CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02647944Updated Oct 27, 2017Results posted

Pilot Study of the Effect of Liraglutide on Weight Loss and Gastric Functions in Obesity

A Phase 2 interventional study of Liraglutide and Placebo in Obesity, sponsored by Mayo Clinic. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-10-27.

Sponsored by Mayo Clinic · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
40
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study was being done to assess the stomach emptying effect of a maximum dose of 3 mg Liraglutide compared to placebo in subjects who are overweight or obese. Liraglutide is a medication approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for routine clinical use.

Read the detailed description

The objective of this study was to compare effects of liraglutide and placebo over 16 weeks on gastric motor functions, satiation, satiety and weight in obese patients. Subjects were randomized to liraglutide or placebo. Liraglutide or placebo was escalated by 0.6mg/day each week for 5 weeks and continued until week 16. At baseline and after 16 weeks' treatment, the investigators measured weight, gastric emptying of solids (GES), gastric volumes, satiation (maximum tolerated volume of liquid nutrient drink), and satiety. GES was also measured at 5 weeks.

During the study, the subjects received standardized dietetic and behavioral advice for weight reduction therapy. All subjects were given a standard text for information and met with a behavioral psychologist who has expertise in obesity treatment at the baseline visit and at visits at weeks 4,8, and 12. Additionally, the subjects had brief contact with a member of the study team every 4 weeks to inquire about their adherence to study protocol, any difficulties they were experiencing, whether they were reading their text assignments, and to answer any additional questions.

02

Conditions studied

  • Obesity
03

In context

Obesity

6,296 studies on the registry are indexed under Obesity; 1,695 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 40 is below the median of 78 across 4,878 interventional studies indexed under Obesity.

Browse Obesity studies →

Lead sponsor

Mayo Clinic is the lead sponsor of 3,218 studies on the registry; 670 are open to participants now.

Of its 445 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 313 (70%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Overweight and obese adults (≥30 kg/m\^2 or ≥27 kg/m\^2 with an obesity-related co-morbidity).
  • Subjects residing within 125 miles of Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota.
  • Healthy individuals with no unstable psychiatric disease and not currently on treatment for cardiac, pulmonary, gastrointestinal, hepatic, renal, hematological, neurological, or endocrine (other than hyperglycemia type 2 diabetes mellitus on metformin) disorders.
  • Women of childbearing potential will be using an effective form of contraception, and have negative pregnancy tests within 48 hours of enrolment and before each radiation exposure.
  • Subjects must have the ability to provide informed consent before any trial-related activities.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

  • Weight exceeding 137 kilograms (safety limit of camera for measuring gastric volumes).
  • Abdominal surgery other than appendectomy, Caesarian section or tubal ligation.
  • Positive history of chronic gastrointestinal diseases, systemic disease that could affect gastrointestinal motility, or use of medications that may alter gastrointestinal motility, appetite or absorption, e.g., orlistat.
  • Patients with a personal or family history of medullary thyroid carcinoma or Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia-type 2.
  • Patients with a personal history of pancreatitis (acute or chronic)
  • Significant untreated psychiatric dysfunction based upon screening with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Inventory, a self-administered alcoholism screening test (AUDIT-C), and the Questionnaire on Eating and Weight Patterns (binge eating disorders and bulimia). If such a dysfunction is identified by a Hospital Anxiety Depression (HAD) score >8 or difficulties with substance or eating disorders, the participant will be excluded and given a referral letter to his/her primary care doctor for further appraisal and follow-up.
  • Intake of medication, whether prescribed or over the counter (except multivitamins), within 7 days of the study. Exceptions are birth control pill, estrogen replacement therapy, thyroxin replacement therapy and any medication administered for co-morbidities as long as they do not alter gastrointestinal motility including gastric emptying (GE) and gastric accommodation. For example, statins for hyperlipidemia, diuretics, β-adrenergic blockers,Angiotensin Converting Enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and angiotensin antagonists for hypertension, and metformin for type 2 diabetes mellitus or prediabetes are permissible. In contrast, resin sequestrants for hyperlipidemia [which may reduce GE and reduce appetite, α2-adrenergic agonists for hypertension, or other glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1) receptor agonists (exenatide) or amylin analogs (pramlintide) are not permissible because they significantly affect GE and/or gastric accommodation.
  • Hypersensitivity to the study medication, liraglutide.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Factorial assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
40 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Liraglutide

    Saxenda initiated at 0.6mg S.C. daily for 1 week; subjects will return to the Clinical Research Unit (CRU) each week until an increase by 0.6 mg/day in weekly intervals to a dose of 3.0 mg/day is achieved. Once maintenance dose of 3.0 mg is achieved, subjects will return approximately every 4 weeks to obtain new supply of study medication.

    Drug: Liraglutide

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    Placebo initiated at 0.6mg S.C. daily for 1 week; subjects will return to the Clinical Research Unit (CRU) each week until an increase by 0.6 mg/day in weekly intervals to a dose of 3.0 mg/day is achieved. Once maintenance dose of 3.0 mg is achieved, subjects will return approximately every 4 weeks to obtain new supply of study medication.

    Drug: Placebo

Interventions

  • DrugLiraglutide

    Initiate at 0.6mg S.C. daily for 1 week; subjects will return to the Clinical Research Unit (CRU) each week until an increase by 0.6mg/day in weekly intervals to a dose of 3.0 mg/day is achieved (\~4 weeks). Once maintenance dose of 3.0 mg is achieved, subjects will return approximately every 4 weeks to obtain new supply of study medication.

    Also known as: Saxenda

  • DrugPlacebo
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Gastric Emptying of Solids Half-time (T1/2) at 5 Weeks

    Gastric emptying of solids was assessed by scintigraphy using a 320 Kcal 99mTc-radiolabeled egg, solid-liquid meal. Gastric Emptying Half-time was the linear interpretation of time to when 50% of radiolabeled meal emptied from the stomach.

    Time frame: 5 weeks

  2. Gastric Emptying of Solids Half-time (T1/2) at 16 Weeks

    Gastric emptying of solids was assessed by scintigraphy using a 320 Kcal 99mTc-radiolabeled egg, solid-liquid meal. Gastric Emptying Half-time was the linear interpretation of time to when 50% of radiolabeled meal emptied from the stomach.

    Time frame: 16 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Weight Change at 5 Weeks

    Body weight in kg was measured at 5 weeks and compared to baseline.

    Time frame: baseline, 5 weeks

  2. Weight Change at 16 Weeks

    Body weight in kg was measured at 16 weeks and compared to baseline.

    Time frame: baseline, 16 weeks

  3. Satiety by Buffet Meal, Total Calories Ingested at 16 Weeks

    Satiety (a measure of appetite) was appraised by "free feeding" buffet meal consisting of standard foods of known nutrient composition. The total amount of food consumed was analyzed by the study dietitian.

    Time frame: 16 weeks

  4. Satiation Volume to Fullness at 16 Weeks

    After drinking Ensure, participants recorded their sensations every 5 minutes using a numerical scale from 0 to 5, with level 0 being no symptoms, level 3 corresponding to fullness sensation after a typical meal and level 5 corresponding to the maximal tolerated volume (maximum or unbearable fullness/satiation).

    Time frame: 16 weeks

  5. Satiation Maximum Tolerated Volume at 16 Weeks

    After drinking Ensure, participants recorded their sensations every 5 minutes using a numerical scale from 0 to 5, with level 0 being no symptoms, level 3 corresponding to fullness sensation after a typical meal and level 5 corresponding to the maximal tolerated volume (maximum or unbearable fullness/satiation).

    Time frame: 16 weeks

  6. Gastric Fasting Volume at 16 Weeks

    Gastric fasting volume was measured by single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) imaging of the stomach after intravenous injection of 99mTC-pertechnetate, which is taken up by the gastric mucosa.

    Time frame: 16 weeks

  7. Gastric Postprandial Volume at 16 Weeks

    Gastric fasting volume was measured by single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) imaging of the stomach after intravenous injection of 99mTC-pertechnetate, which is taken up by the gastric mucosa.

    Time frame: 16 weeks

  8. Gastric Accommodation Volume at 16 Weeks

    Change between postprandial and fasting whole gastric volume by 99mTc-SPECT Imaging. A noninvasive SPECT method was used to measure gastric volume during fasting and 32 min after a liquid nutritional supplement meal. Subjects reported to the clinic after an overnight fast. 99mTC was given by an intravenous injection in the forearm. The first fasting scan was obtained, and the study medication was given s.c. After 10 min, a 2nd fasting post medication scan was obtained, and the meal consumed; then two serial postprandial scans were obtained. Each scan required 9-12 min. Tomographic images of the gastric wall were obtained throughout the long axis of the stomach using a dual-head gamma camera that rotates around the body. This allows assessment of the radiolabeled circumference of the gastric wall, rather than the intragastric content.

    Time frame: 16 weeks (approximately 1 hour after 99mTC injection)

07

Results

Posted Oct 27, 2017

Participant flow

Participants were enrolled between December 18, 2015 and September 1, 2016 at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneLiraglutidePlacebo
Started1921
Completed1718
Not completed23
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject03
Withdrew: Adverse event20

Outcome measures

PrimaryGastric Emptying of Solids Half-time (T1/2) at 5 Weeks

Gastric emptying of solids was assessed by scintigraphy using a 320 Kcal 99mTc-radiolabeled egg, solid-liquid meal. Gastric Emptying Half-time was the linear interpretation of time to when 50% of radiolabeled meal emptied from the stomach.

Time frame:
5 weeks
Reported as:
Median · minutes
Gastric Emptying of Solids Half-time (T1/2) at 5 Weeks
minutesLiraglutidePlacebo
Gastric Emptying of Solids Half-time (T1/2) at 5 Weeks180 (162 to 295)117 (96 to 137)
PrimaryGastric Emptying of Solids Half-time (T1/2) at 16 Weeks

Gastric emptying of solids was assessed by scintigraphy using a 320 Kcal 99mTc-radiolabeled egg, solid-liquid meal. Gastric Emptying Half-time was the linear interpretation of time to when 50% of radiolabeled meal emptied from the stomach.

Time frame:
16 weeks
Reported as:
Median · minutes
Gastric Emptying of Solids Half-time (T1/2) at 16 Weeks
minutesLiraglutidePlacebo
Gastric Emptying of Solids Half-time (T1/2) at 16 Weeks142 (120 to 177)113 (101 to 133)
SecondaryWeight Change at 5 Weeks

Body weight in kg was measured at 5 weeks and compared to baseline.

Time frame:
baseline, 5 weeks
Reported as:
Median · kg
Weight Change at 5 Weeks
kgLiraglutidePlacebo
Weight Change at 5 Weeks3.70 (2.80 to 4.80)0.60 (-0.30 to 1.4)
Statistical analysis
  • Liraglutide vs Placebo · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = <0.001
SecondaryWeight Change at 16 Weeks

Body weight in kg was measured at 16 weeks and compared to baseline.

Time frame:
baseline, 16 weeks
Reported as:
Median · kg
Weight Change at 16 Weeks
kgLiraglutidePlacebo
Weight Change at 16 Weeks5.30 (5.20 to 6.80)2.5 (0.1 to 4.2)
Statistical analysis
  • Liraglutide vs Placebo · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = <0.001
SecondarySatiety by Buffet Meal, Total Calories Ingested at 16 Weeks

Satiety (a measure of appetite) was appraised by "free feeding" buffet meal consisting of standard foods of known nutrient composition. The total amount of food consumed was analyzed by the study dietitian.

Time frame:
16 weeks
Reported as:
Median · kcal
Satiety by Buffet Meal, Total Calories Ingested at 16 Weeks
kcalLiraglutidePlacebo
Satiety by Buffet Meal, Total Calories Ingested at 16 Weeks554.0 (406 to 687)680.5 (513 to 1002)
Statistical analysis
  • Liraglutide vs Placebo · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.27
SecondarySatiation Volume to Fullness at 16 Weeks

After drinking Ensure, participants recorded their sensations every 5 minutes using a numerical scale from 0 to 5, with level 0 being no symptoms, level 3 corresponding to fullness sensation after a typical meal and level 5 corresponding to the maximal tolerated volume (maximum or unbearable fullness/satiation).

Time frame:
16 weeks
Reported as:
Median · mL
Satiation Volume to Fullness at 16 Weeks
mLLiraglutidePlacebo
Satiation Volume to Fullness at 16 Weeks360 (360 to 600)600 (480 to 720)
Statistical analysis
  • Liraglutide vs Placebo · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.069
SecondarySatiation Maximum Tolerated Volume at 16 Weeks

After drinking Ensure, participants recorded their sensations every 5 minutes using a numerical scale from 0 to 5, with level 0 being no symptoms, level 3 corresponding to fullness sensation after a typical meal and level 5 corresponding to the maximal tolerated volume (maximum or unbearable fullness/satiation).

Time frame:
16 weeks
Reported as:
Median · mL
Satiation Maximum Tolerated Volume at 16 Weeks
mLLiraglutidePlacebo
Satiation Maximum Tolerated Volume at 16 Weeks750 (651 to 908)1126 (944 to 1185)
Statistical analysis
  • Liraglutide vs Placebo · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.054
SecondaryGastric Fasting Volume at 16 Weeks

Gastric fasting volume was measured by single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) imaging of the stomach after intravenous injection of 99mTC-pertechnetate, which is taken up by the gastric mucosa.

Time frame:
16 weeks
Reported as:
Median · mL
Gastric Fasting Volume at 16 Weeks
mLLiraglutidePlacebo
Gastric Fasting Volume at 16 Weeks231 (192 to 277)192 (179 to 223)
Statistical analysis
  • Liraglutide vs Placebo · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.13
SecondaryGastric Postprandial Volume at 16 Weeks

Gastric fasting volume was measured by single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) imaging of the stomach after intravenous injection of 99mTC-pertechnetate, which is taken up by the gastric mucosa.

Time frame:
16 weeks
Reported as:
Median · mL
Gastric Postprandial Volume at 16 Weeks
mLLiraglutidePlacebo
Gastric Postprandial Volume at 16 Weeks705 (633 to 744)668 (605 to 794)
Statistical analysis
  • Liraglutide vs Placebo · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.68
SecondaryGastric Accommodation Volume at 16 Weeks

Change between postprandial and fasting whole gastric volume by 99mTc-SPECT Imaging. A noninvasive SPECT method was used to measure gastric volume during fasting and 32 min after a liquid nutritional supplement meal. Subjects reported to the clinic after an overnight fast. 99mTC was given by an intravenous injection in the forearm. The first fasting scan was obtained, and the study medication was given s.c. After 10 min, a 2nd fasting post medication scan was obtained, and the meal consumed; then two serial postprandial scans were obtained. Each scan required 9-12 min. Tomographic images of the gastric wall were obtained throughout the long axis of the stomach using a dual-head gamma camera that rotates around the body. This allows assessment of the radiolabeled circumference of the gastric wall, rather than the intragastric content.

Time frame:
16 weeks (approximately 1 hour after 99mTC injection)
Reported as:
Median · mL
Gastric Accommodation Volume at 16 Weeks
mLLiraglutidePlacebo
Gastric Accommodation Volume at 16 Weeks453 (378 to 536)433 (408 to 602)
Statistical analysis
  • Liraglutide vs Placebo · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.95

Adverse events

Collected over 16 weeks. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Liraglutide0/19 (0%)0/19 (0%)17/19 (89.5%)
Placebo0/21 (0%)0/21 (0%)14/21 (66.7%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventLiraglutidePlacebo
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders12/192/21
HeadacheGeneral disorders5/194/21
Abdominal pain/discomfortGastrointestinal disorders4/192/21
Abdominal CrampingGastrointestinal disorders3/192/21
Loose stoolsGastrointestinal disorders3/191/21
Decreased appetiteGastrointestinal disorders3/191/21
DiarrheaGastrointestinal disorders1/193/21
BloatingGastrointestinal disorders2/192/21
ConstipationGastrointestinal disorders2/192/21
LightheadedGeneral disorders1/192/21

Baseline characteristics

Intent to treat analysis

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)LiraglutidePlaceboTotal
Mean40.95 ± 11.0837.81 ± 12.1439.30 ± 11.61
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)LiraglutidePlaceboTotal
Female171835
Male235
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)LiraglutidePlaceboTotal
White Non-Hispanic171936
Asian101
Hispanic or Latino022
Other101
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(Participants)LiraglutidePlaceboTotal
United States192140
Body Mass Index (BMI)
Body Mass Index (BMI)(kg/m^2)LiraglutidePlaceboTotal
Mean37.2 (33.6 to 41.0)34.6 (33.4 to 38.9)36.65 (33.5 to 39.5)
Body Weight
Body Weight(kg)LiraglutidePlaceboTotal
Mean103.7 (90.0 to 112.2)99.1 (90.1 to 111.2)103 (90.0 to 111.5)
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Mayo Clinic in Rochester
    Rochester, Minnesota 55905, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Halawi H, Khemani D, Eckert D, O'Neill J, Kadouh H, Grothe K, Clark MM, Burton DD, Vella A, Acosta A, Zinsmeister AR, Camilleri M. Effects of liraglutide on weight, satiation, and gastric functions in obesity: a randomised, placebo-controlled pilot trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Dec;2(12):890-899. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(17)30285-6. Epub 2017 Sep 27. PubMed 28958851 ↗
  • Maselli D, Atieh J, Clark MM, Eckert D, Taylor A, Carlson P, Burton DD, Busciglio I, Harmsen WS, Vella A, Acosta A, Camilleri M. Effects of liraglutide on gastrointestinal functions and weight in obesity: A randomized clinical and pharmacogenomic trial. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2022 Aug;30(8):1608-1620. doi: 10.1002/oby.23481. PubMed 35894080 ↗
  • Kadouh H, Chedid V, Halawi H, Burton DD, Clark MM, Khemani D, Vella A, Acosta A, Camilleri M. GLP-1 Analog Modulates Appetite, Taste Preference, Gut Hormones, and Regional Body Fat Stores in Adults with Obesity. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2020 May 1;105(5):1552-63. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgz140. PubMed 31665455 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 27, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02647944
Lead sponsor
Mayo Clinic
Collaborators
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK), Novo Nordisk A/S
Responsible party
Michael Camilleri (Principle Investigator, Mayo Clinic) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 6, 2016
Start date
Dec 18, 2015
Primary completion
Dec 30, 2016
Completion
Dec 30, 2016
Results posted
Oct 27, 2017
Last update
Oct 27, 2017

Study contacts

Michael Camilleri, MD
principal investigator · Mayo Clinic

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion