CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02660775(ClaCoS)Updated Jan 27, 2022

Social Cognitive Assessment in Autism and Schizophrenia

An interventional study of schizophrenia and Autism in Schizophrenia, sponsored by Hôpital le Vinatier. Completed at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 45 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-01-27.

Sponsored by Hôpital le Vinatier · Not applicable, Interventional, and Screening

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
440
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years to 45 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

In people with schizophrenia or people with autism, impairments of social cognition are a core feature of the disease and, according to researchers who represent valuable references on this subject for the international community, three to five processes of social cognition are usually altered in those diseases: (1) emotional processing which is the ability to identify emotions through facial expressions, gestures, and tone of voice, (2) theory of mind (ToM), which is defined as "the ability to attribute mental states (beliefs, intents, desires, ...) to oneself and others, and to understand that others have beliefs, intentions, and desires that are different from one's own", (3) attributional style which refers to how people explain the causes of positive and negative events, and corresponding, in schizophrenia, to self-serving and personalizing bias that means a tendency to blame others for negative life events rather than sharing the responsibilities between different sources; and (4 and 5) social perception and knowledge, which can be defined as decoding and interpreting social cues from others, taking the social context into account, and knowing social rules, roles, and goals. Components of social cognition appear to be related to both symptomatology and functioning in everyday life. The present study aims to assess a new social cognitive battery developed by several teams in France: ClaCoS.

Read the detailed description

The project's objectives are: (1) to assess relevance of ClaCoS in schizophrenia and autism compared to healthy controls, and to analyze links between social cognition and both neurocognition and symptoms, (2) to collect data in a large sample of healthy controls in order to establish appropriate standards for tools composing ClaCoS battery.

For the first objective, three kind of evaluation will be proposed: clinical, neurocognitive and social cognitive (ClaCoS). Three populations of 80 participants will be compared: healthy controls, patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorders, and patients with autism spectrum disorders. These three groups will be matched on sex, age and level of education.

For the second objective a systematic collection of data will be carried out in a large sample of healthy controls. In this part of the study, only social cognitive measures will be recorded. Subjects will be ranked according to three criteria: three classes for age (18-25 years old, 26-35 and 36-45), five classes for socio-professional status according to the INSEE classification, and two classes for sex (men/women).

02

Conditions studied

  • Schizophrenia

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • schizophrenia
03

In context

Schizophrenia

3,471 studies on the registry are indexed under Schizophrenia; 471 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 440 is above the median of 70 across 2,871 interventional studies indexed under Schizophrenia.

Browse Schizophrenia studies →

Lead sponsor

Hôpital le Vinatier is the lead sponsor of 106 studies on the registry; 41 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 45 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Aged 18-45 years old
  • No psychiatric or neurologic conditions or comorbidity
  • No relatives with people with people with history of neuropsychiatric disease
  • French native language or education in a French school since the first year of primary school
  • Consent to participate to the study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Aged 18-45 years old
  • Patients with schizophrenia: diagnosis assessed with DSM5 criteria
  • No modification of psychotropic treatment during the month before inclusion
  • French native language or education in a French school since the first year of primary school
  • Consent to participate to the study and agreement of the legal guardian
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Screening
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
440 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    schizophrenia

    this project is to assess relevance of ClaCoS in schizophrenia compared to healthy controls, and to analyze links between social cognition and both neurocognition and symptoms, (2) to collect data in a large sample of healthy controls in order to establish appropriate standards for tools composing ClaCoS battery.

    Behavioral: schizophrenia

  • Experimental
    autism

    this project is to assess relevance of ClaCoS in autism compared to healthy controls, and to analyze links between social cognition and both neurocognition and symptoms, (2) to collect data in a large sample of healthy controls in order to establish appropriate standards for tools composing ClaCoS battery.

    Behavioral: Autism

  • Placebo comparator
    healthy controls

    this project is to assess relevance of ClaCoS in autism compared to healthy controls, and to analyze links between social cognition and both neurocognition and symptoms, (2) to collect data in a large sample of healthy controls in order to establish appropriate standards for tools composing ClaCoS battery.

    Behavioral: Healthy controls

Interventions

  • Behavioralschizophrenia

    The battery (ClaCoS) is composed by 6 tests and several scores will be recorded for each: * for emotion perception : Facial emotions recognition task (TREF) * for theory of mind : Movie for the assessment of social cognition ( MASC-VF) * for attributional bias : Ambiguous Intentions Hostility Questionnaire ( AIHQ) * for social perception and knowledge : interpretation score - with and without index, comprehension score ( PerSo ) * for empathy :Questionnaire of cognitive and affective empathy ( QCAE) for people with schizophrenia * for self assessment : Self - assessment of social cognition (ACSo)

  • BehavioralAutism

    The battery (ClaCoS ) is composed by 6 tests and several scores will be recorded for each: * for emotion perception : Facial emotions recognition task(TREF ): total score, score per emotion, detection levels * for theory of mind : Movie for the assessment of social cognition (MASC ) :total score, error type * for attributional bias : Ambiguous Intentions Hostility Questionnaire (AIHQ) :hostility score, attribution score, aggression score * for social perception and knowledge : interpretation score - with and without index, comprehension score ( PerSo ) * for empathy : Empathy quotient (EQ) * for self assessment : Self - assessment of social cognition ( ACSo ): total score and scores per processes

  • BehavioralHealthy controls

    only social cognitive measures

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change from Baseline in social cognition measures

    The battery (ClaCoS ) is composed by 6 tests and several scores will be recorded for each: * for emotion perception : total score, score per emotion, detection levels (TREF) * for theory of mind : total score, error type (MASC) * for attributional bias : hostility score, attribution score, aggression score (AIHQ ) * for social perception and knowledge : interpretation score - with and without index, comprehension score (PerSo) * for empathy : Empathy quotient (EQ) for people with autism / Questionnaire of cognitive and affective empathy (QCAE )for people with schizophrenia (total score and sub scores) * for self assessment : total score and scores per processes( ACSo )

    Time frame: Week 12

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change from Baseline in symptoms measure

    Positive and negative symptoms scale, global score, positive sub scale score and negative sub scale score (PANSS)

    Time frame: Week 12

  2. Change from Baseline in Neurocognitive functioning measures

    Several neurocognitive processes will be assessed and notably memory, attention, executive functions, and processing speed.

    Time frame: Week 12

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Professeur FRANCK Nicolas
    Bron, Rhone-alpes 69678, France
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 27, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02660775
Lead sponsor
Hôpital le Vinatier
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 21, 2016
Start date
Dec 4, 2015
Primary completion
Mar 31, 2021
Completion
Jun 30, 2021
Last update
Jan 27, 2022

Study contacts

FRANCK NICOLAS, PUPH
principal investigator · Service Universitaire de Réhabilitation - Le Vinatier Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion