ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02690051BeSmoothUpdated Jan 12, 2017

BeSmooth Study, Investigating the BeSmooth Peripheral Stent System for the Treatment of Iliac Lesions

A Phase 4 interventional study of BeSmooth peripheral stent in Peripheral Arterial Disease, sponsored by Flanders Medical Research Program. Completed at 4 sites in Belgium. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-01-12.

Sponsored by Flanders Medical Research Program · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
70
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

A Physician initiated PMCF Trial Investigating the BeSmooth Peripheral Stent System for the treatment of Iliac Lesions.

The objective of this clinical investigation is to evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of the BeSmooth Peripheral Stent System in clinical settings post CE-certification when used according to the indications of the IFU.

02

Conditions studied

  • Peripheral Arterial Disease
03

In context

Peripheral Arterial Disease

1,573 studies on the registry are indexed under Peripheral Arterial Disease; 284 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 70 is close to the median of 73 across 1,078 interventional studies indexed under Peripheral Arterial Disease.

Browse Peripheral Arterial Disease studies →

Lead sponsor

Flanders Medical Research Program is the lead sponsor of 25 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Corresponding to the CE-mark indications/contra-indications and according to the current medical guidelines for minimally invasive peripheral interventions.
  2. Patient presenting with a stenotic or occlusive lesion at the iliac arteries suitable for stenting (on indication for primary stenting, based on the discretion of the investigator)
  3. Patient presenting a score from 2 to 5 following Rutherford classification
  4. Patient is willing to comply with specified follow-up evaluations at the specified times for the duration of the study
  5. Patient is >18 years old
  6. Patient (or their legal representative) understands the nature of the procedure and provides written informed consent, prior to enrolment in the study
  7. Patient is eligible for treatment with the BeGraft Peripheral Stent Graft System (Bentley InnoMed)
  8. The target lesion is either a modified TASC-II class A, B, C or D lesion with one of the listed specifications:

    • Type A lesions

      • Unilateral or bilateral stenoses of the Common Iliac Artery
      • Unilateral or bilateral single short (≤3 cm) stenosis of the External Iliac Artery
    • Type B lesions

      • Unilateral Common Iliac Artery occlusion
      • Single or multiple stenosis totaling 3-10 cm involving the External Iliac Artery not extending into the Common Femoral Artery
      • Unilateral External Iliac Artery occlusion not involving the origins of Internal Iliac Artery or Common Iliac Artery
    • Type C lesions

      • Bilateral Common Iliac Artery occlusions
      • Bilateral External Iliac Artery stenoses 3-10 cm long not extending into the Common Femoral Artery
  9. The target lesion has angiographic evidence of stenosis or restenosis > 50% or occlusion which can be passed with standard guidewire manipulation
  10. There is angiographic evidence of a patent Common an Deep Femoral Artery

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. PTA is technically not possible (not feasible to access the lesion or a defect with the guidewire or balloon catheter)
  2. Presence of an aneurysm immediately adjacent to the site of stent implantation
  3. Stenosis distal to the site of stent implantation
  4. Lesions in or adjacent to essential collaterals(s)
  5. Lesions in locations subject to external compression
  6. Heavily calcified lesions resistant to PTA
  7. Patients with diffuse distal disease resulting in poor stent outflow
  8. Patients with a history of coagulation disorders
  9. Patients with aspirin allergy or bleeding complications and patients unable or unwilling to tolerate anticoagulant/antiplatelet therapy and/or non-responders to anticoagulant/antiplatelet therapy
  10. Fresh thrombus formation
  11. Patients with known hypersensitivity to the stent material(L605)
  12. The target lesion is either a modified TASC-II class B or D lesion with aortic or common femoral lesion involvement:

    • Type B lesions

      -Short (≤3 cm) stenosis of infrarenal aorta

    • Type C lesions

      • Unilateral External Iliac Artery stenosis extending into the Common Femoral Artery
      • Unilateral External Iliac Artery occlusion that involves the origins of the Internal Iliac and/or Common Femoral Artery
      • Heavily calcified unilateral External Iliac Artery occlusion with or without involvement of origins of the Internal Iliac and/or Common Femoral Artery
    • Type D lesions

      • Infra-renal aortoiliac occlusion
      • Iliac stenoses in patients with an Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm (AAA) requiring treatment and not amenable to endograft placement or other lesions requiring open aortic or iliac surgery
      • Diffuse multiple stenoses involving the unilateral Common Iliac, External Iliac and Common Femoral Artery
      • Unilateral occlusions of both Common Iliac and External Iliac Artery
      • Diffuse disease involving the aorta and both iliac arteries requiring treatment
      • Bilateral occlusions of the External Iliac Artery
  13. Previously implanted stent(s) at the same lesion site
  14. Reference segment diameter is not suitable for the available stent design
  15. Untreatable lesion located at the distal outflow arteries
  16. Use of alternative therapy (e.g. atherectomy, cutting balloon, laser, radiation therapy) as part of the index procedure
  17. Patients refusing treatment
  18. Patients for whom antiplatelet therapy, anticoagulants or thrombolytic drugs are contraindicated
  19. Patients who exhibit persistent acute intraluminal thrombus of the proposed lesion site
  20. Perforation at the angioplasty site evidenced by extravasation of contrast medium
  21. Patients with a history of prior life-threatening contrast medium reaction
  22. Patients with uncorrected bleeding disorders
  23. Female patient with child bearing potential not taking adequate contraceptives or currently breastfeeding
  24. Life expectancy of less than twelve months
  25. Any planned surgical intervention/procedure within 30 days of the study procedure
  26. Any patient considered to be hemodynamically unstable at onset of procedure
  27. Patient is currently participating in another investigational drug or device study that has not completed the entire follow up period
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
70 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    BeSmooth Peripheral Stent system

    Patients treated with the BeSmooth Peripheral Stent System

    Device: BeSmooth peripheral stent

Interventions

  • DeviceBeSmooth peripheral stent

    patients treated with the BeSmooth Peripheral Stent System

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Primary Patency at 12 months

    defined as a target lesion without a hemodynamically significant stenosis on duplex ultrasound (\>50%, systolic velocity ratio no greater than 2.4) and without Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR) within 12 months.

    Time frame: 12 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Primary Patency at 1 & 6 month

    Patients that present without a hemodynamically significant stenosis at the target area on duplex ultrasound (\>50%, systolic velocity ratio no greater than 2.4) and without prior TLR are defined as being primary patent at the given follow-up.

    Time frame: 1 and 6 months

  2. Stent Occlusion Rate at 1,6 and 12-month follow-up

    100% (re)occlusion rate within the study stent

    Time frame: up to 12 months

  3. ABI at 1,6 and 12-month follow-up, compared with baseline

    Ankle-Brachial index measurements at 1,6 and 12-month FU visit, compared with measurements at baseline (pre operatively)

    Time frame: up to 12 months

  4. Amputation rate at 1,6 and 12-month follow-up

    Amputation rate at 1-, 6- and 12-month follow-up, defined as any amputation above the knee.

    Time frame: up to 12 months

  5. Performance success rate at baseline, defined as restoration of blood flow

    Device success, restoration of blood flow during index procedure

    Time frame: during the index study procedure

  6. In-stent restenosis rate

    restenosis rate within the study stent

    Time frame: up to 12 months

  7. Freedom from Target Lesion Revascularization

    Freedom from Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR), defined as freedom from a repeat intervention to maintain or re-establish patency within the region of the treated arterial vessel plus 5mm proximal and distal to the treated lesion edge.

    Time frame: up to 12 months

  8. Serious Adverse Events

    Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), defined according to ISO 14155:2011 as any clinical event that is fatal, life-threatening, or judged to be severe by the investigator; resulted in persistent or significant disability; necessitated surgical or percutaneous intervention; or required prolonged hospitalization.

    Time frame: up to 12 months

  9. Technical success

    The ability to achieve final residual angiographic stenosis no greater than 30%

    Time frame: during the index study procedure

  10. Clinical success at follow-up is defined as an improvement of Rutherford Classification at 1-,6- and 12-month follow-up

    Clinical success at follow-up is defined as an improvement of Rutherford classification at 1-, 6- and 12-month follow-up of one class or more as compared to the pre-procedure Rutherford classification

    Time frame: up to 12 months

07

Study locations

4 sites
  • OLV Hospital
    Aalst, 9300, Belgium
  • Imelda Hospital Bonheiden
    Bonheiden, 2820, Belgium
  • AZ Sint-Blasius
    Dendermonde, 9200, Belgium
  • Heilig Hart Hospital
    Tienen, 3300, Belgium
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 12, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02690051
Lead sponsor
Flanders Medical Research Program
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 24, 2016
Start date
Oct 2014
Primary completion
Dec 2016
Completion
Dec 2016
Last update
Jan 12, 2017

Study contacts

Koen Deloose, MD
principal investigator · Flanders Medical Research Program

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion