

    Weeks in which the patient does not experience a worsening of his respiratory condition according to accepted symptom-based definitions of an exacerbation. This outcome is measured on a weekly basis with the Telephonic Exacerbation Assessment System (TEXAS)

    Time frame: 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Successful ICS withdrawal

    The proportion of patients with successful cessation of ICS, i.e. a period of 26 weeks after the withdrawal date without the occurrence of a moderate or severe exacerbation or reintroduction of ICS treatment.

    Time frame: 6 months

  2. Time to first exacerbation

    Time (in weeks) to first exacerbation will be calculated for all subjects. The definition for an exacerbation will be comparable to the definition used for EFWs. Information on time to first exacerbation will be collected using TEXAS.

    Time frame: Max. 6 months

  3. Moderate and severe exacerbations

    A moderate exacerbation is defined as prescription of a course of oral corticosteroids and/or antibiotics related to deterioration of COPD registered as episodes in the electronic patient record. A severe exacerbation is defined as a COPD-related ER visit and/or unscheduled COPD-related hospital admission.

    Time frame: 6 months

  4. Health status (CCQ)

    Health status will be measured using the Clinical COPD Questionnaire (CCQ) which has been developed as a COPD specific health status measurement. CCQ questionnaires that are filled out at the start (t=0) and end of the study period (t = 26 weeks) will be used to evaluate the difference in change in CCQ score between the intervention and control groups.

    Time frame: 6 months

  5. Health-related quality of life (HRQoL)

    Disease specific HRQoL will be assessed with the Short-form Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire (SF-CRQ) at baseline and 26 weeks of follow up.

    Time frame: 6 months

  6. General health state (EQ-5D-3L)

    The EuroQol-5 Dimensions-3 Levels (EQ-5D-3L) will be used to assess the general health state of subjects at the start and after 26 weeks.

    Time frame: 6 months

  7. Side effects of inhaled corticosteroids

    Side effects of inhaled corticosteroids will be measured using the Inhaled Corticosteroids Questionnaire Short form (ICQ-S).

    Time frame: 6 months

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Radboud University Medical Centre, Department of Primary and Community Care
    Nijmegen, 6500 HB, Netherlands
    Recruiting
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 25, 2016, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02691988
Lead sponsor
Radboud University Medical Center
Collaborators
Novartis, Boehringer Ingelheim
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 25, 2016
Start date
Dec 2015
Primary completion
Jan 2017 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 2017 (estimated)
Last update
Feb 25, 2016

Study contacts

Tjard R Schermer, PhD
Contact
Tjard.Schermer@radboudumc.nl
0031243614611
Lisette van den Bemt, PhD
Contact
Lisette.vandenbemt@radboudumc.nl
0031243619588

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Feb 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion