ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02570321CLAIRUpdated Jun 18, 2025Results posted

Cross-linking for Corneal Ulcers Treatment Trial

A Phase 3 interventional study of Corneal Cross-linking and Anti Fungal Drug in Corneal Ulcer, Infectious Keratitis and Bacterial Ulcer, sponsored by University of California, San Francisco. Completed at 2 sites in 2 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-06-18.

Sponsored by University of California, San Francisco · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
147
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-12

Among 22 studies in Corneal Ulcer with a site in United States — 4 open to participants now, 4 under way, 2 of them phase 3. Corneal Ulcer · United States.

Enrollment
11th of 19
147 · median 150
Started
2015
the only one that year
Phase 3
6 of 22
2 open now
Registered
11th of 22
by date
Lead sponsor
5 of 22
University of California, San Francisco

Among the 22 studies in Corneal Ulcer with a site in United States, this one is the 11th largest by enrollment of the 19 interventional ones, is the only one that started in 2015, is one of 6 in phase 3, and was the 11th registered.

By phase

22 studies; the count open now beside each. This study's row is marked.

Phase 26 · 2 open
Phase 3this study6 · 2 open
No phase3 · 0 open
Observational3 · 0 open
Phase 2/32 · 0 open
Phase 11 · 0 open
Phase 41 · 0 open

By the year they started

First in 2002; this study’s year is marked. 1 started in 2015.

Size and results

Median enrollment 150 across the 19 interventional studies, 55 across the 3 observational. Of the 14 that completed or were terminated, 8 (57%) have results posted.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVWith an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 22 studies in Corneal Ulcer with a site in United States, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

The primary purpose of this study is to determine if patients randomized to corneal collagen cross-linking plus medical therapy will have a lower prevalence of positive bacterial or fungal cultures immediately after the procedure than patients who received medical therapy alone.

The secondary purpose of this study is to determine if patients randomized to corneal collagen cross-linking will have a better visual acuity at 3 and 12 months than patients who receive medical therapy alone.

Read the detailed description

The proposed study is a randomized controlled trial to determine whether collagen cross-linking improves outcomes in microbial keratitis. Patients presenting to the Aravind Eye Hospitals in Madurai, India for treatment of microbial keratitis will be recruited for the proposed study. Approximately 266 patients will be enrolled in the study. Subjects presenting with bacterial keratitis will be randomized to receive medical therapy plus corneal collagen cross-linking at presentation or to receive medical therapy alone. All subjects with bacterial ulcers will receive standard topical antibiotic medications as required after the procedure.

Subjects with fungal keratitis will be randomized into one of four groups:

  1. collagen cross-linking + amphotericin;
  2. collagen cross-linking + natamycin;
  3. amphotericin alone;
  4. natamycin alone.

All study subjects will be followed for 12 months to evaluate response to treatment.

Investigators from the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) will assist Aravind Eye Hospital with the study design, implementation, and analysis of the research, and will help fund the study. The investigators plan to visit Aravind to help with the study implementation. UCSF will play an important role in this study by assisting with the study design, implementation, analysis, and funding.

03

Conditions studied

  • Corneal Ulcer
  • Infectious Keratitis
  • Bacterial Ulcer
  • Fungal Ulcer

Keywords

  • Cornea
  • Ulcer
  • Infectious keratitis
  • Bacterial
  • Fungal
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Corneal ulcer that is smear positive for either bacteria or filamentous fungus
  • Pinhole visual acuity worse than 20/70 in the affected eye
  • Not treated already with antimicrobial medications at presentation
  • Age over 18 years
  • Basic understanding of the study as determined by the physician
  • Commitment to return for follow up visits

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

  • Evidence of concomitant infection on exam or gram stain (i.e. herpes, both bacteria and acanthamoeba on gram stain)
  • Impending or frank perforation at recruitment
  • Involvement of sclera at presentation
  • Non-infectious or keratitis
  • History of corneal transplantation or recent intraocular surgery
  • No light perception in the affected eye
  • Pinhole visual acuity worse than 20/200 in the unaffected eye
  • Participants who are decisionally and/or cognitively impaired
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Autoimmune disease

A condition in which the immune system attacks the body’s own tissues, such as rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, psoriasis, type 1 diabetes or inflammatory bowel disease.

Immunotherapy studies often leave out active autoimmune disease, and some name exceptions, such as thyroid disease on replacement hormone. Check the exceptions this study lists.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
147 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Bacterial ulcer cross-linking

    Standard of care topical treatment for bacterial ulcer plus cross-linking

    Procedure: Corneal Cross-linking

  • Active comparator
    Bacterial ulcer control

    Standard of care topical treatment for bacterial ulcer

    Procedure: Corneal Cross-linking

  • Experimental
    Fungal ulcer cross-linking plus natamycin

    Standard of care topical treatment for fungal ulcer with natamycin plus cross-linking

    Procedure: Corneal Cross-linking · Drug: Anti Fungal Drug

  • Active comparator
    Fungal ulcer control with natamycin

    Standard of care topical treatment for fungal ulcer with natamycin

    Procedure: Corneal Cross-linking · Drug: Anti Fungal Drug

  • Experimental
    Fungal ulcer cross-linking plus amphotericin

    Standard of care topical treatment for fungal ulcer with amphotericin plus cross-linking

    Procedure: Corneal Cross-linking · Drug: Anti Fungal Drug

  • Active comparator
    Fungal ulcer control with amphotericin

    Standard of care topical treatment for fungal ulcer with amphotericin

    Procedure: Corneal Cross-linking · Drug: Anti Fungal Drug

Interventions

  • ProcedureCorneal Cross-linking

    For those subjects randomized to receive collagen cross-linking, the procedure will be performed as per the routine at the hospital (UV-X machine; strict aseptic precautions; corneal epithelium debrided and 0.1% riboflavin applied for 30 minutes, then UV-A radiation applied for 30 minutes at 370nm with 3mW/cm2). Corneal cross-linking is a routine procedure performed by Aravind Eye Hospital for infectious keratitis.

  • DrugAnti Fungal Drug

    Topical Amphotericin B vs Topical Natamycin

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Microbiological Cure on Repeat Culture

    Corneal scraping of the ulcer will be performed and directly inoculated on to sheep's blood agar, chocolate agar, potato dextrose agar or Sabouraud's agar for bacterial and fungal culture. Microbiological cure is defined as no growth of bacteria or fungus on these media.

    Time frame: 4 to 24 hours after enrollment

Secondary outcomes

  1. Best Spectacle-corrected Visual Acuity

    Best corrected visual acuity will be measured at baseline for both eyes using the standard ETDRS chart light box at the 4- and 1-meter test distances. In the case that the patient reads less than 10 letters at 4 meters, move the patient or the chart to a distance of 1 meter from the patient.

    Time frame: 3 months

  2. Scar Size

    Study clinician will measure infiltrate or scar size using a standardized protocol with the slit lamp biomicroscope. The geometric mean of the scar size will be measured by recording the horizontal and vertical diameter.

    Time frame: 3 months

  3. Adverse Events Including Rate of Perforation/Need for Therapeutic Penetrating Keratoplasty

    Adverse events include glaucoma, endophthalmitis, medication reaction, perforation including treatment by therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty.

    Time frame: 3 months

Other outcomes

  1. Vision Related Quality of Life

    Mobility subscale: As measured by the Indian Visual Function Questionnaire (IVFQ) which records quality of life on a scale of 0 to 100 with 100 representing the best quality of life.

    Time frame: 3 months

07

Results

Posted Aug 27, 2024

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneBacterial Ulcer ControlBacterial Ulcer Cross-linkingFungal Ulcer Control With NatamycinFungal Ulcer Cross-linking Plus NatamycinFungal Ulcer Control With AmphotericinFungal Ulcer Cross-linking Plus Amphotericin
Started191726273028
Completed171621272725
Not completed215033

Outcome measures

PrimaryMicrobiological Cure on Repeat Culture

Corneal scraping of the ulcer will be performed and directly inoculated on to sheep's blood agar, chocolate agar, potato dextrose agar or Sabouraud's agar for bacterial and fungal culture. Microbiological cure is defined as no growth of bacteria or fungus on these media.

Time frame:
4 to 24 hours after enrollment
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Microbiological Cure on Repeat Culture
ParticipantsBacterial Ulcer ControlBacterial Ulcer Cross-linkingFungal Ulcer Control With NatamycinFungal Ulcer Cross-linking Plus NatamycinFungal Ulcer Control With AmphotericinFungal Ulcer Cross-linking Plus Amphotericin
Culture negative5517141513
Culture positive14119121213
SecondaryBest Spectacle-corrected Visual Acuity

Best corrected visual acuity will be measured at baseline for both eyes using the standard ETDRS chart light box at the 4- and 1-meter test distances. In the case that the patient reads less than 10 letters at 4 meters, move the patient or the chart to a distance of 1 meter from the patient.

Time frame:
3 months
Reported as:
Median · logMar
Best Spectacle-corrected Visual Acuity
logMarBacterial Ulcer ControlBacterial Ulcer Cross-linkingFungal Ulcer Control With NatamycinFungal Ulcer Cross-linking Plus NatamycinFungal Ulcer Control With AmphotericinFungal Ulcer Cross-linking Plus Amphotericin
Best Spectacle-corrected Visual Acuity0.82 (0.62 to 1.4)1.32 (0.43 to 1.75)0.43 (0.1 to 0.72)1 (0.3 to 1.8)0.48 (0.2 to 1.7)0.8 (0.5 to 1.24)
SecondaryScar Size

Study clinician will measure infiltrate or scar size using a standardized protocol with the slit lamp biomicroscope. The geometric mean of the scar size will be measured by recording the horizontal and vertical diameter.

Time frame:
3 months
Reported as:
Mean · mm
Scar Size
mmBacterial Ulcer ControlBacterial Ulcer Cross-linkingFungal Ulcer Control With NatamycinFungal Ulcer Cross-linking Plus NatamycinFungal Ulcer Control With AmphotericinFungal Ulcer Cross-linking Plus Amphotericin
Scar Size3.5 (2.7 to 4.0)3.0 (2.24 to 4.0)3.0 (2.5 to 3.5)3.9 (2.6 to 4.5)3.5 (2.7 to 4.5)3.1 (2.8 to 5.0)
SecondaryAdverse Events Including Rate of Perforation/Need for Therapeutic Penetrating Keratoplasty

Adverse events include glaucoma, endophthalmitis, medication reaction, perforation including treatment by therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty.

Time frame:
3 months
Reported as:
Number · participants
Adverse Events Including Rate of Perforation/Need for Therapeutic Penetrating Keratoplasty
participantsBacterial Ulcer ControlBacterial Ulcer Cross-linkingFungal Ulcer Control With NatamycinFungal Ulcer Cross-linking Plus NatamycinFungal Ulcer Control With AmphotericinFungal Ulcer Cross-linking Plus Amphotericin
Perforation102143
Therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty315553
Endophthalmitis000010
Median tarsorrhaphy000001
Other pre-specifiedVision Related Quality of Life

Mobility subscale: As measured by the Indian Visual Function Questionnaire (IVFQ) which records quality of life on a scale of 0 to 100 with 100 representing the best quality of life.

Time frame:
3 months
Reported as:
Median · score on a scale
Vision Related Quality of Life
score on a scaleBacterial Ulcer ControlBacterial Ulcer Cross-linkingFungal Ulcer Cross-linking Plus NatamycinFungal Ulcer Control With NatamycinFungal Ulcer Control With AmphotericinFungal Ulcer Cross-linking Plus Amphotericin
Vision Related Quality of Life——89.6 (71.9 to 100)91.7 (75 to 100)95.8 (72.9 to 100)89.6 (71.9 to 100)

Adverse events

Collected over 3 months. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Bacterial Ulcer Control0/19 (0%)4/19 (21.1%)0/19 (0%)
Bacterial Ulcer Cross-linking0/17 (0%)1/17 (5.9%)0/17 (0%)
Fungal Ulcer Control With Natamycin0/26 (0%)7/26 (26.9%)0/26 (0%)
Fungal Ulcer Cross-linking Plus Natamycin0/27 (0%)6/27 (22.2%)0/27 (0%)
Fungal Ulcer Control With Amphotericin0/30 (0%)10/30 (33.3%)0/30 (0%)
Fungal Ulcer Cross-linking Plus Amphotericin0/28 (0%)6/28 (21.4%)1/28 (3.6%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventBacterial Ulcer ControlBacterial Ulcer Cross-linkingFungal Ulcer Control With NatamycinFungal Ulcer Cross-linking Plus NatamycinFungal Ulcer Control With AmphotericinFungal Ulcer Cross-linking Plus Amphotericin
Therapeutic penetrating keratoplastyEye disorders3/191/175/265/275/303/28
PerforationEye disorders1/190/172/261/274/303/28
EndophthalmitisEye disorders0/190/170/260/271/300/28
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventBacterial Ulcer ControlBacterial Ulcer Cross-linkingFungal Ulcer Control With NatamycinFungal Ulcer Cross-linking Plus NatamycinFungal Ulcer Control With AmphotericinFungal Ulcer Cross-linking Plus Amphotericin
Median tarsorrhaphyEye disorders0/190/170/260/270/301/28

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Bacterial Ulcer ControlBacterial Ulcer Cross-linkingFungal Ulcer Control With NatamycinFungal Ulcer Cross-linking Plus NatamycinFungal Ulcer Control With AmphotericinFungal Ulcer Cross-linking Plus AmphotericinTotal
Median60 (54.5 to 65)59 (48 to 66)50 (36 to 55)55 (47 to 65)45 (40 to 58)56 (45 to 65)54.5 (45 to 64)
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Bacterial Ulcer ControlBacterial Ulcer Cross-linkingFungal Ulcer Control With NatamycinFungal Ulcer Cross-linking Plus NatamycinFungal Ulcer Control With AmphotericinFungal Ulcer Cross-linking Plus AmphotericinTotal
Female69912161163
Male1381715141784
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Bacterial Ulcer ControlBacterial Ulcer Cross-linkingFungal Ulcer Control With NatamycinFungal Ulcer Cross-linking Plus NatamycinFungal Ulcer Control With AmphotericinFungal Ulcer Cross-linking Plus AmphotericinTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native0000000
Asian191726273028147
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0000000
Black or African American0000000
White0000000
More than one race0000000
Unknown or Not Reported0000000
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(Participants)Bacterial Ulcer ControlBacterial Ulcer Cross-linkingFungal Ulcer Control With NatamycinFungal Ulcer Cross-linking Plus NatamycinFungal Ulcer Control With AmphotericinFungal Ulcer Cross-linking Plus AmphotericinTotal
India191726273028147
Occupation
Occupation(Participants)Bacterial Ulcer ControlBacterial Ulcer Cross-linkingFungal Ulcer Control With NatamycinFungal Ulcer Cross-linking Plus NatamycinFungal Ulcer Control With AmphotericinFungal Ulcer Cross-linking Plus AmphotericinTotal
Agriculture1281613181380
Nonagriculture691014121566
NA1000001
Medication use at enrollment
Medication use at enrollment(Participants)Bacterial Ulcer ControlBacterial Ulcer Cross-linkingFungal Ulcer Control With NatamycinFungal Ulcer Cross-linking Plus NatamycinFungal Ulcer Control With AmphotericinFungal Ulcer Cross-linking Plus AmphotericinTotal
Count of participants81018211924100
Affected Eye
Affected Eye(Participants)Bacterial Ulcer ControlBacterial Ulcer Cross-linkingFungal Ulcer Control With NatamycinFungal Ulcer Cross-linking Plus NatamycinFungal Ulcer Control With AmphotericinFungal Ulcer Cross-linking Plus AmphotericinTotal
Left881112181370
Right1191515121577
Visual acuity
Visual acuity(LogMar)Bacterial Ulcer ControlBacterial Ulcer Cross-linkingFungal Ulcer Control With NatamycinFungal Ulcer Cross-linking Plus NatamycinFungal Ulcer Control With AmphotericinFungal Ulcer Cross-linking Plus AmphotericinTotal
Mean1.7 (0.7 to 1.7)1.7 (0.9 to 1.8)1.05 (0.62 to 1.12)1.1 (0.6 to 1.7)1.05 (0.62 to 1.7)1.22 (0.91 to 1.7)1.1 (0.63 to 1.7)

6 further baseline measures are reported on the registry.

08

Study locations

2 sites
  • Proctor Foundation, UCSF
    San Francisco, California 94143, United States
  • Aravind Eye Hospitals
    Madurai, Tamil Nadu, India
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Prajna NV, Radhakrishnan N, Lalitha P, Liu Z, Keenan JD, Arnold BF, Rose-Nussbaumer J. Mediators of the Effect of Corneal Cross-Linking on Visual Acuity for Fungal Ulcers: A Prespecified Secondary Analysis From the Cross-Linking-Assisted Infection Reduction Trial. Cornea. 2022 Oct 1;41(10):1217-1221. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000002965. Epub 2022 Jan 17. PubMed 35044972 ↗
  • Prajna NV, Lalitha P, Krishnan T, Rajaraman R, Radnakrishnan N, Srinivasan M, Devi L, Das M, Liu Z, Zegans ME, Acharya NR, Porco TC, Lietman TM, Rose-Nussbaumer J. Patterns of Antifungal Resistance in Adult Patients With Fungal Keratitis in South India: A Post Hoc Analysis of 3 Randomized Clinical Trials. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2022 Feb 1;140(2):179-184. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2021.5765. PubMed 35024776 ↗
  • Prajna NV, Radhakrishnan N, Lalitha P, Rajaraman R, Narayana S, Austin AF, Liu Z, Keenan JD, Porco TC, Lietman TM, Rose-Nussbaumer J. Cross-Linking Assisted Infection Reduction (CLAIR): A Randomized Clinical Trial Evaluating the Effect of Adjuvant Cross-Linking on Bacterial Keratitis. Cornea. 2021 Jul 1;40(7):837-841. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000002510. PubMed 33079921 ↗
  • Prajna NV, Radhakrishnan N, Lalitha P, Austin A, Liu Z, Keenan JD, Porco TC, Lietman TM, Rose-Nussbaumer J. Cross-Linking Assisted Infection Reduction: One-year Follow-up of a Randomized Clinical Trial Evaluating Cross-Linking for Fungal Keratitis. Ophthalmology. 2021 Jun;128(6):950-952. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.09.042. Epub 2020 Oct 5. No abstract available. PubMed 33031809 ↗
  • Davis SA, Bovelle R, Han G, Kwagyan J. Corneal collagen cross-linking for bacterial infectious keratitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jun 17;6(6):CD013001. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013001.pub2. PubMed 32557558 ↗
  • Prajna NV, Radhakrishnan N, Lalitha P, Austin A, Ray KJ, Keenan JD, Porco TC, Lietman TM, Rose-Nussbaumer J. Cross-Linking-Assisted Infection Reduction: A Randomized Clinical Trial Evaluating the Effect of Adjuvant Cross-Linking on Outcomes in Fungal Keratitis. Ophthalmology. 2020 Feb;127(2):159-166. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2019.08.029. Epub 2019 Sep 4. PubMed 31619359 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Nov 2015 to primary completion in Jun 2018, 31 months.

Results were first posted in Aug 2024, 6 years 2 months after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 15, 2015
First posted
Oct 7, 2015
StartActual
Nov 2015
Primary completionActual
Jun 18, 2018
CompletionActual
Mar 19, 2019
Results first posted
Aug 27, 2024
Last update
Jun 18, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 18, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02570321
Collaborators
Aravind Eye Hospitals, India
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 7, 2015
Start date
Nov 2015
Primary completion
Jun 18, 2018
Completion
Mar 19, 2019
Results posted
Aug 27, 2024
Last update
Jun 18, 2025

Study contacts

Jennifer R Rose-Nussbaumer, MD
principal investigator · University of California, San Francisco

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion