CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02556424TRIOZUpdated Sep 14, 2026

Efficacy and Tolerance Comparison Between Subconjunctival Injection of Triamcinolone and Intravitreal Implant of Dexamethasone for the Treatment of Inflammatory Macular Edema

A Phase 3 interventional study of Dexamethasone and Triamcinolone in Inflammatory Macular Edema, sponsored by Nantes University Hospital. Completed at 16 sites in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-14.

Sponsored by Nantes University Hospital · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
114
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Corticosteroids, whether injected peri- or intra-ocularly, remain indispensable tools of the therapeutic arsenal in treating inflammatory macular edema. However, a few years ago, only triamcinolone acetonide was available to ophthalmologists. This molecule, developed initially for rheumatological or dermatological use, has been increasingly deployed in ophthalmology, while still off-label.

In 2011, the delivery system of dexamethasone from biodegradable and injectable implant into the vitreous cavity obtained the label for inflammatory macular edema. This protocol is therefore designed to compare the efficacy and safety of peri- and intra-ocular injections of corticosteroids in the treatment of inflammatory macular edema.

Read the detailed description

This research compares the implantation techniques of corticosteroids in the eye, with two groups of equal size being followed. This is a multi-center, controlled study, with the reference drug being the intravitreal implant of 700μg of dexamethasone (Ozurdex®) compared to subconjunctival injection of triamcinolone (Kénacort retard®). This is an open, prospective, randomized study. It is not possible, for technical reasons, to inject blind two products with different injection routes and that are visible to the investigator during control examinations (sub-conjunctival crystals and intravitreal implant). However, the assessment of visual acuity and central macular thickness will be performed by an uninformed ophthalmologist.

02

Conditions studied

  • Inflammatory Macular Edema

Keywords

  • Ophthalmology
  • Uveitic macular edema
  • Triamcinolone subconjunctival injection
  • Dexamethasone intraocular implant
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Nantes University Hospital is the lead sponsor of 825 studies on the registry; 195 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Patient, male or female (under effective contraception if premenopausal) over 18 years old
  • Patient affiliated with a social security plan
  • Patient able to understand and follow the instructions of the study
  • Patient having signed an informed consent
  • Patient having a central macular thickness greater than 320μm (Spectral Domain, 270µm Time Domain)
  • Patient with an inflammatory macular edema, unilateral or bilateral (in the case of a bilateral inflammatory macular edema, the eye most affected will be treated)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient with an infectious uveitis
  • Patient with uncontrolled active infection
  • Patient receiving an unbalanced general anti-inflammatory and/or immunosuppressive and/or immunomodulatory therapy (recent modification \<1 month)
  • Patient having a history of glaucoma and/or ocular hypertension in the eye studied (intraocular pressure (IOP) > 25 mmHg without antiglaucoma medication or > 21 mmHg with antiglaucoma combination therapy) and/or cortisone-causing-hypertension not controlled by an antiglaucoma dual therapy
  • Patient with uncontrolled diabetes (HbA1c> 8%) or unbalanced hypertension (Systolic Blood Pressure > 160 mmHg and/or Diastolic Blood Pressure > 100mmHg)
  • Edematous diabetic maculopathy
  • Patient who had received triamcinolone (subconjunctivally or sub-tenon) 3 months before randomization, or 700μg dexamethasone intravitreally 6 months before randomization
  • Suspected or active ocular or periocular infection, including most viral diseases of the cornea and conjunctiva, such as active epithelial keratitis with herpes simplex (dendritic keratitis), vaccinia, varicella, mycobacterial infections and mycoses
  • History of ocular herpes infection or central serous chorioretinopathy
  • Aphakic eye with rupture of the posterior lens capsule
  • Eye with implant in the anterior chamber, iris- or transscleral-fixated intraocular implant and rupture of the posterior lens capsule
  • Uncontrolled systemic inflammatory disease.
  • Known hypersensitivity to the active substance or to one of the excipients of Ozurdex®, Kenacort® or injectable fluorescein
  • Pregnant woman or likely to become pregnant or nursing
  • Patient participating in another clinical trial
  • Adult under a legal protection regime (guardianship, trusteeship, "sauvegarde de justice")
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
114 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Reference Drug

    Intravitreal implant of 700μg of dexamethasone (Ozurdex®)

    Drug: Dexamethasone

  • Experimental
    Tested Drug

    Subconjunctival injection of 16 mg triamcinolone (Kénacort Retard®)

    Drug: Triamcinolone

Interventions

  • DrugDexamethasone

    Intravitreal implant at D0

    Also known as: Ozurdex®

  • DrugTriamcinolone

    Subconjunctival injection at 4 mm from the limbus at 6 o'clock

    Also known as: Kénacort retard®

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Evaluation of the effectiveness of a subconjunctival injection of triamcinolone on reducing the central macular thickness versus an intravitreal implant of dexamethasone between patient selection and 2 months after treatment

    Difference of the central macular thickness in the treated eye, measured by Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) spectral domain, for each patient between patient selection and 2 months after treatment

    Time frame: At 2 months after treatment

Secondary outcomes

  1. Evaluation of the experience of the injection by a questionnaire (tolerable, unpleasant and very unpleasant) and by EVA (0 cm = no pain to 10 cm = extreme pain)

    Scale of "patient experience" the day of the injection (tolerable, unpleasant, very unpleasant) and visual analogue scale (VAS)

    Time frame: At day 0 (= the day of the treatment)

  2. Evaluation of the effectiveness of the studied injection at each visit regarding gain in visual acuity (ETDRS)

    Visual acuity (ETDRS)

    Time frame: Up to 6 months

  3. Evaluation of the effectiveness of the studied injection at each visit regarding reduction of the anterior flare

    Anterior flare ("Lampe A Fente" and Laser Flare Meter, if available)

    Time frame: Up to 6 months

  4. Evaluation of the effectiveness of the studied injection at each visit regarding reduction of the vitreous haze

    Vitreous flare

    Time frame: Up to 6 months

  5. Evaluation of the effectiveness of the studied injection at each visit regarding central macular thickness measured by OCT, allowing the evaluation of the duration of action of the treatment

    Central macular thickness of the eye treated for determining the duration of action

    Time frame: Up to 6 months

  6. Evaluation of the effectiveness of the studied injection at each visit regarding local and general tolerance, by collecting all Adverse Events (AEs) / Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

    Evaluation of tolerance by collecting all AEs / SAEs of randomized patients, such as intra-ocular hypertension, cataracts, endophthalmitis, poor glycemic and/or blood pressure control

    Time frame: Up to 6 months

  7. Evaluation of the effectiveness of the studied injection at each visit regarding patients' quality of life

    Patients' quality of life questionnaire (EQ-5D)

    Time frame: Up to 6 months

07

Study locations

16 sites
  • CHU Angers
    Angers, France
  • CHU de Bordeaux
    Bordeaux, 33076, France
  • CHU de Brest
    Brest, 29609, France
  • CHU de Dijon
    Dijon, 21079, France
  • CHU de Grenoble
    La Tronche, 38700, France
  • Hôpital Bicêtre (AP-HP)
    Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, 94270, France
  • CHRU de Lille
    Lille, 59037, France
  • Hopices Civils de Lyon
    Lyon, 69004, France
  • CHU de Montpellier
    Montpellier, 34295, France
  • CHU de Nantes
    Nantes, 44093, France
  • CHU de Nice
    Nice, 06000, France
  • Hôpital La Pitié-Salpêtrière (AP-HP)
    Paris, 75013, France
  • Fondation Ophtalmologique Adolphe de Rothschild
    Paris, 75019, France
  • Centre Hospitalier National d'Ophtalmologie des Quinze-Vingts
    Paris, 75571, France
  • CHU de Tours
    Tours, 37044, France
  • CHU de Nancy
    Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, 54500, France
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Couret C, Poinas A, Volteau C, Riche VP, Le Lez ML, Errera MH, Creuzot-Garcher C, Baillif S, Kodjikian L, Ivan C, Le Jumeau de Kergaradec LM, Chiffoleau A, Jobert A, Jaulin J, Biron L, Hervouet E, Weber M. Comparison of two techniques used in routine care for the treatment of inflammatory macular oedema, subconjunctival triamcinolone injection and intravitreal dexamethasone implant: medical and economic importance of this randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2020 Feb 10;21(1):159. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-4066-0. PubMed 32041669 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 14, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02556424
Lead sponsor
Nantes University Hospital
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 22, 2015
Start date
Jan 2016
Primary completion
Feb 15, 2021
Completion
Feb 15, 2021
Last update
Sep 14, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion