ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02618811Updated Dec 1, 2015

ERAS in Colorectal Surgery Diminishes the Negative Impact of Sarcopenia on Short Term Outcomes

An observational study in Sarcopenia and Colonic Neoplasms, sponsored by Jagiellonian University. Completed at 1 site in Poland. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2015-12-01.

Sponsored by Jagiellonian University · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
171
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

So far, the impact of sarcopenia has been analysed only in patients undergoing traditional surgical procedures (laparotomy) or those with metastatic spread. As the ERAS protocol combined with minimally invasive access decreases postoperative metabolic disorders, it seems possible that it can limit the deleterious impact of sarcopenia as well. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the use of ERAS protocol in colorectal cancer patients influences the postoperative risk due to sarcopenia.

Read the detailed description

The prospective observation with post-hoc analysis of 171 consecutive colorectal cancer patients was performed. In all patients 16-item ERAS protocol was applied.

Contrast-enhanced CT scan was performed preoperatively. From each scan one CT image at the level of L3 vertebra was transferred in Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine format (DICOM) and anonymised. Firstly, the threshold range between -29 and +150 Hounsfield units was set to semi-automatically outline muscle areas, - 150 to - 50 was used for visceral adipose tissue areas, and -190 to -30 was used for subcutaneous and intermuscular adipose tissue areas. Secondly, the software calculated the surface area (cm2) of each tissue. The L3 skeletal muscle area (rectus abdominis, external and internal obliques, transversus abdominis, quadratus lumborum, psoas, erector spinae) normalized for patient height was used to calculate skeletal muscle index (SMI) (cm2/m2).

According to Martin et al. sarcopenia was defined as a SMI \<41 cm2/m2 in women, \<43 cm2/m2 in men with a BMI \<25 kg/m2, and \<53 cm2/m2 in men with a BMI >25 kg/m2 (10). To assess for myosteatosis the mean radiodensity of a L3 psoas muscle was measured. The cut-off for patients with BMI \<25 kg/m2 was \<41 Hounsfield units and \<33 Hounsfield units for patients with BMI ≥25 kg/m2.

For the purposes of further analysis the entire group of patients was divided into subgroups depending on the presence of sarcopenia or myosteatosis.

02

Conditions studied

  • Sarcopenia
  • Colonic Neoplasms

Keywords

  • sarcopenia
  • myosteatosis
  • enhanced recovery after surgery
  • colorectal cancer
  • minimally invasive surgery
  • complications
03

In context

Sarcopenia

1,242 studies on the registry are indexed under Sarcopenia; 405 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 171 is above the median of 120 across 433 observational studies indexed under Sarcopenia.

Browse Sarcopenia studies →

Lead sponsor

Jagiellonian University is the lead sponsor of 160 studies on the registry; 35 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

The analysis included prospectively collected data from consecutive patients electively operated for colorectal cancer in the years 2014-2015. All patients were operated using laparoscopic surgery, and the perioperative care was based on pre-established ERAS protocol consisting of 13 items

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • confirmed adenocarcinoma of colon or rectum
  • complete preoperative radiology assessment with abdominal CT scan
  • laparoscopic resection
  • perioperative care according to ERAS principles

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • unavailability of a preoperative abdominal CT scan (within 30 days prior surgery)
  • emergency or initially open surgery
  • patients treated with endoscopic techniques: transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM), transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME)
  • concomitant inflammatory bowel diseases.
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
171 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Group 1

    not sarcopenic

  • Group 2

    sarcopenic

  • Group 3

    not myosteatotic

  • Group 4

    myosteatotic

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Complications

    Time frame: up to 30 days post surgery

Secondary outcomes

  1. Hospital length of stay (days)

    Time frame: up to discharge from hospital, an average 6 days

  2. Compliance with ERAS protocol (%)

    Time frame: up to discharge from hospital, an average 6 days

  3. Tolerance of oral diet on the 1st postoperative day

    tolerating at least 800 ml of clear water/fluids and 1 oral nutritional supplement within the first 24h postoperative hours

    Time frame: up to discharge from hospital, an average 6 days

  4. Time to first flatus

    Time frame: up to discharge from hospital, an average 6 days

  5. Readmission rate

    Time frame: up to 30 days post surgery

  6. Mobilization on the 1st postoperative day

    walking at least 100 m without assistance, at least 6h out of bed (sitting, walking)

    Time frame: up to discharge from hospital, an average 6 days

  7. Need for opioid analgesia postoperatively

    no need for opioid drug administration (any kind, dosage or administration route)

    Time frame: up to discharge from hospital, an average 6 days

07

Study locations

1 site
  • 2nd Department of General Surgery, Jagiellonian University
    Krakow, 31-501, Poland
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Greco M, Capretti G, Beretta L, Gemma M, Pecorelli N, Braga M. Enhanced recovery program in colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. World J Surg. 2014 Jun;38(6):1531-41. doi: 10.1007/s00268-013-2416-8. PubMed 24368573 ↗
  • Vlug MS, Wind J, Hollmann MW, Ubbink DT, Cense HA, Engel AF, Gerhards MF, van Wagensveld BA, van der Zaag ES, van Geloven AA, Sprangers MA, Cuesta MA, Bemelman WA; LAFA study group. Laparoscopy in combination with fast track multimodal management is the best perioperative strategy in patients undergoing colonic surgery: a randomized clinical trial (LAFA-study). Ann Surg. 2011 Dec;254(6):868-75. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31821fd1ce. PubMed 21597360 ↗
  • Huang DD, Wang SL, Zhuang CL, Zheng BS, Lu JX, Chen FF, Zhou CJ, Shen X, Yu Z. Sarcopenia, as defined by low muscle mass, strength and physical performance, predicts complications after surgery for colorectal cancer. Colorectal Dis. 2015 Nov;17(11):O256-64. doi: 10.1111/codi.13067. PubMed 26194849 ↗
  • Jones KI, Doleman B, Scott S, Lund JN, Williams JP. Simple psoas cross-sectional area measurement is a quick and easy method to assess sarcopenia and predicts major surgical complications. Colorectal Dis. 2015 Jan;17(1):O20-6. doi: 10.1111/codi.12805. PubMed 25328119 ↗
  • Thoresen L, Frykholm G, Lydersen S, Ulveland H, Baracos V, Prado CM, Birdsell L, Falkmer U. Nutritional status, cachexia and survival in patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma. Different assessment criteria for nutritional status provide unequal results. Clin Nutr. 2013 Feb;32(1):65-72. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2012.05.009. Epub 2012 Jun 12. PubMed 22695408 ↗
  • Martin L, Birdsell L, Macdonald N, Reiman T, Clandinin MT, McCargar LJ, Murphy R, Ghosh S, Sawyer MB, Baracos VE. Cancer cachexia in the age of obesity: skeletal muscle depletion is a powerful prognostic factor, independent of body mass index. J Clin Oncol. 2013 Apr 20;31(12):1539-47. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.45.2722. Epub 2013 Mar 25. PubMed 23530101 ↗
  • Malietzis G, Aziz O, Bagnall NM, Johns N, Fearon KC, Jenkins JT. The role of body composition evaluation by computerized tomography in determining colorectal cancer treatment outcomes: a systematic review. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2015 Feb;41(2):186-96. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2014.10.056. Epub 2014 Nov 3. PubMed 25468746 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 1, 2015, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02618811
Responsible party
Michał Pędziwiatr (MD PhD, Jagiellonian University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 1, 2015
Start date
Jan 2014
Primary completion
Oct 2015
Completion
Nov 2015
Last update
Dec 1, 2015

Study contacts

Michał Pędziwiatr, MD, PhD
principal investigator · 2nd Department of Surgery, Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2015. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion