ClinicalTrials.gg
WithdrawnNCT02636803Updated Aug 15, 2019

Study of the Efficacy of Oxfendazole Compared to Albendazole in the Treatment of Trichuris Trichiura Infection in Adults

A Phase 2 interventional study of oxfendazole and albendazole in Helminthiasis, sponsored by Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. Withdrawn. Open to participants aged 16 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-08-15.

Sponsored by Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was withdrawn
not going to be conducted
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
0
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
16 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The aim of this study is to provide data on the efficacy of oxfendazole against Trichuris trichiura at different doses in comparison to the standard single 400 mg dose of albendazole. In addition, the study will provide data on oxfendazole efficacy against other common nematodes encountered in man (Enterobius vermicularis, Ascaris lumbricoides, Ancylostoma duodenalis, Necator americanus).

Read the detailed description

This is an open, comparative study in adult patients with proven intestinal infection with Trichuris trichiura. Patients meeting the study entry criteria will receive either 6mg/kg, or 30 mg/kg of oxfendazole as a single oral dose or 6 mg/kg orally for three days or albendazole 400mg as a single oral dose. Stool samples will be obtained and examined 7, 14 and 21 days after treatment.

Two hundred clinically evaluable patients of either gender, 16 - 65 years of age, presenting with proven Trichuris trichiura infection, recruited from one centre, will be included in the study. there will be 15 patients in each treatment group. Duration of accrual will be determined in discussion with the clinical site in Iquitos, Peru.

02

Conditions studied

  • Helminthiasis

Keywords

  • trichuris
  • hookworms
  • Ascaris
03

In context

Helminthiasis

37 studies on the registry are indexed under Helminthiasis; 2 are open to participants now.

Browse Helminthiasis studies →

Lead sponsor

Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health is the lead sponsor of 371 studies on the registry; 42 are open to participants now.

Of its 5 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 3 (60%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
16 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Written or witnessed oral has been obtained.
  2. Has Trichuris trichiura demonstrated in stool samples obtained during the week before enrolment: The presence of other helminths: Enterobius vermicularis, Ascaris lumbricoides, Necator americanus, Ancylostoma duodenalis will not be a cause for exclusion.
  3. Is willing to comply with the requirements of the protocol and particularly to provide 4 stool samples, pretreatment and 7, 14 and 21 days after treatment.
  4. Female patients of child bearing potential, who are using an established method of (surgically sterile, intra-uterine contraceptive device, oral contraceptives, diaphragm in combination with contraceptive cream or foam, or condom in combination with contraceptive cream or foam)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. The patient has demonstrated a previous reaction to benzimidazole or other related compound.
  2. Presence of other helminths without Trichuris trichiura. Note: Non-target species may be present and details of response will be recorded.
  3. The patient has diarrhoeal disease that would interfere with the evaluation of stool samples.
  4. The patient has received an anthelminthic in the 2 weeks prior to enrolment into the study.
  5. The patient has received an drug within 30 days or 5 half-lives (whichever is longer) of the screening visit or is scheduled to receive such a drug during the study period.
  6. The patient has a concomitant infection or any other underlying disease that would compromise the diagnosis and the evaluation of the response to the study medication.
  7. The patient has a known history of renal dysfunction (plasma creatinine ≥ 1.5 times for age) or hepatic dysfunction (liver enzymes ≥ 1.5
  8. Is a female who is pregnant, lactating or planning a pregnancy during the study, or is not practicing any form of (see inclusion criteria (4.2.5).
  9. Patient that is unwilling or unable to take part in this study.
  10. The patient has previously been enrolled in the study.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(5)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

ULN (upper limit of normal)

The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.

“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Factorial assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
0 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    oxfendazole 6 mg/kg

    patients receive 6 mg/kg oxfendazole once

    Drug: oxfendazole

  • Experimental
    oxfendazole 30 mg/kg

    patients receive 30 mg/kg oxfendazole once

    Drug: oxfendazole

  • Experimental
    oxfendazole 6 mg/kg 3 times

    patients receive 6 mg/kg oxfendazole three times

    Drug: oxfendazole

  • Active comparator
    albendazole 400 mg

    patients receive 400 mg albendazole once

    Drug: albendazole

Interventions

  • group receives a single dose of oxfendazole at 6 or 30 mg/kg or three 6 mg/kg doses

  • group receives one 400 mg dose of albendazole

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Cure of Trichuris trichiura

    Cure of infection (Clinical Cure) shown by absence of Trichuris eggs in stool examinations at Day 21, using Kato Katz test.

    Time frame: day 21 following treatment

  2. Reduction in Trichuis trichiura eggs (compared to pretreatment)

    Reduction (compared to baseline) of Trichuris eggs in stool examinations at 21, using Kato Katz test.

    Time frame: day 21 following treatment

Secondary outcomes

  1. Cure of other intestinal helminths

    Absence of Ascaris, Necator eggs in stool using Kato Katz test

    Time frame: day 21 following treatment

  2. Safety and tolerability of oxfendazole in the treatment of adult patients assessed by cumulative adverse events

    Cumulative adverse events following treatment up to Day 21

    Time frame: treatment through day 21 following treatment

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — posting to CT.gov and publication

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Start is estimated for Nov 2019; primary completion for Aug 2020, 9 months later.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Dec 14, 2015
First posted
Dec 22, 2015
StartEst.
Nov 2019
Primary completionEst.
Aug 2020
CompletionEst.
Feb 2021
Last update
Aug 15, 2019
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 15, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02636803
Collaborators
Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 22, 2015
Start date
Nov 2019 (estimated)
Primary completion
Aug 2020 (estimated)
Completion
Feb 2021 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 15, 2019

Study contacts

Robert H Gilman, MD
principal investigator · Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
Hector H Garcia, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia
Richard J Horton, MB BChir, MRCGP, FFPM
principal investigator · Tropical Projects
Armando E Gonzalez, DVM, PhD
principal investigator · National University of San Marcos, Peru

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is withdrawn, as verified in Aug 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Oxfendazole

Start the discussion