CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02608671Updated Jan 20, 2021

Adhesive Tape in Episiotomy Repair

A Phase 4 interventional study of Skin adhesive tape in Episiotomy, sponsored by Ain Shams University. Completed. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-01-20.

Sponsored by Ain Shams University · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
320
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

This study will be undertaken to question the superiority of use skin adhesive tape (® Steri-Strip) closure system in wound healing over the traditional running absorbable subcuticular suture technique in perineal repair after episiotomy.

Read the detailed description

Episiotomy is the most common operating procedure that most obstetricians will perform in their lifetime. Because it is so common and considered minor surgery, teaching students or interns the principles and techniques usually is left to the most junior of residents

The optimal method for episiotomy and perineal trauma repair following childbirth remains open to debate and a great cause of concern to doctors, midwives, and the public

Apparently, the ideal method for perineal repair should be quick, painless, easy to perform and preferably, without increase in pain and dyspareunia during the puerperium

This study will be undertaken to question the superiority of use skin adhesive tape (® Steri-Strip) closure system in wound healing over the traditional running absorbable subcuticular suture technique in perineal repair after episiotomy.

02

Conditions studied

  • Episiotomy

Keywords

  • Episiotomy
  • continuous suture
  • Skin adhesive tape
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Ain Shams University is the lead sponsor of 1,876 studies on the registry; 423 are open to participants now.

Of its 32 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Primiparous.
  • First and second degree perineal tear.
  • Normal not instrumental vaginal delivery; spontaneous not induced.
  • Patient willingness to randomize to episiotomy repair technique.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previously existing local infections or lesions.
  • Third and forth degrees perineal tear.
  • Maternal diseases interfere with wound healing or causing excessive bleeding (coagulopathy, collagen disease, diabetes mellitus, known immunodeficiency, immunosuppressive treatment).
  • Known hypersensitivity to adhesive materials
  • Maternal unwillingness to undergo randomization.
  • Participation in another intervention-trial with interference of intervention and/or outcome of this study.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator)
Enrollment
320 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    Continuous skin suturing

    will be subjected to skin repair after episiotomy with the currently traditional method for episiotomy repair by continuous absorbable subcuticular suture.

  • Experimental
    Adhesive tape

    will be subjected to skin repair after episiotomy with skin adhesive tape.

    Procedure: Skin adhesive tape

Interventions

  • ProcedureSkin adhesive tape

    Also known as: (® Steri-Strip

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. postoperative pain

    pain experience will be evaluated during the procedure,, 6 hours and 12 hours after the procedure by Wong-Baker faces pain rating scale . During the second visit 7-10 days after delivery; pain and patient satisfaction will be evaluated and recorded, data may be collected by phone for those may not be able to come back for the second visit.

    Time frame: During the procedure

Secondary outcomes

  1. wound healing.

    During the second visit 7-10 days after delivery; wound healing will be evaluated and recorded by Redness, Edema, Ecchymosis, Drainage, Approximation (REEDA), data may be collected by phone for those may not be able to come back for the second visit.

    Time frame: 10 days

  2. wound sepsis

    During the second visit 7-10 days after delivery; wound sepsis will be evaluated and recorded by wound sepsis score, data may be collected by phone for those may not be able to come back for the second visit.

    Time frame: 10 days

  3. Postoperative pain

    pain experience will be evaluated 2 hours after the procedure by Wong-Baker faces pain rating scale .

    Time frame: 2 hours after procedure

  4. Postoperative pain

    pain experience will be evaluated 6 hours after the procedure by Wong-Baker faces pain rating scale .

    Time frame: 6 hours after procedure

  5. Postoperative pain

    pain experience will be evaluated 12 hours after the procedure by Wong-Baker faces pain rating scale .

    Time frame: 12 hours after procedure

  6. Postoperative pain

    pain experience will be evaluated by Wong-Baker faces pain rating scale .

    Time frame: 10 days after procedure

  7. timing of procedure

    timing of both procedures will be recorded and documented

    Time frame: During the procedure

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Feigenberg T, Maor-Sagie E, Zivi E, Abu-Dia M, Ben-Meir A, Sela HY, Ezra Y. Using adhesive glue to repair first degree perineal tears: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:526590. doi: 10.1155/2014/526590. Epub 2014 Jun 26. PubMed 25089271 ↗
  • Ghosh A, Nanjappa M, Nagaraj V, Rajkumar GC. Comparison between stainless steel staples and silk sutures for primary closure of skin in patients undergoing neck dissection: A comparative clinical study. Contemp Clin Dent. 2015 Mar;6(Suppl 1):S51-5. doi: 10.4103/0976-237X.152938. PubMed 25821376 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 20, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02608671
Lead sponsor
Ain Shams University
Collaborators
Lobna Ahmed Nabil, Dr. Ahmed Sherif, Dr. Mohamed Mahmoud El Sherbiny, Prof. Mohamed Ashraf Mohamed Farouk Kortam, Dr.Haitham Torky
Responsible party
Ahmed Abass (lecturer, Ain Shams University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 20, 2015
Start date
Dec 2015
Primary completion
Jan 1, 2017
Completion
Dec 1, 2017
Last update
Jan 20, 2021

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion