CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT02589379PMPPOPFUpdated Jan 20, 2016

Ultrasound Elastography for Prediction of Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula

An observational study in Pancreatic Fistula, sponsored by University of Zurich. Status unknown at 1 site in Switzerland. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-01-20.

Sponsored by University of Zurich · Observational

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Jan 2016), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
90
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to assess the value of preoperative objective modalities such as endoscopic ultrasound elastography and magnet resonance imaging in predicting development of postoperative pancreatic fistula in patients undergoing pancreatic surgery for benign or malignant disease.

Read the detailed description

One of the most generally accepted causes of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is soft texture of the pancreas. The stiffness of organs depends on histologic features such as content of fat, fibrotic tissue and micro vascular structures. Yet, pancreatic stiffness was evaluated only subjectively. Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may allow objective quantification of pancreatic stiffness prior to surgery.

Endoscopic ultrasound elastography (EUE) is based on real-time Doppler technology. Image colors are derived from vibration patterns which depend on the stiffness of a specific region of the investigated organ. The retrieved images could be converted into numeric matrix using a specially designed program.

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a non-invasive method for quantitatively assessing the mechanical properties of tissues based on fat tissue content.

In this trial the investigators will assess at first the value of EUE and MRI in predicting development of postoperative pancreatic fistula and in a next step the value EUE and MRI as an objective method in prediction of pancreatic stiffness.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pancreatic Fistula

Keywords

  • postoperative pancreatic fistula
  • soft and hard pancreas
03

In context

Pancreatic Fistula

125 studies on the registry are indexed under Pancreatic Fistula; 27 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 90 is below the median of 173 across 49 observational studies indexed under Pancreatic Fistula.

Browse Pancreatic Fistula studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Zurich is the lead sponsor of 1,030 studies on the registry; 130 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

Patients undergoing pancreatic resection for benign or malignant disease

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult (more than 18 years) with resectable pancreatic lesion(s)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Total pancreatectomy
  • Unresectable pancreatic lesion(s)
  • Pregnancy
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
90 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples without dna

Groups and cohorts

  • Pancreatic Resection

    All consecutive patients undergoing pancreatic resection for benign or malignant disease and meet inclusion criteria.

    Procedure: Pancreatic Resection

Interventions

  • ProcedurePancreatic Resection

    Endoscopic ultrasound elastography, intraoperative ultrasound elastography and magnet resonance imaging to asses pancreatic stiffness prior to pancreatic resection

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. POPF rate (in %) as defined by the International Study Group on Pancreatic Fistula (ISGPF) in the soft versus hard pancreas group based on the median EUE stiffness measurements generated by values derived from hue histograms.

    Time frame: within the 30 days after surgery

Secondary outcomes

  1. Pearson correlation coefficient between preoperative EUE measurements of pancreatic stiffness generated by values derived from hue histograms with the fat content (in %) of the resected specimen on histology.

    Time frame: within the 30 days after surgery

  2. Pearson correlation coefficient between preoperative EUE measurements of pancreatic stiffness generated by values derived from hue histograms with intra-operative ultrasound elastography measurements generated by values derived from hue histograms.

    Time frame: within the 30 days after surgery

  3. Postoperative pancreatic fistula rate (in %) as defined by the ISGPF in the soft versus hard pancreas group based on the median MRI fat measurement (in %) on histology.

    Time frame: within the 30 days after surgery

  4. Pearson correlation coefficient between preoperative MRI measurements of pancreatic fat (in %) with the fat content (in %) of the resected specimen on histology.

    Time frame: within the 30 days after surgery

  5. Postoperative pancreatic fistula rate (in %) as defined by the ISGPF in the soft versus hard pancreas group based on the surgeons assessment of stiffness on a visual analogue scale from soft (0) to hard (10) intraoperatively.

    Time frame: within the 30 days after surgery

  6. Pearson correlation coefficient between the two surgeons assessing pancreatic stiffness intraoperatively.

    Time frame: within the 30 days after surgery

  7. Intraclass correlation coefficient of the all measurements derived from EUE, IUE, MRI, surgeons assessment and histology.

    within the 30 days after surgery

    Time frame: within the 30 days after surgery

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G, Fingerhut A, Yeo C, Izbicki J, Neoptolemos J, Sarr M, Traverso W, Buchler M; International Study Group on Pancreatic Fistula Definition. Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery. 2005 Jul;138(1):8-13. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2005.05.001. PubMed 16003309 ↗
  • Lin JW, Cameron JL, Yeo CJ, Riall TS, Lillemoe KD. Risk factors and outcomes in postpancreaticoduodenectomy pancreaticocutaneous fistula. J Gastrointest Surg. 2004 Dec;8(8):951-9. doi: 10.1016/j.gassur.2004.09.044. PubMed 15585382 ↗
  • Mathur A, Pitt HA, Marine M, Saxena R, Schmidt CM, Howard TJ, Nakeeb A, Zyromski NJ, Lillemoe KD. Fatty pancreas: a factor in postoperative pancreatic fistula. Ann Surg. 2007 Dec;246(6):1058-64. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31814a6906. PubMed 18043111 ↗
  • Nathan H, Cameron JL, Goodwin CR, Seth AK, Edil BH, Wolfgang CL, Pawlik TM, Schulick RD, Choti MA. Risk factors for pancreatic leak after distal pancreatectomy. Ann Surg. 2009 Aug;250(2):277-81. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181ae34be. PubMed 19638926 ↗
  • Saftoiu A, Vilmann P, Gorunescu F, Janssen J, Hocke M, Larsen M, Iglesias-Garcia J, Arcidiacono P, Will U, Giovannini M, Dietrich CF, Havre R, Gheorghe C, McKay C, Gheonea DI, Ciurea T; European EUS Elastography Multicentric Study Group. Efficacy of an artificial neural network-based approach to endoscopic ultrasound elastography in diagnosis of focal pancreatic masses. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012 Jan;10(1):84-90.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2011.09.014. Epub 2011 Oct 1. PubMed 21963957 ↗
  • Sato N, Yamaguchi K, Chijiiwa K, Tanaka M. Risk analysis of pancreatic fistula after pancreatic head resection. Arch Surg. 1998 Oct;133(10):1094-8. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.133.10.1094. PubMed 9790207 ↗
  • Schafer M, Mullhaupt B, Clavien PA. Evidence-based pancreatic head resection for pancreatic cancer and chronic pancreatitis. Ann Surg. 2002 Aug;236(2):137-48. doi: 10.1097/00000658-200208000-00001. PubMed 12170018 ↗
  • Watanabe H, Kanematsu M, Tanaka K, Osada S, Tomita H, Hara A, Goshima S, Kondo H, Kawada H, Noda Y, Tanahashi Y, Kawai N, Yoshida K, Moriyama N. Fibrosis and postoperative fistula of the pancreas: correlation with MR imaging findings--preliminary results. Radiology. 2014 Mar;270(3):791-9. doi: 10.1148/radiol.13131194. Epub 2013 Nov 8. PubMed 24475834 ↗
  • Yeh TS, Jan YY, Jeng LB, Hwang TL, Wang CS, Chen SC, Chao TC, Chen MF. Pancreaticojejunal anastomotic leak after pancreaticoduodenectomy--multivariate analysis of perioperative risk factors. J Surg Res. 1997 Feb 1;67(2):119-25. doi: 10.1006/jsre.1996.4974. PubMed 9073557 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 20, 2016, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02589379
Lead sponsor
University of Zurich
Responsible party
Mickael Lesurtel (Professor, MD, PhD, University of Zurich) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 28, 2015
Start date
Jul 2015
Primary completion
May 2019 (estimated)
Completion
May 2019 (estimated)
Last update
Jan 20, 2016

Study contacts

Henrik Petrowsky, Prof, MD
Contact
henrik.petrowsky@usz.ch
+41 44 255 30 41
Dilmurodjon Eshmuminov, MD
Contact
dilmurodjon.eshmuminov@usz.ch
+41 44 255 11 11
Henrik Petrowsky, Prof, MD
study chair · University of Zurich

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Jan 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion