An interventional study of tissue/ organ prefabrication in Soft Tissue Infections and Intentional Self Harm by Other Specified Means, sponsored by Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine. Status unknown at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 5 Years to 65 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2015-11-03.
Sponsored by Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
The purpose of this study is to observe the feasibility and its application of autologous prefabrication for body surface tissues/oranges
In the field of tissue regeneration techniques, the in vitro processes and other exogenous factors still have many uncertainties. These uncertainties have hampered road to the clinical application. As the importance of in vivo environment has aroused more awareness, the investigators validated the hypothesis that the feasibility of self-regeneration prefabricated unaided by any in vitro culture process or exogenous elements.
90 studies on the registry are indexed under Soft Tissue Infections; 11 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 1 is below the median of 120 across 57 interventional studies indexed under Soft Tissue Infections.
Browse Soft Tissue Infections studies →Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine is the lead sponsor of 358 studies on the registry; 104 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
in vivo generation of autologous tissue for joint replacement
Procedure: tissue/ organ prefabrication
tissue/ organ is prefabricated in vivo independent of exogenous factors for replacement/ reconstruction purposes
Also known as: ear, joint, bone, cartilage
Occurence of major adverse events
Including infection, necrosis, resorption
Time frame: through study completion 12 months after prefabrication
Feasibility of self-prefabrication
To observe the regeneration changes of prefabricated neo-tissue by histology (staining) and biomechanical analysis (bone density, Young's modulus)
Time frame: 3, 6, and 12 months after prefabrication
survival of prefabricated tissue after grafting
Assessed by radiologic imaging (CT, MRT)
Time frame: 3, 6, 12, and 36 months after grafting
biomechanical function of prefabricated tissue after grafting
Assessed by total range of motion (degree)
Time frame: 3, 6, 12, and 36 months after grafting
biomechanical function of prefabricated tissue after grafting
Assessed by grip strength (kg)
Time frame: 3, 6, 12, and 36 months after grafting
This study is status unknown, as verified in Oct 2015. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine