CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02683629Updated May 14, 2019

Investigation of the Safety and Efficacy of NTCELL® [Immunoprotected (Alginate-Encapsulated) Porcine Choroid Plexus Cells for Xenotransplantation] in Patients With Parkinson's Disease

A Phase 2 interventional study of NTCELL Implantation and Sham Surgery in Parkinson's Disease, sponsored by Living Cell Technologies. Completed at 1 site in New Zealand. Open to participants aged 40 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-05-14.

Sponsored by Living Cell Technologies · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
18
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
40 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

To assess the safety of xenotransplantation of NTCELL [immunoprotected (alginate-encapsulated) choroid plexus cells] in patients with Parkinson's disease, assessed over the duration of the study, by monitoring the occurrence of adverse events and serious adverse events, including clinical and laboratory evidence of xenogeneic infection in transplant recipients and their partners/close contacts. Subsequent safety follow-up will include lifelong monitoring for clinical and laboratory evidence of xenogeneic infection.

To assess the efficacy of xenotransplantation of NTCELL [immunoprotected (alginate-encapsulated) choroid plexus cells] in patients with Parkinson's disease. This will be quantified by testing the secondary endpoints of the trial as described below (see Endpoints/Outcome Measures).

Read the detailed description

Parkinson's disease is characterized by widespread neural degeneration, particularly in the substantia nigra and its projections to the basal ganglia. Current therapy for Parkinson's disease is purely symptomatic. There is a pressing need for a treatment that reverses or slows the degeneration of the nigrostriatal pathway.

Numerous transplant-based therapies have attempted to support, repair or replace the degenerating nigrostriatal neurons. These have included the transplantation of foetal and other neuronal stem cells, gene transfers, and the implantation of devices releasing neural growth factors. All these have been shown to have some effectiveness in animal models, but have been generally disappointing in human studies.

Intracranial choroid plexus cell transplantation has the potential to deliver biological neural agents for the treatment of Parkinson's disease which cannot be achieved by conventional treatment. The overall aim of delivering neural proteins and compounds over many months to the basal ganglia of the brain is to enhance neural repair currently not possible with antiparkinsonian medication or deep brain stimulation (DBS).

As animal-derived tissues have to be protected from immune rejection when transplanted into humans, transplants are usually accompanied by immunosuppressive therapy. However, porcine choroid plexus cells are preferably implanted without the use of immunosuppressive drugs which cause significant morbidity. To protect them from immune rejection, the cells can be encapsulated in alginate microcapsules which permit the inward passage of nutrients and the outward passage of biologic neural proteins and compounds normally secreted by choroid plexus cells. Alginate-encapsulated porcine choroid plexus cells implanted into the brain without immunosuppressive drugs have survived rejection for many months in animal studies.

NTCELL comprises neonatal porcine choroid plexus cells encapsulated in alginate microcapsules.

The bilateral dose that will be administered to the 18 patients (initially 3 groups of 6 patients, randomised 4:2 NTCELL:sham surgery) enrolled in this trial will be up to a total of twice the human equivalent dose administered unilaterally in LCT's non-human primate study. Thus up to 240 NTCELL microcapsules (± 5%) administered on each side of the brain.

If there are no significant safety issues after implantation of the first group of patients, the second group of patients will then be scheduled to receive implants of NTCELL.

If there are no significant safety issues after implantation of the second group of patients, the third group of patients will then be scheduled to receive implants of NTCELL.

This study will adopt an adaptive design in respect to the choice of dose of NTCELL for the fourth group of patients (those patients who originally received sham surgery in Groups 1-3). Following unblinding of the study after Groups 1-3 have reached 26-week follow-up, an interim analysis, for safety and efficacy, will be undertaken.

If there are no significant safety issues, the last group of patients, Group 4, (who originally received sham surgery) will be scheduled to receive NTCELL implants. The dose of NTCELL given will be determined by the DSMB following a proposal from the Principal Investigator, based on the results of the interim analysis.

Parkinson's disease patients will be followed up for 26 weeks after receiving either an implantation of NTCELL or sham surgery.

02

Conditions studied

  • Parkinson's Disease

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Parkinson's Disease
  • Xenotransplantation
  • choroid plexus
03

In context

Parkinson Disease

4,487 studies on the registry are indexed under Parkinson Disease; 1,082 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 18 is below the median of 40 across 3,294 interventional studies indexed under Parkinson Disease.

Browse Parkinson Disease studies →

Lead sponsor

Living Cell Technologies is the lead sponsor of 3 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
40 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Adults (males or females) in the age range 40 to 65 years
  2. Diagnosis of Parkinson's disease (minimum duration of 5 years) in accordance with the London Brain Bank criteria
  3. Patients diagnosed with idiopathic Parkinson's disease
  4. Optimum medication for Parkinson's disease
  5. Expected to meet the criteria for DBS in the future, in the opinion of the Investigator
  6. If female, no childbearing capability (those who are more than 2 years post-menopausal or have undergone voluntary sterilisation can be considered for enrolment)
  7. Provision of written informed consent. Patients will be required to agree to comply with all tests and visits specified in the protocol, and they (and their partners/close contacts) will also be required to consent to long-term microbiological monitoring, which is an integral part of the study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Any history of central nervous system infection
  2. Significant dementia as determined by neuropsychiatric assessment
  3. Focal neurological defects
  4. Evidence of significant ongoing medical or psychiatric disorders
  5. Secondary parkinsonism
  6. Severe autonomic symptoms
  7. Atypical Parkinson's disease
  8. History of substance abuse
  9. Body mass index (BMI) ≥ 30 kg/m2 or ≤ 20 kg/m2
  10. Serious comorbid conditions that, in the opinion of the Investigator, are likely to affect participation in the study, including:

    1. Previous coronary heart disease manifesting as non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), Q-wave infarction or unstable angina; coronary artery bypass graft (CABG); or percutaneous angioplasty
    2. Previous cerebrovascular disease manifesting as transient ischaemic attacks (TIAs) or stroke
    3. Peripheral vascular disease with foot ulcer and/or previous amputation
    4. History of New York Heart Association (NYHA) class II, III or IV congestive heart failure (CHF) and/or chronic atrial fibrillation
    5. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) or asthma with previous hospitalisation for decompensation; a requirement for mechanical ventilation at any stage; or long-term treatment with oral corticosteroids
    6. Liver disease with abnormal liver function tests defined as serum bilirubin ≥ 20 µmol/L, and/or ALT ≥ 100 U/L, and/or GGT ≥ 100 U/L, and/or albumin \< 35 g/L
    7. Haematological disorders, including haemoglobin ≤ 110 g/L or platelet count \< 80 x 109/L
    8. Kidney disease, defined as serum creatinine > 130 μmol/L in men and > 110 μmol/L in women and/or haematuria and/or active urinary sediment or casts
    9. Peptic ulcer disease and/or history of previous gastrointestinal bleeding
    10. Malignancy other than basal cell carcinoma
    11. History of epilepsy
    12. Untreated hypothyroidism
    13. Known adrenal insufficiency
  11. Previous brain surgery for Parkinson's disease
  12. Poor candidate for any surgery
  13. HIV antibody and/or risk factors for HIV infection
  14. Positive hepatitis C antibody, positive hepatitis B surface antigen, and hepatitis B core antibody
  15. Current administration of immunosuppressive medications (e.g. cyclosporin, tacrolimus, sirolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, muromonab-CD3, daclizumab, basiliximab, antithymocyte globulin, interferons) for other disease conditions
  16. Any other condition that, in the opinion of the Investigator, may interfere with adherence to the study protocol
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
18 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    NTCELL

    NTCELL Implantation

    Biological: NTCELL Implantation

  • Sham comparator
    Sham Surgery

    Sham Surgery

    Other: Sham Surgery

Interventions

  • BiologicalNTCELL Implantation

    NTCELL Implantation

  • OtherSham Surgery

    Sham Surgery

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The safety of xenotransplantation of NTCELL as measured by the incidence of adverse events related to treatment

    Adverse events can result from, for example, abnormal clinical laboratory tests (including xenogeneic viral analysis), abnormal physical examination findings, any abnormal findings following review by an infectious disease physician. These multiple assessments result in the one outcome measure which is the incidence of treatment emergent adverse events

    Time frame: up to 26 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in total Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS in the 'off' and 'on' state) over 26 weeks post-intervention compared with baseline

    Time frame: Baseline and 26 weeks

  2. Change in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS Part III in the 'on' state) over 26 weeks post-intervention compared with baseline

    Time frame: Baseline and 26 weeks

  3. Change in Quality of life as assessed by Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) over 26 weeks post-intervention compared with baseline

    Time frame: Baseline and 26 weeks

  4. Change in L-dopa dosage over 26 weeks post-intervention compared with baseline

    Time frame: Baseline and 26 weeks

  5. Change in scores measured by the Unified Dyskinesia Rating Scale (UDysRS Parts I, II, III, IV - Parts III and IV will be performed in the 'off' and 'on' state) over 26 weeks post-intervention compared with baseline

    Time frame: Baseline and 26 weeks

  6. Change in scores measured by the modified walking test in accordance with the CAPSIT-PD protocol (Defer et al. 1999) over 26 weeks post-intervention compared with baseline

    Time frame: Baseline and 26 weeks

  7. Change in Modified Hoehn and Yahr stage over 26 weeks post-intervention compared with baseline

    Time frame: Baseline and 26 weeks

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Auckland City Hospital
    Auckland, New Zealand
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — International conference presentations, press releases, International journal publications

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 14, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02683629
Lead sponsor
Living Cell Technologies
Collaborators
Statistecol Consultants Limited
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 17, 2016
Start date
Feb 2016
Primary completion
Oct 2017
Completion
May 2, 2019
Last update
May 14, 2019

Study contacts

Barry Snow
principal investigator · Auckland City Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion