ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT02543424Updated Apr 27, 2026

Motor and Cognitive Functions in Acquired and Developmental Brain Damaged Patients

An interventional study of Motor, cognitive and neuropsychological assessment in Cerebral Palsy, Perceptual Disorders and Hemiparesis, sponsored by Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc- Université Catholique de Louvain. Recruiting at 2 sites in Belgium. Open to participants aged 5 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-04-27.

Sponsored by Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc- Université Catholique de Louvain · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 4 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Apr 2015, registered Aug 2015).
  • Started Apr 2015; still recruiting 11 years 7 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
400
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
5 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Neurological pathologies cause important and permanent disabilities in every day life. These pathologies can follow stoke, affecting two people per one thousand each year or cerebral palsy, affecting two births per one thousand each year. To date, the diagnosis and the rehabilitation of motor and cognitive problems has been carried out separately by different domains. For example, physiotherapists have focused on motor problems and neuropsychologists have focused on cognitive functions. However, a number of studies have demonstrated a link between motor and cognitive abilities in adults and children. The present study has three main aims: (1) to better evaluate motor and cognitive problems in brain damaged patients (all ages), (2) to understand the link between motor and cognitive abilities in patients and healthy participants and, (3) to propose new types of therapies based on the link between motor and cognitive functions.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cerebral Palsy
  • Perceptual Disorders
  • Hemiparesis
03

In context

Cerebral Palsy

1,936 studies on the registry are indexed under Cerebral Palsy; 458 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 400 is above the median of 34 across 1,431 interventional studies indexed under Cerebral Palsy.

Browse Cerebral Palsy studies →

Lead sponsor

Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc- Université Catholique de Louvain is the lead sponsor of 350 studies on the registry; 64 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
5 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Congenital cerebral palsy and acquired brain injury children and adult patients
  • Presenting upper limb paresis and/or hemineglect
  • Between the age of 3 to 90.
  • Able to understand and carry out simple verbal instruction

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • IQ \< 70
  • Severe aphasia, attentional disorder or psychiatric disorders
  • Neurodegenerative disorders
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
400 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Patient group

    Brain damaged adults with either hemiparesis and/or hemineglect. Brain damaged children with developmental and/or acquired disease inducing hemiparesis and/or hemineglect.

    Behavioral: Motor, cognitive and neuropsychological assessment

  • Sham comparator
    Control group

    Healthy adults and children.

    Behavioral: Motor, cognitive and neuropsychological assessment

Interventions

  • BehavioralMotor, cognitive and neuropsychological assessment

    Cognitive and motor testing and/or experimental cognitive or motor changes and/or cognitive or motor rehabilitation depending on part of the study investigated.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Kinematics

    Kinematics will be measured with a robotic tool called the REAplan. This tool is a distal effector robotic device that enables the patients to perform upper limb movements in a horizontal plane. The robot comprises a distal effector, a visual interface for the patient and a visual interface for the experimenter. It is fitted with incremental position sensors allowing the record of the distal effector's trajectory in the X and Y plane as function of time (125 Hz). From these records, all kind of quantitative and objective indices of upper limb quality of movement can be computed. Motor and cognitive tasks have been created on this device and have to be validated. These new tools on the robot provide a more accurate measure to better understand the participant's motor and cognitive functioning through kinematics analyses. Moreover, the robot can be used as a rehabilitative device, providing cognitive and motor assistance for specific exercises depending on participant performance.

    Time frame: Change from Baseline (T0) in kinematics at an expected average of 1 week (T1), 2 months (T2) and 3 months (T3).

Secondary outcomes

  1. Standardized cognitive and motor assessment

    Cognition and motor performance will be also measured with standardized paper and pencil tests, scales and questionnaires using the three dimensions of the International Classification of Functioning (Body structure and function / Activity limitation / Participation restriction).

    Time frame: Change from Baseline (T0) in cognitive and motor assessment at an expected average of 1 week (T1), 2 months (T2) and 3 months (T3).

07

Study locations

2 of 2 sites recruiting
  • Centre Hospitalier Neurologique William Lennox
    Ottignies, Brabant Wallon 1340, Belgium
    Recruiting
    • Sybille Andries · Contact
  • Cliniques Universitaires St Luc
    Woluwé-Saint-Lambert, Brussels Capital 1200, Belgium
    Recruiting
    • Thierry Lejeune, Pr · Contact
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Doumas I, Lejeune T, Edwards M, Stoquart G, Vandermeeren Y, Dehez B, Dehem S. Clinical validation of an individualized auto-adaptative serious game for combined cognitive and upper limb motor robotic rehabilitation after stroke. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2025 Jan 23;22(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s12984-025-01551-w. PubMed 39849588 ↗
  • Dehem S, Montedoro V, Brouwers I, Edwards MG, Detrembleur C, Stoquart G, Renders A, Heins S, Dehez B, Lejeune T. Validation of a robot serious game assessment protocol for upper limb motor impairment in children with cerebral palsy. NeuroRehabilitation. 2019;45(2):137-149. doi: 10.3233/NRE-192745. PubMed 31498135 ↗
  • Montedoro V, Alsamour M, Dehem S, Lejeune T, Dehez B, Edwards MG. Robot Diagnosis Test for Egocentric and Allocentric Hemineglect. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2019 Jun 1;34(4):481-494. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acy062. PubMed 30084880 ↗
09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Apr 2015 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2028, 164 months after the start.

Of 902 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Cerebral Palsy, half reached primary completion within 12 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 5 and three quarters within 31. This study's planned 164 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 921 studies reached it within 12 months; a quarter within 5 and three quarters within 31.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 12, 2015
First posted
Sep 7, 2015
StartActual
Apr 2015
Primary completionEst.
Dec 2028
CompletionEst.
Dec 2028
Last update
Apr 27, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 27, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02543424
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 7, 2015
Start date
Apr 2015
Primary completion
Dec 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 27, 2026

Study contacts

Marie Alsamour
Contact
marie.alsamour@uclouvain.be
Stéphanie Dehem
Contact
stephanie.dehem@uclouvain.be
Thierry Lejeune
principal investigator · St. Luc Hospital
Gaëtan Stoquart
principal investigator · St. Luc Hospital
Martin Edwards
principal investigator · Université Catholique de Louvain
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion