CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02634684Updated Aug 17, 2021Results posted

Pharmacologically-augmented Cognitive Therapies (PACTs) for Schizophrenia.

A Phase 2 interventional study of Dextroamphetamine and Placebo in Schizophrenia, sponsored by University of California, San Diego. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 55 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-08-17.

Sponsored by University of California, San Diego · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 1 year 5 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jul 2014, registered Dec 2015).
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
82
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 55 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This application seeks renewed support for MH59803, "Dopaminergic substrates of startle gating across species," to extend a clear path of "bench-to-bedside" progress towards a critical paradigm shift in therapeutic models for schizophrenia (SZ) and schizoaffective disorder, depressed type (SZA): the use of Pharmacologic Augmentation of Cognitive Therapies (PACTs). This novel therapeutic strategy for SZ/SZA directly addresses the need for more effective treatments for this devastating disorder. MH59803 has investigated the neural regulation of laboratory-based measures of deficient information processing in SZ/SZA patients, using rodents and healthy human subjects (HS) to explicate the biology of these deficits, and to establish a rational basis for developing novel therapies for SZ/SZA. In its first 9 years, MH59803 studies of the neural regulation of prepulse inhibition (PPI) of startle in rats focused on basic neurobiological and molecular mechanisms. Over the past 2 years of support, MH59803 studies moved "from bench-to-bedside," focusing on dopamine (DA) agonist effects on PPI and neurocognition in HS, and their regulation by genes identified in cross-species studies. These studies detected biological markers that predict PPI-enhancing and pro-cognitive effects of the DA releaser, amphetamine (AMPH) in humans, leading to specific predictions of AMPH effects on PPI, neurocognition and Targeted Cognitive Training in SZ/SZA patients. If confirmed in the present application, these predictions could help transform therapeutic approaches to SZ/SZA. This renewal application of MH59803 thus reflects a logical progression of studies at systems and molecular levels, translated first to HS, and now to potentially transformative therapeutic models in SZ/SZA patients.

Read the detailed description

MH59803 demonstrated that AMPH (20 mg p.o.) significantly increased PPI and neurocognitive performance (MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery; MCCB) in HS characterized by specific performance-based or genetic biomarkers, including the val/val genotype for the rs4680 polymorphism of catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT). Mechanistically-informative results were detected in studies of AMPH effects on PPI in rats with high vs. low brain regional Comt expression. Together with several reports of improved neurocognition and no adverse effects of acute or sustained AMPH administration to antipsychotic (AP)-medicated SZ/SZA patients, MH59803 findings provide a strong rationale for the next goal of this application: to test the potential utility of AMPH in a paradigm of biomarker-informed "PACTs". This "next step" is highly innovative - never previously reported, or perhaps even attempted - and consistent with National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) objectives, directly challenges existing models for SZ/SZA therapeutics. Investigators will determine whether a test dose of 10 mg AMPH p.o. administered to biomarker-identified, AP-medicated SZ/SZA patients generates predicted increases in PPI, MCCB performance, and sensory discrimination learning in a Targeted Cognitive Training (TCT) module. In total, Investigators will leverage knowledge generated through converging cross-species studies in MH59803, to directly advance scientific and clinical domains, by testing the effects of a pro-cognitive drug on neurophysiological and neurocognitive performance, and Targeted Cognitive Training, in biomarker-stratified subgroups of SZ/SZA patients.

Aim: To assess acute effects of AMPH (0 vs 10 mg po) on PPI, neurocognition and computerized TCT in AP-medicated SZ/SZA patients. Hypothesis: PPI- and MCCB-enhancing effects of AMPH seen previously in HS will also be detected in SZ/SZA patients, as will TCT-enhancing effects of AMPH. Prediction: In a within-subject, placebo-controlled, randomized design, AMPH (10 mg po) will increase PPI and enhance MCCB and TCT performance in medicated SZ/SZA patients, particularly among those characterized by low basal performance levels and/or the val/val rs4680 COMT polymorphism. Concurrent HS testing will confirm and extend findings of AMPH effects on PPI and neurocognition, and help interpret findings in SZ/SZA patients.

In all participants, the aim to assess acute effects of 0 vs. 10 mg po dextroamphetamine (AMPH) on Prepulse Inhibition (PPI), neurocognition MATRICS: Consensus Cognitive Battery; MCCB, and computerized Targeted Cognitive Training (TCT).

Hypothesis: AMPH will enhance:

  1. PPI
  2. neurocognition (MCCB performance)
  3. computerized TCT performance in biomarker-identified SZ/SZA patients.
  4. The PPI and MCCB-enhancing effects of AMPH seen previously in HS will also be detected in SZ/SZA patients, as will TCT-enhancing effects of AMPH.

Prediction: In a within-subject, placebo-controlled, randomized design, AMPH (10 mg po) will increase PPI and enhance MCCB and TCT performance in medicated SZ/SZA patients, particularly among those characterized by low basal performance levels and/or the val/val rs4680 COMT polymorphism. Concurrent HS testing will confirm and extend findings of AMPH effects on PPI and neurocognition, and help interpret findings in SZ/SZA patients.

02

Conditions studied

  • Schizophrenia

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Schizophrenia
  • Schizoaffective Disorder
  • Mental Disorders
  • Anti-Dyskinesia Agents
  • Antiparkinson Agents
  • Central Nervous System Agents
  • Dopamine Agents
  • Excitatory Amino Acid Agents
  • Excitatory Amino Acid Antagonists
  • Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action
  • Neurotransmitter Agents
  • Pharmacologic Actions
  • Physiological Effects of Drugs
  • Therapeutic Uses
  • Prepulse inhibition
  • Neurocognition
  • Working memory
  • Dextroamphetamine
  • MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery
  • Pharmacologic Augmentation of Cognitive Therapies
  • Sensory discrimination learning
  • Targeted Cognitive Training
  • rs4680 polymorphism of catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT)
03

In context

Schizophrenia

3,471 studies on the registry are indexed under Schizophrenia; 471 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 82 is above the median of 70 across 2,871 interventional studies indexed under Schizophrenia.

Browse Schizophrenia studies →

Lead sponsor

University of California, San Diego is the lead sponsor of 958 studies on the registry; 191 are open to participants now.

Of its 110 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 70 (64%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 55 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • 18-55 years old:
  • Drug Free (No recreational/street drugs)
  • Diagnosis of Schizophrenia or Schizoaffective Disorder, Depressed Type
  • Must be stable on antipsychotic medication for at least 1 month
  • Any medications other than antipsychotic medications need to be stable for at least 1 week

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Dominant hand injury
  • Hearing impairment at 40 dB
  • Irregular menstrual cycle or cycle is no within in 25-35 days (menopausal is eligible)
  • EKG, conduction abnormalities confirmed by cardiologist
  • Reading component of Wide Range Achievement Test 4 (WRAT4) Score less than 70
  • Any serious illness, including: Insulin-dependent diabetes, HIV, AIDS, cancer, stroke, heart attack, uncontrolled hypothyroidism
  • Sleep apnea
  • A diagnosis of epilepsy or history of seizures with loss of consciousness
  • Open/closed head injury with loss of consciousness greater than 1 minute at any time in the lifetime
  • Blood pressure: Systolic Blood Pressure \< 90 or > 160, Diastolic Blood Pressure \< 45 or > 95
  • Heart Rate \< 55 or > 110
  • Current use of Dexatrim or drugs containing phenylephrine (eligible if not used for at least 72 hours prior to participation)
  • Current use of St. John's Wort, Milk Thistle (eligible if for at least 1 month)
  • Self report of any illicit drug use within the last 30 days
  • Positive urine toxicology
  • Self-report of any use of ecstasy, lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD), mushrooms, gamma hydroxybutyrate (GHB), ketamine, phencyclidine (PCP), heroin or any intravenous-drugs within past year
  • If there is a history of substance abuse/addiction, participant must be in remission for at least 6 months
  • Within 1 month of recent psychiatric hospitalization
  • Current mania
  • Dementia/Alzheimer's diagnosis
  • Mania episode meeting criteria outlined in the MINI-International Neuropsychiatric Interview Plus 6.0 (M.I.N.I. plus 6.0) anytime in the lifetime (hypomania/Bipolar II eligible)
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
82 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    dextroamphetamine

    Drug: Dexedrine, dextroamphetamine, d-amphetamine. Dosage form, frequency and duration: Each participant receives a single pill of placebo or active drug (dextroamphetamine 10 mg) 30 minutes after arriving at the lab. The participant then completes approximately 6 hours of testing in the laboratory. The participant stays at the lab for 7.5 hours in order to monitor physical condition in case the participant received the active pill One week later, that participant receives a single pill of the alternate comparator and is again tested in the laboratory. Thus, in total, each participant receives one placebo pill and one active pill, separated by one week.

    Drug: Dextroamphetamine · Drug: Placebo

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    Drug: Dexedrine, dextroamphetamine, d-amphetamine Dosage form, frequency and duration: Each participant receives a single pill of placebo or active drug (dextroamphetamine 10 mg) 30 minutes after arriving at the lab. The participant then completes approximately 6 hours of testing in the laboratory. The participant stays at the lab for 7.5 hours in order to monitor physical condition in case the participant received the active pill One week later, that participant receives a single pill of the alternate comparator and is again tested in the laboratory. Thus, in total, each participant receives one placebo pill and one active pill, separated by one week.

    Drug: Dextroamphetamine · Drug: Placebo

Interventions

  • DrugDextroamphetamine

    Each participant receives a single pill of placebo or active drug (dextroamphetamine 10 mg) and completes approximately 6 hours of testing in the laboratory. One week later, that participant receives a single pill of the alternate comparator and is again tested in the laboratory. Thus, in total, each participant receives one placebo pill and one active pill, separated by one week.

    Also known as: d-amphetamine, Dexedrine

  • DrugPlacebo

    Each participant receives a single pill of placebo or active drug (dextroamphetamine 10 mg) and completes approximately 6 hours of testing in the laboratory. One week later, that participant receives a single pill of the alternate comparator and is again tested in the laboratory. Thus, in total, each participant receives one placebo pill and one active pill, separated by one week.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Prepulse Inhibition (PPI)

    PPI was assessed with 42 trials of 6 types: 118 dB 40 ms pulse alone (P) \& the same P preceded 10, 20, 30, 60, or 120 ms by a prepulse (pp) 16 dB over background. Startle magnitude (SM), habituation, latency \& latency facilitation were measured to interpret changes in PPI. %PPI = 100 x \[(SM on P trials) - (SM on pp+P trials)\] / SM on P trials. Example: SM on P trials = 80 units SM on pp+P trials = 30 units %PPI = 100 x (80-30)/80 = 100 x 50/80 = 62.5% Greater %PPI mean the reflex has been inhibited to a greater extent in the presence of a pp. %PPI can't exceed 100: when SM on pp+P trials = 0, then %PPI = 100 x (SM on P trials - 0)/SM on P trials = 100 x 1 = 100%. However, %PPI can theoretically be infinitely negative since SM on pp+P trials could be infinitely large ("prepulse facilitiation" (PPF)), i.e. SM is potentiated in the presence of a pp. PPF is "normal" at very short \& very long pp intervals, but not within a species-specific physiological range of intervals.

    Time frame: two visits, 1 week apart, each visit lasting approximately 6 hours

Secondary outcomes

  1. MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery Performance (MCCB)

    The T-score indicates the performance on a neurocognitive battery of tests. Higher score reflects better performance.

    Time frame: two visits, 1 week apart, each visit lasting approximately 6 hours

  2. Targeted Cognitive Training (TCT): PositScience, Inc.

    Auditory discrimination learning: Subjects identify direction (up vs. down) of 2 consecutive sound sweeps. Parameters (e.g. inter-sweep interval, sweep duration) are established for subjects to maintain 80% correct responses. On screen and test days, subjects complete 1h of TCT. Analytic software yields the key measures: auditory processing speed (APS) and APS "learning". APS is the shortest inter-stimulus interval at which a subject performs to criteria and APS learning is the difference (ms) between the first APS and the best APS of the subsequent trials. A smaller APS reflects "better" discrimination (i.e., subject correctly identified frequency "sweep" direction despite a smaller ms gap between stimuli) and a larger ms value for APS learning reflects more learning, i.e., faster APS with repeated trials. Limits for APS are capped at 0-to-1000 ms; values for APS learning are capped at (-) 1000-to-APS.

    Time frame: two visits, 1 week apart, each visit lasting approximately 6 hours

07

Results

Posted Aug 16, 2021

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneSubjects With Schizophrenia: Placebo 1st, Then 10 mg AmphetamineSubjects With Schizophrenia: 10 mg Amphetamine 1st, Then PlaceboHealthy Subjects: Placebo 1st, Then 10 mg AmphetamineHealthy Subjects: 10 mg Amphetamine 1st, Then Placebo
Started19192123
Completed19192123
Not completed0000

Outcome measures

PrimaryPrepulse Inhibition (PPI)

PPI was assessed with 42 trials of 6 types: 118 dB 40 ms pulse alone (P) \& the same P preceded 10, 20, 30, 60, or 120 ms by a prepulse (pp) 16 dB over background. Startle magnitude (SM), habituation, latency \& latency facilitation were measured to interpret changes in PPI. %PPI = 100 x \[(SM on P trials) - (SM on pp+P trials)\] / SM on P trials. Example: SM on P trials = 80 units SM on pp+P trials = 30 units %PPI = 100 x (80-30)/80 = 100 x 50/80 = 62.5% Greater %PPI mean the reflex has been inhibited to a greater extent in the presence of a pp. %PPI can't exceed 100: when SM on pp+P trials = 0, then %PPI = 100 x (SM on P trials - 0)/SM on P trials = 100 x 1 = 100%. However, %PPI can theoretically be infinitely negative since SM on pp+P trials could be infinitely large ("prepulse facilitiation" (PPF)), i.e. SM is potentiated in the presence of a pp. PPF is "normal" at very short \& very long pp intervals, but not within a species-specific physiological range of intervals.

Time frame:
two visits, 1 week apart, each visit lasting approximately 6 hours
Reported as:
Mean · % inhibition of startle
Prepulse Inhibition (PPI)
% inhibition of startleSubjects With Schizophrenia: Placebo 1st, Then 10 mg AmphetamineSubjects With Schizophrenia: 10 mg Amphetamine 1st, Then PlaceboHealthy Subjects: Placebo 1st, Then 10 mg AmphetamineHealthy Subjects: 10 mg Amphetamine 1st, Then Placebo
Placebo22.629 ± 62.65741.162 ± 42.10350.626 ± 25.85050.626 ± 29.621
Amphetamine32.656 ± 57.66939.545 ± 33.42945.822 ± 31.77753.029 ± 24.671
SecondaryMATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery Performance (MCCB)

The T-score indicates the performance on a neurocognitive battery of tests. Higher score reflects better performance.

Time frame:
two visits, 1 week apart, each visit lasting approximately 6 hours
Reported as:
Mean · standardized T-score
MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery Performance (MCCB)
standardized T-scoreSubjects With Schizophrenia: Placebo 1st, Then 10 mg AmphetamineSubjects With Schizophrenia: 10 mg Amphetamine 1st, Then PlaceboHealthy Subjects: Placebo 1st, Then 10 mg AmphetamineHealthy Subjects: 10 mg Amphetamine 1st, Then Placebo
placebo31.895 ± 15.93739.895 ± 11.70454.476 ± 11.55757.870 ± 11.153
amphetamine33.842 ± 16.26938.105 ± 12.55255.476 ± 11.38356.000 ± 11.286
SecondaryTargeted Cognitive Training (TCT): PositScience, Inc.

Auditory discrimination learning: Subjects identify direction (up vs. down) of 2 consecutive sound sweeps. Parameters (e.g. inter-sweep interval, sweep duration) are established for subjects to maintain 80% correct responses. On screen and test days, subjects complete 1h of TCT. Analytic software yields the key measures: auditory processing speed (APS) and APS "learning". APS is the shortest inter-stimulus interval at which a subject performs to criteria and APS learning is the difference (ms) between the first APS and the best APS of the subsequent trials. A smaller APS reflects "better" discrimination (i.e., subject correctly identified frequency "sweep" direction despite a smaller ms gap between stimuli) and a larger ms value for APS learning reflects more learning, i.e., faster APS with repeated trials. Limits for APS are capped at 0-to-1000 ms; values for APS learning are capped at (-) 1000-to-APS.

Time frame:
two visits, 1 week apart, each visit lasting approximately 6 hours
Reported as:
Mean · msec
Targeted Cognitive Training (TCT): PositScience, Inc.
msecSubjects With Schizophrenia: Placebo 1st, Then 10 mg AmphetamineSubjects With Schizophrenia: 10 mg Amphetamine 1st, Then PlaceboHealthy Subjects: Placebo 1st, Then 10 mg AmphetamineHealthy Subjects: 10 mg Amphetamine 1st, Then Placebo
placebo-15.118 ± 346.088-50.158 ± 218.4645.911 ± 75.105-2.113 ± 107.563
amphetamine52.647 ± 305.887101.000 ± 434.37935.905 ± 64.53929.190 ± 83.183

Adverse events

Collected over two visits, 1 week apart, each visit lasting approximately 6 hours. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Subjects With Schizophrenia: Placebo0/38 (0%)0/38 (0%)0/38 (0%)
Subjects With Schizophrenia: 10 mg Amphetamine0/38 (0%)0/38 (0%)0/38 (0%)
Healthy Subjects: Placebo0/44 (0%)0/44 (0%)0/44 (0%)
Healthy Subjects: 10 mg Amphetamine0/44 (0%)0/44 (0%)0/44 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Subjects With Schizophrenia: Placebo 1st, Then 10 mg AmphetamineSubjects With Schizophrenia: 10 mg Amphetamine 1st, Then PlaceboHealthy Subjects: Placebo 1st, Then 10 mg AmphetamineHealthy Subjects: 10 mg Amphetamine 1st, Then PlaceboTotal
Mean39 (23 to 51)42 (27 to 55)29 (19 to 55)30 (20 to 53)35 (19 to 55)
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Subjects With Schizophrenia: Placebo 1st, Then 10 mg AmphetamineSubjects With Schizophrenia: 10 mg Amphetamine 1st, Then PlaceboHealthy Subjects: Placebo 1st, Then 10 mg AmphetamineHealthy Subjects: 10 mg Amphetamine 1st, Then PlaceboTotal
Female1166629
Male813151753
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Subjects With Schizophrenia: Placebo 1st, Then 10 mg AmphetamineSubjects With Schizophrenia: 10 mg Amphetamine 1st, Then PlaceboHealthy Subjects: Placebo 1st, Then 10 mg AmphetamineHealthy Subjects: 10 mg Amphetamine 1st, Then PlaceboTotal
Hispanic or Latino586524
Not Hispanic or Latino129131852
Unknown or Not Reported22206
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Subjects With Schizophrenia: Placebo 1st, Then 10 mg AmphetamineSubjects With Schizophrenia: 10 mg Amphetamine 1st, Then PlaceboHealthy Subjects: Placebo 1st, Then 10 mg AmphetamineHealthy Subjects: 10 mg Amphetamine 1st, Then PlaceboTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native332412
Asian025613
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander01001
Black or African American833115
White5771231
More than one race22105
Unknown or Not Reported11305
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Subjects With Schizophrenia: Placebo 1st, Then 10 mg AmphetamineSubjects With Schizophrenia: 10 mg Amphetamine 1st, Then PlaceboHealthy Subjects: Placebo 1st, Then 10 mg AmphetamineHealthy Subjects: 10 mg Amphetamine 1st, Then PlaceboTotal
United States1919212382
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Clinical Teaching Facility (CTF-B102) at UCSD Medical Center
    San Diego, California 92103, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Swerdlow NR. Beyond antipsychotics: pharmacologically-augmented cognitive therapies (PACTs) for schizophrenia. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2012 Jan;37(1):310-1. doi: 10.1038/npp.2011.195. No abstract available. PubMed 22157876 ↗
  • Barch DM, Carter CS. Amphetamine improves cognitive function in medicated individuals with schizophrenia and in healthy volunteers. Schizophr Res. 2005 Sep 1;77(1):43-58. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2004.12.019. PubMed 16005384 ↗
  • Fisher M, Holland C, Merzenich MM, Vinogradov S. Using neuroplasticity-based auditory training to improve verbal memory in schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry. 2009 Jul;166(7):805-11. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2009.08050757. Epub 2009 May 15. PubMed 19448187 ↗
  • Fisher M, Holland C, Subramaniam K, Vinogradov S. Neuroplasticity-based cognitive training in schizophrenia: an interim report on the effects 6 months later. Schizophr Bull. 2010 Jul;36(4):869-79. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbn170. Epub 2009 Mar 5. PubMed 19269924 ↗
  • Tarasenko M, Perez VB, Pianka ST, Vinogradov S, Braff DL, Swerdlow NR, Light GA. Measuring the capacity for auditory system plasticity: An examination of performance gains during initial exposure to auditory-targeted cognitive training in schizophrenia. Schizophr Res. 2016 Apr;172(1-3):123-30. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2016.01.019. Epub 2016 Feb 2. PubMed 26851143 ↗
  • Vinogradov S, Fisher M, de Villers-Sidani E. Cognitive training for impaired neural systems in neuropsychiatric illness. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2012 Jan;37(1):43-76. doi: 10.1038/npp.2011.251. Epub 2011 Nov 2. PubMed 22048465 ↗
  • Chew ML, Mulsant BH, Pollock BG, Lehman ME, Greenspan A, Mahmoud RA, Kirshner MA, Sorisio DA, Bies RR, Gharabawi G. Anticholinergic activity of 107 medications commonly used by older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2008 Jul;56(7):1333-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2008.01737.x. Epub 2008 May 26. PubMed 18510583 ↗
  • Chou HH, Talledo JA, Lamb SN, Thompson WK, Swerdlow NR. Amphetamine effects on MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery performance in healthy adults. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2013 May;227(1):165-76. doi: 10.1007/s00213-012-2948-x. Epub 2013 Jan 12. PubMed 23314393 ↗
  • Lieberman JA, Stroup TS, McEvoy JP, Swartz MS, Rosenheck RA, Perkins DO, Keefe RS, Davis SM, Davis CE, Lebowitz BD, Severe J, Hsiao JK; Clinical Antipsychotic Trials of Intervention Effectiveness (CATIE) Investigators. Effectiveness of antipsychotic drugs in patients with chronic schizophrenia. N Engl J Med. 2005 Sep 22;353(12):1209-23. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa051688. Epub 2005 Sep 19. Erratum In: N Engl J Med. 2010 Sep 9;363(11):1092-3. PubMed 16172203 ↗
  • Dinse HR, Ragert P, Pleger B, Schwenkreis P, Tegenthoff M. Pharmacological modulation of perceptual learning and associated cortical reorganization. Science. 2003 Jul 4;301(5629):91-4. doi: 10.1126/science.1085423. PubMed 12843392 ↗
  • Goldberg TE, Bigelow LB, Weinberger DR, Daniel DG, Kleinman JE. Cognitive and behavioral effects of the coadministration of dextroamphetamine and haloperidol in schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry. 1991 Jan;148(1):78-84. doi: 10.1176/ajp.148.1.78. PubMed 1984711 ↗
  • Green MF. What are the functional consequences of neurocognitive deficits in schizophrenia? Am J Psychiatry. 1996 Mar;153(3):321-30. doi: 10.1176/ajp.153.3.321. PubMed 8610818 ↗
  • Green MF, Kern RS, Heaton RK. Longitudinal studies of cognition and functional outcome in schizophrenia: implications for MATRICS. Schizophr Res. 2004 Dec 15;72(1):41-51. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2004.09.009. PubMed 15531406 ↗
  • Hamidovic A, Dlugos A, Palmer AA, de Wit H. Catechol-O-methyltransferase val158met genotype modulates sustained attention in both the drug-free state and in response to amphetamine. Psychiatr Genet. 2010 Jun;20(3):85-92. doi: 10.1097/YPG.0b013e32833a1f3c. PubMed 20414144 ↗
  • Hamidovic A, Dlugos A, Palmer AA, de Wit H. Polymorphisms in dopamine transporter (SLC6A3) are associated with stimulant effects of D-amphetamine: an exploratory pharmacogenetic study using healthy volunteers. Behav Genet. 2010 Mar;40(2):255-61. doi: 10.1007/s10519-009-9331-7. Epub 2010 Jan 21. PubMed 20091113 ↗
  • Kay SR, Fiszbein A, Opler LA. The positive and negative syndrome scale (PANSS) for schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull. 1987;13(2):261-76. doi: 10.1093/schbul/13.2.261. PubMed 3616518 ↗
  • Keefe RS, Bilder RM, Davis SM, Harvey PD, Palmer BW, Gold JM, Meltzer HY, Green MF, Capuano G, Stroup TS, McEvoy JP, Swartz MS, Rosenheck RA, Perkins DO, Davis CE, Hsiao JK, Lieberman JA; CATIE Investigators; Neurocognitive Working Group. Neurocognitive effects of antipsychotic medications in patients with chronic schizophrenia in the CATIE Trial. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2007 Jun;64(6):633-47. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.64.6.633. PubMed 17548746 ↗
  • Kumari V, Premkumar P, Fannon D, Aasen I, Raghuvanshi S, Anilkumar AP, Antonova E, Peters ER, Kuipers E. Sensorimotor gating and clinical outcome following cognitive behaviour therapy for psychosis. Schizophr Res. 2012 Feb;134(2-3):232-8. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2011.11.020. Epub 2011 Dec 3. PubMed 22138048 ↗
  • Mattay VS, Goldberg TE, Fera F, Hariri AR, Tessitore A, Egan MF, Kolachana B, Callicott JH, Weinberger DR. Catechol O-methyltransferase val158-met genotype and individual variation in the brain response to amphetamine. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 May 13;100(10):6186-91. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0931309100. Epub 2003 Apr 25. PubMed 12716966 ↗
  • Light GA, Swerdlow NR. Neurophysiological biomarkers informing the clinical neuroscience of schizophrenia: mismatch negativity and prepulse inhibition of startle. Curr Top Behav Neurosci. 2014;21:293-314. doi: 10.1007/7854_2014_316. PubMed 24850080 ↗
  • Nuechterlein KH, Green MF, Kern RS, Baade LE, Barch DM, Cohen JD, Essock S, Fenton WS, Frese FJ 3rd, Gold JM, Goldberg T, Heaton RK, Keefe RS, Kraemer H, Mesholam-Gately R, Seidman LJ, Stover E, Weinberger DR, Young AS, Zalcman S, Marder SR. The MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery, part 1: test selection, reliability, and validity. Am J Psychiatry. 2008 Feb;165(2):203-13. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2007.07010042. Epub 2008 Jan 2. PubMed 18172019 ↗
  • Pietrzak RH, Snyder PJ, Maruff P. Amphetamine-related improvement in executive function in patients with chronic schizophrenia is modulated by practice effects. Schizophr Res. 2010 Dec;124(1-3):176-82. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2010.09.012. Epub 2010 Oct 13. PubMed 20947305 ↗
  • Pietrzak RH, Snyder PJ, Maruff P. Use of an acute challenge with d-amphetamine to model cognitive improvement in chronic schizophrenia. Hum Psychopharmacol. 2010 Jun-Jul;25(4):353-8. doi: 10.1002/hup.1118. PubMed 20521327 ↗
  • Ressler KJ, Rothbaum BO, Tannenbaum L, Anderson P, Graap K, Zimand E, Hodges L, Davis M. Cognitive enhancers as adjuncts to psychotherapy: use of D-cycloserine in phobic individuals to facilitate extinction of fear. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2004 Nov;61(11):1136-44. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.61.11.1136. PubMed 15520361 ↗
  • Sheehan DV, Lecrubier Y, Sheehan KH, Amorim P, Janavs J, Weiller E, Hergueta T, Baker R, Dunbar GC. The Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (M.I.N.I.): the development and validation of a structured diagnostic psychiatric interview for DSM-IV and ICD-10. J Clin Psychiatry. 1998;59 Suppl 20:22-33;quiz 34-57. PubMed 9881538 ↗
  • Shilling PD, Saint Marie RL, Shoemaker JM, Swerdlow NR. Strain differences in the gating-disruptive effects of apomorphine: relationship to gene expression in nucleus accumbens signaling pathways. Biol Psychiatry. 2008 Apr 15;63(8):748-58. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2007.10.015. Epub 2008 Feb 20. PubMed 18083141 ↗
  • Swerdlow NR. Are we studying and treating schizophrenia correctly? Schizophr Res. 2011 Aug;130(1-3):1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2011.05.004. Epub 2011 Jun 8. PubMed 21645998 ↗
  • Swerdlow NR, Bhakta S, Chou HH, Talledo JA, Balvaneda B, Light GA. Memantine Effects On Sensorimotor Gating and Mismatch Negativity in Patients with Chronic Psychosis. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2016 Jan;41(2):419-30. doi: 10.1038/npp.2015.162. Epub 2015 Jun 11. PubMed 26062785 ↗
  • Swerdlow NR, Light GA, Sprock J, Calkins ME, Green MF, Greenwood TA, Gur RE, Gur RC, Lazzeroni LC, Nuechterlein KH, Radant AD, Ray A, Seidman LJ, Siever LJ, Silverman JM, Stone WS, Sugar CA, Tsuang DW, Tsuang MT, Turetsky BI, Braff DL. Deficient prepulse inhibition in schizophrenia detected by the multi-site COGS. Schizophr Res. 2014 Feb;152(2-3):503-12. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2013.12.004. Epub 2014 Jan 7. PubMed 24405980 ↗
  • Talledo JA, Sutherland Owens AN, Schortinghuis T, Swerdlow NR. Amphetamine effects on startle gating in normal women and female rats. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2009 May;204(1):165-75. doi: 10.1007/s00213-008-1446-7. Epub 2009 Jan 16. PubMed 19148623 ↗
  • Turetsky BI, Calkins ME, Light GA, Olincy A, Radant AD, Swerdlow NR. Neurophysiological endophenotypes of schizophrenia: the viability of selected candidate measures. Schizophr Bull. 2007 Jan;33(1):69-94. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbl060. Epub 2006 Nov 29. PubMed 17135482 ↗
  • Wilkinson GS, Robertson GJ (2006) WRAT4: Wide Range Achievement Test professional manual, 4th edn Psychological Assessment Resources: Lutz, FL

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Jul 9, 2020
  • Statistical analysis plan · Jul 9, 2020

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 17, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02634684
Lead sponsor
University of California, San Diego
Responsible party
Neal R. Swerdlow, M.D., Ph.D. (Professor of Psychiatry and Director of the Research Residency Track at the University of California, San Diego, School of Medicine., University of California, San Diego) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 18, 2015
Start date
Jul 1, 2014
Primary completion
Aug 2020
Completion
Aug 2020
Results posted
Aug 16, 2021
Last update
Aug 17, 2021

Study contacts

Neal R. Swerdlow, M.D., Ph.D.
principal investigator · UC San Diego

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion