CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT02587377Updated Oct 27, 2015

New Biomarkers for Invasive Fungal Infections in Paediatric Haemato-oncology

An interventional study of Non Standard of Care blood samples collection in Haemato-oncological Paediatric Patients Under Intensive Chemotherapy, sponsored by Queen Fabiola Children's University Hospital. Terminated. Open to participants aged 3 Months to 18 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2015-10-27.

Sponsored by Queen Fabiola Children's University Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

Why this study was terminated
The current rate of recruitment is insufficient.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
20
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
3 Months to 18 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The availability of sensitive and specific fungal biomarkers could be a precious help to improve the management of patients suffering from fungal diseases, not only by allowing preemptive treatment, but also by offering objective elements to assess patient therapeutic response and prognosis.

The use of such biomarkers could also contribute to accurately evaluate novel antifungal drugs effectiveness and to serve as a valuable tool to guide decisions regarding ineffective treatments and dose selection in product development. Using two or three tests may increase the sensitivity to detect IFI.

The results of the serum assays will be correlated to the definition of 'proven' fungal infection as defined by the EORTC/MSG criteria published in 2008. Based upon results from adults' studies, the investigators estimate that galactomannan antigen or 1, 3 β-D glucan could reasonably have a 90% sensitivity (with a 95% CI between 73% and 98%) under the current design. As concern the aspergillus fumigatus PCR, sensitivity and specificity could be estimated between 63% to 100% and 87% to 96.7%, respectively.

02

Conditions studied

  • Haemato-oncological Paediatric Patients Under Intensive Chemotherapy
03

In context

Mycoses

539 studies on the registry are indexed under Mycoses; 55 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 20 is below the median of 46 across 358 interventional studies indexed under Mycoses.

Browse Mycoses studies →

Lead sponsor

Queen Fabiola Children's University Hospital is the lead sponsor of 28 studies on the registry; 6 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
3 Months to 18 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Any febrile episode in :

    • either a neutropenic child suffering from acute lymphoblastic leukemia under induction chemotherapy or relapse, acute myeloblastic leukemia under chemotherapy (all cycles of chemotherapy included) or myelodysplasic syndrome
    • an allogenetic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation recipient child, from conditioning till 3 months or receiving aggressive immunosuppressive therapy for at least 1 months
  2. Age of children will be from 3 months till 18 years
  3. Informed consent from the parents and from children older than 12 years obtained

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Any previous history of fungal infection (proven, probable or possible) with prescription of secondary oral prophylaxis (voriconazole or posaconazole) under current use at the time of the study.
  2. Any previous episode already enrolled (only one episode/patient).
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
20 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Other
    Cohort 1

    single cohort of patient

    Other: Non Standard of Care blood samples collection

Interventions

  • OtherNon Standard of Care blood samples collection

    According to Belgian Law of 07MAY2004, if non standard of care interventions are performed as per protocol, the study must be classified as Interventional Study.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. clinical relevance of a "combined tests strategy" (positive results of serum 1,3 beta-D-glucan test and/or PCR Aspergillus fumigatus, with or without positive galactomannan antigen) to improve early diagnosis of IFI

    To assess the clinical relevance, in term of sensitivity and specificity, of a "combined tests strategy" (positive results of serum 1,3 beta-D-glucan test and/or PCR Aspergillus fumigatus, with or without positive galactomannan antigen) to improve early diagnosis of IFI and to allow a pre-emptive "diagnostic driven" therapeutic approach among haemato-oncological immunocompromised children.

    Time frame: 1 year after the end of the study

Secondary outcomes

  1. % of early diagnosis of invasive fungal infection using serum 1,3 beta-D-glucan test

    Time frame: 1 year after the end of the study

  2. Validity of the PCR for A. fumigatus in early diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis in a pediatric population.

    Time frame: 1 year after the end of the study

  3. incidence of invasive fungal infection among neutropenic febrile episodes reported

    Time frame: 1 year after the end of the study

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 27, 2015, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02587377
Lead sponsor
Queen Fabiola Children's University Hospital
Collaborators
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 27, 2015
Start date
Jun 2013
Primary completion
Apr 2014
Completion
Apr 2014
Last update
Oct 27, 2015

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Sep 2014. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion