CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT02595996Updated Oct 22, 2021Results posted

Propranolol Dose Escalation in Lymphedema in Patients

A Phase 2 interventional study of Propranolol in Primary Lymphedema, sponsored by Columbia University. Terminated at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 12 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-10-22.

Sponsored by Columbia University · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
Lack of funding
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
1
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
12 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a study to investigate the safety and efficacy of propranolol in the treatment of patients with primary lymphedema. The primary goal is to assess patient tolerability of increasing doses of propranolol. The secondary goal is to assess lymphedema symptoms and signs in response to propranolol treatment.

Read the detailed description

Lymphatic malformations (LMs) arise from abnormal development of lymphatic vasculature. Primary lymphedema is considered a form of LM. Recently, results in the investigators' laboratory demonstrated that propranolol, a pan beta-adrenergic receptor (βAR) antagonist, had cytotoxic and anti-proliferative effects against cells isolated from LM tissues. Preliminary results from treating symptomatic LM patients with propranolol at a dose range from 0.7-1mg/kg/day demonstrated a 70% positive response rate, with patients reporting improvement in their symptoms.

Propranolol has been used for different indications for many years. Propranolol is accepted for use in infants with hemangiomas and supraventricular tachycardia. Hemangeol was approved by the FDA for use in infants with hemangiomas. However, βAR antagonists are not without potential adverse effects, including hypotension, bradycardia, hypoglycemia, bronchospasms, and sleep disturbances. FDA-approved dose range for treating hemangiomas in infants (>5 weeks old, >2kg) ranged from 1-3mg/kg/day in divided doses. Propranolol doses of up to 4mg/kg/day has been used for pediatric supraventricular tachycardia. Therefore, the investigator's experience with propranolol use in LM patients have been at the low end of most accepted clinical indications. The investigators propose to escalate propranolol dosages up to 3mg/kg/day in this study, well below the dose ranges currently used in clinical settings.

This dose range of 0.7-1mg/kg/day was chosen for LM patients as it was the low end of dose range for infants treated with propranolol for problematic hemangiomas, a related vascular anomaly. At this dose, no significant hemodynamic adverse effects were noted in LM patients. However, when patients stopped propranolol or their dose fell below 0.7mg/kg/day, they suffered rebound worsening of their symptoms. Moreover, inflammatory events such as infections temporarily overcame the effects of 0.7-1mg/kg/day of propranolol. Thus, it is unknown whether maximum propranolol efficacy was achieved at the current dose range. The investigators propose to examine whether optimized propranolol usage for treatment of LM patients has been achieved. The primary endpoint for this study is to ascertain whether LM patients can tolerate higher doses of propranolol, as measured by known propranolol adverse effects and patient-reported symptoms. A secondary endpoint will address whether patient-reported LM symptoms and quality of life are improved with higher doses of propranolol; objective findings such as LM size on physical examination and imaging studies will be analyzed as well. In addition, LM tissue biopsies will acquired from patients before and after propranolol treatment for further analyses of disease progression.

02

Conditions studied

  • Primary Lymphedema

Browse trials for

03

In context

Lymphedema

560 studies on the registry are indexed under Lymphedema; 135 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 1 is below the median of 50 across 403 interventional studies indexed under Lymphedema.

Browse Lymphedema studies →

Lead sponsor

Columbia University is the lead sponsor of 1,103 studies on the registry; 193 are open to participants now.

Of its 172 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 142 (83%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
12 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Primary lymphedema
  • Measurable disease
  • Adequate functional status: Karnofsky >50% (>age 16), Lanky >50 (\<age 16),
  • No prior therapy within 4 weeks of enrollment
  • Adequate bone marrow, renal function, cardiac, and pulmonary function, negative pregnancy test (for women).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Secondary lymphedema
  • Patients already receiving other investigational drugs
  • Patients with known contraindications to receiving propranolol
  • Other medical comorbidities including but not limited to: pheochromocytoma, bradycardia, bronchospasm/reactive airway disease, decompensated heart failure, heart block, ongoing active infections.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
1 participant (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Treatment

    Patients will be given propranolol in escalating doses

    Drug: Propranolol

Interventions

  • DrugPropranolol

    escalating doses of propranolol from 1mg/kg/day to 2mg/kg/day to 3mg/kg/day

    Also known as: Inderal

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Patients That Tolerated Propranolol

    To assess whether patients tolerated propranolol

    Time frame: 8 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of Patients With Improved Quality of Life Based on Self-reported Questionnaires

    To assess subjective lymphedema symptoms improvements only - whether patients' general quality of life symptoms improved on propranolol treatment by self-reported questionnaires (SF 36)

    Time frame: 8 weeks

  2. Number of Patients With Decreased Fluid Retention by Weight

    To assess whether patients' lymphedema signs are improved on propranolol by weight (BMI kg/m\^2) - objective signs of improvement of their lymphedema

    Time frame: 8 weeks

  3. Number of Patients With Lower Limb Discrepancy

    To assess whether patients' lymphedema signs are improved on propranolol by limb girth discrepancy measurement (%) - objective signs of improvement of their lymphedema

    Time frame: 8 weeks

  4. Number of Patients With Decreased Fluid Retention on MRI

    To assess whether patients' lymphedema signs are improved on propranolol - the decrease in fluid retention will be calculated by the measurement of fat (a number) divide by the measurement of fluid (a number) to yield a ratio - if a patient has a lower ratio at 8 weeks than at baseline, they will be reported in this category.

    Time frame: baseline to 8 weeks

07

Results

Posted Oct 22, 2021
Limitations and caveats
Study terminated due to lack of funding. Data was not analyzed or disclosed due to subject confidentiality being an issue (n=1).

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneTreatment
Started1
Completed1
Not completed0

Outcome measures

PrimaryNumber of Patients That Tolerated Propranolol

To assess whether patients tolerated propranolol

Time frame:
8 weeks

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryNumber of Patients With Improved Quality of Life Based on Self-reported Questionnaires

To assess subjective lymphedema symptoms improvements only - whether patients' general quality of life symptoms improved on propranolol treatment by self-reported questionnaires (SF 36)

Time frame:
8 weeks

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryNumber of Patients With Decreased Fluid Retention by Weight

To assess whether patients' lymphedema signs are improved on propranolol by weight (BMI kg/m\^2) - objective signs of improvement of their lymphedema

Time frame:
8 weeks

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryNumber of Patients With Lower Limb Discrepancy

To assess whether patients' lymphedema signs are improved on propranolol by limb girth discrepancy measurement (%) - objective signs of improvement of their lymphedema

Time frame:
8 weeks

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryNumber of Patients With Decreased Fluid Retention on MRI

To assess whether patients' lymphedema signs are improved on propranolol - the decrease in fluid retention will be calculated by the measurement of fat (a number) divide by the measurement of fluid (a number) to yield a ratio - if a patient has a lower ratio at 8 weeks than at baseline, they will be reported in this category.

Time frame:
baseline to 8 weeks

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

Adverse events

Collected over Up to 8 weeks. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Treatment0/1 (0%)0/1 (0%)0/1 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Treatment
<=18 years1
Between 18 and 65 years0
>=65 years0
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Treatment
Female1
Male0
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Treatment
Hispanic or Latino0
Not Hispanic or Latino1
Unknown or Not Reported0
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Treatment
American Indian or Alaska Native0
Asian0
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0
Black or African American0
White1
More than one race0
Unknown or Not Reported0
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Treatment
United States1
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Columbia University
    New York, New York 10032, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Mar 22, 2018

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 22, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02595996
Lead sponsor
Columbia University
Responsible party
June Wu (Assistant Professor of Surgery, Columbia University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 4, 2015
Start date
Jun 7, 2017
Primary completion
Oct 8, 2020
Completion
Oct 8, 2020
Results posted
Oct 22, 2021
Last update
Oct 22, 2021

Study contacts

June K. Wu, MD
principal investigator · Columbia University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Sep 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion