ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02572427Updated Apr 5, 2023Results posted

Resident Training Enhanced by New Innovations: Teleintubation

An interventional study of Education for intubation skills and No added education for intubation skills in Asphyxia Neonatorum, sponsored by University of Arkansas. Completed. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-04-05.

Sponsored by University of Arkansas · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
82
Allocation
Randomized
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The overall goal of this study was to create a simulation environment with repeated practice for residents and intense, immediate feedback. Repeated simulations for neonatal resuscitation when coupled with clinical experience have been shown to improve resident confidence.The investigators sought to determine if resident exposure to individual training and video laryngoscopy using the C-MAC video laryngoscope would improve cognitive skills and decrease intubation times in a neonatal manikin. The primary outcome was time to intubation after one year. The secondary outcome was the ability to retain cognitive instruction related to intubation

Read the detailed description

Objective: Tracheal intubation of infants and children is a critical lifesaving skill, but many upper level pediatric residents are unable to successfully intubate neonates or pediatric patients in a timely manner. Simulation has been shown to be effective in teaching procedural skills, but it is not known if improvements in intubation skills can persist. The investigators sought to determine if video laryngoscopy could be used to enhance resident intubation skills that would be retained for one year.

Methods: There were 67 Pediatric and Internal Medicine/Pediatric residents, levels 1-4, who completed the study and were randomized by month of service into non-intervention (NI, n= 36) and intervention (IN, n=31) groups. IN residents observed the intubation portion of the Neonatal Resuscitation Program (NRP) training video and received cognitive instruction and 30 minutes of hands on instruction using a video laryngoscope. At the study's conclusion, 12 months after enrollment, residents completed a survey of intubations of live patients over the past year, a cognitive assessment of intubation, and were timed on intubating a manikin. Results were analyzed by Student's T-Test.

02

Conditions studied

  • Asphyxia Neonatorum

Browse trials for

03

In context

Asphyxia Neonatorum

106 studies on the registry are indexed under Asphyxia Neonatorum; 19 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 82 is below the median of 173 across 73 interventional studies indexed under Asphyxia Neonatorum.

Browse Asphyxia Neonatorum studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Arkansas is the lead sponsor of 399 studies on the registry; 38 are open to participants now.

Of its 37 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 34 (92%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Pediatric residents

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

  • Residents from other departments
  • Neonatology fellows
  • Medical students
  • Medical school Faculty
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
82 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Education for intubation skills

    Interventions: Training for Pediatric Advanced Life Support (PALS) and Neonatal Resuscitation Program (NRP); 7 minute excerpt from the NRP training video regarding intubation; cognitive instruction which consisted of equipment needed for intubation; hands on instruction using the Storz video laryngoscope with manikins in simulation lab.

    Other: Education for intubation skills

  • Active comparator
    No added education for intubation skills

    Interventions: Training for Routine Pediatric Advanced Life Support (PALS) and Neonatal Resuscitation Program (NRP) training; no additional training for intubating newborns.

    Other: No added education for intubation skills

Interventions

  • OtherEducation for intubation skills

    Routine training in neonatal resuscitation, intensive cognitive and hands on training for intubating neonates using manikins in a simulation lab.

  • OtherNo added education for intubation skills

    Routine training in neonatal resuscitation but no added experience in simulation lab.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Skill in Intubating Neonatal Manikin

    Time in seconds needed to intubate neonatal manikin Skill test on neonatal resuscitation in simulation lab

    Time frame: Up to two minutes

Secondary outcomes

  1. Knowledge Concerning Intubation of Neonates

    Score on cognitive test on intubation of neonates.Scores ranged on scale from 0 to 21 , with higher score indicating greater knowledge (better outcome).

    Time frame: 30 minutes

07

Results

Posted Dec 15, 2015

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneEducation for Intubation SkillsNo Added Education for Intubation Skills
Started3745
Completed3136
Not completed69

Outcome measures

PrimarySkill in Intubating Neonatal Manikin

Time in seconds needed to intubate neonatal manikin Skill test on neonatal resuscitation in simulation lab

Time frame:
Up to two minutes
Reported as:
Mean · seconds
Skill in Intubating Neonatal Manikin
secondsEducation for Intubation SkillsNo Added Education for Intubation Skills
Skill in Intubating Neonatal Manikin23.4 ± 22.439.9 ± 38.2
Statistical analysis
  • Education for Intubation Skills vs No Added Education for Intubation Skills · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.039
SecondaryKnowledge Concerning Intubation of Neonates

Score on cognitive test on intubation of neonates.Scores ranged on scale from 0 to 21 , with higher score indicating greater knowledge (better outcome).

Time frame:
30 minutes
Reported as:
Mean · scores on a scale
Knowledge Concerning Intubation of Neonates
scores on a scaleEducation for Intubation SkillsNo Added Education for Intubation Skills
Knowledge Concerning Intubation of Neonates15 ± 1.713.1 ± 2.3
Statistical analysis
  • Education for Intubation Skills vs No Added Education for Intubation Skills · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.001

Adverse events

Collected over 1 year. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Education for Intubation Skills—0/37 (0%)0/37 (0%)
No Added Education for Intubation Skills—0/45 (0%)0/45 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Education for Intubation SkillsNo Added Education for Intubation SkillsTotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years374582
>=65 years000
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Education for Intubation SkillsNo Added Education for Intubation SkillsTotal
Female213556
Male161026
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Education for Intubation SkillsNo Added Education for Intubation SkillsTotal
Hispanic or Latino044
Not Hispanic or Latino374178
Unknown or Not Reported000
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Education for Intubation SkillsNo Added Education for Intubation SkillsTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian549
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American134
White313869
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported000
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Education for Intubation SkillsNo Added Education for Intubation SkillsTotal
United States374582
08

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 5, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02572427
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 9, 2015
Start date
Sep 2013
Primary completion
Nov 2014
Completion
Nov 2014
Results posted
Dec 15, 2015
Last update
Apr 5, 2023

Study contacts

Richard W Hall, M.D.
principal investigator · University of Arkansas

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion