CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02560207Updated Oct 27, 2016

Randomized Trial of Continuous Versus Intermittent Cefotaxime Infusion on ICU.

A Phase 4 interventional study of Cefotaxime in Critically Ill, sponsored by University Medical Center Groningen. Completed at 1 site in Netherlands. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-10-27.

Sponsored by University Medical Center Groningen · Phase 4, Interventional, and Basic science

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study evaluates target attainment after either intermittent intravenous bolus or intravenous continuous infusion of cefotaxime in critically ill patients. Critically ill patients will be randomized to intermittent infusion or continuous infusion of cefotaxime.

Read the detailed description

Critically ill patients have other pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic profiles than healthy volunteers. Suboptimal, both under- and overdosing of antibiotics is an important threat in this patient category. Given the time-dependent character of beta-lactam antibiotics continuous dosing as opposed to traditional intermittent dosing is likely to render better target attainment and maintenance and might improve clinical outcome.

02

Conditions studied

  • Critically Ill

Browse trials for

03

In context

Critical Illness

1,881 studies on the registry are indexed under Critical Illness; 462 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 60 is below the median of 90 across 979 interventional studies indexed under Critical Illness.

Browse Critical Illness studies →

Lead sponsor

University Medical Center Groningen is the lead sponsor of 609 studies on the registry; 174 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Admitted to intensive care
  • Able to give informed consent by themselves or informed consent can be obtained via next of kin
  • Indication for treatment with cefotaxime (as judged by treating physician) in the context of our standard treatment protocol of Selective decontamination of the digestive tract (SDD).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Renal replacement therapy
  • Contra-indication for cefotaxime, including known or suspected allergy to cefotaxime
  • No indication for an arterial line; an arterial line will not be placed solely for the purpose of this study; thus, only patients with an indication for an arterial line outside this protocol are eligible.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Basic science
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
60 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Intermittent cefotaxime

    Cefotaxime 1 gram (1000 mg) is to be administered 4 times daily for 4 days

    Drug: Cefotaxime

  • Experimental
    Continuous cefotaxime

    After a 1 gram (1000 mg) Cefotaxime loading dose, Cefotaxime 4 gram (4000 mg) is to be administered as a continuous infusion in 24h for 4 days .

    Drug: Cefotaxime

Interventions

  • DrugCefotaxime

    To assess the influence of administration route on target attainment cefotaxime is administered via two IV routes.

    Also known as: Claforan

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Cefotaxim serum concentrations

    Cefotaxime serum concentrations, total and unbound, will be determined. The Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) target of total serum concentration of 4 times above minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) ascertains that the unbound drug serum concentration will be above the MIC value of 1 mg/mL, which is determined to be the minimum target.

    Time frame: 40 min, 1 hour, 2, 4, 8, 12 and 24 hours; 36h; 48 h; 60h; 72h; 84h and 96h post administration

Secondary outcomes

  1. Area under the curve of cefotaxim

    Based on the data from the primary outcome measure a pharmacokinetic model for ICU patients will be developed.

    Time frame: 0-96h post administration

07

Study locations

1 site
  • University Medical Center Groningen
    Groningen, 9700 RB, Netherlands
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Aardema H, Bult W, van Hateren K, Dieperink W, Touw DJ, Alffenaar JC, Zijlstra JG. Continuous versus intermittent infusion of cefotaxime in critically ill patients: a randomized controlled trial comparing plasma concentrations. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2020 Feb 1;75(2):441-448. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkz463. PubMed 31697336 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 27, 2016, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02560207
Lead sponsor
University Medical Center Groningen
Responsible party
Prof. dr. J.G. Zijlstra (prof. dr., University Medical Center Groningen) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 25, 2015
Start date
Nov 2015
Primary completion
Jun 2016
Completion
Sep 2016
Last update
Oct 27, 2016

Study contacts

Jan G Zijlstra, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Department of Critical Care, UMCG

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion