A Phase 2 interventional study of Propranolol in Primary Lymphedema, sponsored by Columbia University. Terminated at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 12 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-10-22.
Sponsored by Columbia University · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment
This is a study to investigate the safety and efficacy of propranolol in the treatment of patients with primary lymphedema. The primary goal is to assess patient tolerability of increasing doses of propranolol. The secondary goal is to assess lymphedema symptoms and signs in response to propranolol treatment.
Lymphatic malformations (LMs) arise from abnormal development of lymphatic vasculature. Primary lymphedema is considered a form of LM. Recently, results in the investigators' laboratory demonstrated that propranolol, a pan beta-adrenergic receptor (βAR) antagonist, had cytotoxic and anti-proliferative effects against cells isolated from LM tissues. Preliminary results from treating symptomatic LM patients with propranolol at a dose range from 0.7-1mg/kg/day demonstrated a 70% positive response rate, with patients reporting improvement in their symptoms.
Propranolol has been used for different indications for many years. Propranolol is accepted for use in infants with hemangiomas and supraventricular tachycardia. Hemangeol was approved by the FDA for use in infants with hemangiomas. However, βAR antagonists are not without potential adverse effects, including hypotension, bradycardia, hypoglycemia, bronchospasms, and sleep disturbances. FDA-approved dose range for treating hemangiomas in infants (>5 weeks old, >2kg) ranged from 1-3mg/kg/day in divided doses. Propranolol doses of up to 4mg/kg/day has been used for pediatric supraventricular tachycardia. Therefore, the investigator's experience with propranolol use in LM patients have been at the low end of most accepted clinical indications. The investigators propose to escalate propranolol dosages up to 3mg/kg/day in this study, well below the dose ranges currently used in clinical settings.
This dose range of 0.7-1mg/kg/day was chosen for LM patients as it was the low end of dose range for infants treated with propranolol for problematic hemangiomas, a related vascular anomaly. At this dose, no significant hemodynamic adverse effects were noted in LM patients. However, when patients stopped propranolol or their dose fell below 0.7mg/kg/day, they suffered rebound worsening of their symptoms. Moreover, inflammatory events such as infections temporarily overcame the effects of 0.7-1mg/kg/day of propranolol. Thus, it is unknown whether maximum propranolol efficacy was achieved at the current dose range. The investigators propose to examine whether optimized propranolol usage for treatment of LM patients has been achieved. The primary endpoint for this study is to ascertain whether LM patients can tolerate higher doses of propranolol, as measured by known propranolol adverse effects and patient-reported symptoms. A secondary endpoint will address whether patient-reported LM symptoms and quality of life are improved with higher doses of propranolol; objective findings such as LM size on physical examination and imaging studies will be analyzed as well. In addition, LM tissue biopsies will acquired from patients before and after propranolol treatment for further analyses of disease progression.
560 studies on the registry are indexed under Lymphedema; 135 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 1 is below the median of 50 across 403 interventional studies indexed under Lymphedema.
Browse Lymphedema studies →Columbia University is the lead sponsor of 1,103 studies on the registry; 193 are open to participants now.
Of its 172 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 142 (83%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Patients will be given propranolol in escalating doses
Drug: Propranolol
escalating doses of propranolol from 1mg/kg/day to 2mg/kg/day to 3mg/kg/day
Also known as: Inderal
Number of Patients That Tolerated Propranolol
To assess whether patients tolerated propranolol
Time frame: 8 weeks
Number of Patients With Improved Quality of Life Based on Self-reported Questionnaires
To assess subjective lymphedema symptoms improvements only - whether patients' general quality of life symptoms improved on propranolol treatment by self-reported questionnaires (SF 36)
Time frame: 8 weeks
Number of Patients With Decreased Fluid Retention by Weight
To assess whether patients' lymphedema signs are improved on propranolol by weight (BMI kg/m\^2) - objective signs of improvement of their lymphedema
Time frame: 8 weeks
Number of Patients With Lower Limb Discrepancy
To assess whether patients' lymphedema signs are improved on propranolol by limb girth discrepancy measurement (%) - objective signs of improvement of their lymphedema
Time frame: 8 weeks
Number of Patients With Decreased Fluid Retention on MRI
To assess whether patients' lymphedema signs are improved on propranolol - the decrease in fluid retention will be calculated by the measurement of fat (a number) divide by the measurement of fluid (a number) to yield a ratio - if a patient has a lower ratio at 8 weeks than at baseline, they will be reported in this category.
Time frame: baseline to 8 weeks
| Milestone | Treatment |
|---|---|
| Started | 1 |
| Completed | 1 |
| Not completed | 0 |
To assess whether patients tolerated propranolol
No measurements were reported for this outcome.
To assess subjective lymphedema symptoms improvements only - whether patients' general quality of life symptoms improved on propranolol treatment by self-reported questionnaires (SF 36)
No measurements were reported for this outcome.
To assess whether patients' lymphedema signs are improved on propranolol by weight (BMI kg/m\^2) - objective signs of improvement of their lymphedema
No measurements were reported for this outcome.
To assess whether patients' lymphedema signs are improved on propranolol by limb girth discrepancy measurement (%) - objective signs of improvement of their lymphedema
No measurements were reported for this outcome.
To assess whether patients' lymphedema signs are improved on propranolol - the decrease in fluid retention will be calculated by the measurement of fat (a number) divide by the measurement of fluid (a number) to yield a ratio - if a patient has a lower ratio at 8 weeks than at baseline, they will be reported in this category.
No measurements were reported for this outcome.
Collected over Up to 8 weeks. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.
| Group | Deaths | Serious | Other |
|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment | 0/1 (0%) | 0/1 (0%) | 0/1 (0%) |
| Age, Categorical(Participants) | Treatment |
|---|---|
| <=18 years | 1 |
| Between 18 and 65 years | 0 |
| >=65 years | 0 |
| Sex: Female, Male(Participants) | Treatment |
|---|---|
| Female | 1 |
| Male | 0 |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants) | Treatment |
|---|---|
| Hispanic or Latino | 0 |
| Not Hispanic or Latino | 1 |
| Unknown or Not Reported | 0 |
| Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants) | Treatment |
|---|---|
| American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 |
| Asian | 0 |
| Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 |
| Black or African American | 0 |
| White | 1 |
| More than one race | 0 |
| Unknown or Not Reported | 0 |
| Region of Enrollment(participants) | Treatment |
|---|---|
| United States | 1 |
Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.
This study is terminated, as verified in Sep 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Columbia University