A Phase 4 interventional study of BeSmooth peripheral stent in Peripheral Arterial Disease, sponsored by Flanders Medical Research Program. Completed at 4 sites in Belgium. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-01-12.
Sponsored by Flanders Medical Research Program · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment
A Physician initiated PMCF Trial Investigating the BeSmooth Peripheral Stent System for the treatment of Iliac Lesions.
The objective of this clinical investigation is to evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of the BeSmooth Peripheral Stent System in clinical settings post CE-certification when used according to the indications of the IFU.
1,573 studies on the registry are indexed under Peripheral Arterial Disease; 284 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 70 is close to the median of 73 across 1,078 interventional studies indexed under Peripheral Arterial Disease.
Browse Peripheral Arterial Disease studies →Flanders Medical Research Program is the lead sponsor of 25 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
The target lesion is either a modified TASC-II class A, B, C or D lesion with one of the listed specifications:
Type A lesions
Type B lesions
Type C lesions
Exclusion Criteria:
The target lesion is either a modified TASC-II class B or D lesion with aortic or common femoral lesion involvement:
Type B lesions
-Short (≤3 cm) stenosis of infrarenal aorta
Type C lesions
Type D lesions
Patients treated with the BeSmooth Peripheral Stent System
Device: BeSmooth peripheral stent
patients treated with the BeSmooth Peripheral Stent System
Primary Patency at 12 months
defined as a target lesion without a hemodynamically significant stenosis on duplex ultrasound (\>50%, systolic velocity ratio no greater than 2.4) and without Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR) within 12 months.
Time frame: 12 months
Primary Patency at 1 & 6 month
Patients that present without a hemodynamically significant stenosis at the target area on duplex ultrasound (\>50%, systolic velocity ratio no greater than 2.4) and without prior TLR are defined as being primary patent at the given follow-up.
Time frame: 1 and 6 months
Stent Occlusion Rate at 1,6 and 12-month follow-up
100% (re)occlusion rate within the study stent
Time frame: up to 12 months
ABI at 1,6 and 12-month follow-up, compared with baseline
Ankle-Brachial index measurements at 1,6 and 12-month FU visit, compared with measurements at baseline (pre operatively)
Time frame: up to 12 months
Amputation rate at 1,6 and 12-month follow-up
Amputation rate at 1-, 6- and 12-month follow-up, defined as any amputation above the knee.
Time frame: up to 12 months
Performance success rate at baseline, defined as restoration of blood flow
Device success, restoration of blood flow during index procedure
Time frame: during the index study procedure
In-stent restenosis rate
restenosis rate within the study stent
Time frame: up to 12 months
Freedom from Target Lesion Revascularization
Freedom from Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR), defined as freedom from a repeat intervention to maintain or re-establish patency within the region of the treated arterial vessel plus 5mm proximal and distal to the treated lesion edge.
Time frame: up to 12 months
Serious Adverse Events
Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), defined according to ISO 14155:2011 as any clinical event that is fatal, life-threatening, or judged to be severe by the investigator; resulted in persistent or significant disability; necessitated surgical or percutaneous intervention; or required prolonged hospitalization.
Time frame: up to 12 months
Technical success
The ability to achieve final residual angiographic stenosis no greater than 30%
Time frame: during the index study procedure
Clinical success at follow-up is defined as an improvement of Rutherford Classification at 1-,6- and 12-month follow-up
Clinical success at follow-up is defined as an improvement of Rutherford classification at 1-, 6- and 12-month follow-up of one class or more as compared to the pre-procedure Rutherford classification
Time frame: up to 12 months
Plan to share: Undecided
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Flanders Medical Research Program