CClinicalTrials.gg
WithdrawnNCT02666365Updated May 24, 2018

Continuous v Bolus Infusion of Cefazolin During Ventral Hernia Repair

A Phase 4 interventional study of Bolus infusion of Cefazolin and Continuous infusion of Cefazolin in Surgical Site Infections, sponsored by Milton S. Hershey Medical Center. Withdrawn. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-05-24.

Sponsored by Milton S. Hershey Medical Center · Phase 4, Interventional, and Prevention

Why this study was withdrawn
Investigator decided not to proceed.
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
0
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Patients undergoing an elective ventral hernia repair will be randomly assigned to receive either bolus infusion or continuous infusion of the cefazolin as the prophylactic antibiotic. The blood concentrations of unbound cefazolin would be measured in their blood samples and the levels compared within the two groups with respect to their minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) value.

Read the detailed description

Patients who will be undergoing elective ventral hernia repair will be potential candidates for this study. Once identified, the surgical team will approach the participant for consent and inclusion in the study. On the day of surgery, the subjects will be assigned to either the Bolus Group (CB) or Continuous Infusion Group (CI) according to a randomly generated assignment procedure. During the procedure, the dose of prophylactic Cefazolin will be given an hour before surgery and will be administered in accordance to group assignment. Subjects in the CB will receive bolus infusions of Cefazolin every 4 hours till the end of surgery. Subjects in the CI group will receive an initial bolus injection of Cefazolin followed by a continuous infusion till the closure of skin incision. Blood samples will be taken during surgery at t=0, 15, 30 and 60 minutes and every hour following till the end of surgery or 6 hours (whichever comes sooner)

02

Conditions studied

  • Surgical Site Infections

Keywords

  • anesthesia
  • surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis
  • surgical site infections
03

In context

Surgical Wound Infection

670 studies on the registry are indexed under Surgical Wound Infection; 141 are open to participants now.

Browse Surgical Wound Infection studies →

Lead sponsor

Milton S. Hershey Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 480 studies on the registry; 61 are open to participants now.

Of its 56 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 42 (75%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Age >18 years
  • Elective open Ventral hernia repair in CDC class one (clean) cases
  • Planned operative time greater than 4 Hours
  • Planned routine administration of cefazolin for pre-op prophylaxis
  • No history of MRSA

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients unable to give informed consent
  • Allergy to cephalosporins
  • Pre-existing documented infection or ostomy (class II-IV wounds)
  • Received cefazolin within 24 hours before surgery
  • Creatinine clearance \< 30 ml/min
  • Upstaging of wound class intra-op that results in the administration of additional antibiotics
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
0 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Bolus infusion of Cefazolin

    Subjects undergoing a ventral hernia repair in this arm of the study will receive the surgical prophylactic, cefazolin, in a bolus infusion

    Procedure: Bolus infusion of Cefazolin

  • Active comparator
    Continuous Infusion of Cefazolin

    Subjects undergoing a ventral hernia repair in this arm of the study will receive the surgical prophylactic, cefazolin, in a continuous infusion

    Procedure: Continuous infusion of Cefazolin

Interventions

  • ProcedureBolus infusion of Cefazolin

    Subjects in the bolus infusion arm of the study will receive bolus infusions of cefazolin throughout the surgical procedure

    Also known as: Bolus infusion

  • ProcedureContinuous infusion of Cefazolin

    Subjects in the continuous infusion arm of the study will receive a continuous infusion of the cefazolin throughout the surgical procedure

    Also known as: Continuous infusion

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Difference in Area Under Curve (AUC) of Cefazolin plasma concentration and minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) in both treatment arms

    After blood sample collection is completed samples will be analyzed for plasma concentrations of cefazolin. This concentration will be compared with the standard minimum inhibitory concentration of Cefazolin. It is expected that the difference between AUC and MIC in the continuous infusion group will be higher than the bolus infusion group during the first four hours of surgery.

    Time frame: First four hours

Secondary outcomes

  1. Difference in AUC of plasma concentration between the two regimens for the entire duration of surgery

    After blood sample collection is completed samples will be analyzed for plasma concentrations of cefazolin. This concentration will be compared with the standard minimum inhibitory concentration of Cefazolin. It is expected that the difference between AUC and MIC in the continuous infusion group will be higher than the bolus infusion group for the entire duration of surgery.

    Time frame: Duration of surgery

  2. Total dose of cefazolin administered during the surgery

    Time frame: Duration of surgery

  3. Total dose of cefazolin administered during the first 24 hours

    Time frame: 24 hours after the beginning of surgery

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • MILES AA, MILES EM, BURKE J. The value and duration of defence reactions of the skin to the primary lodgement of bacteria. Br J Exp Pathol. 1957 Feb;38(1):79-96. No abstract available. PubMed 13413084 ↗
  • Lee FM, Trevino S, Kent-Street E, Sreeramoju P. Antimicrobial prophylaxis may not be the answer: Surgical site infections among patients receiving care per recommended guidelines. Am J Infect Control. 2013 Sep;41(9):799-802. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2012.11.021. Epub 2013 Mar 13. PubMed 23489739 ↗
  • Hawn MT, Vick CC, Richman J, Holman W, Deierhoi RJ, Graham LA, Henderson WG, Itani KM. Surgical site infection prevention: time to move beyond the surgical care improvement program. Ann Surg. 2011 Sep;254(3):494-9; discussion 499-501. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31822c6929. PubMed 21817889 ↗
  • Stulberg JJ, Delaney CP, Neuhauser DV, Aron DC, Fu P, Koroukian SM. Adherence to surgical care improvement project measures and the association with postoperative infections. JAMA. 2010 Jun 23;303(24):2479-85. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.841. PubMed 20571014 ↗
  • Bratzler DW, Dellinger EP, Olsen KM, Perl TM, Auwaerter PG, Bolon MK, Fish DN, Napolitano LM, Sawyer RG, Slain D, Steinberg JP, Weinstein RA; American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (ASHP); Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA); Surgical Infection Society (SIS); Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA). Clinical practice guidelines for antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgery. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2013 Feb;14(1):73-156. doi: 10.1089/sur.2013.9999. Epub 2013 Mar 5. No abstract available. PubMed 23461695 ↗
  • Adembri C, Ristori R, Chelazzi C, Arrigucci S, Cassetta MI, De Gaudio AR, Novelli A. Cefazolin bolus and continuous administration for elective cardiac surgery: improved pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010 Aug;140(2):471-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2010.03.038. Epub 2010 Jun 8. PubMed 20570290 ↗
  • Trent Magruder J, Grimm JC, Dungan SP, Shah AS, Crow JR, Shoulders BR, Lester L, Barodka V. Continuous Intraoperative Cefazolin Infusion May Reduce Surgical Site Infections During Cardiac Surgical Procedures: A Propensity-Matched Analysis. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2015 Dec;29(6):1582-7. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2015.03.026. Epub 2015 Mar 31. PubMed 26275516 ↗
  • Ferraz AA, Siqueira LT, Campos JM, Araujo GC, Martins Filho ED, Ferraz EM. ANTIBIOTIC PROPHYLAXIS IN BARIATRIC SURGERY: a continuous infusion of cefazolin versus ampicillin/sulbactam and ertapenem. Arq Gastroenterol. 2015 Apr-Jun;52(2):83-7. doi: 10.1590/S0004-28032015000200002. PubMed 26039823 ↗
  • Finan KR, Vick CC, Kiefe CI, Neumayer L, Hawn MT. Predictors of wound infection in ventral hernia repair. Am J Surg. 2005 Nov;190(5):676-81. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.06.041. PubMed 16226938 ↗
  • Dunne JR, Malone DL, Tracy JK, Napolitano LM. Abdominal wall hernias: risk factors for infection and resource utilization. J Surg Res. 2003 May 1;111(1):78-84. doi: 10.1016/s0022-4804(03)00077-5. PubMed 12842451 ↗
  • Houck JP, Rypins EB, Sarfeh IJ, Juler GL, Shimoda KJ. Repair of incisional hernia. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1989 Nov;169(5):397-9. PubMed 2530641 ↗
  • Kaafarani HM, Kaufman D, Reda D, Itani KM. Predictors of surgical site infection in laparoscopic and open ventral incisional herniorrhaphy. J Surg Res. 2010 Oct;163(2):229-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2010.03.019. Epub 2010 Apr 1. PubMed 20605590 ↗
  • Blatnik JA, Krpata DM, Novitsky YW, Rosen MJ. Does a history of wound infection predict postoperative surgical site infection after ventral hernia repair? Am J Surg. 2012 Mar;203(3):370-4; discussion 374. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2011.12.001. PubMed 22364903 ↗
  • Buijk SE, Gyssens IC, Mouton JW, Metselaar HJ, Groenland TH, Verbrugh HA, Bruining HA. Perioperative pharmacokinetics of cefotaxime in serum and bile during continuous and intermittent infusion in liver transplant patients. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2004 Jul;54(1):199-205. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkh268. Epub 2004 Jun 2. PubMed 15175266 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 24, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02666365
Lead sponsor
Milton S. Hershey Medical Center
Responsible party
Kunal Karamchandani (Assistant Professor of Anesthesiology, Milton S. Hershey Medical Center) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 28, 2016
Start date
Mar 2018 (estimated)
Primary completion
Mar 2019 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 2019 (estimated)
Last update
May 24, 2018

Study contacts

Kunal Karamchandani, MD
principal investigator · Milton S. Hershey Medical Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is withdrawn, as verified in May 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion