An interventional study of Transperineal repair with PIS and Transperineal repair without PIS in Rectocele, sponsored by Mansoura University. Completed at 1 site in Egypt. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-03-16.
Sponsored by Mansoura University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
Comparison between transperineal repair of rectocele with or without posterior internal sphincterotomy.
Transperineal repair of anterior rectocele is performed in two groups of patients, the first will undergo limited posterior internal sphincterotomy, the second group will not have internal sphincteroromy. The two groups are compared regarding recurrence of rectocele and improvement of symptoms.
50 studies on the registry are indexed under Rectocele; 9 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 60 is close to the median of 62 across 37 interventional studies indexed under Rectocele.
Browse Rectocele studies →Mansoura University is the lead sponsor of 1,119 studies on the registry; 183 are open to participants now.
Of its 9 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
transperineal repair of anterior rectocele with limited internal sphincterotomy
Procedure: Transperineal repair with PIS
transperineal repair of anterior rectocele only
Procedure: Transperineal repair without PIS
Repair of anterior rectocele via transperineal approach followed by limited internal sphincterotomy at 6 o'clock.
Repair of anterior rectocele via transperineal approach without performing limited internal sphincterotomy
Incidence of recurrence
Number of patients presenting with recurrent or persistent symptoms during follow up
Time frame: 18 months
Plan to share: No
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
The record gives a start of Jan 2011, a primary completion of Jan 2016 and a completion of Feb 2016. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.