CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT02618798Updated Dec 1, 2015

Hepatic Venous Pressure Gradient and Platelet Activation in Chronic Liver Disease

An observational study in Chronic Liver Disease, sponsored by Medical University of Vienna. Status unknown at 1 site in Austria. Open to participants aged 19 Years to 90 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2015-12-01.

Sponsored by Medical University of Vienna · Observational

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Nov 2015), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Study type
Observational
Model
Case-only
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
100
Ages
19 Years to 90 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Background: Thrombosis may be crucial in driving the progression of fibrosis in chronic liver disease (CLD). The potential role of platelets and platelet activation in this process is unclear. Platelets participate in inflammation by secretion of pro-inflammatory mediators which may advance hepatic fibrosis. Hepatitis B virus transgenic mice, developed significantly smaller necroinflammatory foci and their serum ALT levels were 80% lower, if they were pre-treated with anti-platelet antibodies. Sinusoidal aggregation of activated platelets also occurs in chronic hepatitis C in humans. It may contribute to thrombocytopenia observed in CLD. Platelet activation is generally believed to be compromised in CLD. However, there is data suggesting that CLD may even be associated with an enhancement of platelet activation. Measurement of hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) constitutes the most common method for estimation of portal venous pressure. HVPG is significantly correlated with histological indices of CLD progression.

Study hypotheses:

  1. HVPG as a marker for advancement of hepatic fibrosis and progression of CLD is associated with an increase in platelet activation.
  2. Platelet activation and function is not generally compromised in CLD. Comparison of platelet function in CLD to a control group of healthy volunteers is intended to clarify whether CLD leads to a manifest platelet dysfunction

Methods: Study design is observational. 100 patients with CLD of various origins (viral, alcoholic, cholestatic) scheduled for routine HVPG measurement will be enrolled. 30 healthy volunteers will donate blood as a control group. Platelet function and activation will be evaluated by multiple electrode aggregometry (primary outcome variable area under the curve (AUC). Plasma levels of P-selectin (ELISA), PFA (Platelet Function Analyzer) 100™ parameters (EPI-CT and ADP-CT), percentage of P-selectin, GPIIb/IIIa, thrombin receptor positive platelets after stimulation (flow-cytometry) will constitute secondary outcome parameters. Plasmatic coagulation will be evaluated by rotational thrombelastometry (ROTEM). Platelet count and routine coagulation parameters will be monitored. HVPG measurement by hepatic vein catheterization and patient blood sampling will be carried out via the internal jugular vein. Blood sampling in volunteers will be performed via the antecubital vein

Study Rationale: If higher levels of platelet activation are associated with increased HVPGs, this would provide an insight into the pathogenesis of CLD. It would also point toward a possible benefit of anti-platelet therapy in CLD. Verification of platelet dysfunction in CLD is relevant to clinical practice in anaesthesiology and intensive care as procedures are often postponed in CLD-patients for fear of bleeding complications. CLD patients may also receive prophylactic platelet concentrates prior to interventions which is costly, fraught with risk of bacterial infection and may be unnecessary in the absence of platelet dysfunction.

02

Conditions studied

  • Chronic Liver Disease

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • chronic liver disease
  • CLD
  • platelet function
03

In context

Liver Diseases

2,081 studies on the registry are indexed under Liver Diseases; 390 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 100 is below the median of 167 across 681 observational studies indexed under Liver Diseases.

Browse Liver Diseases studies →

Lead sponsor

Medical University of Vienna is the lead sponsor of 1,076 studies on the registry; 177 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
19 Years to 90 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

Patients suffering from chronic liver disease scheduled for routine measurement of the hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG).

Inclusion criteria

  • Confirmed chronic liver disease (CLD), alcoholic, viral, cholestatic.
  • CHILD-PUGH Stage A, B, C, and non-cirrhotics
  • Planned routine measurement of HVPG.
  • Age: 19 years or older

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Impaired kidney function (Creatinine > 1.3mg/dl)
  • Platelet count \< 50,000/µl
  • Participation in a clinical trial in the 3 weeks preceding the study
  • IFN-therapy within 6 months of inclusion into the study.
  • Use of anti-thrombotic or anticoagualant medication
  • Pregnancy
  • Intra or extra-hepatic malignancy
  • Haemostatic diseases other than cirrhosis
  • Current abuse of alcohol (Abstinence from alcohol for at least 6 weeks preceding the study is required)
05

Study design

Observational model
Case-only
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
100 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples with dna
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Multiple electrode aggregometry (MEA) parameter area under the curve (AUC)

    Time frame: Single measurement within study duration of two years

Secondary outcomes

  1. MEA parameters velocity (AU/min)

    Time frame: Single measurement within study duration of two years

  2. Aggregation (AU)

    Time frame: Single measurement within study duration of two years

  3. Percentage (%) of P-selectin positive platelets

    FACS

    Time frame: Single measurement within study duration of two years

  4. Percentage (%) GPIIa/IIIb receptor positive platelets

    FACS

    Time frame: Single measurement within study duration of two years

  5. Percentage (%) thrombin receptor positive platelets

    FACS

    Time frame: Single measurement within study duration of two years

  6. P-selectin plasma level

    Time frame: Single measurement within study duration of two years

  7. Serotonin plasma level

    Time frame: Single measurement within study duration of two years

  8. Rotational thrombelastometry parameter: CT (coagulation time) (seconds)

    Time frame: Single measurement within study duration of two years

  9. Rotational thrombelastometry parameter: CFT (clot formation time) (seconds)

    Time frame: Single measurement within study duration of two years

  10. Rotational thrombelastometry parameter: MCF (maximum clot firmness) (mm)

    Time frame: Single measurement within study duration of two years

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 1, 2015, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02618798
Lead sponsor
Medical University of Vienna
Responsible party
Sibylle Pramhas (M.D., Medical University of Vienna) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 1, 2015
Start date
Jan 2014
Primary completion
Jan 2016 (estimated)
Completion
Jan 2016 (estimated)
Last update
Dec 1, 2015

Study contacts

Sibylle Pramhas, M.D.
Contact
sibylle.pramhas@meduniwien.ac.at
+43140400 ext. 41000
Gisela Scharbert, M.D.
Contact
gisela.scharbert@meduniwien.ac.at

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Nov 2015. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion