CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02563392ORAMUpdated Aug 13, 2024

Does Preventive Uterine Artery Occlusion During Laparoscopic Myomectomy Impact on Ovarian Reserve Markers?

An interventional study of uterine myomectomy with preventive uterine arteries occlusion and laparoscopic uterine myomectomy without preventive uterine arteries occlusion in Uterine Myoma, sponsored by University Hospital, Geneva. Completed at 1 site in Switzerland. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 45 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-08-13.

Sponsored by University Hospital, Geneva · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 3 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Apr 2015, registered Jul 2015).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
58
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 45 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Hysterectomy is an effective treatment used as a first-line approach for uterine myomas. Several others alternatives to hysterectomy have been developed in recent years for women wishing to retain their uterus: myomectomy, radiological embolization, focused ultrasound.

Myomectomy, particularly through minimally invasive surgery, is currently considered the conservative treatment of choice for patients wishing to preserve their fertility. However, three important issues should be considered: the risk of intra- and postoperative bleeding, the risk for recurring myomas, and the preservation of subsequent fertility.

Preventive uterine artery occlusion can be combined with laparoscopic myomectomy in order to avoid bleeding and improve uterine suture. Another expected long-term benefit is the improvement of treatment efficacy, leading to less symptoms and myomas recurrence. However, the effect of uterine arteries occlusion on the ovarian reserve of women of childbearing age has not yet been studied, which limits its clinical application.

Read the detailed description

Objectives:

  1. To assess the effect of preventive uterine artery occlusion during laparoscopic myomectomy on ovarian reserve parameters;
  2. To evaluate the effect of preventive uterine artery occlusion during laparoscopic myomectomy on intra- and postoperative blood loss, operative time, clinical symptoms improvement, long-term recurrence of myomas and fertility.

Materials and methods:

Design: This is a prospective randomized single blind trial, including 60 women undergoing a laparoscopic myomectomy for symptomatic uterine myomas. Patients are randomized into two groups: a control group "myomectomy alone" and an experimental group "myomectomy with preventive uterine arteries occlusion".

Setting: The duration of the study will normally be 5 years and will take place at the University Hospitals of Geneva. The study will include about 20 women per year and follow-up will last 2 years. Inclusion criteria are: women of childbearing age, wishing to retain their uterus, having symptomatic uterine myomas and who are eligible for a laparoscopic myomectomy.

The parameters that will be intraoperatively evaluated are the operation time, blood loss and the complications of the surgical technique. Postoperative complications, improving clinical symptoms, myomas recurrence and fertility are discussed at short and long term follow-up.

The ovarian reserve will be evaluated pre- and postoperatively for each patient. It will be determined by plasmatic AMH (anti-Mullerian Hormone) and ultrasound antral follicle count. Women with undetectable preoperative plasmatic AMH will be excluded from the study. Plasmatic AMH and antral follicle count will be measured at 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months during the postoperative follow-up.

Limitations:

The sample size is calculated in order to demonstrate a significant difference in plasmatic AMH before and after myomectomy. Small differences are not highlighted in this study, but they probably would not have any impact in clinical practice.

Impact of the study:

The results of this study could have a real impact on daily surgical practice. In case of persistent alteration of ovarian reserve in the experimental group compared to the control group, preventive uterine arteries occlusion during a laparoscopic myomectomy should only be indicated in patients who do not wish pregnancy. If there is no significant impact on ovarian reserve and a beneficial effect on reducing intraoperative blood loss and long-term improvement of symptoms, it should be systematically proposed in all patients undergoing a laparoscopic myomectomy.

02

Conditions studied

  • Uterine Myoma
03

In context

Leiomyoma

490 studies on the registry are indexed under Leiomyoma; 81 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 58 is close to the median of 62 across 345 interventional studies indexed under Leiomyoma.

Browse Leiomyoma studies →

Lead sponsor

University Hospital, Geneva is the lead sponsor of 372 studies on the registry; 68 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 45 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • over 18 years
  • signed the surgery consent form
  • capable of discernment understanding and accepting the risks and benefits of the operation
  • symptomatic : menorrhagia, breakthrough bleeding and / or pelvic pain and / or infertility and / or repeated spontaneous abortions.
  • uterine myoma or more, including at least one type of myoma FIGO 2-6 (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics) objectified by ultrasound and / or pelvic MRI
  • laparoscopic approach is technically feasible (as recommended by the National College of Obstetrics and Gynecology French published in 2011): myoma single lower or equal to 9 cm or sum of the size of myomas in centimeters or less equal to 13 and number of myomas inferior to four.
  • Female patients of childbearing age younger than 45 years and having a plasma AMH (anti-Mullerian hormone) than 3 pmol / l.
  • Patients who accept a postoperative follow-up of 2 years

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • pregnant patients.
  • who underwent radiological uterine artery embolization.
  • who have an undetectable AMH levels (\<3 pmol / l).
  • over 45 years
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
58 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Uterine arteries occlusion

    Laparoscopic myomectomy with preventive uterine arteries occlusion

    Procedure: uterine myomectomy with preventive uterine arteries occlusion

  • Active comparator
    No uterine arteries occlusion

    Laparoscopic myomectomy without preventive uterine arteries occlusion

    Procedure: laparoscopic uterine myomectomy without preventive uterine arteries occlusion

Interventions

  • Procedureuterine myomectomy with preventive uterine arteries occlusion

    laparoscopic uterine myomectomy with preventive uterine arteries occlusion

  • Procedurelaparoscopic uterine myomectomy without preventive uterine arteries occlusion

    laparoscopic uterine myomectomy

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Evolution of ovarian reserve markers after myomectomy

    It will be determined by plasmatic AMH and ultrasound antral follicle count

    Time frame: Evaluation of the ovarian reserve at several times: on preoperative, 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months postoperative

Secondary outcomes

  1. Intra-and post-operative blood loss

    Blood loss will be estimated during the operation, and will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 3 days. furthermore, we will dose the hemoglobin before and after the intervention.

    Time frame: peroperative

  2. operative time

    Time needed to realise the intervention from the incision to the cutaneous stitches

    Time frame: peroperative

  3. peroperative complications

    it will be noticed the conversion in laparotomy, the blood transfusion, the organic and vessels lesions

    Time frame: peroperative

  4. Clinical symptoms improvement: hypermenorrhea

    Evaluation of quantity of blood during menstruation with the PBAC scale (Pictorial Blood Assessment Chart) before and after the intervention

    Time frame: 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months postoperative

  5. Clinical symptoms improvement: dysmenorrhea

    Evaluation of improvement of dysmenorrhea by asking patients the pain they have from 0 to 10 and their consumption of pain killers (NSAIDs and paracetamol) during menstruation.

    Time frame: 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months postoperative

  6. Clinical symptoms improvement: occuring of pregnancy

    Evaluation of the occurence of pregnancy by asking women the number of pregnancy, of miscarriage, of abortion, of term pregnancy since the intervention

    Time frame: 12 and 24 months postoperative

  7. long-term recurrence of myomas

    An US will be made at 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months to estimate the recidive of myoma. It will be considered a recidive when the myoma will be bigger than 20 mm

    Time frame: 2 years

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Hôpitaux Universitaires de Genève, Service de gynécologie
    Geneva, 1206, Switzerland
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 13, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02563392
Lead sponsor
University Hospital, Geneva
Responsible party
Isabelle Streuli (Dr, University Hospital, Geneva) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 30, 2015
Start date
Apr 2015
Primary completion
May 2024
Completion
May 2024
Last update
Aug 13, 2024

Study contacts

Patrick Petignat, Pr
study director · University Hospital, Geneva

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion