CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT02551146GCUpdated Dec 22, 2022

Influence of Implants and Locators for Improved Retention

An interventional study of A Locator with retention elements and B Locator without retention elements in Mouth, Edentulous, sponsored by Philipps University Marburg. Terminated at 1 site in Germany. Open to participants aged 45 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-12-22.

Sponsored by Philipps University Marburg · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
Difficulties concerning the recruitment of participants
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
14
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
45 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The aim of this study is to assess the influence of this particular treatment method on the patients' quality of life and masticatory function.

Read the detailed description

For this prospective randomized controlled clinical trial patients with edentulous mandibles and tissue supported (full) dentures were treated with 2 dental implants and locators in order to improve prosthesis stability.

The LOCATOR System is comprised of three parts: The LOCATOR implant attachment (LOCATOR abutment), the LOCATOR Male and the LOCATOR Denture Cap. The abutment is inserted directly into the implant using a torque wrench, while the Denture Cap is placed into the base of the overdenture for polymerization using acrylic resin. Custom retention is achieved via LOCATOR Males - small color-coded (according to retention force) plastic inserts - which can be exchanged as needed.

02

Conditions studied

  • Mouth, Edentulous

Browse trials for

03

In context

Mouth, Edentulous

244 studies on the registry are indexed under Mouth, Edentulous; 37 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 14 is below the median of 30 across 187 interventional studies indexed under Mouth, Edentulous.

Browse Mouth, Edentulous studies →

Lead sponsor

Philipps University Marburg is the lead sponsor of 114 studies on the registry; 12 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
45 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • age 45-80 years (male or female)
  • sufficient full dentures in the mandible
  • must be able to clean their teeth on their own
  • edentulous mandible with interforaminal adequate bone for insertion of implants
  • implantation sites free of infections and root fragments
  • no need for treatment of the maxillary teeth
  • Written Informed Consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • systemic diseases
  • mental disability that may affect the participant's ability to properly follow study instructions
  • oral mucosal diseases
  • long-term medication with steroids, bisphosphonates
  • known allergic reactions to dental materials
  • malignant tumor in the head and neck area
  • requirement of any concurrent radiotherapy or chemotherapy or any radiotherapy or chemotherapy within the last 10 years pregnancy or breastfeeding at study entry
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
14 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    A Locator with retention elements

    GC Pilier Locator abutment with retention elements: For patients in the experimental group (arm A) the connection of the full dentures to the implants will be achieved by fitting the dentures with GC Pilier Locator abutments with retention elements.

    Device: A Locator with retention elements

  • Active comparator
    B Locator without retention elements

    GC Pilier Locator abutment without retention elements: For patients with the active comparator (arm B) the full dentures will get Pilier Locator abutments without retention elements and thus no connection to the implants.

    Device: B Locator without retention elements

Interventions

  • DeviceA Locator with retention elements

    Insertion of GC Pilier locator abutments with retention elements

  • DeviceB Locator without retention elements

    Insertion of GC Pilier locator abutments without retention elements

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Quality of life (OHIP-G-49)

    The oral health-related quality of life is assessed by the German version of the Oral Health Impact Profile questionnaire (OHIP-G-49, Locker et al 1993)

    Time frame: 3 months after randomization

Secondary outcomes

  1. masticatory function

    Video documentation of chewing a defined bolus. After chewing a defined bolus for 10 seconds comparison of reduction ratio of the bolus is documented by photography and the change from baseline will be documented.

    Time frame: 3 months (T0), 6 months (T1), 9 months (T2), 12 months (T3)

  2. Plaque index

    The Plaque index (Silness and Loe 1964) will be assessed and the change from baseline will be documented.

    Time frame: 3 months (T0), 6 months (T1), 9 months (T2), 12 months (T3)

  3. Probing pocket depth

    The Probing pocket depth with bleeding on probing (6 sites of every tooth and implant) will be assessed and the change from baseline will be documented.

    Time frame: 3 months (T0), 6 months (T1), 9 months (T2), 12 months (T3)

  4. Gingival index

    The Gingival index (Loe and Silness 1963) will be assessed and the change from baseline will be documented.

    Time frame: 3 months (T0), 6 months (T1), 9 months (T2), 12 months (T3)

  5. Gingival recessions

    The Gingival recessions at teeth will be assessed and the change from baseline will be documented.

    Time frame: 3 months (T0), 6 months (T1), 9 months (T2), 12 months (T3)

  6. Mucosal recessions

    The mucosal recessions at implants will be assessed and the change from baseline will be documented.

    Time frame: 3 months (T0), 6 months (T1), 9 months (T2), 12 months (T3)

  7. width of keratinized gingiva/mucosa

    The width of keratinized gingiva/mucosa will be assessed and the change from baseline will be documented.

    Time frame: 3 months (T0), 6 months (T1), 9 months (T2), 12 months (T3)

  8. intraoral photo-documentation

    A photo-documentation (intraoral) will be done to assess the changes from baseline.

    Time frame: 3 months (T0), 6 months (T1), 9 months (T2), 12 months (T3)

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Dept. of Prosthodontics and Orofacial Function Philipps-University, School of Dental Medicine
    Marburg, 35033, Germany
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Assuncao WG, Barao VA, Delben JA, Gomes EA, Tabata LF. A comparison of patient satisfaction between treatment with conventional complete dentures and overdentures in the elderly: a literature review. Gerodontology. 2010 Jun;27(2):154-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-2358.2009.00299.x. Epub 2009 May 6. PubMed 19467020 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 22, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02551146
Lead sponsor
Philipps University Marburg
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 16, 2015
Start date
Sep 7, 2015
Primary completion
May 17, 2018
Completion
May 17, 2018
Last update
Dec 22, 2022

Study contacts

Reiner Mengel, Professor MD
principal investigator · Dept. of Prosthodontics and Orofacial Function Philipps-University, School of Dental Medicine

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Dec 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion