CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02607397ROCOCO LGGUpdated Mar 28, 2017

ROCOCO - Low Grade Glioma - Planning Study

An observational study in Low Grade Glioma, sponsored by Maastricht Radiation Oncology. Completed at 4 sites in 2 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-03-28.

Sponsored by Maastricht Radiation Oncology · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
25
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The cost of particle therapy (PT) are considerably higher than conventional radiotherapy (RT) with photons. Considering potential dosimetric advantages of PT, it is necessary to determine if PT are more cost-effective than photons per indication regarding quality of life, survival, and progression free survival. Given the lack of evidence for the benefit of particle therapy in relevant cases, investigators proposed an in silico trial to investigate to what extend proton therapy decrease the amount of irradiated normal tissue and, consequently, the risk of side effects in the surrounding normal tissue as well as the risk of secondary tumors. Given validated dose-response curves and/or NTCP models, a 10% lower mean dose of proton therapy on normal tissue compared to photon therapy should result in at least a 20% lower risk of side effects.

Read the detailed description

Patients with low grade glioma have a far better prognosis than patients with high grade glioma. Despite their low incidence and initial favorable biological behavior, low-grade gliomas are behaving as malignant brain tumours leading to considerable morbidity and mortality especially in young patients. Low-grade infiltrating gliomas in adults include diffuse astrocytoma, oligoastrocytoma and oligodendroglioma. With the WHO 2007 classification the variety within the low grade glioma patient group was large. With the introduction of molecular marker like IDH, MGMT, 1p/19q the classification of glioma's in general is a matter of debate, because shifts in treatments and prognosis. In this context, the importance of molecular markers is recognized and used for designing new trials.

Because of this improved determining of long term survivors like low grade glioma patients, reducing the long term side effect becomes even more relevant. One of the prominent side effect of radiotherapy in low grade glioma patients is the decline in neurocognitive function and loss of memory. This enables patients in their daily activities and causes loss of quality of life. The hippocampus and associated limbic system have long been known to be important in memory formation and pre-clinical models show loss of hippocampal stem cells with radiation as well as changes in architecture and function of mature neurons. Cognitive outcomes in clinical studies are beginning to provide evidence of cognitive effects associated with hippocampal dose and the cognitive benefits of hippocampal sparing. With currently developing IMRT techniques attempts are made to lower the dose to the hippocampus. Besides the hippocampus the dose to the posterior part of the cerebellum seems to influence cognition. Koziol wrote recently the current consensus paper which gathers diverse views on a variety of important roles played by the cerebellum across a range of cognitive and emotional functions. This paper considers the cerebellum in relation to neurocognitive development, language function, working memory, executive function, and the development of cerebellar internal control models and reflects upon some of the ways in which better understanding the cerebellum's status as a "supervised learning machine" can enrich our ability to understand human function and adaptation.

This in silico planning study compares different treatments (photon, proton and C-ion) focusing on normal tissue radiation exposure for a fixed tumor dose, using the same delineation of gross target volume (GTV), clinical target volume (CTV) and planning target volume (PTV). The comparison will be based on dosimetric parameters on normal tissues such as mean hippocampus dose, etc. In addition, the NTCP for a fixed tumor dose or the same expected TCP will be determined. Cobalt Gy equivalent doses will be used when reporting the proton and C-ion dose. In the case of protons, a constant RBE value of 1.1 will be used for both the tumor and the normal tissues. The RBE of C-ions will be calculated based on the models used by the participating centers. The GSI in-house treatment planning system uses RBE values calculated on the basis of the local effect model (LEM). The LEM I (alpha/beta=2) is based on the radial dose distribution of each charged particle crossing into a cell nucleus, as well as on the radiosensitivity and repair capacity of the tissue. The TPSs used by UHM is also based on the LEM model. The model used at NIRS utilizes fixed RBE values that are dependent on the depth in the body, but independent of dose level or tumor type.

02

Conditions studied

  • Low Grade Glioma

Browse trials for

03

In context

Glioma

1,397 studies on the registry are indexed under Glioma; 351 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 25 is below the median of 88 across 238 observational studies indexed under Glioma.

Browse Glioma studies →

Lead sponsor

Maastricht Radiation Oncology is the lead sponsor of 104 studies on the registry; 9 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

25 patients. Each patient will function as his or her own control.

Inclusion criteria

  • Low Grade Glioma patients
  • Treated with radical intent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • No Low Grade Glioma
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
25 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Dmean

    The normal tissue dose volume parameters per tumor type are defined as Hippocampus: Dmean

    Time frame: 1 month

  2. Dmax

    The normal tissue dose volume parameters per tumor type are defined as Hippocampus: Dmax

    Time frame: 1 month

Secondary outcomes

  1. Normal Tissue Complication Probability

    Based on the OAR's radiation exposure, normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) will be calculated using existing models or existing dose response curves.

    Time frame: 1 month

07

Study locations

4 sites
  • University of Heidelberg
    Heidelberg, Germany
  • University Hospital Giessen and Marburg
    Marburg, Germany
  • Radiotherapy Group
    Deventer, Netherlands
  • University Medical Center Nijmegen
    Nijmegen, Netherlands
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 28, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02607397
Lead sponsor
Maastricht Radiation Oncology
Collaborators
University Medical Center Nijmegen, Radiotherapy Group Deventer, Heidelberg University, University of Giessen
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 18, 2015
Start date
May 2015
Primary completion
Mar 2017
Completion
Mar 2017
Last update
Mar 28, 2017

Study contacts

Philippe Lambin, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Maastro Clinic, The Netherlands

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion