CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT02590783Updated May 14, 2024

Treatment of Pelvic Ring Fractures in the Elderly

An interventional study of experimental intervention surgery and control intervention in Pelvic Pain, sponsored by University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland. Terminated at 1 site in Switzerland. Open to participants aged 65 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-05-14.

Sponsored by University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
study question was not suitable
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
88
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
65 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Pelvic ring fractures in the elderly are associated with high morbidity during standard conservative treatment due to immobility. Furthermore the risk of long term dependence even after the fracture has united is high. In analogy to the treatment of hip fractures in a similar patient population, patients might benefit from surgical treatment due to a reduction in pain and early mobilization.

Read the detailed description

Comparison of surgical vs conservative treatment with respect to mobility, pain, morbidity and mortality.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pelvic Pain

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • treatment
03

In context

Pelvic Pain

375 studies on the registry are indexed under Pelvic Pain; 83 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 88 is above the median of 54 across 273 interventional studies indexed under Pelvic Pain.

Browse Pelvic Pain studies →

Lead sponsor

University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland is the lead sponsor of 968 studies on the registry; 191 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
65 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • CTI/MRI verified fracture of the sacrum affecting the posterior ring or both posterior and anterior ring
  • age>65 years, ambulatory with/without walking aids before Trauma
  • ambulatory with/without walking aids before trauma
  • postmenopausal status in women
  • informed consent for study participation and surgery

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Refusal of consent by the patient or legal representatives to participate in the study
  • Other fractures or
  • Unstable pelvic fracture (type B or C according to classification of 'Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen' (AO)/OTA) requiring surgical stabilisation after high- or low-energy trauma
  • Suspicion of a pathological fracture in the context of known or unknown malignancy
  • Previous surgery of the pelvis with metal obstructing the planned paths of the ilio-sacral screws
  • Symptomatic low back pain with morphological changes, i.e. intervertebral disc displacement, neoplasm metastasis in the axial skeleton, spinal stenosis, vertebral fracture, spondylarthropathy etc.
  • Comorbidity that precludes undergoing general or spinal anaesthesia
  • Pre-trauma mobility status that precludes achieving a post-trauma mobility status enabling the patient to perform the timed up and go test (e.g. patient being in a wheel chair)
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
88 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    experimental intervention surgery

    screw osteosynthesis of the sacrum and in certain cases additional plate osteosynthesis of dislocated pubic rami fractures, postoperative analgesia, physiotherapy, work-up for osteoporosis, geriatric rehabilitation if necessary

    Procedure: experimental intervention surgery

  • Active comparator
    control intervention conservative

    analgesia, physiotherapy, work-up for osteoporosis, geriatric rehabilitation if necessary

    Procedure: control intervention

Interventions

  • Procedureexperimental intervention surgery

    Patients are placed supine on the carbon table. Screw paths are planned on a spiral CT scan from the sacrum on transversal slices, two Kirschner-wires 2.5 mm in diameter are introduced into the iliac bone through a stab incision and advanced into the ilio-sacral joint, through the lateral part of sacrum into the first and second sacral body, through the contralateral lateral part of the sacrum and exiting the contralateral iliac bone through the sacra-iliac joint with aid of CT-guidance. Over the Kirschner-wires 7.0 mm cannulated screws are introduced and the Kirschner-wires withdrawn. Several low-dose computer tomography scans are performed to secure the correct position. Total radiation dose is 300 mille gray square centimetres (mGycm).

  • Procedurecontrol intervention

    Mobilization guided by our physiotherapists. Full weight bearing is allowed. Analgetic treatment with metamizol, ibuprofen or paracetamol to the attending physicians discretion under regular surveillance laboratory values and/ or morphine or methadone. Patients will be treated with an individually based approach, if necessary involving our anesthesiologic pain service. Thrombo-embolic prophylaxis with a low molecular weight heparin or rivaroxaban for 6 weeks unless there is an indication for oral anticoagulation. All patients will be followed up by the Geriatric Fracture Center considering osteoporosis, fall prophylaxis, malnutrition and delirium. For the duration of the study the patients will not receive Parathyroid Hormone Substitution or Phosphonates.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Mobility at 3 weeks post-diagnosis

    Quality of mobilization will be compared using the TUG test. The primary endpoint is TUG at 3 weeks following diagnosis (+/- 3 days) all TUG measurements are assessed by the study nurse.

    Time frame: 3 weeks post-diagnosis

Secondary outcomes

  1. Activities of Daily Living (ADL) at baseline

    Functional recovery will be measured using the ADL score.

    Time frame: baseline

  2. Activities of Daily Living (ADL) at 4-7 days after diagnosis

    Functional recovery will be measured using the ADL score.

    Time frame: 4-7 days after diagnosis

  3. Activities of Daily Living (ADL) at 3 weeks

    Functional recovery will be measured using the ADL score.

    Time frame: 3 weeks

  4. Activities of Daily Living (ADL) at 3 months

    Functional recovery will be measured using the ADL score.

    Time frame: 3 months

  5. Activities of Daily Living (ADL) at 12 months

    Functional recovery will be measured using the ADL score.

    Time frame: 12 months

  6. Pain (VAS 10) at baseline

    Pain will be assessed using the 10 point Visual Analogue Scale (VAS10).

    Time frame: baseline

  7. Pain (VAS 10) at 4-7 days after diagnosis

    Pain will be assessed using the 10 point Visual Analogue Scale (VAS10).

    Time frame: 4-7 days after diagnosis

  8. Pain (VAS 10) at 3 weeks

    Pain will be assessed using the 10 point Visual Analogue Scale (VAS10).

    Time frame: 3 weeks

  9. Pain (VAS 10) at 3 months

    Pain will be assessed using the 10 point Visual Analogue Scale (VAS10).

    Time frame: 3 months

  10. Number of patients that are able to return to their pre-injury living situation at 3 months

    Number of patients that are able to return to their pre-injury living Situation. The outcome to compare the "return to the pre-injury living situation".

    Time frame: 3 months

  11. Number of patients that are able to return to their pre-injury living situation at 12 months

    Number of patients that are able to return to their pre-injury living Situation. The outcome to compare the "return to the pre-injury living situation".

    Time frame: 12 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • University Hospital Basel
    Basel, Basel-Stadt 4021, Switzerland
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Rommens PM, Hofmann A. Comprehensive classification of fragility fractures of the pelvic ring: Recommendations for surgical treatment. Injury. 2013 Dec;44(12):1733-44. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2013.06.023. Epub 2013 Jul 18. PubMed 23871193 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 14, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02590783
Lead sponsor
University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 29, 2015
Start date
Oct 17, 2017
Primary completion
Jul 11, 2022
Completion
Jul 11, 2022
Last update
May 14, 2024

Study contacts

Marcel Jakob, Prof
study director · University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in May 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion