An observational study in Atrial Fibrillation, sponsored by Bayer. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-04-05.
Sponsored by Bayer · Observational
To obtain a better understanding on the comparative effectiveness of apixaban versus VKA (Vitamin K antagonist) for stroke prevention in patients with NVAF (Non-valvular atrial fibrillation) in a real-life setting.
3,957 studies on the registry are indexed under Atrial Fibrillation; 933 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 18,591 is above the median of 300 across 1,390 observational studies indexed under Atrial Fibrillation.
Browse Atrial Fibrillation studies →Bayer is the lead sponsor of 1,674 studies on the registry; 54 are open to participants now.
Of its 213 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 130 (61%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF)
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients who were initiated on apixaban for stroke prevention
Drug: Apixaban
Non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients who were initiated on Vitamin K antagonist for stroke prevention
Drug: Vitamin K antagonist
As prescribed by treating physicians
As prescribed by treating physicians
Incidence of Hospitalization Events (composite endpoint)
Time frame: Up to 2 years
Ran from Feb 2016 to primary completion in Mar 2016, 0 months.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.