CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02608593BROWSEUpdated May 22, 2020

Breast Reconstruction Outcomes With and Without StratticE

An observational study in Breast Neoplasms, sponsored by Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust. Completed. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-05-22.

Sponsored by Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-control
Time perspective
Other
Enrollment
121
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Approximately 4,000 women undergo a mastectomy for breast cancer each year in the UK and around 1,500 will have an immediate breast reconstruction. Approximately half of these ladies will have an implant-based breast reconstruction, of which many have an "implant-assisted" breast reconstruction with an Acellular Dermal Matrix.

Strattice™ is an Acellular Dermal Matrix (a pig skin product) made by Acelity. It is used to cover and disguise the lower part of the breast implant. Acellular Dermal Matrices have only been widely used for the last eight years and long-term outcomes for women who have had this form of reconstruction are lacking. Despite this, it is one of the most commonly offered methods of breast reconstruction in the UK for both ladies with a diagnosis of breast cancer and in the risk-reduction setting.

The objective of this study is to assess long-term outcomes of Strattice™-based breast reconstructions in multiple Breast Surgery Centres across the UK. This will be a case-control study comparing women who have had an immediate implant-based breast reconstruction with Strattice™ (case) or without (control). This will be achieved by review and analysis of retrospective data from patients who have undergone immediate breast reconstruction using implants with or without Strattice™ following either a diagnosis breast cancer or for risk-reduction. In addition there will be a prospective clinical assessment of the reconstruction outcomes. Outcomes assessed will include complications, surgical re-interventions and aesthetic results. These will be related to co-morbid conditions and other risk factors. Data will also be collected on unplanned interventions associated with a cost, if available.

Read the detailed description

Primary Outcome The primary outcome measure will be unexpected loss of the implant.

Secondary Outcomes

To investigate short and long-term outcomes with Strattice™ including:

  • Quality of Life
  • In-patient treatment costs
  • Ipsilateral Revision rates
  • Aesthetic outcome
  • Breast reconstruction softness (Tonometry)
  • Regional pain
  • Loco-regional recurrence
  • Effect of radiotherapy
  • Complications - (seroma drainage, skin necrosis/ wound breakdown)

Study Design

  • All patients who have had an immediate implant-based breast reconstruction will be identified from prospective databases.
  • Patients will be invited to enter the research study by post. The invitation letter will include: an offer to take part in the study, a Patient Information Leaflet, a Stamped addressed envelope and an Accept/Decline outcome form.
  • If they fail to respond, patients will be re-contacted on one further occasion, in the same manner, after approximately two months.
  • Patients will be invited to attend a clinical appointment at the Breast Surgery Centre where their reconstruction was performed. Here they will see a clinical researcher in the presence of a clinic nurse and consent to participate in the study.
  • Patients will be asked to undergo a clinical assessment, Tonometry (measurement of breast reconstruction softness) and medical photography. The data obtained from this will be anonymised and inputted into a database for analysis.
  • Patients will receive a postal questionnaire following the clinic visit asking them about the "Patient Reported Outcomes" of their reconstruction. (This will not be performed at the clinic visit in an attempt to avoid bias). They will receive a further follow-up questionnaire 12 months later.
  • The medical records of patients will be reviewed to assess outcomes including complications from surgery.
  • If a patient does not consent for the prospective part of the study, a retrospective audit of their notes for implant loss, revisions and complications will be performed
  • All data will be collected on Case Report Forms. Study numbers will be allocated, and linked-anonymised data inputted into a database on a NHS computer for analysis.
  • Medical records, including clinic letters, nursing records and anaesthetic charts will be reviewed to collect data on:

    • Patient demographics (age, BMI, comorbidities and smoking history at time of surgery)
    • Surgical details (operation type, operation time, mastectomy weight, implant size/type)
    • Details on cancer outcome and adjuvant therapies
    • Post-operative complications (including need for reoperation, prolonged healing, loss of implant)
  • Additional prospective data analysed will include:

    • Patient Reported Outcome questionnaire results
    • Tonometry (breast softness)
    • Baker Capsular Contracture grade
    • Aesthetic outcome (using Likert score) This will be assessed by the clinical researcher, and independently assessed using the medical photographs, with the assessor blinded to the reconstruction technique

Assessment of Contracture Using the Baker Breast Contracture Scale, the researcher will assess the Baker Grade for each breast to assess the level of capsular contracture.

Baker Grade Parameters I the breast is normally soft and looks natural II the breast is a little firm but looks normal III the breast is firm and looks abnormal IV the breast is hard, painful, and looks abnormal

Inclusion Criteria

  • Patients age 18 years or older at the time of surgery.
  • Patients who have undergone immediate Implant-based breast reconstruction with or without Strattice™ with a minimum follow-up of six months.
  • Patients capable of providing informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Patients who have had an immediate implant-based breast reconstruction with an alternative brand of matrix/mesh to Strattice™.
  • Patients who have had a flap based-reconstruction with implant.
  • Delayed reconstructions.

Study Size and Statistical Analysis

  • From three large breast units across the UK, we shall aim to recruit a maximum of 400 patients to the prospective part of the study.
  • Statistical Analysis will be performed in collaboration with Dr Julie Morris, Honorary Senior Lecturer, Department of Medical Statistics. SPSS 15 will be used to analyse the data.

Study Sites:

University Hospital of South Manchester Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Trust Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

02

Conditions studied

  • Breast Neoplasms

Browse trials for

03

In context

Breast Neoplasms

12,544 studies on the registry are indexed under Breast Neoplasms; 2,892 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 121 is below the median of 184 across 2,642 observational studies indexed under Breast Neoplasms.

Browse Breast Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust is the lead sponsor of 135 studies on the registry; 27 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

  • Patients age 18 years or older at the time of surgery.
  • Patients who have undergone immediate Implant-based breast reconstruction with or without Strattice™ with a minimum follow-up of six months.
  • Patients capable of providing informed consent.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients age 18 years or older at the time of surgery.
  • Patients who have undergone immediate Implant-based breast reconstruction with or without Strattice™ with a minimum follow-up of six months.
  • Patients capable of providing informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who have had an immediate implant-based breast reconstruction with an alternative brand of matrix/mesh to Strattice™.
  • Patients who have had a flap based-reconstruction with implant.
  • Delayed reconstructions.
05

Study design

Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Other
Enrollment
121 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Implant reconstruction with Strattice

    Women having immediate breast reconstruction with partial or total Strattice cover

    Procedure: Strattice

  • Implant reconstruction without Strattice

    Women having immediate implant based breast reconstruction where no Strattice has been used

Interventions

  • ProcedureStrattice

    Implant based reconstruction with strattice cover of part or all of implant

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of patients planned loss of implant within 12 months of immediate reconstruction

    Time frame: 12 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Quality of Life questionnaire

    Time frame: 8 years

  2. In-patient treatment costs

    Time frame: 8 years

  3. Ipsilateral Revision rates

    Time frame: 1-8 years

  4. Cosmesis

    Cosmesis domains of Breast-Q quality of life questionnaire and likert 1-5 scale

    Time frame: 1-8 years

  5. Breast Reconstruction softness

    Using tonometric measurement of breast softness

    Time frame: 1-8 years

  6. Regional pain

    Using pain domain of Breast-Q Quality of Life questionnaire

    Time frame: 1-8 years

  7. loco-regional cancer recurrence

    Time frame: 1-8 years

  8. Morbidity

    Time frame: 1-8 years

Other outcomes

  1. Effect of Radiotherapy

    Patients will be recorded as to whether they have or have not received radiotherapy. Effect of radiotherapy on the primary and secondary outcome measures will be compared between and within groups

    Time frame: 1-8 years

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 22, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02608593
Lead sponsor
Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust
Collaborators
LifeCell
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 18, 2015
Start date
Aug 19, 2016
Primary completion
Oct 31, 2019
Completion
Oct 31, 2019
Last update
May 22, 2020

Study contacts

Richard Johnson
principal investigator · University Hospital of South Manchester

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion