ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02565628Updated Jul 24, 2023Results posted

PF-06669571 In Subjects With Idiopathic Parkinson's Disease

A Phase 1 interventional study of PF-06669571 and Placebo in Idiopathic Parkinson's Disease, sponsored by Pfizer. Completed at 9 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 45 Years to 85 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-07-24.

Sponsored by Pfizer · Phase 1, Interventional, and Basic science

Phase
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
20
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
45 Years to 85 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study is designed to assess safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetic data for multiple doses of PF-06669571 in subjects with idiopathic Parkinson's disease. In addition, this study will assess whether PF-06669571 is able to demonstrate superior efficacy compared with placebo in the treatment of the motor symptoms of idiopathic Parkinson's disease.

02

Conditions studied

  • Idiopathic Parkinson's Disease

Browse trials for

03

In context

Parkinson Disease

4,583 studies on the registry are indexed under Parkinson Disease; 1,097 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 20 is below the median of 40 across 3,365 interventional studies indexed under Parkinson Disease.

Browse Parkinson Disease studies →

Lead sponsor

Pfizer is the lead sponsor of 3,323 studies on the registry; 145 are open to participants now.

Of its 597 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 391 (65%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
45 Years to 85 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Subjects must have a clinical diagnosis of idiopathic Parkinson's disease and presence of at least 2 out of 3 cardinal characteristics (tremor, rigidity and/or bradykinesia).
  • Must be Hoehn \& Yahr Stage II-III inclusive and experiencing motor fluctuations in the form of end-of-dose wearing off during the morning hours or early morning akinesia.
  • Subjects should be able to recognize their "wearing off" symptoms and verify that they usually improve after their next dose of Parkinson's disease medication. Subjects should be able to recognize drug-induced dyskinesias and verify whether or not they are troublesome.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

- History or clinical features consistent with an atypical parkinsonian syndrome, (for example: ataxia, dystonia, clinically significant orthostatic hypotension.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1
Primary purpose
Basic science
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
20 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    PF-06669571

    Once daily (QD) for 7 days

    Drug: PF-06669571

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    QD for 7 days

    Drug: Placebo

Interventions

  • 1 milligram (mg) QD for 3 days followed by 3 mg QD for 4 days

  • DrugPlacebo

    Placebo

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Maximum Percent Change From Baseline in Movement Disorder Society-Sponsor Revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) Part III at Day 7.

    The total MDS-UPDRS score is the most common method of evaluating the severity of Parkinson's disease across behaviors, activities of daily living, motor abilities, and other complications of Parkinson's disease. The MDS-UPDRS focuses primarily on measuring impairments associated with Parkinson's disease, with subsections organized according to motor and non-motor aspects of the disease. Part III assesses the motor signs of Parkinson's disease. Higher total scores indicate more severe motor signs of Parkinson's disease. Negative changes from baseline indicate improvement. MDS-UPDRS Part III total motor score is comprised of 33 sub-scores based on 18 items, several with right, left or other body distribution scores. Each question is anchored with five responses that are linked to commonly accepted clinical terms: 0 = normal, 1 = slight, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate and 4 = severe.

    Time frame: Day 7

  2. Number of Participants in Each Columbia Classification Algorithm of Suicide Assessment (C-CASA) Category by Study Visit on Day -2, Day 8 or Early Withdrawal, and Early Withdrawal/Follow-Up Visit

    The number of participants in each C-CASA category was mapped from Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) data. C-SSRS assessed whether participant experienced following: completed suicide (1), suicide attempt (2) (response of "Yes" on "actual attempt"), preparatory acts toward imminent suicidal behavior (3) ("Yes" on "preparatory acts or behavior"), suicidal ideation (4) ("Yes" on "wish to be dead", "non-specific active suicidal thoughts", "active suicidal ideation with methods without intent to act or some intent to act or some intent to act, with specific plan and intent"), any suicidal behavior or ideation, self-injurious behavior (7) ("Yes" on "Has subject engaged in non-suicidal self-injurious behavior").

    Time frame: Day -2, Day 8, and follow-up visit (Day 7 - 14 after last dose of PF-06669571)

  3. Number of Participants With New Onset and Worsening of Post-Baseline Suicidality.

    Number of participants with new onset and worsening of post-baseline suicidality was reported

    Time frame: Day 8 or follow-up visit (Day 7 - 14 after last dose of PF-06669571)

  4. Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (All Causalities)

    An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation subject administered a product or medical device; the event need not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment or usage.

    Time frame: Day 1 to 28 calendar days after the last dose of investigational product

  5. Number of Participants With Supine and Standing Vital Sign Abnormalities of Potential Clinical Concern (Absolute Values)

    Number of participants with supine and standing vital signs data of absolute values meeting criteria of potential clinical concern. Absolute values were analyzed for supine/standing systolic blood pressure (SBP), supine/standing diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and supine/standing pulse rate. Number of participants with vital signs data meeting the following criteria was reported: (1) absolute supine SBP \<90 millimeters of mercury (mmHg); (2) absolute standing SBP \<90 mmHg; (3)absolute supine DBP\<50mmHg; (4)absolute standing DBP\<50mmHg (5) absolute supine pulse rate \<40 beats per minute (bpm); (6) absolute supine pulse rate \>120 bpm;(7) absolute standing pulse rate \<40 bpm; (8) absolute standing pulse rate \>140 bpm.

    Time frame: Screening, Days -1, 1, 7 and 8, and follow-up visit

  6. Number of Participants With Supine and Standing Vital Sign Abnormalities of Potential Clinical Concern (Increase From Baseline)

    The number of participants with vital signs data of maximum increase from baseline meeting the following criteria was reported: Criterion A: maximum increase from baseline in supine systolic BP (SBP) \>=30 millimeters of mercury (mmHg); Criterion B maximum increase from baseline in standing SBP \>=30 mmHg; Criterion C: maximum increase from baseline in supine diastolic BP(DBP) \>=20 mmHg; Criterion D: maximum increase from baseline in standing diastolic BP(DBP) \>=20 mmHg

    Time frame: Screening, Days -1, 1, 7 and 8, and follow-up visit

  7. Number of Participants With Supine and Standing Vital Sign Abnormalities (Decrease From Baseline)

    The number of participants with vital signs data of maximum decrease from baseline meeting the following criteria was reported: Criterion A: maximum decrease from baseline in supine systolic BP (SBP) \>=30 mmHg; Criterion B: maximum decrease from baseline in standing SBP \>=30 mmHg; Criterion C: maximum decrease from baseline in supine diastolic BP(DBP) \>=20 mmHg; Criterion D: maximum decrease from baseline in standing diastolic BP(DBP) \>=20 mmHg

    Time frame: Screening, Days -1, 1, 7 and 8, and follow-up visit

  8. Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) That Met Categorical Criteria for Concern (Absolute Value)

    The number of participants with ECG absolute values meeting the following criteria was reported: Criterion A: maximum PR interval (time from the beginning of P wave to the start of QRS complex, corresponding to the end of atrial depolarization and onset of ventricular depolarization) \>=300 msec; Criterion B: maximum QRs complex(time from Q wave to the end of S wave, corresponding to ventricle depolarization) \>=140 msec; Criterion C: maximum QTcF interval (time from the beginning of Q wave to the end of T wave corresponding to electrical systole, corrected for heart rate using Fridericia's formula) 450-\<480 msec; Criterion D: maximum QTcF interval 480-\<500 msec; Criterion E: maximum QTcF interval (Fridericia's correction) \>=500 msec

    Time frame: Screening, Days 1, 7, and 8, and follow-up visit

  9. Primary: Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) That Met Categorical Criteria for Concern(Increase From Baseline)

    Number of participants with ECG(standard 12-lead) meeting the following criteria was reported: Criterion A: maximum PR interval increase from baseline percentage change (PctChg)\>=25/50%; Criterion B: maximum QRs complex increase from baseline PctChg \>=50%; Criterion C: maximum QTcF interval increase from baseline 30\<=change\<60 msec; Criterion D: maximum QTcF interval increase from baseline change \>=60 msec.

    Time frame: Screening, Days 1, 7, and 8, and follow-up visit

  10. Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities That Met Categorical Criteria for Concern (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality)

    Number of participants with a laboratory abnormality meeting specified criteria. The laboratory test included: hematology (hemoglobin, hematocrit, red blood cell count, mean corpuscular volume, mean corpuscular hemoglobin, mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration, platelet count, white blood cell count, absolute total neutrophils, absolute eosinophils, absolute basophils, absolute monocytes, and absolute lymphocytes),liver function(total bilirubin, direct bilirubin, aspartate, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine, alanine aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase, total protein, and albumin), renal function (blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, and uric acid), electrolytes (sodium, potassium, chloride, calcium, and venous bicarbonate), clinical chemistry(glucose) ,and urinalysis (pH, qualitative glucose, qualitative protein, qualitative blood, qualitative ketones, qualitative bilirubin, nitrites, leukocyte esterase, urine urobilinogen, urine leukocyte, esterase and microscopy).

    Time frame: Screening, Days 1, 4, and 7, and follow-up visit

Secondary outcomes

  1. Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of PF-06669571 on Day 1 and Day 7

    Cmax of PF-06669671 was observed directly from data on Day 1 and Day 7

    Time frame: 0, 1, 3, 5, 8 and 12 hours post-dose on both Day 1 and Day 7

  2. Area Under Curve From Time Zero to 12 Hours (AUC12) of PF-06669571 on Day 1 and Day 7

    AUC12 of PF-06669571 refers to the area under the curve from time zero to 12 hours post dose on Day 1 and Day 7. AUC12 was determined by using linear/log trapezoidal method.

    Time frame: 0, 1, 3, 5, 8 and 12 hours post-dose on both Day 1 and Day 7

  3. Time to Reach Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of PF-06669571 on Day 1 and Day 7

    Tmax of PF-06669571 was observed directly from data on Day 1 and Day 7, as time of first occurrence.

    Time frame: 0, 1, 3, 5, 8 and 12 hours post-dose on both Day 1 and Day 7

  4. Area Under Curve From Time Zero to 24 Hours (AUC24) of PF-06669571 on Day 7

    AUC24 of PF-06669571 refers to the area under the curve from time zero to 24 hours post dose on Day 7. AUC24 was determined by using linear/log trapezoidal method

    Time frame: 0, 1, 3, 5, 8, 12 and 24 hours post-dose on Day 7

07

Results

Posted Aug 7, 2017

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestonePF-06669571 0.5 mgPlacebo
Started109
Received treatment109
Completed109
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimaryMaximum Percent Change From Baseline in Movement Disorder Society-Sponsor Revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) Part III at Day 7.

The total MDS-UPDRS score is the most common method of evaluating the severity of Parkinson's disease across behaviors, activities of daily living, motor abilities, and other complications of Parkinson's disease. The MDS-UPDRS focuses primarily on measuring impairments associated with Parkinson's disease, with subsections organized according to motor and non-motor aspects of the disease. Part III assesses the motor signs of Parkinson's disease. Higher total scores indicate more severe motor signs of Parkinson's disease. Negative changes from baseline indicate improvement. MDS-UPDRS Part III total motor score is comprised of 33 sub-scores based on 18 items, several with right, left or other body distribution scores. Each question is anchored with five responses that are linked to commonly accepted clinical terms: 0 = normal, 1 = slight, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate and 4 = severe.

Time frame:
Day 7
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Percentage
Maximum Percent Change From Baseline in Movement Disorder Society-Sponsor Revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) Part III at Day 7.
PercentagePF-06669571 0.5 mgPlacebo
Maximum Percent Change From Baseline in Movement Disorder Society-Sponsor Revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) Part III at Day 7.-19.24 ± 7.21-14.21 ± 7.60
Statistical analysis
  • PF-06669571 0.5 mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.6382 · Least square mean difference: -5.02
PrimaryNumber of Participants in Each Columbia Classification Algorithm of Suicide Assessment (C-CASA) Category by Study Visit on Day -2, Day 8 or Early Withdrawal, and Early Withdrawal/Follow-Up Visit

The number of participants in each C-CASA category was mapped from Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) data. C-SSRS assessed whether participant experienced following: completed suicide (1), suicide attempt (2) (response of "Yes" on "actual attempt"), preparatory acts toward imminent suicidal behavior (3) ("Yes" on "preparatory acts or behavior"), suicidal ideation (4) ("Yes" on "wish to be dead", "non-specific active suicidal thoughts", "active suicidal ideation with methods without intent to act or some intent to act or some intent to act, with specific plan and intent"), any suicidal behavior or ideation, self-injurious behavior (7) ("Yes" on "Has subject engaged in non-suicidal self-injurious behavior").

Time frame:
Day -2, Day 8, and follow-up visit (Day 7 - 14 after last dose of PF-06669571)
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants in Each Columbia Classification Algorithm of Suicide Assessment (C-CASA) Category by Study Visit on Day -2, Day 8 or Early Withdrawal, and Early Withdrawal/Follow-Up Visit
participantsPF-06669571 0.5 mgPlacebo
Day -200
Day 800
Follow-up visit00
PrimaryNumber of Participants With New Onset and Worsening of Post-Baseline Suicidality.

Number of participants with new onset and worsening of post-baseline suicidality was reported

Time frame:
Day 8 or follow-up visit (Day 7 - 14 after last dose of PF-06669571)
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants With New Onset and Worsening of Post-Baseline Suicidality.
participantsPF-06669571 0.5 mgPlacebo
Number of Participants With New Onset and Worsening of Post-Baseline Suicidality.00
PrimaryNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (All Causalities)

An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation subject administered a product or medical device; the event need not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment or usage.

Time frame:
Day 1 to 28 calendar days after the last dose of investigational product
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (All Causalities)
participantsPF-06669571 0.5 mgPlacebo
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (All Causalities)65
PrimaryNumber of Participants With Supine and Standing Vital Sign Abnormalities of Potential Clinical Concern (Absolute Values)

Number of participants with supine and standing vital signs data of absolute values meeting criteria of potential clinical concern. Absolute values were analyzed for supine/standing systolic blood pressure (SBP), supine/standing diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and supine/standing pulse rate. Number of participants with vital signs data meeting the following criteria was reported: (1) absolute supine SBP \<90 millimeters of mercury (mmHg); (2) absolute standing SBP \<90 mmHg; (3)absolute supine DBP\<50mmHg; (4)absolute standing DBP\<50mmHg (5) absolute supine pulse rate \<40 beats per minute (bpm); (6) absolute supine pulse rate \>120 bpm;(7) absolute standing pulse rate \<40 bpm; (8) absolute standing pulse rate \>140 bpm.

Time frame:
Screening, Days -1, 1, 7 and 8, and follow-up visit
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants With Supine and Standing Vital Sign Abnormalities of Potential Clinical Concern (Absolute Values)
participantsPF-06669571 0.5 mgPlacebo
Supine Systolic BP <90 mmHg00
Standing Systolic BP <90 mmHg10
Supine Diastolic BP <50 mmHg00
Standing Diastolic BP <50 mmHg00
Supine Pulse Rate <40 BPM00
Supine Pulse Rate >120 BPM00
Standing Pulse Rate <40 BPM00
Standing Pulse Rate >140 BPM00
PrimaryNumber of Participants With Supine and Standing Vital Sign Abnormalities of Potential Clinical Concern (Increase From Baseline)

The number of participants with vital signs data of maximum increase from baseline meeting the following criteria was reported: Criterion A: maximum increase from baseline in supine systolic BP (SBP) \>=30 millimeters of mercury (mmHg); Criterion B maximum increase from baseline in standing SBP \>=30 mmHg; Criterion C: maximum increase from baseline in supine diastolic BP(DBP) \>=20 mmHg; Criterion D: maximum increase from baseline in standing diastolic BP(DBP) \>=20 mmHg

Time frame:
Screening, Days -1, 1, 7 and 8, and follow-up visit
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants With Supine and Standing Vital Sign Abnormalities of Potential Clinical Concern (Increase From Baseline)
participantsPF-06669571 0.5 mgPlacebo
Criterion A11
Criterion B01
Criterion C01
Criterion D11
PrimaryNumber of Participants With Supine and Standing Vital Sign Abnormalities (Decrease From Baseline)

The number of participants with vital signs data of maximum decrease from baseline meeting the following criteria was reported: Criterion A: maximum decrease from baseline in supine systolic BP (SBP) \>=30 mmHg; Criterion B: maximum decrease from baseline in standing SBP \>=30 mmHg; Criterion C: maximum decrease from baseline in supine diastolic BP(DBP) \>=20 mmHg; Criterion D: maximum decrease from baseline in standing diastolic BP(DBP) \>=20 mmHg

Time frame:
Screening, Days -1, 1, 7 and 8, and follow-up visit
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants With Supine and Standing Vital Sign Abnormalities (Decrease From Baseline)
participantsPF-06669571 0.5 mgPlacebo
Criterion A53
Criterion B42
Criterion C33
Criterion D32
PrimaryNumber of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) That Met Categorical Criteria for Concern (Absolute Value)

The number of participants with ECG absolute values meeting the following criteria was reported: Criterion A: maximum PR interval (time from the beginning of P wave to the start of QRS complex, corresponding to the end of atrial depolarization and onset of ventricular depolarization) \>=300 msec; Criterion B: maximum QRs complex(time from Q wave to the end of S wave, corresponding to ventricle depolarization) \>=140 msec; Criterion C: maximum QTcF interval (time from the beginning of Q wave to the end of T wave corresponding to electrical systole, corrected for heart rate using Fridericia's formula) 450-\<480 msec; Criterion D: maximum QTcF interval 480-\<500 msec; Criterion E: maximum QTcF interval (Fridericia's correction) \>=500 msec

Time frame:
Screening, Days 1, 7, and 8, and follow-up visit
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) That Met Categorical Criteria for Concern (Absolute Value)
participantsPF-06669571 0.5 mgPlacebo
Criterion A00
Criterion B00
Criterion C00
Criterion D00
Criterion E00
PrimaryPrimary: Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) That Met Categorical Criteria for Concern(Increase From Baseline)

Number of participants with ECG(standard 12-lead) meeting the following criteria was reported: Criterion A: maximum PR interval increase from baseline percentage change (PctChg)\>=25/50%; Criterion B: maximum QRs complex increase from baseline PctChg \>=50%; Criterion C: maximum QTcF interval increase from baseline 30\<=change\<60 msec; Criterion D: maximum QTcF interval increase from baseline change \>=60 msec.

Time frame:
Screening, Days 1, 7, and 8, and follow-up visit
Reported as:
Number · participants
Primary: Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) That Met Categorical Criteria for Concern(Increase From Baseline)
participantsPF-06669571 0.5 mgPlacebo
Criterion A00
Criterion B00
Criterion C20
Criterion D00
PrimaryNumber of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities That Met Categorical Criteria for Concern (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality)

Number of participants with a laboratory abnormality meeting specified criteria. The laboratory test included: hematology (hemoglobin, hematocrit, red blood cell count, mean corpuscular volume, mean corpuscular hemoglobin, mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration, platelet count, white blood cell count, absolute total neutrophils, absolute eosinophils, absolute basophils, absolute monocytes, and absolute lymphocytes),liver function(total bilirubin, direct bilirubin, aspartate, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine, alanine aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase, total protein, and albumin), renal function (blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, and uric acid), electrolytes (sodium, potassium, chloride, calcium, and venous bicarbonate), clinical chemistry(glucose) ,and urinalysis (pH, qualitative glucose, qualitative protein, qualitative blood, qualitative ketones, qualitative bilirubin, nitrites, leukocyte esterase, urine urobilinogen, urine leukocyte, esterase and microscopy).

Time frame:
Screening, Days 1, 4, and 7, and follow-up visit
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities That Met Categorical Criteria for Concern (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality)
participantsPF-06669571 0.5 mgPlacebo
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities That Met Categorical Criteria for Concern (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality)85
SecondaryMaximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of PF-06669571 on Day 1 and Day 7

Cmax of PF-06669671 was observed directly from data on Day 1 and Day 7

Time frame:
0, 1, 3, 5, 8 and 12 hours post-dose on both Day 1 and Day 7
Reported as:
Geometric mean · ng/mL
Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of PF-06669571 on Day 1 and Day 7
ng/mLPF-06669571 0.5 mg
Day 116.87 ± 30
Day 792.51 ± 31
SecondaryArea Under Curve From Time Zero to 12 Hours (AUC12) of PF-06669571 on Day 1 and Day 7

AUC12 of PF-06669571 refers to the area under the curve from time zero to 12 hours post dose on Day 1 and Day 7. AUC12 was determined by using linear/log trapezoidal method.

Time frame:
0, 1, 3, 5, 8 and 12 hours post-dose on both Day 1 and Day 7
Reported as:
Geometric mean · ng*hr/mL
Area Under Curve From Time Zero to 12 Hours (AUC12) of PF-06669571 on Day 1 and Day 7
ng*hr/mLPF-06669571 0.5 mg
Day 1150.8 ± 28
Day 7917.5 ± 35
SecondaryTime to Reach Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of PF-06669571 on Day 1 and Day 7

Tmax of PF-06669571 was observed directly from data on Day 1 and Day 7, as time of first occurrence.

Time frame:
0, 1, 3, 5, 8 and 12 hours post-dose on both Day 1 and Day 7
Reported as:
Mean · hr
Time to Reach Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of PF-06669571 on Day 1 and Day 7
hrPF-06669571 0.5 mg
Day 13.35 (1.40 to 8.42)
Day 73.19 (1.42 to 5.42)
SecondaryArea Under Curve From Time Zero to 24 Hours (AUC24) of PF-06669571 on Day 7

AUC24 of PF-06669571 refers to the area under the curve from time zero to 24 hours post dose on Day 7. AUC24 was determined by using linear/log trapezoidal method

Time frame:
0, 1, 3, 5, 8, 12 and 24 hours post-dose on Day 7
Reported as:
Geometric mean · ng*hr/mL
Area Under Curve From Time Zero to 24 Hours (AUC24) of PF-06669571 on Day 7
ng*hr/mLPF-06669571 0.5 mg
Area Under Curve From Time Zero to 24 Hours (AUC24) of PF-06669571 on Day 71626 ± 38

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
PF-06669571 0.5 mg—0/10 (0%)6/10 (60%)
Placebo—0/9 (0%)5/9 (55.6%)
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 15
Most frequent other events
EventPF-06669571 0.5 mgPlacebo
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders2/102/9
VomitingGastrointestinal disorders1/102/9
Dry mouthGastrointestinal disorders2/101/9
Ill-defined disorderGeneral disorders2/100/9
ContusionInjury, poisoning and procedural complications0/101/9
FallInjury, poisoning and procedural complications0/101/9
Resting tremorNervous system disorders0/101/9
Upper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestations1/100/9
DizzinessNervous system disorders1/100/9
DystoniaNervous system disorders1/100/9

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)PF-06669571 0.5 mgPlaceboTotal
Mean65.5 ± 7.467.9 ± 5.966.6 ± 6.6
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)PF-06669571 0.5 mgPlaceboTotal
Female459
Male6410
08

Study locations

9 sites
  • Pfizer New Haven Clinical Research Unit
    New Haven, Connecticut 06511, United States
  • MD Clinical
    Hallandale, Florida 33009, United States
  • QPS-MRA, LLC (Broward Research Group)
    Hollywood, Florida 33024, United States
  • Qps-Mra Llc
    South Miami, Florida 33143, United States
  • QPS-MRA, LLC (Miami research Associates)
    South Miami, Florida 33143, United States
  • QPS-MRA, LLC (MRA Clinical Research)
    South Miami, Florida 33143, United States
  • Atlanta Center for Medical Research
    Atlanta, Georgia 30331, United States
  • CRI Worldwide, LLC
    Marlton, New Jersey 08053, United States
  • CTI Clinical Research Center
    Cincinnati, Ohio 45255, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Gurrell R, Duvvuri S, Sun P, DeMartinis N. A Phase I Study of the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of the Novel Dopamine D1 Receptor Partial Agonist, PF-06669571, in Subjects with Idiopathic Parkinson's Disease. Clin Drug Investig. 2018 Jun;38(6):509-517. doi: 10.1007/s40261-018-0632-6. PubMed 29478239 ↗
10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Nov 2015 to primary completion in May 2016, 5 months.

Results were first posted in Aug 2017, 1 year 2 months after primary completion.

Of 124 industry-sponsored phase 1 interventional studies under Parkinson Disease, half reached primary completion within 10 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 3 and three quarters within 24. This study's 5 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 201 studies reached it within 20 months; a quarter within 5 and three quarters within 41.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 28, 2015
First posted
Oct 1, 2015
StartActual
Nov 16, 2015
Primary completionActual
May 13, 2016
CompletionActual
May 13, 2016
Results first posted
Aug 7, 2017
Last update
Jul 24, 2023
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 24, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02565628
Lead sponsor
Pfizer
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 1, 2015
Start date
Nov 16, 2015
Primary completion
May 13, 2016
Completion
May 13, 2016
Results posted
Aug 7, 2017
Last update
Jul 24, 2023

Study contacts

Pfizer CT.gov Call Center
study director · Pfizer

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: PF-06669571

Start the discussion