An interventional study of Robot, then conventional training and Conventional, then robot training in Stroke, sponsored by National Rehabilitation Center, Seoul, Korea. Completed at 1 site in Korea, Republic of. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-03-05.
Sponsored by National Rehabilitation Center, Seoul, Korea · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
The Effect of Robot Assisted Gait Training in Patients With Infratentorial Stroke
The hypothesis is to determine the robotic gait training would be better than conventional therapy regarding the postural balance.
7,286 studies on the registry are indexed under Stroke; 2,007 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 19 is below the median of 50 across 5,369 interventional studies indexed under Stroke.
Browse Stroke studies →National Rehabilitation Center, Seoul, Korea is the lead sponsor of 20 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Robot assisted gait training 4 weeks after conventional gait training
Other: Robot, then conventional training
Conventional gait training 4 weeks after robot assisted gait training
Other: Conventional, then robot training
Robot assisted gait training from the baseline, then conventional gait training at 4 weeks after baseline
Conventional gait training from the baseline, then robot assisted gait training at 4 weeks after baseline
Change From Baseline in Berg Balance Scale at 4 Weeks
Berg Balance Scale assess the functional balance ability of participants with observation of 14 tasks, representing functional movements common in daily life
Time frame: Baseline and 4 weeks from baseline
Berg Balance Scale
Berg Balance Scale assess the functional balance ability of participants with observation of 14 tasks, representing functional movements common in daily life
Time frame: Baseline, 4 weeks from baseline, 8 weeks from baseline, 12 weeks from baseline
Trunk impairment scale
Trunk impairment scale performs to evaluate the sitting balance and trunk control ability examining static sitting balance, dynamic sitting balance, and coordination
Time frame: Baseline, 4 weeks from baseline, 8 weeks from baseline, 12 weeks from baseline
Functional Ambulation Category
Categorizes patients according to basic motor skills necessary for functional ambulation. It represents the status of ambulation
Time frame: Baseline, 4 weeks from baseline, 8 weeks from baseline, 12 weeks from baseline
10m walk test
10m walk test is used to examine gait speed, in which participant was asked to walk on a 14 meter of walkway wearing harness with two conditions; with the fastest speed or with self-selected comfortable speed
Time frame: Baseline, 4 weeks from baseline, 8 weeks from baseline, 12 weeks from baseline
Fugl-Meyer Assessment
Fugl-Meyer Assessment uses to examine the motor function and coordination of affected lower extremity
Time frame: Baseline, 4 weeks from baseline, 8 weeks from baseline, 12 weeks from baseline
Korean version of Falls efficacy scale
Asseses perception of balance and stability during activities of daily living Assesses fear of falling in the elderly population
Time frame: Baseline, 4 weeks from baseline, 8 weeks from baseline, 12 weeks from baseline
Scale for the assessment and rating of ataxia
Scale for the assessment and rating for infratentorial stroke
Time frame: Baseline, 4 weeks from baseline, 8 weeks from baseline, 12 weeks from baseline
Balance test using force plate
Each subject performs the following four tasks resembling Romberg test: standing with their feet positioning with the distance between their shoulders with eyes open (FSEO) or closed (FSEC), and standing with their feet together with eyes open (FTEO) or closed (FTEC). Each task is performed for 20 seconds and repeat for three times.
Time frame: Baseline, 4 weeks from baseline, 8 weeks from baseline, 12 weeks from baseline
Plan to share: No
This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
National Rehabilitation Center, Seoul, Korea