ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02610153SULTANUpdated Apr 25, 2019

Subtherapeutic INR Levels in Patients With AVK: Incidence, Associated Factors, Prognosis and Control Strategies

An observational study in Atrial Fibrillation, sponsored by Bayer. Completed at 1 site in Spain. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-04-25.

Sponsored by Bayer · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
1,013
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This prospective observational study is to assess the predictive factors of poor control of international normalized ratio (INR) to determine the treatment strategies received by patients with a poor control of INR in real-life clinical practice and to explore the effectiveness and safety of these strategies in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation who start vitamin K antagonist (VKA) treatment

02

Conditions studied

  • Atrial Fibrillation

Browse trials for

03

In context

Atrial Fibrillation

3,957 studies on the registry are indexed under Atrial Fibrillation; 933 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 1,013 is above the median of 300 across 1,390 observational studies indexed under Atrial Fibrillation.

Browse Atrial Fibrillation studies →

Lead sponsor

Bayer is the lead sponsor of 1,674 studies on the registry; 54 are open to participants now.

Of its 213 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 130 (61%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Adult patients diagnosed with non-valvular atrial fibrillation who are going to start vitamine K antagonist treatment or have started over the previous two months and that attend the Cardiology Units at Spanish hospitals (as outpatients).

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients aged ≥ 18 years.
  • Patients with a diagnosis of nonvalvular atrial fibrillation according to the criteria of the Spanish Agency of Medicines and Medical Devices (AEMPS) (2013) who are treated in cardiology practices.
  • Patients about to start treatment with a vitamin K antagonist or who are in the first two months of treatment.
  • Patients for whom access to at least 80% of INR tests performed during treatment with vitamin K antagonists is expected to be available.
  • Patients with the mental and physical capacity to complete the study questionnaires and give their informed consent to participate in the study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with mitral stenosis or another significant valve disease for which specific treatment is scheduled or has already been performed (prosthesis or valvuloplasty).
  • Patients hospitalised at the time of inclusion in the study.
  • Patients with a life expectancy of less than 13 months.
  • Patients who are participating in a clinical trial.
  • Patients receiving double antiplatelet therapy.
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
1,013 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Cohort 1

    Adult patients, diagnosed with no-valvular atrial fibrillation and who have recently initiated or are going to initiate VKA treatment, that attend the Cardiology Units

    Drug: Vitamin K Antagonist

Interventions

  • The vitamin K antagonists exert their anticoagulant effect through inhibition of the enzyme complex of vitamin K epoxide reductase subunit 1 with subsequent reduction of the gamma-carboxylation of certain glutamic acid molecules endpoints located on factors coagulation II (prothrombin), VII, IX and X and protein C or its cofactor protein S. This gamma-carboxylation has a significant bearing on the interaction of coagulation factors referenced with calcium ions. Without this reaction, blood clotting cannot be initiated. The dose must be adjusted to each patient at baseline and after regular basis, since the sensitivity to anticoagulants varies between individuals and can also vary throughout the treatment. For this, the Prothrombin Time (PT) is used and standardized ratio called International Normalised Ratio (INR).

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. International Normalized Ratio (INR) Time in Therapeutic Range (TTR)

    Percentage of time within an INR range of 2-3 estimated using the Rosendaal method

    Time frame: Up to 24 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Baseline thromboembolic risk based on the CHADS2 scale

    CHADS2: Cardiac failure, Hypertension, Age, Diabetes, Stroke

    Time frame: Baseline

  2. Baseline thromboembolic risk based on the CHA2DS2-VASc scale

    CHA2DS2-VASc:Cardiac failure, Hypertension, Age ≥75, Diabetes, Stroke -Vascular disease, Age and sex category

    Time frame: Baseline

  3. Baseline haemorrhagic risk based on the HAS-BLED scale

    HAS-BLED: Hypertension, Abnormal renal/liver function, Stroke, Bleeding history or predisposition, Labile INR, Elderly , Drugs/alcohol

    Time frame: Baseline

  4. Changes in INR time in therapeutic range

    INR time in therapeutic range: percentage of time within an INR range of 2-3 estimated using the Rosendaal method

    Time frame: Up to 24 months

  5. Patient preferences with regard to anticoagulant treatment based on patients' questionnaires

    Time frame: Up to 12 months

  6. Satisfaction with the anticoagulant treatment based on the Anti-Clot Treatment Scale (ACTS)

    Time frame: Up to 12 months

  7. Adherence to the anticoagulant treatment: Morisky-Green test

    Time frame: Up to 12 months

  8. Number and type of visits by patients to health professionals related to their anticoagulant treatment

    Time frame: Up to 12 months

  9. Number of patients using anticoagulant treatment strategies

    Strategies: patients continuing vitamin K antagonists, patients with changes/adjustments to the dose of vitamin K antagonists and patients whose treatment is changed to direct action oral anticoagulants

    Time frame: Up to 24 months

  10. Number of patients treated according to clinical practice guidelines based on the Spanish Agency of Medicines and Medical Devices (AEMPS) therapeutic positioning report

    Time frame: Up to 24 months

  11. Number of thromboembolic events in patients with inadequate anticoagulation management

    Time frame: Up to 24 months

  12. Number of haemorrhagic events in patients with inadequate anticoagulation management

    Time frame: Up to 24 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Multiple Locations, Spain
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Oct 2015 to primary completion in Jun 2018, 32 months.

Of 149 industry-sponsored observational studies under Atrial Fibrillation, half reached primary completion within 28 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 15 and three quarters within 44. This study's 32 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 685 studies reached it within 38 months; a quarter within 22 and three quarters within 75.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 20, 2015
First posted
Nov 20, 2015
StartActual
Oct 1, 2015
Primary completionActual
Jun 30, 2018
CompletionActual
Mar 15, 2019
Last update
Apr 25, 2019
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 25, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02610153
Lead sponsor
Bayer
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 20, 2015
Start date
Oct 1, 2015
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2018
Completion
Mar 15, 2019
Last update
Apr 25, 2019

Study contacts

Bayer Study Director
study director · Bayer

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion