ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02593370Updated Feb 12, 2016

Suprasacral Parallel Shift - Ultrasound/MR Image Fusion Guided Lumbosacral Plexus Block

A Phase 1 interventional study of Lidocaine-epinephrine added gadoterate meglumine in Hip Fractures, Anesthesia Local and Pain, Perioperative, sponsored by Thomas F. Bendtsen. Completed at 1 site in Denmark. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-02-12.

Sponsored by Thomas F. Bendtsen · Phase 1, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
26
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The main objective of the trial is to complete a double-blinded randomized controlled trial with crossover design of a lumbosacral plexus block with the Suprasacral Parallel Shift technique guided by ultrasound/magnetic resonance (MR) image fusion vs. Suprasacral Parallel Shift guided by ultrasound by estimating sensory block of the femoral nerve, the obturator nerve, the lumbosacral trunk, and spinal nerve L1 in healthy volunteers.

Read the detailed description

The main objective of the trial is to complete a double-blinded randomized controlled trial with crossover design of a one-injection nerve block of the lower part of the lumbar plexus and the upper part of the sacral plexus (Suprasacral Parallel Shift, SSPS) to achieve analgesia of the femoral nerve, the obturator nerve, the lumbosacral trunk, and spinal nerve L1 with SSPS guided by ultrasound/MR image fusion vs. SSPS guided by ultrasound by estimating sensory block of in healthy volunteers by estimating the sensory block of dermatomes of the terminal nerves in healthy volunteers.

The secondary objective is to estimate a) preparation and b) procedure time, c) injection site and d) depth, e) discomfort, f) change in MAP, g) plasma lidocaine pharmacokinetics, h) motor and i) sensory block, j) perineural and k) epidural spread of lidocaine-epinephrine added gadotorate meglumine on MRI, and l) cost-effectiveness of SSPS guided by ultrasound/MR image fusion vs. SSPS guided by ultrasound.

The investigators hypothesize that block success is higher for SSPS guided by ultrasound/MR image fusion than for SSPS guided by ultrasound.

02

Conditions studied

  • Hip Fractures
  • Anesthesia Local
  • Pain, Perioperative

Keywords

  • Hip surgery anesthesia
  • Perioperative analgesia
03

In context

Hip Fractures

848 studies on the registry are indexed under Hip Fractures; 160 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 26 is below the median of 90 across 540 interventional studies indexed under Hip Fractures.

Browse Hip Fractures studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Thomas F. Bendtsen as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Volunteers who has given their written and oral informed consent to participate in the study after having fully understood the content and the limitations of the protocol.
  • Normal healthy person (American Society of Anesthesiology [ASA] Classification I)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Volunteers not able to cooperate in the study
  • Volunteers not able to understand or speak Danish
  • Daily use of analgesics
  • Allergy against the medicines used in the study
  • Drug abuse (according to the investigator's judgement)
  • Alcohol consumption greater than the recommendations of the Danish National Board of Health
  • Contraindication for MRI including pregnancy
  • Volunteer in whom nerve blocks are not possible due to technical reasons
  • Volunteer who are incompetent (ie. surrogate consent is not accepted)
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
26 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Suprasacral Parallel Shift guided by US/MR image fusion

    Use of ultrasound/MR image fusion guided Suprasacral Parallel Shift technique to place a lumbar plexus block (20 mL 2% lidocaine with epinephrine added gadoterate meglumine).

    Drug: Lidocaine-epinephrine added gadoterate meglumine

  • Active comparator
    Suprasacral Parallel Shift guided by US

    Use of ultrasound guided Suprasacral Parallel Shift technique to place a lumbar plexus block (20 mL 2% lidocaine with epinephrine added gadoterate meglumine).

    Drug: Lidocaine-epinephrine added gadoterate meglumine

Interventions

  • DrugLidocaine-epinephrine added gadoterate meglumine
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Block success

    Block success of the clinical relevant lumbosacral nerves that innervate the hip joint capsule estimated as significant motor block of the obturator nerve, the femoral nerve, and the lumbosacral trunk. Motor block is a significant proxy marker of sensory block. Motor block (muscle strength, mmHg) is assessed with a handheld dynamometer.

    Time frame: Estimated 40 min after completed intervention. Presented 10 months after last patient last visit (LVLP).

Secondary outcomes

  1. Plasma lidocaine

    Time frame: Blood samples are withdrawn 0, 5, 10, 20, 40, 60, and 90 minutes after intervention. Presented 10 months after LVLP

  2. Time for preparation

    Time for preparation in seconds is defined as the time of placement of the volunteer on the bed until the end of pre-ultrasound scanning

    Time frame: Estimated prior to intervention. Presented 10 months after LVLP

  3. Block procedure time

    Block procedure time in seconds is defined as the time of the placement of the ultrasound probe on the skin to until the block needle is pulled out after injection of local anesthetics

    Time frame: Estimated during intervention. Presented 10 months after LVLP

  4. Injection site

    Time frame: Estimated at the end of the intervention. Presented 10 months after LVLP

  5. Block needle depth

    Time frame: Estimated at the end of the intervention. Presented 10 months after LVLP

  6. Discomfort

    Estimated on numeric rating scale 0-10

    Time frame: Estimated immediately after the intervention. Presented 10 months after LVLP

  7. Mean arterial pressure change

    Time frame: Mean arterial pressure is measured prior intervention and 5 min after intervention. Presented 10 months after LVLP

  8. Sensory (cold, warm, touch, pain) block of the dermatomes T12-S3 and the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve

    Time frame: Estimated 50 min after intervention. Presented 10 months after LVLP

  9. Perineural spread of local anesthetics added gadoterate meglumine

    Time frame: Estimated on MRI sampled 10-30 minutes after intervention. Presented 10 months after LVLP

  10. Epidural spread of local anesthetics added gadoterate meglumine

    Time frame: Estimated on MRI sampled 10-30 minutes after intervention. Presented 10 months after LVLP

  11. Cost-effectiveness (ICER)

    ICER is estimated as the difference in mean marginal cost of the blocks.

    Time frame: Calculated after LVLP. Presented 10 months after the last visit of the last volunteer

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Aarhus University Hospital
    Aarhus C, 8000, Denmark
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Strid JM, Pedersen EM, Al-Karradi SN, Bendtsen MA, Bjorn S, Dam M, Daugaard M, Hansen MS, Linnet KD, Borglum J, Soballe K, Bendtsen TF. Real-Time Ultrasound/MRI Fusion for Suprasacral Parallel Shift Approach to Lumbosacral Plexus Blockade and Analysis of Injectate Spread: An Exploratory Randomized Controlled Trial. Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:1873209. doi: 10.1155/2017/1873209. Epub 2017 Mar 15. PubMed 28396863 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 12, 2016, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02593370
Lead sponsor
Thomas F. Bendtsen
Collaborators
AP Moeller Foundation, Aarhus University Hospital
Responsible party
Thomas F. Bendtsen (Research anesthetist, ass. professor, PhD, Aarhus University Hospital) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Nov 2, 2015
Start date
Oct 2015
Primary completion
Nov 2015
Completion
Jan 2016
Last update
Feb 12, 2016

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion