ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02623816Updated Oct 25, 2022Results posted

Symptom Control Satisfaction With Proton Pump Inhibitor Regimen

A Phase 4 interventional study of Optimal Dosing of Omeprazole in Heartburn, sponsored by MetroHealth Medical Center. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-10-25.

Sponsored by MetroHealth Medical Center · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
64
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The overall aim of this study is to assess if patients with persistent gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptoms receiving sub-optimal omeprazole dosing experience improvement in GERD symptoms when prescribed an optimal dosing regimen. The optimal dosing regimen is defined as taking omeprazole 30 minutes prior to the first meal of the day.

Read the detailed description

GERD remains a common gastrointestinal complaint, resulting in 6% of outpatient visits. The economic burden is significant with direct costs exceeding $12 billion/year and indirect cost as high as $75 billion/year. The primary aim of this study was determine whether a brief educational intervention optimizing proton pump inhibitor (PPI) dosing would reduce GERD symptoms using the gastroesophageal reflux disease symptom assessment scale (GSAS) questionnaire. Further, secondary analysis would utilize the results of the trial and combine them with costs related to uncontrolled GERD to estimated the potential economic impact.

02

Conditions studied

  • Heartburn

Browse trials for

03

In context

Heartburn

154 studies on the registry are indexed under Heartburn; 12 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 64 is below the median of 100 across 127 interventional studies indexed under Heartburn.

Browse Heartburn studies →

Lead sponsor

MetroHealth Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 104 studies on the registry; 20 are open to participants now.

Of its 12 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 7 (58%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • ≥ 18 years old
  • taking omeprazole 20 mg
  • episodic heartburn at least 3 times per week
  • provides consent and be willing to complete study questionnaires
  • read, speak and write English

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • weight loss (alarm symptom)
  • normal esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) in last one year
  • pregnant or women planning on becoming pregnant at any time during the study
  • history of Barrett's esophagus
  • prior esophageal strictures
  • intolerance/allergy to study medications
  • patients on plavix or a history of upper gastrointestinal surgery
  • investigators or their immediate family (spouse, children, sibling)
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
64 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    Sub-optimal dosing

    No change will be made to the sub-optimal dosing regimen of omeprazole 20 mg. Rescue antacid use is permitted. Total duration of 6 weeks.

  • Experimental
    Optimal dosing

    Patients will be administered optimal dosing regimen of Omeprazole 20 mg for 4 weeks starting at week 2. Rescue antacid use is permitted. Total duration of 6 weeks.

    Drug: Optimal Dosing of Omeprazole

Interventions

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Symptom Frequency and Severity/Distress Scores From Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Symptom Assessment Scale (GSAS) (Overall)

    The 15-symptom GSAS questionnaire includes measures of: Gastrointestinal distress, Regurgitation/heartburn and Upper respiratory manifestations. The outcome measures were the number, frequency, and severity of GSAS symptoms reported at 6 weeks. Measures were based on aggregate GSAS scores. Symptom numbers range from 0 to 15. Frequency is based on the total number of reported days of symptomatic episodes in the past week divided by the number of potential symptoms (number reported divided by 15 for GSAS score. The range for frequency score:0 to 7 with higher scores indicative of greater frequency of symptoms. Severity is the average distress score reported by individuals (zero if no symptoms). Symptom distress is based on a 4 point Likert scale (0= not at all, 1=somewhat, 2=quite a bit and 3=very much). The higher the score the worse outcome. .

    Time frame: 6 weeks

07

Results

Posted Oct 25, 2022
Limitations and caveats
1. Single healthcare system 2. Symptom scoring questionnaire 3. Study did not assess gastric pH

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneSub-optimal DosingOptimal Dosing
Started4024
Completed3822
Not completed22

Outcome measures

PrimarySymptom Frequency and Severity/Distress Scores From Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Symptom Assessment Scale (GSAS) (Overall)

The 15-symptom GSAS questionnaire includes measures of: Gastrointestinal distress, Regurgitation/heartburn and Upper respiratory manifestations. The outcome measures were the number, frequency, and severity of GSAS symptoms reported at 6 weeks. Measures were based on aggregate GSAS scores. Symptom numbers range from 0 to 15. Frequency is based on the total number of reported days of symptomatic episodes in the past week divided by the number of potential symptoms (number reported divided by 15 for GSAS score. The range for frequency score:0 to 7 with higher scores indicative of greater frequency of symptoms. Severity is the average distress score reported by individuals (zero if no symptoms). Symptom distress is based on a 4 point Likert scale (0= not at all, 1=somewhat, 2=quite a bit and 3=very much). The higher the score the worse outcome. .

Time frame:
6 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Symptom Frequency and Severity/Distress Scores From Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Symptom Assessment Scale (GSAS) (Overall)
score on a scaleSub-optimal DosingOptimal Dosing
GSAS Symptoms Score8.5 ± 0.75.2 ± 0.5
GSAS Frequency Score2.2 ± 0.31.0 ± 0.2
GSAS Severity Score1.0 ± 0.10.6 ± 0.1

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse event and/or serious adverse event data were collected for 1 year after study enrollment for each study participant.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Sub-optimal Dosing0/40 (0%)0/40 (0%)0/40 (0%)
Optimal Dosing0/24 (0%)0/24 (0%)0/24 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Sub-optimal DosingOptimal DosingTotal
Mean49.9 ± 12.252.3 ± 13.451.1 ± 12.5
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Sub-optimal DosingOptimal DosingTotal
Female231538
Male17926
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(Participants)Sub-optimal DosingOptimal DosingTotal
United States402464
08

Study locations

1 site
  • MetroHealth Medical System
    Cleveland, Ohio 44109, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Waghray A, Waghray N, Perzynski AT, Votruba M, Wolfe MM. Optimal Omeprazole Dosing and Symptom Control: A Randomized Controlled Trial (OSCAR Trial). Dig Dis Sci. 2019 Jan;64(1):158-166. doi: 10.1007/s10620-018-5235-9. Epub 2018 Aug 9. PubMed 30094626 ↗
10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Aug 2014, a primary completion of Dec 2015 and a completion of Dec 2015. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

Results were first posted in Oct 2022, 6 years 10 months after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 29, 2015
First posted
Dec 8, 2015
Start
Aug 2014
Primary completionActual
Dec 2015
CompletionActual
Dec 2015
Results first posted
Oct 25, 2022
Last update
Oct 25, 2022
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 25, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02623816
Responsible party
Nisheet Waghray (Investigator, MetroHealth Medical Center) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 8, 2015
Start date
Aug 2014
Primary completion
Dec 2015
Completion
Dec 2015
Results posted
Oct 25, 2022
Last update
Oct 25, 2022

Study contacts

M. Michael Wolfe, MD
principal investigator · MetroHealth Medical System

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Omeprazole

Start the discussion