CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT02562287Updated Oct 2, 2018

Clozapine Versus Other Atypical Antipsychotics for Bipolar Disorder

A Phase 4 interventional study of Clozapine and Risperidone in Bipolar Disorder, sponsored by Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre. Status unknown at 1 site in Brazil. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-10-02.

Sponsored by Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Oct 2018), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
54
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The clinical use of clozapine has been an unequivocal advance in the treatment of schizophrenia, a chronic and severe mental illness. A wealth of clinical data demonstrates it offers enhanced efficacy on both positive and negative symptomatology, improving cognition, functioning and quality of life. It is also associated with improved compliance and a continued efficacy in long-term treatment that can be translated into a reduction of suicidality and all-cause mortality. Because of preclinical evidence that it modulates neuroplasticity and prefrontal cortex connectivity, clozapine may be an interesting strategy for further severe psychotic illnesses. Nevertheless, even considering the growing use of other atypical antipsychotics in the management of bipolar disorder, a role for clozapine has been poorly defined. The clinical evidence-base for its use in this condition is largely based on uncontrolled naturalistic trials and retrospective studies and chart reviews. Several of these have supported clozapine's efficacy in treatment-resistant bipolar disorder. Possibly because of clozapine's profile of adverse effects and lack of interest from pharmaceutical companies, only two randomized trials have examined its effectiveness. Both suggest clinically relevant antimanic and mood-stabilizing properties. Therefore, the primary objective of this trial is to determine the effectiveness of clozapine for treatment-resistant bipolar disorder. Secondary objectives include examining the effects of treatment with clozapine on cognition and functioning of patients with bipolar disorder. Tolerability and safety of long-term clozapine use will also be examined. To that end, the investigators will conduct a clinical trial with 54 patients with a history of treatment resistance. Patients will be randomized to either open-label treatment with clozapine, in combination with lithium or valproate, or open-label treatment with an atypical antipsychotic with consistent evidence of efficacy in the treatment of bipolar disorder (olanzapine, quetiapine or risperidone), also in combination with lithium or valproate. Patients will be followed for one-year and time to all-cause treatment failure will be the primary outcome measure. It is the belief of the investigators that this study will generate meaningful clinical data of tremendous importance to validate clozapine as a legitimate treatment option for treatment-resistant bipolar disorder.

02

Conditions studied

  • Bipolar Disorder

Browse trials for

03

In context

Bipolar Disorder

1,601 studies on the registry are indexed under Bipolar Disorder; 254 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 54 is below the median of 64 across 1,223 interventional studies indexed under Bipolar Disorder.

Browse Bipolar Disorder studies →

Lead sponsor

Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre is the lead sponsor of 450 studies on the registry; 61 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • DSM-IV Bipolar I Disorder;
  • having had a mood episode within the preceding year; DSM-IV rapid cyclers will be permitted to participate in this study;
  • males or females between 18 and 65 years of age;
  • ongoing illness symptoms including significant functional impairment;
  • documented history of treatment resistance, defined as persistent symptoms despite simultaneous, adequate treatment with at least two medications: one mood stabilizer (lithium or valproate) + antipsychotic OR two mood stabilizers (at least one of them being lithium or valproate).
  • each patient must have a level of understanding sufficient to agree to all the tests required by the protocol and must sign an informed consent document

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • patients with onset of illness after age 40 or illness resulting from secondary causes
  • women who are pregnant or breastfeeding, or not using adequate contraception
  • unstable medical illnesses
  • clinically significant abnormal laboratory tests
  • current active alcohol or substance abuse
  • severe personality disorders
  • contraindication to the use of clozapine or previous treatment with clozapine
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
54 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Clozapine

    Clozapine, P.O., flexible dose, for up to 6 months

    Drug: Clozapine

  • Active comparator
    Risperidone, olanzapine or quetiapine

    Risperidone, olanzapine or quetiapine, according to clinical indication, flexible dose, for up to 6 months

    Drug: Risperidone · Drug: Olanzapine · Drug: Quetiapine

Interventions

  • DrugClozapine

    Flexible dosage, with up-titration according to standard schedules employed for schezophrenia

    Also known as: Clozaril

  • DrugRisperidone

    Risperidone, in a flexible dosage

    Also known as: Risperdal

  • DrugOlanzapine

    Olanzapine, flexible dosage

    Also known as: Zyprexa

  • DrugQuetiapine

    Quetiapine, flexible dosage

    Also known as: Seroquel

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Functioning according to Functioning Assessment Short-Test

    Global functioning according to Functioning Assessment Short-Test

    Time frame: 6 month follow up

Secondary outcomes

  1. Time to all-cause treatment failure

    Include drug treatment (commencement of a new drug, restarting of a discontinued drug, or increasing the investigational drug dose in response to an emergent mood episode), admission to hospital or withdrawal from study treatment.

    Time frame: Six months

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre
    Porto Alegre, Rio Grande Do Sul 90540001, Brazil
    • PEDRO V MAGALHAES, M.D., Ph.D. · Contact
    Recruiting
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 2, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02562287
Lead sponsor
Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre
Collaborators
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior., Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
Responsible party
Pedro Vieira da Silva Magalhães (Professor of Psychiatry, Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 29, 2015
Start date
Oct 2015
Primary completion
Jun 2019 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2020 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 2, 2018

Study contacts

PEDRO V MAGALHAES, M.D., Ph.D.
Contact
pedromaga2@gmail.com
+555191123773
PEDRO V MAGALHAES, M.D., Ph.D.
principal investigator · Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre / Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Oct 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion