CClinicalTrials.gg
No longer availableNCT02564224PURSEUpdated Jun 6, 2018

Study Comparing Pursestring Wound Closure vs Conventional Closure to Reverse Stoma of Colorectal Cancer Patients

An expanded access record providing Pursestring Wound Closure and Conventional Wound Closure in Colorectal Cancer and Stoma Closure Technic, sponsored by Zhejiang University. No longer available at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-06-06.

Sponsored by Zhejiang University · Expanded access

Study type
Expanded access
Access type
Treatment IND/protocol
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Temporary stomas has been performed to reduce complications after colorectal cancer surgery, especially in high-risk anastomosis. Different closure technics showed different outcome. The aim of this study is to compare the scar length , surgical site infection and pain score of purse-string wound closure vs conventional closure.

02

Conditions studied

  • Colorectal Cancer
  • Stoma Closure Technic
03

In context

Colorectal Neoplasms

5,599 studies on the registry are indexed under Colorectal Neoplasms; 1,459 are open to participants now.

Browse Colorectal Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Zhejiang University is the lead sponsor of 351 studies on the registry; 165 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Receiving temporary ostomy because of colorectal cancer at least 3 months ago;
  • Age of≥18 and ≤80

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Not willing or incapable to comply with all study visits and assessments
  • Evidence of any other disease, metabolic dysfunction, physical examination finding or laboratory finding giving reasonable suspicion of a disease or condition that puts the patient at high risk for treatment-related complications
05

Access details

Study type
Expanded access
Access type
Treatment IND/protocol

Available treatment

  • ProcedurePursestring Wound Closure

    Procedure: Pursestring Wound Closure

  • ProcedureConventional Wound Closure

    Procedure: Conventional Wound Closure

  • Deviceprolene
06

Where to request access

1 site
  • Second Affiliated Hospital Zhejiang University College of Medicine
    Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310999, China
07

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 6, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02564224
Lead sponsor
Zhejiang University
Responsible party
Ding Ke-Feng (the Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University, Zhejiang University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 30, 2015
Last update
Jun 6, 2018
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Requesting access

Expanded access is arranged between your doctor and the company. Ask your care team to contact the provider listed on this record.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion