A Phase 3 interventional study of Ipragliflozin and Placebo in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, sponsored by Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC. Completed. Open to participants aged 20 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-09-04.
Sponsored by Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment
This is a study to assess the safety and efficacy of the addition of ipragliflozin once daily in Japanese participants with Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) who have inadequate glycemic control on sitagliptin, diet, and exercise therapy. The primary hypothesis for this study is that the addition of ipragliflozin compared with placebo provides greater reduction in hemoglobin A1C (HbA1c) as assessed by change from baseline at Week 24.
10,925 studies on the registry are indexed under Diabetes Mellitus; 1,319 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 143 is above the median of 80 across 8,367 interventional studies indexed under Diabetes Mellitus.
Browse Diabetes Mellitus studies →Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC is the lead sponsor of 2,114 studies on the registry; 133 are open to participants now.
Of its 489 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 362 (74%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Ipragliflozin once daily for 24 weeks in addition to sitagliptin, diet, and exercise.
Drug: Ipragliflozin · Drug: Sitagliptin
Placebo to ipragliflozin once daily for 24 weeks in addition to sitagliptin, diet, and exercise.
Drug: Placebo · Drug: Sitagliptin
50 mg tablet administered orally
Placebo to ipragliflozin tablet administered orally
Background medication; 50 mg tablet administered orally
Also known as: Januvia®, Tesavel®, Xelevia®, Ristaben®, Glactiv®
Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Week 24
HbA1c is measured as percent. Thus, this change from baseline reflects the Week 24 HbA1c percent minus the Week 0 HbA1c percent. Statistical analysis based on a constrained longitudinal data analysis (cLDA) model with terms for treatment, time, prior use of AHAs, the interactions of treatment by time, time by prior use of AHAs, treatment by time by prior use of AHAs, and baseline eGFR value with the constraint that the mean baseline HbA1c is the same for both treatment groups.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
Percentage of Participants Who Experienced at Least One Adverse Event (AE)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment.
Time frame: Up to 26 weeks
Percentage of Participants Who Discontinued Study Drug Due to an AE
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment.
Time frame: Up to 24 weeks
Change From Baseline in FPG at Week 24
Change from baseline in FPG at Week 24 is defined as Week 24 FPG minus Week 0 FPG. Statistical analysis based on a cLDA model with terms for treatment, time, prior use of AHAs, the interactions of treatment by time, time by prior use of AHAs, treatment by time by prior use of AHAs, and baseline eGFR value with the constraint that the mean baseline FPG is the same for both treatment groups.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
Change From Baseline in 2-hr PMG at Week 24
Change from baseline in 2-hr PMG at Week 24 is defined as Week 24 2-hr PMG minus Week 0 2-hr PMG. Statistical analysis based on a cLDA model with terms for treatment, time, prior use of AHAs, the interactions of treatment by time, time by prior use of AHAs, treatment by time by prior use of AHAs, and baseline eGFR value with the constraint that the mean baseline 2-hr PMG is the same for both treatment groups.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
Change From Baseline in Glucose Total AUC0-2hr After Meal at Week 24
Change from baseline in glucose total AUC0-2hr after meal at Week 24 is defined as Week 24 glucose total AUC0-2hr after a meal minus Week 0 glucose total AUC0-2hr after a meal. Statistical analysis based on a cLDA model with terms for treatment, time, prior use of AHAs, the interactions of treatment by time, time by prior use of AHAs and treatment by time by prior use of AHAs, and baseline eGFR value with the constraint that the mean baseline glucose total AUC0-2hr after meal is the same for both treatment groups.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24 (just before the loading meal [0 min], 30 min, 60 min and 120 min)
Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 24
Change from baseline in body weight at Week 24 is defined as Week 24 body weight minus Week 0 body weight. Statistical analysis based on a cLDA model with terms for treatment, time, prior use of AHAs, the interactions of treatment by time, time by prior use of AHAs and treatment by time by prior use of AHAs, and baseline eGFR value with the constraint that the mean baseline body weight is the same for both treatment groups.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
| Milestone | Ipragliflozin + Sitagliptin | Placebo + Sitagliptin |
|---|---|---|
| Started | 73 | 70 |
| Completed | 71 | 65 |
| Not completed | 2 | 5 |
| Withdrew: Adverse event | 2 | 4 |
| Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject | 0 | 1 |
HbA1c is measured as percent. Thus, this change from baseline reflects the Week 24 HbA1c percent minus the Week 0 HbA1c percent. Statistical analysis based on a constrained longitudinal data analysis (cLDA) model with terms for treatment, time, prior use of AHAs, the interactions of treatment by time, time by prior use of AHAs, treatment by time by prior use of AHAs, and baseline eGFR value with the constraint that the mean baseline HbA1c is the same for both treatment groups.
| Percent | Ipragliflozin + Sitagliptin | Placebo + Sitagliptin |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Week 24 | -0.84 (-0.99 to -0.69) | -0.07 (-0.22 to 0.09) |
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment.
| Percentage of participants | Ipragliflozin + Sitagliptin | Placebo + Sitagliptin |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants Who Experienced at Least One Adverse Event (AE) | 50.7 | 65.7 |
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment.
| Percentage of participants | Ipragliflozin + Sitagliptin | Placebo + Sitagliptin |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants Who Discontinued Study Drug Due to an AE | 2.7 | 5.7 |
Change from baseline in FPG at Week 24 is defined as Week 24 FPG minus Week 0 FPG. Statistical analysis based on a cLDA model with terms for treatment, time, prior use of AHAs, the interactions of treatment by time, time by prior use of AHAs, treatment by time by prior use of AHAs, and baseline eGFR value with the constraint that the mean baseline FPG is the same for both treatment groups.
| mg/dL | Ipragliflozin + Sitagliptin | Placebo + Sitagliptin |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline in FPG at Week 24 | -30.3 (-35.5 to -25.0) | -2.1 (-7.6 to 3.3) |
Change from baseline in 2-hr PMG at Week 24 is defined as Week 24 2-hr PMG minus Week 0 2-hr PMG. Statistical analysis based on a cLDA model with terms for treatment, time, prior use of AHAs, the interactions of treatment by time, time by prior use of AHAs, treatment by time by prior use of AHAs, and baseline eGFR value with the constraint that the mean baseline 2-hr PMG is the same for both treatment groups.
| mg/dL | Ipragliflozin + Sitagliptin | Placebo + Sitagliptin |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline in 2-hr PMG at Week 24 | -52.4 (-61.5 to -43.2) | -3.8 (-13.3 to 5.7) |
Change from baseline in glucose total AUC0-2hr after meal at Week 24 is defined as Week 24 glucose total AUC0-2hr after a meal minus Week 0 glucose total AUC0-2hr after a meal. Statistical analysis based on a cLDA model with terms for treatment, time, prior use of AHAs, the interactions of treatment by time, time by prior use of AHAs and treatment by time by prior use of AHAs, and baseline eGFR value with the constraint that the mean baseline glucose total AUC0-2hr after meal is the same for both treatment groups.
| mg・hr/dL | Ipragliflozin + Sitagliptin | Placebo + Sitagliptin |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline in Glucose Total AUC0-2hr After Meal at Week 24 | -86.9 (-101.0 to -72.9) | -2.3 (-17.0 to 12.3) |
Change from baseline in body weight at Week 24 is defined as Week 24 body weight minus Week 0 body weight. Statistical analysis based on a cLDA model with terms for treatment, time, prior use of AHAs, the interactions of treatment by time, time by prior use of AHAs and treatment by time by prior use of AHAs, and baseline eGFR value with the constraint that the mean baseline body weight is the same for both treatment groups.
| kg | Ipragliflozin + Sitagliptin | Placebo + Sitagliptin |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 24 | -2.4 (-2.9 to -1.9) | -0.6 (-1.1 to -0.1) |
Collected over Up to 26 weeks. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.
| Group | Deaths | Serious | Other |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ipragliflozin + Sitagliptin | — | 2/73 (2.7%) | 12/73 (16.4%) |
| Placebo + Sitagliptin | — | 4/70 (5.7%) | 15/70 (21.4%) |
| Event | Ipragliflozin + Sitagliptin | Placebo + Sitagliptin |
|---|---|---|
| Angina pectorisCardiac disorders | 0/73 | 1/70 |
| CardiomyopathyCardiac disorders | 0/73 | 1/70 |
| UreterolithiasisRenal and urinary disorders | 0/73 | 1/70 |
| Sleep apnoea syndromeRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | 0/73 | 1/70 |
| Cerebral infarctionNervous system disorders | 1/73 | 0/70 |
| Pulmonary massRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | 1/73 | 0/70 |
| Event | Ipragliflozin + Sitagliptin | Placebo + Sitagliptin |
|---|---|---|
| NasopharyngitisInfections and infestations | 10/73 | 10/70 |
| ConstipationGastrointestinal disorders | 2/73 | 4/70 |
| ContusionInjury, poisoning and procedural complications | 0/73 | 4/70 |
| Age, Continuous(Years) | Ipragliflozin + Sitagliptin | Placebo + Sitagliptin | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | 61.0 ± 9.1 | 60.0 ± 10.4 | 60.5 ± 9.7 |
| Sex: Female, Male(Participants) | Ipragliflozin + Sitagliptin | Placebo + Sitagliptin | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 19 | 17 | 36 |
| Male | 54 | 53 | 107 |
| HbA1c(Percent) | Ipragliflozin + Sitagliptin | Placebo + Sitagliptin | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | 8.05 ± 0.83 | 7.99 ± 0.62 | 8.02 ± 0.73 |
| Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR)(mL/min/1.73m^2) | Ipragliflozin + Sitagliptin | Placebo + Sitagliptin | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | 82.0 ± 13.5 | 83.4 ± 16.7 | 82.7 ± 15.1 |
| Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)(mg/dL) | Ipragliflozin + Sitagliptin | Placebo + Sitagliptin | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | 158.0 ± 33.2 | 163.0 ± 26.2 | 160.5 ± 30.0 |
| 2-hour Post-Meal Glucose (2-hr PMG)(mg/dL) | Ipragliflozin + Sitagliptin | Placebo + Sitagliptin | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | 225.3 ± 59.9 | 231.5 ± 48.9 | 228.3 ± 54.7 |
| Glucose Total Area Under the Plasma Concentration Curve from Hour 0 to Hour 2 (AUC0-2hr) after Meal(mg・hr/dL) | Ipragliflozin + Sitagliptin | Placebo + Sitagliptin | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | 429.4 ± 86.3 | 443.4 ± 67.0 | 436.2 ± 77.5 |
| Body Weight(kg) | Ipragliflozin + Sitagliptin | Placebo + Sitagliptin | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | 69.8 ± 11.7 | 70.1 ± 11.1 | 69.9 ± 11.4 |
1 further baseline measures are reported on the registry.
No study locations are listed for this record.
Plan to share: Yes — https://www.merck.com/clinical-trials/pdf/ProcedureAccessClinicalTrialData.pdf
This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC