ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02582866Updated Jun 6, 2023Results posted

A Clinical Study to Investigate the Long-term Use of Lacosamide as Monotherapy in Subjects Who Completed Study SP0994

A Phase 3 interventional study of Lacosamide in Epilepsy, sponsored by UCB Biopharma S.P.R.L.. Completed at 46 sites in 15 countries. Open to participants aged 17 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-06-06.

Sponsored by UCB Biopharma S.P.R.L. (part of UCB S.A.) · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
106
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
17 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-12

Among 37 studies testing lacosamide in Epilepsy — 1 open to participants now, 1 under way, none of them phase 3. Lacosamide · Epilepsy.

Enrollment
18th of 37
106 · median 103
Started
2016
the only one that year
Phase 3
24 of 37
none open now
Registered
30th of 37
by date

Among the 37 studies testing lacosamide in Epilepsy, this one is the 18th largest by enrollment, is the only one that started in 2016, is one of 24 in phase 3, and was the 30th registered.

By phase

37 studies; the count open now beside each. This study's row is marked.

Phase 3this study24 · 0 open
Phase 26 · 0 open
Phase 44 · 1 open
Phase 12 · 0 open
Phase 2/31 · 0 open

By the year they started

First in 2004; this study’s year is marked. 1 started in 2016.

Tested beside lacosamide

Size and results

Median enrollment 103 across the 37 interventional studies. Of the 32 that completed or were terminated, 27 (84%) have results posted.

Watch this landscapeDownload CSVWith an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 37 studies testing lacosamide in Epilepsy, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

Study is conducted to evaluate the long-term safety and tolerability of lacosamide (LCM) in patients receiving LCM in SP0994 [NCT01465997]. The study will enable collection of additional monotherapy safety data, and will facilitate access to treatment until commercial availability for monotherapy use.

03

Conditions studied

  • Epilepsy

Keywords

  • Lacosamide
  • Vimpat
  • Epilepsy
  • Partial onset seizures
  • Tonic-clonic seizures
  • Monotherapy
  • AED
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
17 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • An Institutional Review Board /Institutional Ethics Committee approved written Form (ICF) is signed and dated by the subject or by the parent(s) or legal representative. The ICF or a specific Assent form, where required, will be signed and dated by minors
  • Subject/legal representative is considered reliable and capable of adhering to the protocol, visit schedule, and medication intake according to the judgment of the investigator
  • Subject has completed the Termination Visit of SP0994 [NCT01465997] and has been treated with lacosamide monotherapy

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subject is receiving any drugs or using any experimental devices in addition to lacosamide (LCM)
  • Subject experienced a seizure at the 3rd target dose (i.e. LCM 600 mg/day) during SP0994
  • Subject required another Anti Epileptic Drug (AED) for the treatment of seizures
  • Subject meets a "must" withdrawal criteria for SP0994
  • Subject is experiencing an ongoing Serious Adverse Event from SP0994
  • Female subject who is pregnant or nursing, and/or a woman of who is not surgically sterile, 2 year or does not practice one highly effective method of , unless sexually abstinent, for the duration of the study
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(5)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Postmenopausal

Periods have stopped for good: usually no period for 12 months in a row without another medical reason, sometimes confirmed by a blood test (FSH).

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
106 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Lacosamide

    Lacosamide (LCM) will be administered orally twice daily from 200 mg/day to 600 mg/day (at approximately 12 hour intervals in the morning and in the evening) in 2 divided doses. Medication must not be chewed and must be swallowed with a sufficient amount of fluid. The investigator may maintain the subject's LCM dose, decrease the dose in decrements of 100 mg/day per week to a minimum dose of LCM 200 mg/day, or increase the dose in increments of 100 mg/day per week up to a maximum dose of LCM 600 mg/day. Subjects stopping LCM should be tapered off LCM at recommended decreasing steps of 200 mg/day/week. A slower taper (eg, 100 mg/day/week) or faster taper is permitted, if medically necessary; however, the maximum duration of tapering should not exceed 6 weeks.

    Drug: Lacosamide

Interventions

  • * Pharmaceutical Form: Oral tablets * Concentration: 50 mg * Route of Administration: Oral administration

    Also known as: Vimpat, SPM927, LCM

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants Experiencing Any Adverse Events (AEs) Reported Spontaneously by the Subject and/or Caregiver or Observed by Investigator

    An Adverse Event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study medication, whether or not considered related to the study medication. An AE could, therefore, be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of study medication.

    Time frame: From Visit 1 (Week 0) to Final Visit (up to Week 158)

  2. Percentage of Participants That Withdrew Due to Adverse Events (AEs)

    An Adverse Event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study medication, whether or not considered related to the study medication. An AE could, therefore, be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of study medication.

    Time frame: From Visit 1 (Week 0) to Final Visit (up to Week 158)

  3. Percentage of Participants Experiencing Any Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) Reported Spontaneously by the Subject and/or Caregiver or Observed by Investigator

    A Serious Adverse Event (SAE) is any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: * Results in death * Is life-threatening * Requires in patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization * Is a congenital anomaly or birth defect * Is an infection that requires treatment parenteral antibiotics * Other important medical events which based on medical or scientific judgement may jeopardize the study participants, or may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent any of the above.

    Time frame: From Visit 1 (Week 0) to Final Visit (up to Week 158)

07

Results

Posted Jan 22, 2021

Participant flow

The study started to enroll study participants in January 2016 and concluded in January 2020.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneLacosamide
Started106
Completed84
Not completed22
Withdrew: Death1
Withdrew: Lack of efficacy2
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up2
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject7
Withdrew: Investigator decision5
Withdrew: Participant wants to get pregnant1
Withdrew: Pregnancy2
Withdrew: Sponsor decision1
Withdrew: Withdrawal due to personal reasons1

Outcome measures

PrimaryPercentage of Participants Experiencing Any Adverse Events (AEs) Reported Spontaneously by the Subject and/or Caregiver or Observed by Investigator

An Adverse Event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study medication, whether or not considered related to the study medication. An AE could, therefore, be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of study medication.

Time frame:
From Visit 1 (Week 0) to Final Visit (up to Week 158)
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Experiencing Any Adverse Events (AEs) Reported Spontaneously by the Subject and/or Caregiver or Observed by Investigator
percentage of participantsLacosamide (SS)
Percentage of Participants Experiencing Any Adverse Events (AEs) Reported Spontaneously by the Subject and/or Caregiver or Observed by Investigator59.4
PrimaryPercentage of Participants That Withdrew Due to Adverse Events (AEs)

An Adverse Event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study medication, whether or not considered related to the study medication. An AE could, therefore, be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of study medication.

Time frame:
From Visit 1 (Week 0) to Final Visit (up to Week 158)
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants That Withdrew Due to Adverse Events (AEs)
percentage of participantsLacosamide (SS)
Percentage of Participants That Withdrew Due to Adverse Events (AEs)0.9
PrimaryPercentage of Participants Experiencing Any Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) Reported Spontaneously by the Subject and/or Caregiver or Observed by Investigator

A Serious Adverse Event (SAE) is any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: * Results in death * Is life-threatening * Requires in patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization * Is a congenital anomaly or birth defect * Is an infection that requires treatment parenteral antibiotics * Other important medical events which based on medical or scientific judgement may jeopardize the study participants, or may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent any of the above.

Time frame:
From Visit 1 (Week 0) to Final Visit (up to Week 158)
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Experiencing Any Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) Reported Spontaneously by the Subject and/or Caregiver or Observed by Investigator
percentage of participantsLacosamide (SS)
Percentage of Participants Experiencing Any Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) Reported Spontaneously by the Subject and/or Caregiver or Observed by Investigator14.2

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse events were collected from Visit 1 (Week 0) to Final Visit (up to Week 158). Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Lacosamide (SS)1/106 (0.9%)15/106 (14.2%)19/106 (17.9%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 22
Most frequent serious events
EventLacosamide (SS)
OsteoarthritisMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders2/106
EpilepsyNervous system disorders2/106
Atrial FlutterCardiac disorders1/106
Cardiac FailureCardiac disorders1/106
Myocardial InfarctionCardiac disorders1/106
Ventricular TachycardiaCardiac disorders1/106
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders1/106
Gastrooesophageal Reflux DiseaseGastrointestinal disorders1/106
Umbilical HerniaGastrointestinal disorders1/106
Device DislocationGeneral disorders1/106
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventLacosamide (SS)
HeadacheNervous system disorders11/106
NasopharyngitisInfections and infestations8/106

Baseline characteristics

Baseline Characteristics refer to the Safety Set (SS) which consisted of all study participants in the Enrolled Set (ES) who received at least 1 dose of study medication in SP1042.

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Lacosamide
<=18 years2
Between 18 and 65 years90
>=65 years14
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Lacosamide
Mean43.5 ± 17.1
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Lacosamide
Female48
Male58
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)Lacosamide
Asian19
White86
Other/Mixed1
08

Study locations

46 sites
  • Sp1042 805
    Blagoevgrad, Bulgaria
  • Sp1042 807
    Pazardzhik, Bulgaria
  • Sp1042 811
    Sofia, Bulgaria
  • Sp1042 205
    Helsinki, Finland
  • Sp1042 207
    Kuopio, Finland
  • Sp1042 236
    Nancy, France
  • Sp1042 263
    Altenburg, Germany
  • Sp1042 265
    Bad Neustadt An Der Saale, Germany
  • Sp1042 269
    Leipzig, Germany
  • Sp1042 256
    Marburg, Germany
  • Sp1042 259
    Osnabruck, Germany
  • Sp1042 831
    Asaka, Japan
  • Sp1042 834
    Kagoshima, Japan
  • Sp1042 844
    Kamakura, Japan
  • Sp1042 835
    Nagoyashi, Japan
  • Sp1042 837
    Okayama, Japan
  • Sp1042 847
    Sapporo, Japan
  • Sp1042 521
    Daegu, Korea, Republic of
  • Sp1042 518
    Daejeon, Korea, Republic of
  • Sp1042 517
    Seoul, Korea, Republic of
  • Sp1042 519
    Seoul, Korea, Republic of
  • Sp1042 751
    Riga, Latvia
  • Sp1042 547
    San Luis Potosi, Mexico
  • Sp1042 672
    Pasig, Philippines
  • Sp1042 676
    Quezon, Philippines
  • Sp1042 340
    Katowice, Poland
  • Sp1042 342
    Lublin, Poland
  • Sp1042 343
    Warszawa, Poland
  • Sp1042 576
    Bucuresti, Romania
  • Sp1042 570
    Iasi, Romania
  • Sp1042 572
    Targu Mures, Romania
  • Sp1042 387
    Kazan, Russian Federation
  • Sp1042 389
    Kazan, Russian Federation
  • Sp1042 401
    Moscow, Russian Federation
  • Sp1042 392
    Novosibirsk, Russian Federation
  • Sp1042 397
    Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation
  • Sp1042 400
    Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation
  • Sp1042 440
    Goteborg, Sweden
  • Sp1042 442
    Linköping, Sweden
  • Sp1042 438
    Stockholm, Sweden
  • Sp1042 651
    Aarau, Switzerland
  • Sp1042 654
    Biel, Switzerland
  • Sp1042 653
    Lugano, Switzerland
  • Sp1042 622
    Chernihiv, Ukraine
  • Sp1042 626
    Kharkov, Ukraine
  • Sp1042 625
    Odesa, Ukraine
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Ben-Menachem E, Dominguez J, Szasz J, Beller C, Howerton C, Jensen L, McClung C, Roebling R, Steiniger-Brach B. Long-term safety and tolerability of lacosamide monotherapy in patients with epilepsy: Results from a multicenter, open-label trial. Epilepsia Open. 2021 Sep;6(3):618-623. doi: 10.1002/epi4.12522. Epub 2021 Aug 2. PubMed 34265173 ↗
  • Inoue Y, Liao W, Wang X, Du X, Tennigkeit F, Sasamoto H, Osakabe T, Hoshii N, Yuen N, Hong Z. Safety and efficacy of adjunctive lacosamide in Chinese and Japanese adults with epilepsy and focal seizures: A long-term, open-label extension of a randomized, controlled trial. Epilepsy Res. 2021 Oct;176:106705. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2021.106705. Epub 2021 Jun 29. PubMed 34246118 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 6, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02582866
Collaborators
Parexel
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 21, 2015
Start date
Jan 2016
Primary completion
Jan 2020
Completion
Jan 2020
Results posted
Jan 22, 2021
Last update
Jun 6, 2023

Study contacts

UCB Cares
study director · +1 844 599 2273 (UCB)

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Lacosamide

Start the discussion