CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02612896CYSTISTOPUpdated Mar 1, 2023

Taenia Solium Elimination Versus Control: What is the Best Way Forward for Sub-Saharan Africa?

An interventional study of Mass drug administration, praziquantel 10mg/kg and Health education in Taenia Solium Infection, sponsored by Institute of Tropical Medicine, Belgium. Completed at 1 site in Zambia. Open to participants aged 5 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-03-01.

Sponsored by Institute of Tropical Medicine, Belgium · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
2,900
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
5 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Taenia solium taeniosis/cysticercosis is a neglected zoonotic parasitic disease complex with significant economic and public health impacts, occurring primarily in developing countries. Humans are the carriers of the tapeworm (taeniosis); the normal intermediate pig host develops the metacestode larval stage (porcine cysticercosis). However, people can also act as accidental intermediate hosts and develop human cysticercosis or neurocysticercosis (NCC) when the central nervous system is involved.

The scattered efforts of researchers into evaluation of control programmes in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) have focussed on single control options. It is becoming clear that these stand-alone options have the potential to reduce the occurrence of the parasite, however either long term or more integrated efforts seem to be required to reach an elimination status.

The objective of the current study is to evaluate the cost-effectiveness/acceptability of elimination (to be achieved on a short term via integrated measures), and control (single measures, with an elimination goal on a longer term) of T. solium in a highly endemic area in SSA.

This intervention study will entail an elimination study arm in which multiple control options are combined (integrated) aiming at the final human host (Mass drug administration (MDA) and health education) and pig intermediate hosts (pig treatment and vaccination). In a second study arm a single control option will be carried out (pig treatment). In both study arms (health) education will be implemented. At baseline and in the final sampling year, prevalence of human taeniosis/cysticercosis and porcine cysticercosis will be determined in all study villages. Active ongoing surveillance and 6 monthly (biannual) human and pig sampling will be conducted in the elimination study arm, as well as two-yearly (biennial) sampling of the pig intermediate host in the control study arm. Additionally, (open ended) questionnaires and focus group discussions will be administered/held to obtain data on the cost of pig keeping, T. solium, the interventions and the perception/acceptability of the proposed control measures to the local communities.

Read the detailed description

As T. solium is a zoonosis, it's control will be evaluated in a One Health perspective, tackling both the human and pig host. The study will be carried out in the Katete district, in the Eastern Province of Zambia, an area reported to be endemic for T. solium in both pigs and humans. The pig interventions will not be described here, as requested by ClinicalTrials.gov Suitability of communities in the Katete district was assessed during a pilot survey conducted by the proposers (April 2015).

Two communities were selected that fulfilled all of the eligibility criteria. The Nyembe neighbourhood community (1,210 people, 5 villages, 520 pigs), within the Nyembe Rural Health Centre (RHC) catchment was selected for the elimination study arm; and Chimvira neighbourhood community (1,470 people, 11 villages, 827 pigs), in the Mtandaza Rural Health Centre catchment, was selected for the control study arm.

The interventional study will entail a high-input elimination study arm (E), in which multiple control options targeting both the final (human, mass drug administration, health education) and intermediate (pig) hosts (treatment and vaccination), are combined; and a lower-input control study arm (CI), which will use a single control option targeting only the porcine host (treatment).

Teams of suitably qualified and trained human and veterinary medical staff will go from door-to-door to each household in the study communities.

Procedures will include collection of both qualitative and quantitative data from human participants and pigs; subject-related interventions in both human participants and pigs; and laboratory analysis of collected samples.

For the baseline surveys, one randomly-selected consenting adult member and one randomly-selected assenting (and parental consent) child member (above 5 years) from each household will be sampled (serum: diagnosis of human cysticercosis; and stool: diagnosis of taeniasis), whereas for all subsequent surveys in the elimination arm (see protocol for specific time points), all eligible consenting members of the elimination communities will be invited to participate (stool samples: diagnosis of taeniasis). All eligible consenting members from the control arm will be included at the final study sampling (stool: diagnosis of taeniasis and serum: diagnosis of cysticercosis). It is expected that all age, sex and socioeconomic groups will be equally represented.

For the socio-economic questionnaires, 50% of the households will be randomly selected and the head of the household addressed.

The school based questionnaire will be administered to grade 5-6 children attending school in each of the study communities.

For the perception questionnaires: here also 50% of the households will be targeted (random selection), until data saturation has been reached.

For the focus group discussions (FGD): 6 FGD (3 with each time 10 men, 3 with each time 10 women) will be conducted in the elimination study arm, 12 in the control study arm (6 iterations involving 10 men and 6 iterations involving 10 women), at defined time points (table 1), until data saturation has been reached.

02

Conditions studied

  • Taenia Solium Infection

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Taenia solium
  • control
  • elimination
  • One Health
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
5 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Willing and able to participate in all aspects of the study, including providing blood and stool samples, participating in a questionnaire survey and group discussions, and taking oral anthelmintic tablets (the latter specific for the elimination arm)
  • Willing and able to provide informed consent (signature or thumb print with impartial witness; assent for minors with parental consent).
  • Living in, attending school in, or regularly visiting the bore holes present in, the study communities
  • Aged five years of age or older
  • People without epilepsy

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unwilling or unable to participate in some or all aspects of the study, including providing blood and stool samples, participating in a questionnaire survey and group discussions, or taking oral anthelmintic tablets (the latter specific for the elimination arm)

    • Unwilling or unable to provide written (signature or thumb print with impartial witness) informed consent (or assent for minors)
    • Living outside of, and not regularly visiting, or attending school in, the study communities
    • Children aged four years or younger
    • People with epilepsy (identified cases by the Rural Health Centre, questions included in the registration procedure)
    • Seriously ill individuals (people unable to engage in the normal activities of daily living without assistance because of their illnesses)
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Investigator)
Enrollment
2,900 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Elimination arm

    Both human and porcine interventions at four-monthly intervals in the first two study years, for a total of six iterations (only human interventions will be detailed here): Human: Mass drug administration, praziquantel 10mg/kg, according to the list of WHO recommended anthelmintic drugs for use in preventive chemotherapy for taeniasis. And Health Education

    Drug: Mass drug administration, praziquantel 10mg/kg · Behavioral: Health education

  • Experimental
    Control intervention arm

    Human: yearly health education, for a total of five iterations. The intervention on the pig host will not be detailed here)

    Behavioral: Health education

Interventions

  • DrugMass drug administration, praziquantel 10mg/kg

    see previous, in elimination study arm only

    Also known as: praziquantel

  • BehavioralHealth education

    in all study arms, using village meetings, posters, pamphlets.

    Also known as: education

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in porcine cysticercosis: in this One Health approach, the primary outcome is not a human measure

    serological measurement of porcine cysticercosis (in pigs), antigen ELISA result: ratio

    Time frame: Elimination arm: day 0, Year 1, Year 2, Year 2.5, Year 3, Year 3.5, Year 4, Year 4.5, Year 5. Control intervention arm: day 0, Year 2, Year 4,Year 5

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in human cysticercosis active infection (serum: )

    human cysticercosis: serological diagnosis: B60/B158 Antigen-ELISA (ratio\>1 is positive)

    Time frame: in both study arms: day 0, Year 5.

  2. Change in human cysticercosis, exposure to infection (serum)

    human cysticercosis: serological diagnosis: Enzyme-linked Electroimmunotransfer blot assay (EITB): number of bands: one band is positive

    Time frame: in both study arms: day 0, year 5

  3. Change in human taeniasis (stool)

    human taeniasis: coprological diagnosis: copro- antigen ELISA: Optical Density (OD) values (with all OD's higher then cutoff= positive) ; copro polymerase chain reaction (PCR) followed by restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) if needed: band result leading to pos/neg. An individual is considered 'POSITIVE' if any of the test results is positive.

    Time frame: in both study arms: day 0, year 5; elimination study arm: Year 1, Year 2, year 2.5, year 3, year 3.5,year 4, year 4.5 and year 5

06

Study locations

1 site
  • Nyembe and Mtandaza Rural Health Centre
    Katete, Eastern Province, Zambia
07

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02612896
Lead sponsor
Institute of Tropical Medicine, Belgium
Collaborators
University of Zambia, Ministry of Health, Zambia, Université Catholique de Louvain, University Ghent
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 24, 2015
Start date
Mar 2016
Primary completion
Oct 2021
Completion
Feb 2022
Last update
Mar 1, 2023

Study contacts

Pierre Dorny, PhD
study chair · Institute of Tropical Medicine, Belgium
Emmanuel Bottieau, PhD, MD
study chair · Institute of Tropical Medicine, Belgium

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion